Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



melannen ([info]melannen) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2012-07-05 10:54:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:2 wanks in one day? it's a miracle!, fandom entitlement, vintage wank

'I am more than disappointed, I am angry'
I recently went to visit the Boston area, and specifically to visit the $1-used-book shelves at Brattle Books, and there I picked up a copy of "Edgar Rice Burroughs Quarterly, vol 1., no. 1, Fall, 1982". Because who wouldn't? (You may know of ERB fandom from things such as Tarzan and the John Carter of Mars books. It has a history almost as long and excellent as ACD fandom, with which it often crossed over.)

What I didn't realize until I got it home is that it contained a bonus: a beautiful example of pristine, vintage, excellent fan history, in the form of an impressively wank-filled open letter sent from the editor to all of his subscribers.

I reproduce it here, unaltered and in full, for your delectation:

EDGAR RICE BURROUGHS QUARTERLY
George T. McWhorter, Editor
Department of Rare Books
University of Louisville
Louisville, Kentucky 40292
2 December 1982


AN OPEN LETTER TO SUBSCRIBERS OF EDGAR RICE BURROUGHS QUARTERLY


Trouble has been brewing ever since publication of V.I, No.1. It stems from Marion Burroughs (wife of ERB's only living child) who is in charge of Edgar Rice Burroughs, Inc. Other board members include two of ERB's grandsons, Dan Burroughs and Mike Pierce.

Marion Burroughs disapproves of the ERBQ and refuses to show a copy of it to her husband (Hulbert) on the grounds that it might "upset him." She further maintains that the ERBQ is "in competition with the corporation" and has forbidden the other Board members from supporting it in any way. She declares that, if the journal continues, it will have to undergo a change of name to indicate that it is NOT endorsed by the Burroughs family. Meanwhile, she has forbidden further advertising for additional subscriptions.

This is in violation of our contract in which I agreed to give Edgar Rice Burroughs complete ownership to the journal personally without help from the corporation, in return for the privilege of editing previously unpublished materials from the Burroughs archives. I offered in writing to remit to them any proceeds which might accrue after printing costs had been paid.

I feel that Marion Burroughs' attitude is tantamount to looking a gift horse in the teeth, and being the ONLY ONE who has failed to admire the dentures. I am more than disappointed; I am angry. Therefore, I have delivered an ultimatum via Danton Burroughs (Marion will not correspond with me directly), giving them until January, 1983 to change their minds, support the ERBQ, and SUBSIDIZE IT until it becomes self-supporting, guaranteeing interest on their investment.

The bottom line is this: If the ERBQ is not accepted and legitimized by the Burroughs family corporation by January, 1983 I will personally refund all subscriptions recieved to date (less $5 for the first issue) and stop publication before the second issue goes to press.

In closing, may I say that I am enormously pleased with your response and support, and deeply humiliated to bring this bad news to your attention. I have done what I can to support the Burroughs image and, indeed, have exciting plans for future issues of the ERBQ. But if the Burroughs family doesn't want me, then I have to get on with my life, as would any of you who read this. All is not lost. Perhaps the corporation will come to reason. But if not, I thank every one of you who has invested in this enterprise in good faith and cold hard cash. You will be repaid.


Yours in the heroic tradition of Edgar Rice Burroughs,
[signature]
George T. McWhorter
Curator, Rare Books & Special Collections;
Editor: ERBQ


*fans self* Wank was just so much classier back then.

(There is more to this story - McWhorter eventually managed to start an ERB journal that lasted more than one issue, so there must be - but I think I shall just leave this letter as is, as its own shining jewel.)


(Post a new comment)


[info]ladyvyola
2012-07-05 05:46 pm UTC (link)
That is indeed a thing of beauty. And entitlement. And impressive grammar and punctuation. (He is definitely the 1% of wankers.) "I was going to bring you prestige and money! Why won't you pat me on the head? Why? Why? Whyyyyyyyyyy???????!!!!!!1111111!!???"

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]melannen
2012-07-05 05:49 pm UTC (link)
He is DEEPLY HUMILIATED okay.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]annathepiper
2012-07-05 05:58 pm UTC (link)
That's definitely one of the better-expressed flounce threats I've ever seen!

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]melannen
2012-07-05 06:07 pm UTC (link)
It's just so classic, in so many ways.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]spawn_of_kong
2012-07-05 05:59 pm UTC (link)
I feel that Marion Burroughs' attitude is tantamount to looking a gift horse in the teeth, and being the ONLY ONE who has failed to admire the dentures.

