Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



KrisCynical (kriscynical) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2003-08-19 19:47:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:*sporfle!*

ur wrong r/h furever!!!1!one.
This is my first post to F_W and I hope that a personal wank is okay to post. I used to be quite active in the HP fandom, although I've just dropped it lately due to shit like this happening. I never made it to BNF status (a la Cassie Claire), but ah well. Not all of us can be that self-centered. I used to draw fanart and post frequently to Artistic Alley, but the fandom has gotten so rediculous with the release of OotP that I haven't posted anything in months.

I am/was a H/Hr shipper. R/Hr shippers can kiss my ass for all I care; that ship makes me gag. R/Hr shippers are some of the wankiest people on the net. God forbid you disagree with their ship and if it's H/Hr... well, you're obviously the Anti-Christ.

I draw H/Hr art based off of the Paradigm of Uncertainty fanfiction series. This is where the following wank comes from, my "H/Hr in the Windowseat" picture to be more specific.

Hamster_chan: they never sat in the window it was ron and hermione,
you need to learn to reead right so you can draw the right picture. have you ever read the harry potter book?/ you would see that ron and hermione are in love

Kristin: You Ron/Hermione shippers never cease to amaze me. All of you are so RUDE! God. If you would have looked at the picture description, you would have seen that the picture was a FANFIC ILLUSTRATION. Thus IT IS NOT CANON.

And if you're so against H/Hr, why exactly did you look at a picture that was titled "H/H in the Windowseat"? I believe it is you that does not know how to read.

Oh, and it wouldn't hurt to try and use proper spelling and sentence structure when writing a review. It makes you look more intelligent.

Hamster_chan: you are a mean person; i was replying to tell you that you were wrong about the ship. ron and hermione are in love and you cant stop it. it is You who canot read so think again

Kristin: I am quite positive that you can't be older than 12. I'd say that you're younger but the thought of an 8 year old on the net scares me, to be honest. I still stand by my opinion that you R/Hr shippers are some of the most rude and obnoxious people in the fandom, much less the entire net. So sorry that I offended your opinion, since you know that OF COURSE hamster_chan's opinion is the all-ruling LAW in the HP fandom.

Again, if you don't like H/Hr, don't look at H/Hr labeled art. I can draw H/Hr if I want, especially considering that I find it more believable than R/Hr.

It's a free country. Deal with it.

Hamster_chan: i'm am an adult!! for 18!!! you anre mean and wrong about the ship so i dont think you are smart and you are 8 yeard old!! h/hr are meanst people in the canon! you have no idea about the love and you are WRONG!!! h/g is to happen too along with the real love!

Kristin: I find you quite ammusing to be honest. If you're really 18, why don't you talk like you are? The only vibes I'm getting off of you are "Nu-uh you poop head!"

Harry Potter is fiction. F-I-C-T-I-O-N. Therefore it is up for interpretation and purely for fun. Get over yourself. It's people like you that have made me all but withdraw from the whole HP fandom. The whole thing is populated by rediculously rude and obnoxious people like you.

Sadly, this is as far as it's gotten as of yet. It's stupid to keep up a line of "conversation" with someone this wanky, but it's just so damn amusing! I love getting flamed by people like this. It's so much more fun to laugh at them than be the adult.

Because we all know that "j00 sux0rs!" flames are just so potent.



(Post a new comment)


[info]slashcat
2003-08-20 04:17 am UTC (link)
You know you shouldn't mock the rabid R/Hr shippers! It's mean to make fun of the mentally handicapped.

And yet it's impossible to resist.

Have you been here, by any chance? It's not as fun as the wank brewing on the many Mary Sue communities, but still good for a point-and-laugh at dull moments.

(Reply to this)


[info]psychofangirl
2003-08-20 05:09 am UTC (link)
I actually prefer H/HR over Ron/HR, but either one is fine with me.

(Reply to this)

Axe to grind, huh?
[info]redpanda
2003-08-20 05:40 am UTC (link)
See, to me, wanky isn't just "people I don't like/agree with" or "immature brats who flamed me." Wanky = "arrogance." And on that count, you're FAR wankier than anyone you just reported. Congrats!

Sorry, but "your 'ship sucks" is stupid in BOTH directions. Take your own advice. IT'S JUST A BOOK. But! That's a pretty pic. :)

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Axe to grind, huh?
[info]dunc
2003-08-20 05:56 am UTC (link)
You know... I'm just a newbie here... but I have to agree. This is mutual wank, and not the good kind.

