(Post a new comment)

	musette 2003-09-20 08:33 pm UTC (link)
	I really must remember that anal sex = ultimate supreme evil. Because otherwise, I just think people are insanely wanky in the extreme, and we know THAT can't be true. (Reply to this)(Thread)

	tempslut 2003-09-22 06:19 am UTC (link)
	It's not that evil if you remember your economy-sized bottle of K-Y Jelly. Then, you get Jesus's approval (and perhaps wanting to join in). (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	Re: musette 2003-09-22 07:00 am UTC (link)
	No such thing as too much lubricant. ::hearts Mark Morford of the SF Gate:: (Reply to this)(Parent)

	*pokes head in* lurker32 2003-09-20 08:46 pm UTC (link)
	All I could think was "they can tell the kid's orientation in, um, utero now?" (Reply to this)(Thread)

	Re: pokes head in iczer6 2003-09-20 08:54 pm UTC (link)
	That was my take on it. So I guess nowadays when babies are born doctors suction the face, smack the ass, and then whip out the Kinsey test? Icz (Reply to this)(Parent)

	Goody, another RPF/S wank in the making! ieatpeople 2003-09-20 09:16 pm UTC (link)
	I wonder if ginmar will show up! grabs popcorn, sits a spell (Reply to this)(Thread)

	Re: Goody, another RPF/S wank in the making! iczer6 2003-09-20 09:27 pm UTC (link)
	Well IIRC didn't someone once rant about you can't do RPS unless the subject has been dead for a number of years? Wouldn't that apply to the Beatles? I mean Lennon's been dead for years and did George Harrison die recently to? I know Ringo is still around so no slash for him.... Icz (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	Re: Goody, another RPF/S wank in the making! necronomist 2003-09-20 10:40 pm UTC (link)
	"I know Ringo is still around so no slash for him...." So is Paul, and no one has asked his opinion about Poppy Z Brite's "OMG Paul and John would be so HAWT together" essay in nerve.com. I highly doubt he cares. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	Re: Goody, another RPF/S wank in the making! ieatpeople 2003-09-20 11:50 pm UTC (link)
	Hell, she wrote thinly-disguised RPS about them. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	Re: Goody, another RPF/S wank in the making! necronomist 2003-09-21 12:52 am UTC (link)
	Yeah, I love how some people think changing the names is going to remove the stigma of eval RPS. Uh-huh. (Reply to this)(Parent)

	Re: Goody, another RPF/S wank in the making! moonjaguar 2003-09-21 11:02 am UTC (link)
	She also wrote a short essay that's on nerve.com that's definitely not veiled RPS. Sadly one has to be a Nerve member to view the damn thing. (Reply to this)(Parent)

	Re: Goody, another RPF/S wank in the making! allen 2003-09-20 11:33 pm UTC (link)
	George passed away a couple of years ago, so I think that's a safe period of time. These people need to watch the movie VH-1 came out with a few years back, about an idealized situation where John and Paul run into each other again and hang out for an afternoon and discuss getting the band back together. And kiss. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	Re: Goody, another RPF/S wank in the making! parlance 2003-09-21 08:52 pm UTC (link)
	And Backbeat. Lots of homoerotic tension. (Reply to this)(Parent)

	Re: Goody, another RPF/S wank in the making! phosfate 2003-09-22 04:25 pm UTC (link)
	Or that godawful Spider Robinson story where Paul has John frozen and revived. Cringe, cringe, cringe. (Reply to this)(Parent)

	Re: Goody, another RPF/S wank in the making! moonjaguar 2003-09-21 11:03 am UTC (link)
	No slash for Stu either... (Reply to this)(Parent)

	Re: Goody, another RPF/S wank in the making! chash 2003-09-21 12:03 am UTC (link)
	VIR!!!!!!! tackleglomps your icon (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	Re: Goody, another RPF/S wank in the making! ieatpeople 2003-09-21 04:15 am UTC (link)
	... damn, Vir is getting more action than me lately. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	Re: Goody, another RPF/S wank in the making! chash 2003-09-21 04:29 am UTC (link)
	He's so wonderstful. (Reply to this)(Parent)

	senor_pinata 2003-09-20 09:38 pm UTC (link)
	I actually kind of love the fic that's being ranted about, because it's so incredibly bad that it comes around the other side and is freakishly entertaining. (Reply to this)

rinoared
2003-09-20 09:57 pm UTC (link)

I had very mixed feelings about that comment.

I was a major, major Beatles fan in my youth. I wrote my first fanfic about them (ripe age of 10 I believe) and it was a Gary-Stu! I remember feeling very attracted to the sweaty leathery Hamburg-scene. If my innocent mind had even acknowledged the existance of Teh Gay, I would've been happily slashing them.

As a matter of fact, I still might be tempted to write Lennon slash. Really, someone here saying he never took advantage of Epstein's big crush on him?

Pretty much anything that suggests RPF is wrong just because it's gay is...

