Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Karen ([info]karenmystic) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2003-09-28 17:03:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Darn, I want to be an elitist whore too... *Pouts*
Am new here, but I bring really an extra add on to a wank. Hopefully, people will find it funny.

Remember this wank? It's the wank about 2-3 posts below this one.

Remember how the people in the comments said to let it go and all and play nice? A sort of rocky conclusion? So I guess we expected maybe a little peace for a while from this particular part of this fandom.

So much for letting it go.

Mmmm, weren't they trying to prove that they weren't bullies to begin with in the wank that ended up wanking itself? Yet, an interest is... *gasp* bullying! 0h kn03s!

I'm not sure if this would fall under 'ego-stroking' or 'endless flamewars' now. Apparently, it's friend's locked and most likely, invite only.

Darn, I wanna be an elitist whore too! Anyone wanna offer any tips?


(Post a new comment)


[info]uniquesnowflake
2003-09-29 12:48 am UTC (link)
1: Move to Hollywood
2: Proclaim yourself a young actress
3: Suck a lot of cock
4: Move up the ranks
5: Eventually get in with the Velvet Mafia
6: Relish in your own elitism

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]seda
2003-09-29 01:53 pm UTC (link)
I wonder if I could try that...

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]soy_latte
2003-09-29 01:47 am UTC (link)
Okay, this needs to die already and everyone involved needs to go do other things, or at least not do it here. Why? Because some of the people involved are under 18 and therefore should not have been linked to in the other wank.

Please see this if anyone reading this needs further explanation.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Sheesh. Cope.
[info]redpanda
2003-09-29 04:59 am UTC (link)
And again, I don't see how it's OUR responsibility to diligently research each and every person involved in a wank to determine their age. If that were the case, we might as well close up shop right now. The community linked above doesn't shout "WE'RE UNDER 18" in the profile anywhere -- that's good enough for me.

No, I really don't care much about this wank either way. I'm just saying let's not get anal-retentive here. e.e

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Sheesh. Cope.
[info]soy_latte
2003-09-29 05:38 am UTC (link)
No, it's not our responsibility. I just happened to find out while reading the previous wank on this same topic. But [info]zorrorojo has made it clear that if later we find out they're underage, we need to cease wanking.

This is follow-up of a wank that brought the wanking underagers to the site so I think it's fair enough for me to say let's just drop it already and move on. That's not being anally retentive, it's just abiding by what the JF admins have requested of us.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]starherd
2003-09-29 02:59 am UTC (link)
...am I the only one who doesn't get it?

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]schoenschoen
2003-09-29 03:36 am UTC (link)
I get it.

I just don't give a flying horse's ass. ^_^V

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]amasaglajax
2003-09-29 05:15 am UTC (link)
It all falls under the blanket of "STUPID MINORS ARE SPOOGING UP OUR SCREENS." That's really all you need to know about it. I mean, you could look up shiningangelic's 8 page dissertation, but considering it's written in spooge, why bother?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]kyuuketsukirui
2003-09-29 06:18 am UTC (link)
Bwah! That's beautiful and so true.

Teenies go home! This is not the place to whinge about how mean people were to you.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]schoenschoen
2003-09-29 03:38 am UTC (link)
I'm betting it falls under "being snarky", but that's just me.

But, yes - pretty wanky. Now if the entire thing wasn't spooging up our comm and I could see my computer screen properly, I might be able to give you a better opinion. But alas, I cannot.

(Reply to this)


(Anonymous)
2003-09-29 04:35 am UTC (link)
I think it falls under "Let's poke fun at ourselves and laugh when people are too stupid to realize it" but that's just my uninformed guess, being not at all l33t.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]amasaglajax
2003-09-29 05:04 am UTC (link)
It's an endless circle of stupid people, poking themselves and other stupid people. That would be funny, if it weren't so pathetic.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]amasaglajax
2003-09-29 05:13 am UTC (link)
Was the comm name meant to be all, like, clever and poking fun at the people who are poking fun at them?

'Cause it's, like, not.

It's actually kind of stupid and pathetic, like a swamp monster in its death throes. At least they paid attention to my icon. ::points:: Then again, you just don't argue with Eric Draven's hands....

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]ecchaniz0r
2003-09-30 10:42 pm UTC (link)
It's actually kind of stupid and pathetic, like a swamp monster in its death throes.

OH MY GODS.

That is a beautiful, beautiful simile and I am now laughing so hard that I cannot type straight. I had to correct that last sentence fifteen times, man. Aahahahargh heh.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]telesilla
2003-09-29 06:19 am UTC (link)
Oh look it's Return of the Grudge Wank that Left.

*yawns*

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]ereshkigal
2003-09-29 07:16 am UTC (link)
I swear, Sleeping Beauty syndrome. *yawns* Wake me up when my knight in shining wank finally rides by! *snoozes*

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]sagralisse
2003-09-29 05:05 pm UTC (link)
Wake me up when my knight in shining wank finally rides by!

Ew.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]ereshkigal
2003-09-29 05:28 pm UTC (link)
It does conjure up interesting mental images, doesn't it? XD

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]sagralisse
2003-09-29 06:10 pm UTC (link)
That's just.... just... so not my kink.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]ereshkigal
2003-09-29 06:41 pm UTC (link)
It's not mine either, actually. I just find it an amusing turn of phrase. Squicky and laughable.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]telesilla
2003-10-01 03:49 am UTC (link)
Would the Knight in Shining Wank be named Sir Bukkake?

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]sorchar
2003-09-29 06:29 am UTC (link)
On my personal scale of, "That's nice, pass the potatoes," this ranks somewhere between Ben and J.Lo's relationship status and whether or not Anne Rice will ever write another novel.

Nice try, though.

(Reply to this)


[info]phosfate
2003-09-29 06:39 am UTC (link)
We don't care if you go away mad, kids, so long as you go away.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]amasaglajax
2003-09-29 06:42 am UTC (link)
::icon pointage:: Total agreement.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]shoiryu
2003-09-29 07:24 am UTC (link)
Anyone wanna offer any tips?

Put it down and walk away.

(Reply to this)


[info]katsue
2003-09-29 11:03 pm UTC (link)
Aw, come on! Elitist Whores was pretty obviously created with tongue in cheek and Fandom Wank in mind! ^_^

(Reply to this)


 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map