Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



polly peachum-wright ([info]wallflower) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2011-10-25 19:28:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:baleetion, fandom: doctor who, sockpuppets, yay screencaps!

Over in Doctor Who fandom, it seems like Doctor/Rose fic writer [info]jeprdyfrndly (aka Victoria Lane-Lyton), BFF of fellow Doctor/Rose fic writer [info]amberfocus, has a serendipitous life. She met her gorgeous husband, also a Doctor Who fan, when he saw her reading a Doctor Who book in a cafe. They had a lovely wedding (the groom's cake even had a Doctor and Rose on it!), went on a European honeymoon that included several Doctor Who-themed locations (London, Cardiff, and Barcelona), and settled into domestic bliss and financial security (he owns a coffee shop; she has access to a trust). Then she got pregnant despite two kinds of birth control, and had twin girls (she herself is a twin, and there's a history of twins in her family). She's a stay-at-home mum now, but her husband hired a high-school girl to help out by coming in for three hours every day after school to cook, clean, and mind the twins.

A few days ago, she posted a picture of her adorable babies.


The only problem? Those aren't her kids. (According to the metadata, the picture is from 2006. In fact, the girls in that picture are two years old; Victoria says her twins are less than ten months old and are small for their age.)

Huh. That's weird. Why would she post a picture of someone else's kids and claim them as hers?

And for that matter, why would aforementioned BFF [info]amberfocus leave a positive comment if they're someone else's kids, considering she probably knows what they look like, since she saw them in person last month?

On closer inspection, [info]amberfocus is involved in a lot of the major events of [info]jeprdyfrndly's life. They beta (and even rec!) each other's fic. [info]amberfocus introduced her to LJ. She went to Victoria's wedding (but oh no, she forgot her camera, and Victoria's awful private about pictures on the internet, so you'll never see that Doctor/Rose cake topper, sorry :(). She made Victoria take that fateful pregnancy test, and went to an ultrasound with her. (ETA: She also kept everyone updated when when Victoria went into labor early and was kept in hospital for treatment, and announced the babies' birth. According to a mousie on [info]who_anon, the names "Lily" and "Iris" are a common trope in D/R babyfic.)

Victoria and her husband even have their own Facebook profiles. (Isn't it amazing how much they look like Billie Piper and Kellan Lutz?)

All evidence points towards [info]jeprdyfrndly and her entire backstory (and her fic, too) being the work of [info]amberfocus (something that some people have suspected but before now had no proof of).

The big question, though, is WHY go to all that trouble of creating an elaborate sockpuppet if the most self-serving thing you're going to do is rec your own fic?

Deepest thanks to the mousies of [info]who_anon who first posted about this and did most of the work (and if things are deleted, caps are here and here, as well as in in more recent comments, which I can't link to directly because I can't get into LJ right now.)


ETA1: Screencaps showing amberfocus and jeprdyfrndly have the same IP address. (thanks, [info]minibalrogmum!)

ETA2: And so the backpedaling begins! She was trying to protect her own privacy...by using a picture of someone else's kids.

ETA3: [info]jeprdyfrndly has been deleted. [info]amberfocus says she is the victim of photoshopping bitches and flounces.



(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]phosfate
2011-10-26 12:06 pm UTC (link)
(the groom's cake even had a Doctor and Rose on it!)

Reader, I barfed.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]seanchaigirl
2011-10-26 12:26 pm UTC (link)
This.

I believe there are a bunch of dudes who are rabid Whovians (I mean, David Tennant, to say the least) who would be extra attracted to Whovian partners, but I've never met a male Whovian that was a rabid Doctor/Rose shipper. All the guys in my Who watching group gagged in unison at the end of Journey's End. For them, it's about aliens and time travel and running for your life. If they're not outright pissy about the Doctor now falling in love and having companions throw themselves at him, they're really just tolerating the shippy scenes and waiting for the chase to start.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]jujubee
2011-10-26 01:57 pm UTC (link)
One of my male Who fans thinks Rose is great, for some reason. Another hate her nearly as much as I hate her, but he is a total Doctor/River shipper. But I think that's more understandable, because River is all about the chase scenes.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]blue_penguin
2011-10-27 06:09 am UTC (link)
One of my male cousins is a huge Rose fan (which may or may not have been the source of a major argument at at least one family gathering, ahem). I don't know how he feels about shipping, though.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]yattara
2011-10-26 02:34 pm UTC (link)
Amy/Rory for life, yo! That's the best one to have on your cake.

If I were the kind of person to have fannish toppers on my wedding cake, that is.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]nostalgia
2011-10-26 03:45 pm UTC (link)
Yeah but then your unborn child might turn up at the wedding when she's 30.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]nostalgia
2011-10-26 03:45 pm UTC (link)
But were they edible? Enquiring minds, etc.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]puipui
2011-10-27 03:16 am UTC (link)
See, now, I would pay money for an itty-bitty Rose figurine if it were edible. I would enjoy biting its head off.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]catmoran
2011-10-26 05:15 pm UTC (link)
I know, why not just put a Tardis on the cake? Simple, elegant, and non-controversial amongst shippers. And it can be used later as a USB hub!

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]caito
2011-10-27 03:45 am UTC (link)
Actually I think the Tardis makes a better card box.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]napalmnacey
2011-10-28 02:06 pm UTC (link)
Yeah. If I'm having anything Doctor Who themed on my wedding cake, it's Romana with a gun and K-9 at her feet. Doctor? What Doctor?

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map