Hee.

I should show this to my uncle -- he's a huge fan of Tarzan.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]melannen
2012-07-05 06:08 pm UTC (link)
I consider Tarzan sort of my ur-fandom because my grandmother was a collector. It's probably also why I love stuff like this.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]redcoast
2012-07-05 05:59 pm UTC (link)
Therefore, I have delivered an ultimatum via Danton Burroughs (Marion will not correspond with me directly), giving them until January, 1983 to change their minds, support the ERBQ, and SUBSIDIZE IT until it becomes self-supporting, guaranteeing interest on their investment.

Wow, what great negotiating skills. "Either bow to my demands or I will accede to yours immediately!"

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]cmdr_zoom
2012-07-05 06:03 pm UTC (link)
Angrily!
That's the important part.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]redcoast
2012-07-05 06:22 pm UTC (link)
He will do exactly what they want him to but he sure won't be happy about it! Wow, this reminds me of my dad's passive-aggressive tactics.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]paladin
2012-07-05 09:28 pm UTC (link)
"Do what I say or I will end this magazine on my terms! Which are exactly like your terms, with the added proviso that I get to whine about them in public. Moral victory is mine! (Actual victory might be yours.)"

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]cmdr_zoom
2012-07-06 05:27 pm UTC (link)
Just so. :)

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]paladin
2012-07-06 09:19 pm UTC (link)
I read this comment and hear it in the voice of Syrio Forel, Instructor of Young Wankas.

"All wankers are made of entitlement, do you know this? When you prick them, the entitlement leaks out and they wank."

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]uldihaa
2012-07-05 09:30 pm UTC (link)
This is in violation of our contract in which I agreed to give Edgar Rice Burroughs complete ownership to the journal personally without help from the corporation, in return for the privilege of editing previously unpublished materials from the Burroughs archives.

So he was going to give them something they didn't want, and he'd get access to the unpublished works... Am I reading that right?

Then, I offered in writing to remit to them any proceeds which might accrue after printing costs had been paid. So he'd edit and publish those works, then graciously turn over any profits? To work that wasn't his and he didn't have any rights to?

Wow, classic entitlement. It's very well written though.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]melannen
2012-07-05 10:29 pm UTC (link)
I think the story, at least as he's trying to outline it, isn't all that unreasonable - the ERB corporation was effectively sitting on an archive of historical/literary documents, and presumably he went to them as a scholar, saying, "I'd like to do scholarly work and publish it based on these documents, but I know you have a financial interest in maintaining copyright control, so if you let me publish, you can keep the copyrights and proceeds," and they agreed to this (which is pretty reasonable for an estate sitting on an archive like that) and then something suddenly went drastically wrong. (Given the bits about how Marion refuses to communicate with him at all, and his, um, undiplomatic wording in the later parts of this letter, I assume there was major personality clash involved. And possibly he is misrepresenting the matter entirely.)

Like I said, it's not an unreasonable arrangement, but you add fandom to the mix, and amazing things can happen. :P Someday I'll have to finally write up the classic Old Wank that involves someone being banned for life from the unpublished Heinlein archives, which is incredibly full of hilarity and incredibly well-documented.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]puipui
2012-07-06 08:23 am UTC (link)
Someday I'll have to finally write up the classic Old Wank that involves someone being banned for life from the unpublished Heinlein archives, which is incredibly full of hilarity and incredibly well-documented.

*WANTS*

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]uldihaa
2012-07-06 08:51 am UTC (link)
Seconding this!

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]staroverthebay
2012-07-07 02:21 am UTC (link)
Thirding!

(STFU, spellcheck, I know it's not a word. I don't care. See me not caring? I'm going to write Thirding and you're going to just deal with it. So there.)

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]rosehiptea
2012-07-07 09:30 am UTC (link)
When I was a kid I was a huge fan of Heinlein's "juvenile" stuff. But after exposure to his "adult" stuff I kind of shudder to think what might be in his unpublished works.

(Not actually familiar with Edgar Rice Burroughs, though I did used to live in Tarzana, California and see a display about him in I think the post office.)

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]brown_betty
2012-07-09 10:59 pm UTC (link)
My understanding is that the heinlein estate is wanky like a wanky thing.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]wankismyfandom
2012-07-05 10:38 pm UTC (link)
I think more people should sign their letters "Yours in the heroic tradition of Edgar Rice Burroughs." Although in this day and age, that might lead to closings like "Yours in the orange tradition of Snooki."