Well, I like yaoi, and I don't appreciate hinting anal sex is inherently Bad and Wrong.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

	morganya 2003-09-21 03:50 am UTC (link)
	I seem to remember The Love You Make claiming that Lennon actually was intimate with Brian Epstein on one occasion. But that might be my cloudish memory. I've written RPF, and I still don't understand why throwing sexuality into the mix is the thing that makes it OMG SUPA-BAD (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	psychofangirl 2003-09-21 06:01 am UTC (link)
	Actually, you're right. :D (Reply to this)(Parent)

	candy 2003-09-23 09:53 pm UTC (link)
	Having just read that book, I can confirm that it does say that John and Brian did do it, and it also mentions that John said in a censored passage from the 1968 authorised biography that he slept with Brian. What can I say, it's called research :) (Reply to this)(Parent)

	pradaloz 2003-09-20 09:59 pm UTC (link)
	Ooh, slash is icky and RPF is eval all rolled into one! (Reply to this)(Thread)

	dawnswalker 2003-09-21 12:35 am UTC (link)
	I have nothing to say about the subject at hand. I just like your icon. :D (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	pradaloz 2003-09-21 01:13 am UTC (link)
	Thanks! A friend made it for me after I expressed my confusion about fangirls freaking every time I pointed out that SCII just confirmed what we knew all along: the fairy boy is all-caps, bold-font, marquis-scrolling-font-tag GAYGAYGAYGAYGAY. (Reply to this)(Parent)

	irk 2003-09-20 11:47 pm UTC (link)
	I like this whole anti-gay Beatles idea that's going on, as if the band never had any gay or alternative things buried in their dark, seedy history. In fact, it just tops off all the other rumors and weird ideas and strange true things about the Beatles so nicely. ~~PAUL IS DEAD.~~ (Reply to this)

	faultypremise 2003-09-21 05:36 am UTC (link)
	sigh I swear to god, someday I'm going to get precognitive and boot these fucking wankers out of my community /before/ they start getting wanky. ... Then again, it was pretty funny to read that. (Reply to this)(Thread)

	iczer6 2003-09-21 05:42 am UTC (link)
	Well he is a wanker, but he really hasn't broken any rules. Sadly there's no law against making an ass of oneself,[though it would help]. Icz (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	faultypremise 2003-09-21 05:54 am UTC (link)
	If I made a 'no wank' rule would anyone obey it? Probably not, so I won't bother. Though perhaps I should toss a warning up somewhere. Wank and ye shall be wanked on. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	eljuno 2003-09-21 05:57 am UTC (link)
	Maybe you should write it in Big. Bold. Letters. Above the page. "Abandon hope all ye who wank here" or "Fandom_Wankers on premises" or something. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	iczer6 2003-09-21 05:58 am UTC (link)
	"Abandon hope all ye who wank here" Hey you beat me to it! (Reply to this)(Parent)

	faultypremise 2003-09-21 06:07 am UTC (link)
	Done. http://www.livejournal.com/userinfo.bml?user=fanficrants (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	kannaophelia 2003-09-21 08:25 am UTC (link)
	~grin~ Sorry about that, I saw it there first and thought it was a serious warning... (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	Re: faultypremise 2003-09-21 08:27 am UTC (link)
	No, being completely facetious. ;) (Reply to this)(Parent)

	quinctia 2003-09-21 09:21 pm UTC (link)
	How about that post from the maintainer of the soupfiction site? snickers (Reply to this)(Parent)

	delfeus 2003-09-21 04:11 pm UTC (link)
	delighted I didn¨'t know there was Beatles slash around! goes to search for some [Oh, and if anyone has Help! as an ok quality div-x I can trade it to an original VHS. I can't watch the VHS anyway, no videos...] (Reply to this)(Thread)

	candy 2003-09-23 09:56 pm UTC (link)
	There's a beatles slash community on LJ at http://www.livejournal.com/community/beatlesslash More a Rolling Stones fan myself, but there's barely any Stones slash and at least there's a bit of George fic... Am also a secret George/Eric Clapton fan. Okay not so secret ;) (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	Re: delfeus 2003-09-24 09:35 pm UTC (link)
	Oh wow! Thank you! Hmm. I've never liked Clapton. I don't like Layla, so it annoyed me a lot when it was played all the time. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	candy 2003-09-25 09:40 am UTC (link)
	No problem. Actually, I've never heard any of Clapton's music except Tears In Heaven (which makes me cry). It's all about the whole George/Pattie/Clapton thing for me. Love triangles and all. (Reply to this)(Parent)

omgwtflol
2004-02-20 08:50 am UTC (link)

I like how everyone took "homosexual lovechild" totally out of context. Oh no, it could only mean that the love child in question is homosexual, not that it is a child of homosexual love!

But I think people only took it the wrong way to actually start more flames/wank.

You should have waited a while more to post this, after the guy in charge of soupfiction.net got involved for the "I really hate soupfiction.net" comment.

oh, wait... *runs off to do... something*

(Reply to this)