And that pic does rock.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Axe to grind, huh? - [info]ladylisse, 2003-08-20 06:20 am UTC
Re: Axe to grind, huh? - [info]dunc, 2003-08-20 06:43 am UTC
Re: Axe to grind, huh? - [info]rogue, 2003-08-20 07:05 am UTC
Re: Axe to grind, huh? - [info]dunc, 2003-08-20 07:31 am UTC
Re: Axe to grind, huh? - [info]rogue, 2003-08-20 07:49 am UTC
Re: Axe to grind, huh? - [info]dunc, 2003-08-20 07:53 am UTC
Re: Axe to grind, huh? - [info]rogue, 2003-08-20 07:58 am UTC
Re: Axe to grind, huh? - [info]ladylisse, 2003-08-20 10:48 am UTC
Re: Axe to grind, huh? - [info]yadda, 2003-08-20 06:08 pm UTC
Re: Axe to grind, huh? - [info]pyratejenni, 2003-08-21 12:50 am UTC
Re: Axe to grind, huh? - [info]ladylisse, 2003-08-21 12:52 am UTC
Re: Axe to grind, huh? - [info]soleta, 2003-08-20 06:23 pm UTC
Re: Axe to grind, huh? - [info]rogue, 2003-08-20 08:21 pm UTC
Re: Axe to grind, huh? - [info]rogue, 2003-08-20 06:38 am UTC
Re: Axe to grind, huh? - [info]dunc, 2003-08-20 06:40 am UTC
Re: Axe to grind, huh? - [info]fearthainn, 2003-08-20 07:23 am UTC
Re: Axe to grind, huh? - [info]dunc, 2003-08-20 07:40 am UTC
Re: Axe to grind, huh? - [info]ruaki, 2003-08-21 05:54 am UTC
Re: Axe to grind, huh? - [info]dunc, 2003-08-21 06:06 am UTC
Re: Axe to grind, huh? - [info]rogue, 2003-08-20 06:31 am UTC
Re: Axe to grind, huh? - [info]sorchar, 2003-08-20 06:58 am UTC
Re: Axe to grind, huh? - [info]yadda, 2003-08-20 07:55 am UTC
Re: Axe to grind, huh? - [info]dafnap, 2003-08-20 09:13 am UTC
OT, But, - [info]jerry_ds_girl, 2003-08-20 04:37 pm UTC
Re: OT, But, - [info]sagralisse, 2003-08-20 06:04 pm UTC
Re: OT, But, - [info]dafnap, 2003-08-20 07:29 pm UTC
Even OT'er - [info]sagralisse, 2003-08-20 11:03 pm UTC
Re: Even OT'er - [info]dafnap, 2003-08-20 11:07 pm UTC
Re: Even OT'er - [info]sagralisse, 2003-08-21 12:08 am UTC
Re: Even OT'er - guardian_writer, 2003-08-21 01:23 am UTC
Re: Even OT'er - [info]ruaki, 2003-08-21 05:58 am UTC
Re: Even OT'er - [info]sagralisse, 2003-08-21 03:20 pm UTC
Re: Even OT'er - [info]ruaki, 2003-08-22 04:43 am UTC
Re: Axe to grind, huh? - rama_snark, 2003-08-20 06:01 pm UTC

[info]jar
2003-08-20 05:57 am UTC (link)
I think you're both wanky! Not because of how you answered her, but because of what you said when you posted this. Seriously? Leaving the fandom ::gigglesnort:: pfft.

Anyway, I love your art style and pic.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]dawnswalker, 2003-08-20 06:27 am UTC
Re: - [info]jar, 2003-08-20 07:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladylisse, 2003-08-20 10:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dawnswalker, 2003-08-20 11:05 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rann, 2003-08-20 03:50 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]bohicamouse, 2003-08-20 09:39 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]schoenschoen, 2003-08-24 11:08 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rowan, 2003-08-20 07:00 am UTC
Re: - [info]jar, 2003-08-20 07:24 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]coyotegirl, 2003-08-20 07:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rowan, 2003-08-20 09:04 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]starkeymonster, 2003-08-20 05:49 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sagralisse, 2003-08-20 06:07 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]arabel, 2003-08-20 02:48 pm UTC

[info]ladybirdsleeps
2003-08-20 07:30 am UTC (link)
OMGSTFU.

