Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



hinky ([info]hugsnkisses) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2003-10-12 12:44:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:fun times with aja

The HP wank disappeared around 11pm GMT last night, I was actually reading through the comments when it did and thought I had managed to save a copy, alas it was not to be.

There is however, the un-edited version of what Aja posted, quite different to the version she now has on her journal.

Deleting your wank just isn't cool man, especially if you're "laughing at yourself" (honest) in the first place.

Oh yes, and I just thought I should mention that FW is over a year old now. *pets it*



(Post a new comment)


[info]morganya
2003-10-12 03:22 pm UTC (link)
Ah, the old 'can't take the heat, better haul ass' tactic. How super-brave and self-mocking of you, [info]bnfshavemorefun.

(Reply to this)


[info]hugsnkisses
2003-10-12 03:30 pm UTC (link)
Shall also pimp shavethebnfs. Because, teh funneh.

(Reply to this)

*head explodes*
[info]feenix
2003-10-12 03:38 pm UTC (link)
For once, I can't decide who's outwanking whom: [info]ivyblossom (for banning not only Aja, but her entire damned school, for Christ's sake) or [info]bnfshavemorefun (for the self-wank, then retraction of the self-wank). I mean...wow.

It's like BNF Deathmatch in a ring full of jizz mud.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: *head explodes*
[info]hugsnkisses
2003-10-12 05:49 pm UTC (link)
It's all just one wonderful big circle o' wank. Especially since both parties involved post on FW.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

Re: *head explodes*
[info]delfeus
2003-10-13 07:45 pm UTC (link)
I think it's childish to ban her from the whole site - I could understand Ivy's personal site, but all of it?!

Don't they have better things to do than cat fight?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: *head explodes* - (Anonymous), 2003-10-14 07:06 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2003-10-12 03:53 pm UTC (link)
"Fandom is a democracy", she says. So can we vote the pair of them off?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Ahh-nold is our king!
(Anonymous)
2003-10-12 04:07 pm UTC (link)
There'd be a lot of recounts.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Ahh-nold is our king! - (Anonymous), 2003-10-13 01:14 am UTC
Re: Ahh-nold is our king! - [info]singe, 2003-10-13 02:20 am UTC
Re: Ahh-nold is our king! - [info]singe, 2003-10-13 02:21 am UTC

[info]loki
2003-10-12 04:35 pm UTC (link)
If [info]bnfshavemorefun did it to laugh at herself (and prevent [info]thexhibtionist from posting it for her) why the hell did she alter the original post? That really didn't make any sense. Of course, neither did her rant. I felt like I needed a flow chart and a timeline for the thing.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]yadda
2003-10-12 05:03 pm UTC (link)
I felt like I needed a flow chart and a timeline for the thing.

Actually you probably did. Someone in the know should rig up a "Ivyblossom vs. Aja" timeline. And a veela break-up timeline because I have no idea what's up with that. And oh, hell, someone should just timeline the whole wanky fandom. I'd be like those extremely detailed book timelines they have on HP Lexicon and the like. Only with more stuff.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Barebones HP Fandom Timeline - (Anonymous), 2003-10-13 12:47 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cesare, 2003-10-13 12:57 am UTC
Re: Barebones HP Fandom Timeline - [info]lizardlaugh, 2003-10-13 02:10 am UTC
Re: Barebones HP Fandom Timeline - [info]elfy, 2003-10-13 03:51 am UTC
Re: Barebones HP Fandom Timeline - [info]pradaloz, 2003-10-13 04:41 am UTC
Re: Barebones HP Fandom Timeline - [info]yadda, 2003-10-13 04:53 am UTC
Re: Barebones HP Fandom Timeline - [info]loki, 2003-10-13 05:41 am UTC
Re: Barebones HP Fandom Timeline - (Anonymous), 2003-10-13 05:59 am UTC
Re: Barebones HP Fandom Timeline - snowball, 2003-10-13 08:20 am UTC
Small correction to the timeline - (Anonymous), 2003-10-13 11:08 am UTC
Re: Barebones HP Fandom Timeline - [info]melusine, 2003-10-13 02:24 pm UTC
Re: Barebones HP Fandom Timeline - [info]bookshop, 2003-10-13 06:14 pm UTC

[info]hugsnkisses
2003-10-12 05:52 pm UTC (link)
I don't know. I think she may have deleted the wank because she figured out that wanking yourself doesn't mean you won't still be mocked anyway.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]meril, 2003-10-12 10:20 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]bookshop, 2003-10-13 02:55 pm UTC

[info]pyratejenni
2003-10-12 05:42 pm UTC (link)
Could you turn the comments on for that post?

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]hugsnkisses
2003-10-12 05:47 pm UTC (link)
Oh, I'm not [Bad username: theexhibitionist], no idea who they are. Sorry if my wording was misleading *changes*

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]hugsnkisses, 2003-10-12 05:48 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]oulangi, 2003-10-13 12:25 am UTC

[info]ignatius
2003-10-12 05:45 pm UTC (link)
Wow.

The first time around, I didn't get to click the link until the apology was up, and I didn't really understand what was going on. Now I do, and, wow.

Thing. Of. Beauty.

I swear, if I cared the least bit about Harry/Draco, I'd friend Aja over this. Cuz it's not that often you get such a long rant, such a vitriolic piece of work that has good grammar and spelling, and keeps up it's momentum throughout. I think I need a cigarette.

For what it's worth:
- blocking you from a website where stories and pics other than her own was low, and I can understand why you snapped like that.
- I read your parody through f_w, and I agree it was laughable that she referenced it as a death threat, and got lots of sympathy in response.
-Insulting her for refusing to get into flamewars is a bit much, I think, though I don't know the contexts.
-I really want to know what's going on with Stacey? I think there's something I'm missing there.
-HnK's right; deleting your wank is uncool. I mean, I can understand why you cooled down, and changed the entry to an apology, but deleting it off f_w?

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]hugsnkisses
2003-10-12 05:56 pm UTC (link)
it's not that often you get such a long rant, such a vitriolic piece of work that has good grammar and spelling, and keeps up it's momentum throughout

It really is quite a work of art, I've had [Bad username: theexhibitionist] on my JF flist since the last wank and the (un-cut, grrag) c/p took up about 4 page scrolls. Wonderfully written though.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]pyratejenni
2003-10-12 06:27 pm UTC (link)
-I really want to know what's going on with Stacey? I think there's something I'm missing there.

IIRC, from a person involved somewhat....

Aja and Stacey didn't like each other. Aja planned to do something nasty to Stacey, mutual friend(s) found out about Aja's idea, tried to stop it. Stacey found out that mutal friend(s) were talking to Aja (after Stacey had said she wouldn't have anything to do with them if they continued to talk to Aja), and dropped them.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - tintin, 2003-10-12 08:26 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sagralisse, 2003-10-12 08:49 pm UTC
(no subject) - tintin, 2003-10-12 08:57 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]pyratejenni, 2003-10-12 09:28 pm UTC
(no subject) - tintin, 2003-10-12 10:41 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ignatius, 2003-10-13 04:32 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]bookshop, 2003-10-13 03:00 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]bookshop, 2003-10-13 02:57 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]pyratejenni, 2003-10-13 03:28 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]bookshop, 2003-10-13 04:08 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]pyratejenni, 2003-10-13 07:38 pm UTC

[info]shoiryu
2003-10-12 07:01 pm UTC (link)
...Doesn't Ivy post here, too?

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]schoenschoen
2003-10-12 07:40 pm UTC (link)
Oh, yes indeedy-do. She has an account as well. And if I'm not mistaken, Aja used to hate F_Wank for some reason. *shrug* I really have no idea why, or what that was about, though.

I'm also really amazed she had absolutely *nothing* to say about any of this wank.