*sigh*

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]melannen
2012-07-05 10:49 pm UTC (link)
"Yours in the overcaffeinated tradition of Rodney McKay"

"Yours in the shit-stirring tradition of Misha Collins"

"Yours in the stalkery tradition of Stephenie Meyer"

...it could work!

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]librarianmouse
2012-07-11 07:38 am UTC (link)
"Yours in the delusional tradition of Laurell K. Hamilton"

"Yours in the ass-kicking tradition of Nora Roberts"

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]napalmnacey
2012-07-16 02:41 pm UTC (link)
"Yours in the door-humping tradition of James Tiberius Kirk,"

It's a good template, it works, I like it.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]full_metal_ox
2012-07-06 12:38 am UTC (link)
"Yours in the heroic tradition of Edgar Rice Burroughs."

So where was that phrase in the John Carter advertising campaign? (Comes to that, where was the John Carter advertising campiagn?)

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]mcity
2012-07-11 06:40 am UTC (link)
You see that potted plant in the corner? Behind that. Took me a while to find.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]notjo
2012-07-06 06:30 am UTC (link)
That was my favourite part. I may start signing all my emails that way.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]mcity
2012-07-11 06:40 am UTC (link)
Yours in the wanky tradition of Tumblr. I CAN'T EVEN

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]mindset
2012-07-05 11:27 pm UTC (link)
"Trouble has been brewing ever since publication of V.I, No.1." But this letter was in V.I, No.1. A second printing or did he predict the future?

Also, amazing find. I love vintage wank.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]melannen
2012-07-06 12:27 am UTC (link)
Oh, it wasn't actually printed in the volume, I guess I didn't make that clear - it was a typewritten letter folded up and stuck in the booklet. ^_^ Presumably he did a separate mailing, and whoever's this was just filed the letter inside the relevant volume.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]ladyvyola
2012-07-06 01:03 am UTC (link)
A thousand blessings on his head! Thank you, long-forgotten ERB fan, for ensuring that we did not lose this wank to the mists of time!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]honorh
2012-07-06 01:08 am UTC (link)
*Sniff* Nicely-aged whine, with a piquant hint of entitlement and overtones of butthurt. Salut!

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]kumquat_of_doom
2012-07-07 11:53 pm UTC (link)
*raises glass* Iechyd da!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]lyssie
2012-07-06 06:23 pm UTC (link)
I am enormously pleased with your response and support

Awwww. The lurkers support him in, uh, snailmail!

(Reply to this)


[info]harrylovesron
2012-07-06 07:14 pm UTC (link)
This was such a lucky find. Such eloquent whining. *wipes a tear* Thank you for sharing.

(Reply to this)


[info]staroverthebay
2012-07-07 02:30 am UTC (link)
I kind of want a Dramatic Reading of this.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]honorh
2012-07-07 10:05 pm UTC (link)
That would be epic.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]highlander_ii
2012-07-09 08:35 pm UTC (link)
Indeed! I wonder if the dude who did Dot Dot Dot is available. =)

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]mcity
2012-07-11 06:41 am UTC (link)
I'd do it, if I weren't lazy.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]notjo
2012-07-07 07:07 am UTC (link)
This dude has an interesting Google trail.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]melannen
2012-07-07 11:09 pm UTC (link)
I decided not to look, because I suspected it might end with so much other wank that I would never get around to writing it all up, but somehow I am not suprised.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]mcity
2012-07-11 06:38 am UTC (link)
>>I feel that Marion Burroughs' attitude is tantamount to looking a gift horse in the teeth, and being the ONLY ONE who has failed to admire the dentures.
>Wank was just so much classier back then.

I'll say.

(Reply to this)


[info]life_on_mars
2012-07-11 10:09 pm UTC (link)
I must confess that the main reaction this produced in me was enormous nostalgia for the wonderful Brattle Bookshop; it's nearly twenty-five years since I was there and since I live about 3,000 miles away I may never get back, but you tapped into a seam of very happy memories just by mentioning it. Sigh.

(Reply to this)


[info]napalmnacey
2012-07-16 02:42 pm UTC (link)
That is a thing of incredible frickin' beauty. I'm going to cry and shout in joy and cry to the heavens, "It's so BEAUTIFUL! What does it MEAN!?"

(Reply to this)


 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map