|
|
Flik (![[info]](http://www.journalfen.net/img/userinfo.gif){kind=small} argylespy) wrote in ![[info]](http://www.journalfen.net/img/community.gif){kind=small} fandom_wank, |
Found this comment on the FFA thread with further speculation about why the sudden demand for the $20,000 that seems feasible enough as well, especially considering their constant harping about "upper management":
And now that I am reading more closely:
We worked out a plan with the hotel to give them money slowly for the entire course of the weekend, which was more than 100% feasible for us. However, 12 hours later
Why did they work out a payment plan only 12 hours before the whole thing went down? Wouldn't that basically be the day of the con, or the day before? So what happened is they signed a contract that said the money was due on the 11th. On the 11th, they asked the hotel employees if they could make successive payments over the course of the weekend because they did not have the money yet? Hotel staff agreed to this but apparently without approval of their management, who insisted the money be paid on the 11th?
And now that I am reading more closely:
We worked out a plan with the hotel to give them money slowly for the entire course of the weekend, which was more than 100% feasible for us. However, 12 hours later
Why did they work out a payment plan only 12 hours before the whole thing went down? Wouldn't that basically be the day of the con, or the day before? So what happened is they signed a contract that said the money was due on the 11th. On the 11th, they asked the hotel employees if they could make successive payments over the course of the weekend because they did not have the money yet? Hotel staff agreed to this but apparently without approval of their management, who insisted the money be paid on the 11th?
Post a comment in response:
