Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Her Royal Highness the Princess Cimorene ([info]cimorene111) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2003-10-08 20:00:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:rejected

[info]sepiamagpie found and posted a wank that looks much like lotr wank if you squint, only it's about johnny depp. ('i've been a fan since the age of FIVE!')

she's back, with the same bad spelling/grammar, and a BIGGER FONT!



Please- in the future- be kind enough to actually take the time to listen to what I am saying before you throw senseless accusations and cruel barbs in my general direction. You also could at least address me in a manner befitting of a human being and not as if I were some godforsaken mongrel.

what about spitting in her general direction? or is that for mongrels too?

In regards to my spelling, etc, etc, etc- You attempt to do better supporting your own point of view in less than eight minutes late at night and I'll consider your complaints legitimate- for that was when and precisely how long it took me to compose that (Although the thoughts and my platform in general had been meticulously examined and re-affirmed before-hand)

she hands us the 'not-well-thought-out' biscuit with one hand and takes it away with the other!

so are my complaints legitimate if i compose them in six minutes late at night, but they're someone ELSE's point of view? what if i compose them in two minutes during lunch?

I did not place the cold steel barrel of a gun against your temple and scream "READ IT OR FUCKING DIE!"... now did I? *laughs* I think not.

at least if the gun is cold we know it hasn't been fired recently.

But what else can one expect of the vulgar and uneducated? For I certainly hope that is your excuse for being so terribly close-minded. Otherwise plain stupidity is to blame for your rudeness, and this is simply inexcusable.

is there a special variant of snacky's law for the pompously long-winded? perhaps from P@L?

are we SURE she's not a troll? reads like a troll who's trying too hard, or are wankers receiving bonus points for shakespearean language now ('mongrel'? wtf)?



(Post a new comment)


[info]herring
2003-10-09 04:22 am UTC (link)
Ahh, that unending bold font just kills me above all else.

(Reply to this)


guardian_writer
2003-10-09 04:33 am UTC (link)
dang, you beat me to it. I posted this just after you! Ah well, Still wanky and funny too!

(Reply to this)(Thread)


guardian_writer
2003-10-09 04:36 am UTC (link)
and I just realized that this person is part of the POTC community that I mod. I wonder why they didn't post this there? Maybe because of my no wanking/insult policy? Or maybe they just don't care? lol. Whatever the reason, I'm glad its not at mine.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]delfeus, 2003-10-09 04:08 pm UTC
Re:
[info]cimorene111
2003-10-09 04:48 am UTC (link)
yes! viva la wank!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]mare
2003-10-09 04:50 am UTC (link)
I love your icon

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]eyesdelight
2003-10-09 05:02 am UTC (link)
You know, those rants are even more entertaining if one imagines the French Castle Guard from Monty Python and the Holy Grail saying the words.

Go ahead. Try it out. It fits!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re:
[info]cimorene111
2003-10-09 05:06 am UTC (link)
you won't believe it, but i already did.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

(no subject) - [info]mirabellawotr, 2003-10-09 06:38 am UTC
Re: - [info]cimorene111, 2003-10-09 06:46 am UTC

[info]elfy
2003-10-09 05:04 am UTC (link)
or are wankers receiving bonus points for shakespearean language now ('mongrel'? wtf)?


Maybe the poster is Australian? Where I come from mongrel gets a lot of use - and not just because of a particular older actor on a soap... I'd be more inclined to think her aussie though if her use of 'mongrel' was preceeded by the adjective 'mangy'.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: - [info]cimorene111, 2003-10-09 05:07 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]parlance, 2003-10-09 05:11 am UTC
Re: - [info]cimorene111, 2003-10-09 05:15 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cimorene111, 2003-10-09 05:20 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]parlance, 2003-10-09 05:51 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]elfy, 2003-10-09 04:17 pm UTC
Re: - [info]cimorene111, 2003-10-09 04:39 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]elfy, 2003-10-09 04:48 pm UTC
Bloody mongrels - [info]loafing_oaf, 2003-10-10 09:45 am UTC
Re: Bloody mongrels - [info]elfy, 2003-10-10 02:23 pm UTC

[info]iamtheenemy
2003-10-09 05:08 am UTC (link)
This has to...it can't be real, can it? I mean, no one is that stupid. It can't be real, I refuse to believe it. lalalalalala

Steph

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: - [info]cimorene111, 2003-10-09 05:13 am UTC

[info]lil1pinay
2003-10-09 05:13 am UTC (link)
Well, SOMEBODY'S bitter..



this chick needs to get over it.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]littlekitsch, 2003-10-09 02:55 pm UTC

allen
2003-10-09 05:38 am UTC (link)
OK, I couldn't resist:

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]lil1pinay, 2003-10-09 05:40 am UTC
Re: - [info]cimorene111, 2003-10-09 05:47 am UTC
(no subject) - allen, 2003-10-09 06:00 am UTC
Re: - [info]cimorene111, 2003-10-09 06:09 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cimorene111, 2003-10-09 05:58 am UTC
(no subject) - allen, 2003-10-09 06:07 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2003-10-10 06:47 am UTC
Re: - [info]cimorene111, 2003-10-10 06:45 pm UTC

[info]cherry007
2003-10-09 05:39 am UTC (link)
yes, because I so wanted to see 40-pt bold font when I opened up my friends page, yessiree.

Okay, it's not 40 pt, but still.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]mirabellawotr, 2003-10-09 06:34 am UTC
Re: - [info]cherry007, 2003-10-09 07:42 am UTC

[info]loki
2003-10-09 06:00 am UTC (link)
Awww, poor Thesaurus needs therapy. First P@L, and now this bint...

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]janegraddell, 2003-10-09 06:12 am UTC
Re: - [info]cimorene111, 2003-10-09 06:20 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2003-10-09 06:30 am UTC
Re: - [info]cimorene111, 2003-10-09 06:36 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]nitro, 2003-10-09 07:41 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2003-10-09 04:02 pm UTC
Re: - [info]cimorene111, 2003-10-09 04:37 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2003-10-09 05:06 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2003-10-09 07:46 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kyuuketsukirui, 2003-10-09 08:07 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]veuki, 2003-10-23 02:44 am UTC
Re: - [info]cimorene111, 2003-10-25 12:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]veuki, 2003-10-25 05:11 am UTC
Re: - [info]cimorene111, 2003-10-25 12:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]veuki, 2003-10-25 05:57 am UTC
Re: - [info]cimorene111, 2003-10-26 06:09 am UTC

tocomfortyou
2003-10-09 06:27 am UTC (link)
is there a special variant of snacky's law for the pompously long-winded?

Oh man, I propose the

Condescending Corollary:
When, in the course of an online controversy, the accused/attacked party regards the 'masses' or 'mobs' as peons, minions, underlings, plebes, unwashed masses, common mobs, and the like, the offender a) loses the discussion and b) receives an invitation to the Cabal of the Cavalier, hand-scrawled on elegantly faded parchment by Italian monks.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: - [info]cimorene111, 2003-10-09 06:34 am UTC
Re: - tocomfortyou, 2003-10-09 06:57 am UTC
Re: - [info]cimorene111, 2003-10-09 07:10 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]biichan, 2003-10-09 10:07 am UTC
Re: - [info]cimorene111, 2003-10-09 04:35 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]biichan, 2003-10-12 03:24 am UTC
Re: - tocomfortyou, 2003-10-10 01:51 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]biichan, 2003-10-12 03:24 am UTC
Re: - tocomfortyou, 2003-10-12 04:23 am UTC

[info]amakath
2003-10-09 06:30 am UTC (link)
Maybe it's just because it's late, and I've been up since six on very little sleep from the night before, but... my heart burns with hate. Not for the poster herself, as that would be irrational and uncalled for, but certainly for the textual representation thereof. If this is a troll, kudos. You've made me wish for textual Zantac.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: - [info]cimorene111, 2003-10-09 06:35 am UTC
Re: - [info]amakath, 2003-10-09 06:39 am UTC
Re: - [info]cimorene111, 2003-10-09 06:47 am UTC

[info]gairid
2003-10-09 06:36 am UTC (link)
I couldn't help myself...I went and posted to both her troll-y little threads. If it'd been a private journal I wouldn't have bothered but something about her tone, troll or not, really put my back up.

*slinks away*

(Reply to this)


[info]sepiamagpie
2003-10-09 07:42 am UTC (link)
she wrote *laughs*! She loses.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: - [info]cimorene111, 2003-10-09 07:50 am UTC
Re: - [info]sepiamagpie, 2003-10-09 07:52 am UTC

[info]bohicamouse
2003-10-09 07:43 am UTC (link)
('mongrel'? wtf)

At least it's not mutant.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(Reply from suspended user)

[info]veuki
2003-10-09 08:03 am UTC (link)
So I couldn't resist, and...

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]kyuuketsukirui, 2003-10-09 08:10 am UTC
Re: - [info]cimorene111, 2003-10-09 08:20 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]veuki, 2003-10-09 04:51 pm UTC
Re: - [info]cimorene111, 2003-10-09 05:01 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]veuki, 2003-10-09 05:20 pm UTC
Re: - [info]cimorene111, 2003-10-09 05:33 pm UTC

[info]ragnarok
2003-10-09 02:39 pm UTC (link)
There are no words for how stupid this chick is.

Oh, wait, there are. I posted them. Right here.

I couldn't resist. Dammit, I've been slashing Johnny since I was 16. (He and Richard Grieco? So doing it. That's why they can't stand each other. Lovers' tiff, don't ya know.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]delfeus, 2003-10-09 04:18 pm UTC

[info]delfeus
2003-10-09 04:16 pm UTC (link)
You know, for someone who is offended that people like actors because of their looks, she certainly has interesting polls in her journals...

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]veuki, 2003-10-09 04:57 pm UTC
Re: - [info]cimorene111, 2003-10-09 05:08 pm UTC
Re: - [info]delfeus, 2003-10-09 08:15 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]veuki, 2003-10-09 08:41 pm UTC
Re: - [info]delfeus, 2003-10-09 09:12 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]l_s_q, 2003-10-09 05:14 pm UTC

[info]veuki
2003-10-09 05:24 pm UTC (link)
Adding to [info]delfeus' comment, for someone who claims to hate the 'omg wtf lol!!11!1 i <33331 johnny!!1!1' fangirls, she pretty idiotic icons. I've only seen those I'll never be who you want me to be! icons on those ANGSTY INSIPID FANGIRLS WHO <3 JOHNNY DEPP. :p

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]veuki, 2003-10-09 05:24 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mydarkstar, 2003-10-09 09:11 pm UTC

[info]phosfate
2003-10-09 06:17 pm UTC (link)
*dies laughing*

Classic, classic wank. I should see Ed Wood again.

(Reply to this)


rum_tum_tum
2003-10-09 07:46 pm UTC (link)
There was really no need or reason for her to say anything, but she is free to state her opinion as she says... even when it is not asked for or even desired. Maybe some people were cruel to her and disrespectful (which she always was to others though she denies any fault of this). But she did start it and willingly opened herself to any possible havoc and flames. So, she'll have to deal with it until it blows over. Fandom is such a serious thing. And even if one, simple thing is said that rubs someone the completely wrong way, then all hell breaks lose. Degrading someone's passion is a dangerous thing to do, even when you're only stating your opinion of everything or of how you see it. Either shut up and say nothing at all or speak your mind and take the inevitable heat that shall be cast upon you. From her most recent entry at the moment: They spoke with the cruel taunt of childhood bullies upon their breath... Uh-oh, now she really lost this won.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - rum_tum_tum, 2003-10-09 07:47 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]amakath, 2003-10-09 09:02 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2003-10-09 09:41 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]pet, 2003-10-09 11:35 pm UTC

[info]alpheratz
2003-10-10 06:17 am UTC (link)
Another sonnet.

*headdesk*

I actually wanted to comment in her LJ, but she's made it friends-only. Pity. Oh well, at least the "farewell" photo is to die for. *snicker*

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]bohicamouse, 2003-10-10 06:38 am UTC


 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map