|
|
Mistress Saigon (![[info]](http://www.journalfen.net/img/userinfo.gif){kind=small} mistresssaigon) wrote in ![[info]](http://www.journalfen.net/img/community.gif){kind=small} fandom_wank,@ 2003-08-13 10:13:00 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
As promised, here's the wanktastic response from cuntface the alleged philosopher.
At 02:01 PM 8/12/03 +0100, you wrote:
> Having stumbled across your timewasters anonymous piece,
Oh, I very much doubt that. I rather think that you lot are obsessively fuming over it - aren't I correct? Be honest now; I *know* the truth, after all, the numbers are there.
You say you can't stand idiots on your ffnet page - so how do you put up with yourself, eh? I came across your name several times while researching the FW, and not once did your posts impress me with any measure of intelligence. If you've got it, you're doing a good job of hiding it, along with any writing talents. Your canon-free, er, "humour" stories are at best dull and clunky, and in some places the sentences are completely ungrammatical and incoherent. And by associating yourself with a community that exists only for the purpose of mocking others, *you* made yourself a legitimate target.
But keep on screeching, do - it only demonstrates what I set out to prove: that FW can't *take* what it dishes out, oh no, and that all this "have a sense of humour else be mocked" is something none of you is prepared to accept for yourselves. (And that you're a bunch of self-important buffoons whose opinions no one should take seriously.) The more you all shout and stamp, and make wild conspiracy claims and projections, the more you prove yourselves to be the fools I named you.
P@L
--Oh, and do get a beta reader to help with those tricky bits like singular vs. plural and phrases that terminate meaninglessly in adjectives, at least. Such as:
"One of these was a tendency of gravitating towards attractive younger female."
If you were trying for a dry witty tone, you could have written "towards the attractive younger female" (though that would require reworking the rest of the prose to match) but ordinarily the plural should take an "s" at the end in English.
"He drummed his fingers on the arm of his throne, a the click of his fingernails against the bony resonating in the empty hall."
Is it "a click" or "the click" now?
And against the bony resonating *what* exactly? Or was there supposed to be a noun between "bony" and "resonating" instead? True, "resonating" *can* be used as a subject or object, (i.e., "the resonating of the gong gave him a headache") but not in this situation.
--Er, what exactly was I supposed to be respecting you for, now? It isn't like there was any perceptible *point* to the stories any more than to your posts, after all.
>I'd like to inform you that you're exceptionally misguided. Us down at Fandom wank take the piss out of nitty picky stuff, but I think that all of us are willing to admit that we ourselves are all aware that we're a fairly wanky lot ourselves. You claim to be above all this, yet you've clearly gone through a lot of time and effort to construct a rather offensive and judgemental piece of crap which I can see no other reason for other than as a tool of attention seeking whinginess.
At 02:01 PM 8/12/03 +0100, you wrote:
> Having stumbled across your timewasters anonymous piece,
Oh, I very much doubt that. I rather think that you lot are obsessively fuming over it - aren't I correct? Be honest now; I *know* the truth, after all, the numbers are there.
You say you can't stand idiots on your ffnet page - so how do you put up with yourself, eh? I came across your name several times while researching the FW, and not once did your posts impress me with any measure of intelligence. If you've got it, you're doing a good job of hiding it, along with any writing talents. Your canon-free, er, "humour" stories are at best dull and clunky, and in some places the sentences are completely ungrammatical and incoherent. And by associating yourself with a community that exists only for the purpose of mocking others, *you* made yourself a legitimate target.
But keep on screeching, do - it only demonstrates what I set out to prove: that FW can't *take* what it dishes out, oh no, and that all this "have a sense of humour else be mocked" is something none of you is prepared to accept for yourselves. (And that you're a bunch of self-important buffoons whose opinions no one should take seriously.) The more you all shout and stamp, and make wild conspiracy claims and projections, the more you prove yourselves to be the fools I named you.
P@L
--Oh, and do get a beta reader to help with those tricky bits like singular vs. plural and phrases that terminate meaninglessly in adjectives, at least. Such as:
"One of these was a tendency of gravitating towards attractive younger female."
If you were trying for a dry witty tone, you could have written "towards the attractive younger female" (though that would require reworking the rest of the prose to match) but ordinarily the plural should take an "s" at the end in English.
"He drummed his fingers on the arm of his throne, a the click of his fingernails against the bony resonating in the empty hall."
Is it "a click" or "the click" now?
And against the bony resonating *what* exactly? Or was there supposed to be a noun between "bony" and "resonating" instead? True, "resonating" *can* be used as a subject or object, (i.e., "the resonating of the gong gave him a headache") but not in this situation.
--Er, what exactly was I supposed to be respecting you for, now? It isn't like there was any perceptible *point* to the stories any more than to your posts, after all.
>I'd like to inform you that you're exceptionally misguided. Us down at Fandom wank take the piss out of nitty picky stuff, but I think that all of us are willing to admit that we ourselves are all aware that we're a fairly wanky lot ourselves. You claim to be above all this, yet you've clearly gone through a lot of time and effort to construct a rather offensive and judgemental piece of crap which I can see no other reason for other than as a tool of attention seeking whinginess.
Post a comment in response:
