Mock. Mockmockmock. Mockity-mock-mock

3:31pm: When LJ Rapists Attack!
anniemoon puts a distinctly new spin on rape wank.

Is it possible to kind of, sort of, maybe, agree with the gist of an argument (the slang is irritating) and still find it wanky in how over-the-top the indignation flies over such a non-issue? I'm so confused.

7:32pm: boiz suX0r
Moment of Zen. These are the hard-hitting questions, my friends. Is it sexist to say girls give better hugs than boys do? Do we truly have the right to judge literature, even if it's </i>really fucking bad</i>? Does posting your thoughts on a post someone else makes in a public discussion forum automatically mean you're reading too much into it? Is a single word of this thread on topic? And of course, the eternal question--Why do girls need boys anyway?

Let it be said that whatever the intent of the poem was I refuse to watch chick flicks, much less cry at them. I do however know exactly what girls feel like. Raaaaaaawr.

9:24pm: When Mary Sues attack, part two...
Remember the girl I posted about awhile back on PotterSues getting all wanky because her poor little 10-year old Death Eater got raked over the coals by the journal?

It gets better.

How much better? This Mary Sue is 228 comments better!

Massive wankfest, guys - not only does the Mary Sue author find her Sue has been trashed, she brings in her baby 'sister', her 'friends' *for whom English is obviously a second, third, and fourth language*, and every other sockpuppet she can think of to defend her work of 'prose' with, and proceeds to cuss every 'asswhole' in the community until she's blue in the face. Yes, folks, this one has almost everything - sockpuppets, claims of fatal diseases, bad spelling...

The only thing it's missing is the tinhattery we get to see with the DomLijah! crowd. ;_; And I miss the tinhattery, too.