Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Bethan ([info]kumquat_of_doom) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2014-03-14 20:51:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:author entitlement, authors, interrogating from the wrong perspective, person: anne rice, reviews

Amazon reviewers are interrogating Anne Rice's Dickensean principles from the wrong perspective!
...Again.

Poor, misunderstood, editorless vampire author Anne Rice (yes, I am going to take this opportunity to take a stroll through the memory lane of Anne Rice's batshittery) is once again demonstrating a skin of solid tissue paper.

According to The Guardian newspaper good ol' Rice Whine has signed a Change.org petition to convince Amazon to prohibit anonymous reviews because, the petition says:

"People have found ways to exploit this flaw in the system and are using it to bully, harass, and generally make life miserable for certain authors on Amazon. These people are able to create multiple accounts and then use those accounts to viciously attack and go after any author or person that they feel doesn’t belong on Amazon or who shouldn’t have published a book, made a comment on a forum post, etc."


Well, yes. I'm quite prepared to accept that people have been using the Amazon comments to troll their authors of choice (apparently Charlaine Harris has had death threats, which I feel suggests the True Blood fandom deserves some investigation over at [info]unfunny_fandom)... the problem is that Anne, of course, has form in the Department of Kind Of Maybe Overreacting A Tinsy-Winsy Bit.

Referring to an (I quote) "anti-author gangster bully culture" when interviewed by the Grauniad doesn't really help disprove that.

And hey, check out the links on this Time article - we got spotted!

[This report cheerfully cribbed, albeit rewritten, from aforementioned Time article. Sep made me do it.]

BONUS PROTO-WANK: She's bringing back Lestat, guys! And throwing some rather side-eye-worthy shade at Twilight while she's at it:

Rice [...] has previously spoken dismissively of the vampires dreamed up by Stephenie Meyer for Twilight, saying she "feel[s] sorry for vampires that sparkle in the sun", and that Lestat "would never hurt immortals who choose to spend eternity going to high school over and over again in a small town – any more than they would hurt the physically disabled or the mentally challenged".


Stock up on popcorn for October, folks!


(Post a new comment)


[info]tez
2014-03-15 02:38 am UTC (link)
She's bringing Lestat back
Them other vampires don't know how to act...

...maybe I should stop there.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]starfish
2014-03-15 03:36 am UTC (link)
That was genius, though.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]puipui
2014-03-15 06:53 am UTC (link)
I love you. *loves*

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]kumquat_of_doom
2014-03-15 08:10 pm UTC (link)
Noooooo, don't stop! More, more! Encore, encore!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]brennalarose
2014-03-15 10:09 pm UTC (link)
Aw! But, it was good!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]come_love_sleep
2014-03-16 05:47 am UTC (link)
Maybe her books are simply too abstract
Lack of editing makes them inexact.

Take 'em to the bridge!

[Bridge]
Gothic vamp
You see this brooding?
Baby, I'm your tramp
I'm lookin' winsome under this streetlamp
I've got the depth of a used postage stamp...

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]tez, 2014-03-17 01:49 am UTC

[info]miraba
2014-03-15 03:14 am UTC (link)
I'm sure there must be some Twilight fans up in arms at that comment, but like hell I'm looking for that.

(Reply to this)


[info]rosehiptea
2014-03-15 03:31 am UTC (link)
I never thought I would want to defend Twilight but after that comment I kind of do.

*Note: I have never read or seen Twilight. Or anything by Anne Rice, for that matter.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]arekuru
2014-03-15 07:52 am UTC (link)
Well, it does bother me that "vampires sparkling" is supposed to be some kind of supreme indictment of the series. We've had so many takes on monsters before without anyone raising a fuss, what does it matter that these ones sparkle? Except oh, wait - if they sparkle they're for girls and that makes them uncool and we can't have that now, can we?