And in closing, I'd like to say that I feel for Aja in this situation, but wish that she'd stop snapping and then trying to correct herself to seem more polite. Screw polite, baby - cry kerfluffle and let slip the ferrets of wank!

Or, in other words, let your balls hang out, and screw whoever gets offended by it - they ain't worth it! :D

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]iamtheenemy, 2003-10-12 08:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ingrid, 2003-10-12 08:19 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]shoiryu, 2003-10-12 08:51 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]herring, 2003-10-13 04:44 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]shoiryu, 2003-10-15 06:48 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2003-10-14 07:09 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sagralisse, 2003-10-12 08:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]feenix, 2003-10-13 02:28 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lasultrix, 2003-10-13 05:27 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ev_vy, 2003-10-13 08:06 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]altricial, 2003-10-13 09:24 pm UTC

[info]pet
2003-10-12 09:10 pm UTC (link)
Another unforseen hazard of people posting their own wank: if they dislike how things are going, they can just make it all go away.

I have no opinion on the kerfluffle, both parties seem extraordinarily wanky to me, but posting and then deleting *here?* That's got to win some kind of prize.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]meril, 2003-10-12 10:17 pm UTC
Awards - [info]deejay435, 2003-10-12 10:47 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]feenix, 2003-10-13 01:15 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]redmoose, 2003-10-13 03:11 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]bookshop, 2003-10-13 03:02 pm UTC
You are a goddess. Thank you. WANK FOR THE AGES.
[info]redpanda
2003-10-13 03:27 am UTC (link)
*tries to read all that and goes cross-eyed* God, that is about the spoogiest thing I've seen here yet. Here's a nice big steamy cup of "get over yourself" for ya, Aja! *toasts*

(Reply to this)


(Anonymous)
2003-10-13 05:23 am UTC (link)
She re-edited some of the post the first time because CC commented and asked that references to her be removed as she felt she was being us as leverage and she didn't appreciate that. Looks like that comment got removed, though. Shame.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]elfy, 2003-10-13 07:25 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2003-10-13 09:22 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]elfy, 2003-10-13 09:23 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2003-10-13 07:59 am UTC (link)
Just thought that you guys would like to know.... Stacy's back. (http://www.livejournal.com/users/phatphatkitty/76587.html) Shame that she's disabled commenting.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]feenix, 2003-10-13 08:13 am UTC
Feeling clueless - [info]anglinsbees, 2003-10-13 09:28 am UTC
Re: Feeling clueless - [info]lori, 2003-10-13 10:29 am UTC
Re: Feeling clueless - [info]rebeccasama, 2003-10-13 11:03 am UTC
Re: Feeling clueless - [info]anglinsbees, 2003-10-13 05:24 pm UTC
Re: Feeling clueless - [info]feenix, 2003-10-13 06:12 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]delfeus, 2003-10-13 07:58 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lulinda, 2003-10-13 08:28 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]thelame, 2003-10-13 12:09 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sajasma, 2003-10-13 01:03 pm UTC
Re: - [info]thelame, 2003-10-13 01:36 pm UTC

[info]weaverandom
2003-10-13 11:03 am UTC (link)
Hee, so very amusing. I was one of those who also missed the wank in its original form, and I'm eternally grateful to you for saving it.

Wankety wankety wank.

(Reply to this)


[info]thelame
2003-10-13 12:08 pm UTC (link)
I like it because it has the phrase "although phatphatkitty continually harrassed me".

How do you get someone to call you something like phatphatkitty with no irony?

Can everyone please refer to me as "iceicecarrie" from now on?

Thanks.

My life needs more sleep.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2003-10-14 12:26 am UTC

[info]parlance
2003-10-14 04:50 am UTC (link)
Oh yes, and I just thought I should mention that FW is over a year old now. *pets it*

A year since the LJ version, right? JF hasn't been around that long, has it?

(Reply to this)


[info]belldandy
2003-10-14 07:40 am UTC (link)
look, somebody made a poll about it.

apologies to mods if this post was against f_w policy.

(Reply to this)


 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map