Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



franzen. ([info]franzen) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
Re: Top 1% on IQ DOES mean "genius."
Once you're in the short tail, the difference between 145 and 141 is noise. If the test is normed at ~100, you're several standard deviations out to the right, so unless you really, really care about IQ scores as a measure of self-worth, you're not going to get useful information from testing. You may not perceive yourself as a "genius" relative to your peers or the luminaries in your field, but that's when "different kinds of smart" and "an IQ score is not everything" kick in.

For the record, consistency is a good sign, at least over time, since childhood and adolescent scores are normed differently. If you break the test in one skill at eight because your parents stressed it in the home, you may not keep that score a few years down the line -- if you're no longer exceeding your peers, your score will drop. You didn't get dumber so much as that what used to make you a prodigy is now expected.

But, yes, "genius" is a loaded term. If self-applied, even more so.


(Read comments)

Post a comment in response:

From:
( )Anonymous- this user has disabled anonymous posting.
Username:
Password:
Don't have an account? Create one now.
Subject:
No HTML allowed in subject
  
Message:
 
Notice! This user has turned on the option that logs your IP address when posting.
 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map