::grumbles:: I'm all for making fun of bad writing, but the huge backlash against Twilight smacks of misogyny to me.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]seiberwing, 2014-03-15 02:05 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]rosehiptea, 2014-03-15 09:52 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]brennalarose, 2014-03-15 10:14 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]yoritomo_reiko, 2014-03-15 11:00 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]brennalarose, 2014-03-16 11:44 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]yoritomo_reiko, 2014-03-16 11:45 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]rosehiptea, 2014-03-17 02:04 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kaen, 2014-03-16 10:25 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]yoritomo_reiko, 2014-03-16 11:47 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]full_metal_ox, 2014-03-19 09:27 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]rachelmap, 2014-03-26 10:48 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]suzycat, 2014-04-03 12:54 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]beccastareyes, 2014-03-18 03:32 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2014-03-17 04:11 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ekaterinv, 2014-03-23 03:31 am UTC

[info]chienne
2014-03-15 03:45 am UTC (link)
There, there, Anne. I don't think I've ever not bought a book because there was a negative Amazon review. I stopped taking Amazon reviews seriously after I read a review of "Night" by Elie Wiesel that said it sucked because they're weren't any horses in it.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]duraniedrama
2014-03-15 10:22 pm UTC (link)
Sounds like something off of this site:

http://leasthelpful.com/

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]lied_ohne_worte, 2014-03-15 10:32 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]miraba, 2014-03-16 12:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]nevadafighter, 2014-03-17 03:44 am UTC

[info]queencallipygos
2014-03-17 11:21 am UTC (link)
I stopped taking Amazon reviews seriously after I read a review of "Night" by Elie Wiesel that said it sucked because they're weren't any horses in it.

What.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

Think of the children
[info]dorothy1901
2014-03-17 03:00 pm UTC (link)
Excuse me, I've got to go write a letter to my local school, demanding they remove everything except Black Beauty, Misty of Chincoteague, and the poetry of Alfred Noyes from the shelves. Be back soon!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]starfish
2014-03-15 03:51 am UTC (link)
Oh, wow, I remember that wank! How we laughed! Life was so simple then, before we knew we needed to interrogate the text from the right perspective.

Good times. Thanks, Anne. Don't ever change.

(Reply to this)


[info]thoms
2014-03-15 05:13 am UTC (link)
May the circle, be unbroken, by and by...

Oh, Anne.

This is the bestest belated birthday present ever. Anne Rice wank! You guys, you shouldn't have!

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]scifantasy
2014-03-15 02:29 pm UTC (link)
If vampires show up in Columbia (or in Burial Episode 2) I'm blaming you.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]brennalarose, 2014-03-15 10:18 pm UTC

[info]kumquat_of_doom
2014-03-15 08:11 pm UTC (link)
Happy birthday! *flings glitter*

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]seiberwing
2014-03-15 02:06 pm UTC (link)
She's Anne fucking Rice. She's a household name. She's not some newcomer who might have negative online reviews actually affect her book's success or failure. You'd think she'd have some perspective.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]yattara
2014-03-15 02:14 pm UTC (link)
Perspective is for lesser writers.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]scifantasy, 2014-03-15 02:30 pm UTC

[info]rosehiptea
2014-03-15 09:54 pm UTC (link)
Her insistence on getting only praise is one of the things keeping me from reading her books.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]kumquat_of_doom, 2014-03-15 09:59 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]brennalarose, 2014-03-15 10:19 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]darksumomo, 2014-03-15 10:20 pm UTC

[info]sepiamagpie
2014-03-16 12:59 am UTC (link)
I'm trying to make the Lestat thing scan to Backstreet's Back and it's, well, not magical.

I do like how Anne Rice thinks 'internet conspiracy' is why she might get a bad review tho'

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]msmanna
2014-04-01 04:21 pm UTC (link)
I'm trying to make the Lestat thing scan to Backstreet's Back and it's, well, not magical.

But if they ever make another Vampire Chronicles movie, they should definitely cast Howie Dorough as Lestat.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]ashenmote
2014-03-16 04:33 am UTC (link)
She can mock all she wants, but her failure to adapt to the Sparkle innovation will cost her the trend-setting Waitresses in Trailer Parks market segment. And she knows it.

(Reply to this)


[info]floriatosca
2014-03-21 01:45 am UTC (link)
If sparkling was actually considered a disability for vampires in-universe, I'd find the Twilight series a bit more interesting.

(Reply to this)


[info]ekaterinv
2014-03-23 03:36 am UTC (link)
Lestat "would never hurt immortals who choose to spend eternity going to high school over and over again in a small town – any more than they would hurt the physically disabled or the mentally challenged".

Since when? Has Lestat siphoned what little there was of Louis' personality when I wasn't caring? And is this supposed to make Lestat better? Oh, he murders people all the time, but not disabled people, that wouldn't be sporting!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]suzycat, 2014-05-13 02:33 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]deoridhe, 2014-05-19 02:17 am UTC

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map