HARRY/SNAPE 4EVAR!!!!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]yadda, 2003-08-20 08:15 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]the_squid, 2003-08-20 09:10 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]orthanc, 2003-08-20 11:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rann, 2003-08-20 03:51 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]eljuno, 2003-08-20 10:22 pm UTC

[info]ignatius
2003-08-20 08:00 am UTC (link)
For the sake of full disclosure: I'm an R/H fan, all the way. I don't really like H/H, but I also don't like H/G, so I'm probably persona non grata in both communities.

Yes, R/Hers can be very wanky. Yes, Hamster_chan was being very wanky right here, with the bad grammer and the spelling and the telling you you were wrong about the ship. That was totally uncool. Plus, saying things like "H/Hers are the meanest people in canon." I don't support her in any of that.

However, now I come to read your comments, and what do I find? You saying things like "All of you are so RUDE...I still stand by my opinion that you R/Hr shippers are some of the most rude and obnoxious people in the fandom, much less the entire net."

And the great circle of wank continues, because I'm feeling myself getting defensive. In spite of the fact that she made the wide insulting generalization first; now you've made one against *me*. And the bad vibes are getting passed on again; just as this isn't the first time you've dealt with a wanky immature R/Her, this isn't the first time I've come across an insulting H/Her. I think the blame for the environment in this fandom comes from both sides, personally. But I think I've just crossed the line, and become wanky myself. Bah. Should've just pointed and laughed.

In the meantime, did you really think that fandom_wank would have absolutely no R/Hers in it? Or did you just not care that you were insulting us? Also: did you call Cassie Claire self-centered? Because she's a BNF? I thought she was a BNF because she wrote stories a whole bunch of people loved, not because she was self-centered.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]rogue, 2003-08-20 09:08 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]fandom_bitch, 2003-08-20 09:10 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rogue, 2003-08-20 09:15 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ipomoea, 2003-08-20 09:20 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rogue, 2003-08-20 09:28 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]redpanda, 2003-08-20 10:22 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rogue, 2003-08-20 11:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sagralisse, 2003-08-20 06:09 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]dontgiveahoot, 2003-08-21 02:02 am UTC
You know...I was thinkin' the same thing... - [info]fandom_bitch, 2003-08-20 09:21 am UTC
Re: You know...I was thinkin' the same thing... - [info]setsunastar, 2003-08-20 10:34 pm UTC
Re: You know...I was thinkin' the same thing... - [info]sagralisse, 2003-08-20 11:06 pm UTC
Re: You know...I was thinkin' the same thing... - [info]fandom_bitch, 2003-08-28 09:59 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]eljuno, 2003-08-20 10:25 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]dontgiveahoot, 2003-08-21 03:09 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]schoenschoen, 2003-08-24 11:12 am UTC

[info]rann
2003-08-20 09:21 am UTC (link)
*looklooks through the pics*
*oooooos at the bath pic* Yum.
*looklooks*
Wah! There is no Harry/Hermione smut! WHERE IS TEH SMUT?!?!?!?!?!!?!!!?!
... Ahem. Lack of smut aside, good art. n.n
I will not comment on the wank, other than to say, yes, Ron/Hermione rabid shippers are annoying. Ah well... I'm a fan, but not involved in the fandom, so I escape most of that stuff. n.n;

(Reply to this)

Poopy head is a technical term.
[info]bitchysmurf
2003-08-20 09:42 am UTC (link)
Oh, please. R/Hr. H/Hr. You're all morons.

See, there's the fandom. 98% of the fandom is childish, wanky, mean, stupid, ugly, argumentative, nazi losers. And then there is the 2% of us that ship Squid/Hogwarts. And, you may not know this, but we are actually angels blessed by JK Rowling herself and are capable of doing no wrong.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Poopy head is a technical term. - [info]ladylisse, 2003-08-20 10:53 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rann, 2003-08-20 03:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]yadda, 2003-08-20 06:16 pm UTC
Re: - [info]rann, 2003-08-21 02:10 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]bitchysmurf, 2003-08-20 11:40 pm UTC
Re: - [info]rann, 2003-08-21 02:22 am UTC
Re: - [info]bitchysmurf, 2003-08-21 02:27 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dontgiveahoot, 2003-08-21 03:24 am UTC
YUO=FAG. - [info]banal_o_rama, 2003-08-20 04:58 pm UTC
Re: Poopy head is a technical term. - [info]sagralisse, 2003-08-20 06:12 pm UTC
Re: Poopy head is a technical term. - [info]eljuno, 2003-08-20 10:26 pm UTC
Re: Poopy head is a technical term. - [info]bitchysmurf, 2003-08-20 11:36 pm UTC
Re: Poopy head is a technical term. - guardian_writer, 2003-08-21 01:34 am UTC
Re: Poopy head is a technical term. - [info]fearthainn, 2003-08-21 04:25 am UTC
Re: Poopy head is a technical term. - [info]chash, 2003-08-21 06:31 pm UTC

[info]squeakytoy
2003-08-20 11:38 am UTC (link)
P'raps it's just me, buuuuut...

