Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



miss_padfoot ([info]miss_padfoot) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2011-11-03 01:49:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:Catty
Entry tags:reviews, videogames

AV Club gives C grade to Uncharted 3; fanboys go ballistic
Scott Jones of the AV Club gave a mixed review of Uncharted 3: Drake's Deception, a hotly anticipated game for PlayStation 3. Jones praised the storyline and dialogue but criticized the gameplay mechanics:

[T]he story still zips and characters are still conflicted, but targeting is as twitchy as ever, bad guys still require three or four shotgun blasts to the head before they’re deterred, and the game’s star, Nathan Drake, still has no clue whatsoever about how to crouch. Two years after Thieves, Uncharted’s gameplay mechanics and conventions are no longer dated; they’re borderline archaic.
His final grade for the game was a C.

In the comments section, things started out innocuously enough. There was a minor kerfuffle over whether the game's protagonist was a serial killer. A couple of people speculated about what would happen when the review showed up on Metacritic. "Frankly," said one, "if I had the power to fuck with metacritic like this, I don't think I'd be able to resist giving an F to every single triple-A title. It's like having nuclear launch codes for internet fanboys."

And the internet fanboys did not disappoint. You see, elsewhere on the internet, game critics were creaming themselves about how wonderful Uncharted 3 was. Every single other review on Metacritic was positive; Jones's review was the only mixed one. When the Uncharted fanboys saw the AV Club review, they realized that one bad review was not a threat to their beloved game franchise, and moved on with their lives.

--

Just kidding. They registered for the AV Club so they could comment about how Scott Jones is WRONG WRONG WRONG. The sarcastic hipster types who populate the AV Club comments section were only too happy to bait them.

Some highlights:
Here's the best part: the angry comments were posted on October 30 and 31, but Uncharted 3 wasn't released until November 1 (November 2 in Europe). That's right: these valiant fanboys were defending the besmirched honor of a game they'd never played. Except for this guy. Maybe.

EDIT: I just realized that my links to "highlights" aren't working. That's just the AV Club comments system being difficult -- I can't link to anything past page 1. I've put in some page numbers to help out a little.

Also: Eurogamer, which published an 8/10 review of Uncharted 3, has also been overrun with angry fanboys lately. 8/10!


(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]chienne
2011-11-03 04:42 pm UTC (link)
"The major games review sites seem unable to score any game below 7/10 unless it's catastrophically bad (we're talking the gaming equivalent of Manos: The Hands of Fate)."

Oh, you mean like Superman 64?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]littleshebear
2011-11-03 08:16 pm UTC (link)
I always figured the worst game ever was the Atari ET game...or maybe that one where you play a cowboy with his wang hanging out (trigger warnings for racism and rape).

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]rosehiptea
2011-11-03 09:04 pm UTC (link)
Argh, didn't even have to click the link when I saw the title. I remember when it came out, and thinking "Who the hell thought this was a good idea," and people at school defending it, and... yeah, OK, I'm off-topic. *shudders*

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]chienne
2011-11-03 09:13 pm UTC (link)
People actually tried to defend "Custer's Revenge?" Uh... On what grounds?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]the__ivorytower
2011-11-03 09:16 pm UTC (link)
Probably the same kind of people who think creating a colonials-and-indians style of roleplaying campaign is a good idea... and replacing the indians with orcs. Who piss on people to show their sexual attraction. But no one understands the guy's (white, American) grand vision.

(This isn't my story, this belongs to a friend who has spend time on and off engaging this loon.)

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]ecchaniz0r
2011-11-04 01:22 am UTC (link)
*blinks*

Does this nerf herder pull the "BUT IT'S SUPPOSED TO BE 'JEJUNE' AND 'DERIVATIVE' TO LIKE Y'KNOW MUNDANE PEOPLE WHO DON'T GET IT, IT'S LIKE WARHOL MAN! IT'S TOTALLY AVANT GARDE STYLE PASTICHE! IT'S IRONIC!" flail-o-rama that first year students did at my arty-farty university when the were crit clobbered? Because - I can so easily imagine this.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]rosehiptea
2011-11-03 09:18 pm UTC (link)
On the grounds that they're "1/8 Indian" and they thought it was funny and why are people trying to ruin their fun?

(Oh, how I wish I were kidding...)

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]chienne
2011-11-03 10:00 pm UTC (link)
Christ. Just when I think that there's no way people could be that stupid, someone has to prove me wrong. I know I shouldn't be surprised when I've met people on the IMDB boards who insist that Birth of a Nation isn't racist, but...

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]bienegold
2011-11-03 10:57 pm UTC (link)
...how does that work?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]chienne
2011-11-04 02:40 am UTC (link)
This particular person had a bee in their bonnet about letting everyone know how the first wave of Klu Klux Klan weren't racist at all and should be lauded as heroes. You know, despite the thousands of Black people that they terrorized and lynched.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]tofuknight
2011-11-09 06:11 pm UTC (link)
I'm gonna imagine that the person in question is the son/daughter of a first wave KKK, and thus is an elderly man/woman on the IMDB boards flailing away.

Because that amuses me, and defending Birth of a Natioon as not racist doesn't.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]jerel
2011-11-11 01:17 am UTC (link)
I subbed for a film class earlier this year, and they'd just seen Birth of a Nation (I was giving them a quiz about it), so they hadn't had time to discuss it with the teacher. The good news was that they recognized it as a horribly racist film. But most of them couldn't believe it when I said "No, the director was serious. This wasn't a satire."

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]spawn_of_kong
2011-11-04 04:55 am UTC (link)
It's the IMDB boards. That's the only explanation I need.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]chienne
2011-11-03 09:11 pm UTC (link)
Oh God, Custer's Revenge. Yes, you're right. That game fails on every conceivable level. It's really something when you manage to beat out Resistance Records' crap games for sheer bad taste.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]tofuknight
2011-11-09 06:13 pm UTC (link)
I keep trying to think that game is a modhack parody.

Maybe if I drink enough...

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map