Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



miss_padfoot ([info]miss_padfoot) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2011-11-03 01:49:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:Catty
Entry tags:reviews, videogames

AV Club gives C grade to Uncharted 3; fanboys go ballistic
Scott Jones of the AV Club gave a mixed review of Uncharted 3: Drake's Deception, a hotly anticipated game for PlayStation 3. Jones praised the storyline and dialogue but criticized the gameplay mechanics:

[T]he story still zips and characters are still conflicted, but targeting is as twitchy as ever, bad guys still require three or four shotgun blasts to the head before they’re deterred, and the game’s star, Nathan Drake, still has no clue whatsoever about how to crouch. Two years after Thieves, Uncharted’s gameplay mechanics and conventions are no longer dated; they’re borderline archaic.
His final grade for the game was a C.

In the comments section, things started out innocuously enough. There was a minor kerfuffle over whether the game's protagonist was a serial killer. A couple of people speculated about what would happen when the review showed up on Metacritic. "Frankly," said one, "if I had the power to fuck with metacritic like this, I don't think I'd be able to resist giving an F to every single triple-A title. It's like having nuclear launch codes for internet fanboys."

And the internet fanboys did not disappoint. You see, elsewhere on the internet, game critics were creaming themselves about how wonderful Uncharted 3 was. Every single other review on Metacritic was positive; Jones's review was the only mixed one. When the Uncharted fanboys saw the AV Club review, they realized that one bad review was not a threat to their beloved game franchise, and moved on with their lives.

--

Just kidding. They registered for the AV Club so they could comment about how Scott Jones is WRONG WRONG WRONG. The sarcastic hipster types who populate the AV Club comments section were only too happy to bait them.

Some highlights:
Here's the best part: the angry comments were posted on October 30 and 31, but Uncharted 3 wasn't released until November 1 (November 2 in Europe). That's right: these valiant fanboys were defending the besmirched honor of a game they'd never played. Except for this guy. Maybe.

EDIT: I just realized that my links to "highlights" aren't working. That's just the AV Club comments system being difficult -- I can't link to anything past page 1. I've put in some page numbers to help out a little.

Also: Eurogamer, which published an 8/10 review of Uncharted 3, has also been overrun with angry fanboys lately. 8/10!


(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]kedase_derragar
2011-11-03 12:11 pm UTC (link)
And that's nothing compared to the epic backlash against a Gamestop reviewer who gave the Wii version of The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess an 8.8. To this day, if you Google "8.8", it's the second result - just above one of the largest earthquakes in recorded history, and just below the TV Tropes page named after the fiasco. It's hard to find any evidence of it on Gamespot anymore, but there are plenty of write-ups about it around the internet.

(It's worth noting that it wasn't just the 8.8 that caused the ruckus - the fact that the same reviewer gave the GameCube version an 8.9 a few weeks later while simultaneously saying that he recommended the Wii version certainly didn't help matters.)

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]sol
2011-11-03 12:26 pm UTC (link)
I believe that you're talking about the same person; Jeff Gerstmann (the person in the first link up there) was the one who gave it an 8.8, which caused fanboy insanity. The fact that he got fired for the Kane and Lynch review is very ironic.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]kernelm
2011-11-03 10:11 pm UTC (link)
Heh, Gerstmann's been at the center of quite a few review controversies, especially in his Gamespot days. He currently runs Giant Bomb (along with a whole bunch of former Gamespot guys who left shortly after he was fired) which hasn't been too controversial as far as I know in terms of reviews. The main thing I've seen complaints about is that they review on a 5 star scale, no fractional stars.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map