Because we all know that "j00 sux0rs!" flames are just so potent.

May I gently point out that your conversation with thingummybob had more than a few characteristics of a "j00 sux0rs!" flame - personal insults, overuse of emphases, broad generalisations about unknown individuals entirely based on pairing...

Mitigation comes in the form of decent art and an acceptable command of the English language, but still...

The wank-worthy are worthy to be wanked, whether they're drinking methylated spirits in the gutter, or sipping champagne from a crystal flute.

(Reply to this)


[info]rikoshi
2003-08-20 01:55 pm UTC (link)
To: fandoms
From: Rikkyfox
Re: You Down With OTP?

"Shipper wars" are one of the few things that make me sigh by merely mentioning them, without even needing to submit specific examples to my attention. Something about the very virtue of their existence, the sheer asininity and fucknuttery involved, the brainless mudslingers who fuel them... it makes my skin crawl with something indescribable (though decidedly not Lovecraftian).

Look at it this way: I like turkey sandwiches better than ham sandwiches. Does this mean I go out and verbally assault deli customers when I witness them buying ham? Will I lynch a person for putting mayonnaise on a sandwich instead of mustard? Am I fraught with the urge to kill if someone choses Coke over Pepsi?

Let's use Harry Potter as an example, since it's pertinent. Yes, there are some stupid pairings out there (Dumbledore/Dudley comes to mind), but that's not the heart of the issue. I quite enjoy the books. In my reading them, I sense vibes between Harry and Hermione, and also between Ron and Hermione. Both pairings are, at least in essence, "hinted at" perhaps not canonically, but through other canon material. You can't, with a straight face (IMNSHO), tell H/Hr fans that there's no precedent for the R/Hr pairing as well, and vice-versa.

Also, another caveat:

IT'S JUST FUCKING FANFICTION! You have not been done a personal wrong because someone wrote a fake story about something you don't like.

Get over it. Now.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]rann, 2003-08-20 03:55 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mindset, 2003-08-20 04:35 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]bohicamouse, 2003-08-20 09:45 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]schoenschoen, 2003-08-24 12:20 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mindset, 2003-08-25 05:12 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]limyaael, 2003-08-20 04:36 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]redpanda, 2003-08-20 06:24 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]limyaael, 2003-08-21 01:36 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]pyratejenni, 2003-08-21 01:17 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]limyaael, 2003-08-21 01:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rhi_silverflame, 2003-08-21 06:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]limyaael, 2003-08-21 03:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]nolifeking, 2003-08-20 04:40 pm UTC
Oooooooh! - [info]ieatpeople, 2003-08-20 04:48 pm UTC
Re: Oooooooh! - [info]nolifeking, 2003-08-20 05:24 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]bitchysmurf, 2003-08-21 12:09 am UTC
Argh. - [info]bitchysmurf, 2003-08-21 12:10 am UTC
Re: Argh. - [info]rikoshi, 2003-08-21 01:38 am UTC
Re: Argh. - [info]amand_r, 2003-08-21 09:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dawnswalker, 2003-08-21 03:21 am UTC

[info]rann
2003-08-20 03:58 pm UTC (link)
By the way, when I read the first book and glanced through the fics offered here and there, and saw the rather oblique code-pairings used, I found them even more confusing than before I saw GW and was always seeing "2x1" and "3x4". H/R? Could be Harry/Ron, could be Hermione/Ron. Hell, the first time I saw a "H/H", I was like "The hell? Harry/Hagrid?"

