Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



twinno ([info]twinno) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2011-08-29 20:45:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:books/authors, person: neo_prodigy, reviews

What's worse than getting a negative review on Amazon?
Getting caught leaving a positive review under a sockpuppet, of course!

Author Dennis R. Upkin Jr. reviews his own book under a sock account and is outed by Amazon.com's credit card verification system. ETA: Review's been removed, but here's a screencap from the [info]sf_drama post.

Copy and pasted text of the four star review, left by "Roz Torres":

I heard about this novel on an online podcast and after constantly forgetting to pick up the book, I finally got a copy and read it.

The story is intense. It's got a lot going on. With the paranormal elements and the real world commentary. Upkins pulls no punches tackling racism and homophobia, but really surprised me was the interesting cast of women. I loved Ruby and Cassidy and it was nice to see women of color be shown in a light you rarely see. But my favorite character hands down was Neely. I wish there were more characters like her in the media. And I say this as a fellow bisexual woman. The little representation we have, most of it isn't good. Good story. And I'll definitely re-read again to see what I missed the first time.


ETA 2: Dennis R. Upkins, Jr. is also known as [info]neo_prodigy on livejournal, and is known for wankiness already. (Link goes to [info]unfunny_fandom.)

ETA 3: Someone on fail_fandomanon has pointed out that it is possible to get an Amazon-verified account with a phony name, although a "Rosalyn Torres" also left a positive rating on goodreads earlier this month (thanks for the link, [info]sakanagi). Also, while the Amazon review is gone, but the account that posted it is still up, so you can see the real name verification for yourself.



(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]librarianmouse
2011-09-01 05:31 am UTC (link)
animal annoyance =/= animal cruelty

If it did, I'd be in big trouble for making my friend's cat chase my laser pointer.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]zara_zero
2011-09-01 07:35 am UTC (link)
Well, according to Youtube comments, that and just about anything that might possibly mildly inconvenience a cat somehow counts as "animal cruelty"...

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]iczer6
2011-09-01 07:02 pm UTC (link)
anything that might possibly mildly inconvenience a cat somehow counts as "animal cruelty

So basically anything a human does that's not petting or feeding the cat?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]cmdr_zoom
2011-09-01 09:39 pm UTC (link)
hdu. HDU.
Bow down before your feline masters, and present them with offerings of tuna!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]ekaterinv
2011-09-02 11:15 am UTC (link)
I'd be in trouble for not voluntarily feeding our temporary foster kitten ice cream and pizza. It is the height of injustice that she must work to steal these things from us when we blink.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map