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]yadda, 2003-08-20 06:26 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]yadda, 2003-08-20 10:33 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]dontgiveahoot, 2003-08-21 01:22 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]yadda, 2003-08-21 06:44 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rann, 2003-08-21 07:44 pm UTC
Oh yes, Snape/Neville! - [info]dontgiveahoot, 2003-09-07 06:20 pm UTC
Re: Oh yes, Snape/Neville! - [info]rann, 2003-09-07 09:21 pm UTC
OMGWTFBBQ and all that... - [info]beccastareyes, 2003-08-21 07:59 am UTC
Re: OMGWTFBBQ and all that... - [info]yadda, 2003-08-21 05:44 pm UTC
Re: OMGWTFBBQ and all that... - [info]terminal_frost, 2003-08-22 10:30 am UTC

[info]snacky
2003-08-20 04:11 pm UTC (link)
It always makes me chuckle to see such rabid shipper wars based on a book where no one's even kissed yet. *g*

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]yadda, 2003-08-20 06:30 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]snacky, 2003-08-20 07:06 pm UTC
Re: - [info]yadda, 2003-08-20 07:55 pm UTC

[info]phosfate
2003-08-20 04:32 pm UTC (link)
Oh dear. Sorry to hear Cassie Claire killed your dog.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]snacky, 2003-08-20 07:09 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tempslut, 2003-08-20 08:15 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sagralisse, 2003-08-20 11:09 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2003-08-21 12:11 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]potter_wank, 2003-08-21 02:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dawnswalker, 2003-08-21 03:23 am UTC
YOU'RE WASTING IT!!!
[info]resmiranda
2003-08-20 05:27 pm UTC (link)
I never made it to BNF status (a la Cassie Claire), but ah well. Not all of us can be that self-centered.

The... the BITTERNESS... it's seeping out of my monitor and dripping across my desk! Someone get a cup, quick! I don't want it to go to waste on BNFness!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: YOU'RE WASTING IT!!! - [info]chemical_mango, 2003-08-20 06:04 pm UTC
Re: YOU'RE WASTING IT!!! - [info]miome, 2003-08-20 06:50 pm UTC

[info]banal_o_rama
2003-08-20 05:55 pm UTC (link)
I hereby declare a new Internet law:

Whoever first invokes the phrase, "If you don't like it, don't read it/download it/hear of its existence, don't read it/download it/hear of its existence," or any permutation thereof, is automatically declared the loser of the argument, and will die a friendless virgin at the miserable age of 93.

I hereby declare the illiterate 18-year-old R/Hr shipper the victor of this wank, insomuch as one can be a victor in this situation.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

*zoom!* goes the rationale - [info]virago, 2003-08-20 06:20 pm UTC
Re: *zoom!* goes the rationale - [info]yadda, 2003-08-20 06:37 pm UTC
OMG STFU - [info]banal_o_rama, 2003-08-20 07:00 pm UTC
Re: OMG STFU - [info]phosfate, 2003-08-20 07:36 pm UTC
Re: OMG STFU - [info]virago, 2003-08-20 07:47 pm UTC
Re: OMG STFU - [info]banal_o_rama, 2003-08-20 11:49 pm UTC
Re: OMG STFU - [info]virago, 2003-08-21 10:21 pm UTC
Re: OMG STFU - [info]iczer6, 2003-08-20 10:53 pm UTC
Re: OMG STFU - [info]mariagoner, 2003-08-21 03:30 am UTC
Re: OMG STFU - [info]iczer6, 2003-08-21 03:35 am UTC
Re: OMG STFU - [info]mariagoner, 2003-08-21 04:08 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]redpanda, 2003-08-20 06:25 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]bohicamouse, 2003-08-20 09:59 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]resmiranda, 2003-08-20 11:20 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]banal_o_rama, 2003-08-20 11:30 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]iczer6, 2003-08-21 03:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]chash, 2003-08-21 06:35 pm UTC

[info]unanon
2003-08-20 07:55 pm UTC (link)
I have a theory brewing!

I believe hamster_chan at FA is a hoax.

Take a quick look at hamster_chan's Member info at FA and their FAP posts, personal website and artwork.

Is it not a little odd that:

1. Both the "artists" say they want to work at Disney.
2. hamster_chan just has some oddly questionable details(birthday July 31, has not read the HP books according to FAP profile, and the flamed artist left a message in the guest book of the flaming artist!)

Some links of potential interest:
Kriscynical's site

hamster_chan's site

hamster_chan's guestbook

It seems possible that kriscynical wants attention. Or is amusing herself and making fun of R/Hr shippers. Either way posting a wank about this is just so wanky...

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]chaos_priestess, 2003-08-20 08:33 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]banal_o_rama, 2003-08-20 08:40 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]alden, 2003-08-20 08:48 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]rowan, 2003-08-21 02:08 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]alden, 2003-08-20 08:48 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladybirdsleeps, 2003-08-20 09:17 pm UTC
Re: - [info]alden, 2003-08-25 04:34 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]shoiryu, 2003-08-20 09:41 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]unnamed, 2003-08-21 12:22 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]banal_o_rama, 2003-08-20 09:47 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sagralisse, 2003-08-20 11:21 pm UTC
*Live* *wank* *show!* - [info]virago, 2003-08-20 11:30 pm UTC
Re: *Live* *wank* *show!* - [info]sagralisse, 2003-08-21 12:03 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]illuminati, 2003-08-20 11:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]redmenace, 2003-08-21 02:11 am UTC
Too funny... - [info]redpanda, 2003-08-21 02:41 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]nolifeking, 2003-08-21 03:59 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ruaki, 2003-08-21 06:06 am UTC

[info]ladybirdsleeps
2003-08-20 11:09 pm UTC (link)
Am I the only one that imagines someone getting kicked in the ass when they see "BNF"?

"Take that, wanker!"
"BNF!"

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]eljuno, 2003-08-20 11:15 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ymfaery, 2003-08-21 03:19 am UTC
Some advice from Anne McCaffrey*
[info]pyratejenni
2003-08-21 12:55 am UTC (link)
"Don't worry, dear, it's just a story."


(Reply to this)


guardian_writer
2003-08-21 01:32 am UTC (link)
wanky on both sides. get over it d00d. And I'm not a R/Hr shipper, but i've met some very nice shippers of that persusion and i don't see why people get their knickers in such a twist.
Btw, i ship H/Hr/R, the ship that can make everyone happy! lol

(Reply to this)(Thread)

a fellow TrioShipper - yay! - [info]dontgiveahoot, 2003-08-21 03:34 am UTC
Re: a fellow TrioShipper - yay! - [info]bohicamouse, 2003-08-21 03:53 am UTC
Re: a fellow TrioShipper - yay! - [info]dontgiveahoot, 2003-08-21 04:48 am UTC
Re: a fellow TrioShipper - yay! - [info]ladylisse, 2003-08-21 07:34 am UTC
Re: a fellow TrioShipper - yay! - guardian_writer, 2003-08-22 03:03 am UTC
Re: a fellow TrioShipper - yay! - [info]bohicamouse, 2003-08-22 04:22 am UTC
Not to start an icon wank here... - [info]parlance, 2003-08-21 11:48 pm UTC
Re: Not to start an icon wank here... - guardian_writer, 2003-08-22 02:54 am UTC
Re: Not to start an icon wank here... - [info]parlance, 2003-08-22 03:37 am UTC

[info]lots42
2003-08-21 04:52 am UTC (link)
Please tell me where I can find more of your artwork thanks

(Reply to this)

*sniffle*
[info]sylvie
2003-08-21 06:24 pm UTC (link)
I wish she would come back.. and see how we think she's teh wankah.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: *sniffle* - [info]conchoidal, 2003-08-21 06:39 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]rann, 2003-08-21 07:50 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]nolifeking, 2003-08-21 09:09 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]dontgiveahoot, 2003-09-07 06:33 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]redpanda, 2003-08-22 01:57 am UTC

snowball
2003-08-22 08:33 am UTC (link)
Wank's coming from both sides on this one, and frankly I have to give you the dubious honour of being the wankier party. The sweeping generalisations just aren't cool.

(Reply to this)


[info]redmenace
2003-08-22 11:24 am UTC (link)
Update on the situation, on her ujournal, seems that she realizes the wank, apologises, and cleans up the mess: http://www.ujournal.org/users/nevi_al_2001/77906.html

(Reply to this)


[info]delfeus
2003-08-22 08:34 pm UTC (link)
I didn't even realize there are adults who read/write H/Hr or R/Hr as main pairings. Guess I've been in the slash parts of the fandom too long. :D [to me they're always a side pairing, since I don't really like to read about those pairings, or R/H.]

Anyway, I think it's kind of silly to say that all who ship a certain pairing are rude. Sure, there are rude people in all parts of the fandom, but also cool people. I don't know any R/Hr shippers, but I'm sure there are some interesting & intelligent ones. I have to say this one seems immature and kind of stupid, but you can't really blame all for what few people do.

(Reply to this)


 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map