Mock. Mockmockmock. Mockity-mock-mock

History

14th December 2006

9:13am: Does anyone do anything at Milliways except wank? Like order drinks?
I am OFFENDED. Practically my college motto, there.

Why?

Well, the OP doesn't go into details but we get told in a comment that it's because Claire from Heroes entered Milliways while only in a towel.

Cue [info]metaphor trying not to cry, [info]daniidebrabant internet lawyering about child porn and minors, [info]oh_envy jumping in to point out Heroes has graphic gore, and [info]becky_h saying there's no actual kid being hurt so everyone stop overreacting. Because otherwise, [info]dieinahole's dangerous Nuke Sequence's being tripped would have killed us all.

[info]birdseyeview wants to know why nobody thinks of the bisexuals people that weren't offended.

And then finally, [info]sockarooni pops up to make an 'ad homimem attack' that informs people the player in question is a skeeze and talks about his sexual fantasies in a teen-friendly enviroment. Which sheds a whole new light on everything so far to the point that [info]becky_h backs down.

Oh, and just noticed the OP's location is listed as "The Valley of dispair with my anti-wank (hopefully) rifle". Uh-huh.

Edit: Comments from [info]darksunlight aka Mitch make it seem like he's the person the OP is complaining about and according to [info]piobaireachd, they'd practically started a poll on how long it would be before something like that happened, though 'they' is unspecified and it seems to be a complaint about a general trend rather than whoever plays Claire and explains that comment here in a comment to this post. And hey, look, spelling lessons!

[info]viridian tosses in her two cents, and explains herself a little further in comments to this post.

And we have a reaction post in the journal of Claire's player informing us we're all crazy because it's only fiction, while [info]sepiamagpie informs us in comments to this post that Mitch smells -- or probably not, but he's definitely part of the skeevy squad.

Edit II: IC reactions! One per link. Or, IC in the sense that two other muns pull the towel stunt, kindly reported to us by [info]piobaireachd. And two other people get a friend here on JF to toss in their two cents about Mitch's skeeviness. And [info]muffinbutt, weighs in on the game rules concerning how the towel-scene would have happened, speaking from the point of authority as 'a current Bar Mod, Co-Barman, and former game mod'.

Edit III: It's the wank that keeps on giving and got duked out in comments over here! The comment in which [info]piobaireachd pointed out the IC reactions is jumped upon by a self-proclaimed Towel'd Mun and they have a little chat about disliking players versus characters and the difference between drama whoring that creates more work for mods and a good, sarcastic reaction.

Edit IV: Annnd now [info]anonon who IDs his/herself as the other Towel'd Mun, jumps in to give her side of the argument, also in comments to this post. I'm starting to feel like it should be getting quoted over on [info]wankitywank by this point.
Current Mood: Flippant
11:44am: Because dolls are what brings in the wank
American Girl dolls. Sounds completely harmless right? Yeah, well, they are a small yet drama-filled fandom indeed!

Apparently, AG Fans, a message board for the fandom, is full of mods that discriminate and need to be in control no matter what. These mods added a new rule recently.

Religious discussions and/or photos will be allowed, but limited to religious holidays and/or celebrations that have been presented on the AG website, in AG publications, and/or in AG products, as they are now or previously have been portrayed by AG.

Ahh, here comes the mad people~ A mod over at ag_over_18 on LiveJournal, I hear, was warned on AGFans for posting a series called "Otters teaches Paganism" that was nice and informative. They're widely considered on AGPlaythings to be some of the best albums done, but it's just not appropriate according to the mods at AGFans. Not only that, but the AGFans mods are banning people for being a part of the LiveJournal community. Obviously, the can't stand not having control over everything and everyone everywhere. The mod at ag_over_18 is not happy about this.

It's not just her that's bothered by this...

People are not happy. )

Here is the link for anyone who happens to be a member Please don't go signing up just to see it, though. Every single comment to the post agreed with the original poster on both of the posts I mentioned.

There's more to it somewhere, I'm sure, but I don't know every detail.

EDIT:

a friend: Oh, here's more.
a friend: You can't see any posts--INCLUDING the rules--until you join.
a friend: But you have to agree to the rules to join.
a friend: So you have to agree to the rules before you're allowed to read them in order to read them.

EDIT(aka copypasta ftw):

I think it's important to include that someone from that board *must* have joined the LJ com to get a lot of the info, and that users *and* IP's are banned [from AGFan].
And, maybe that one ag18 thinks they might have too widely banned IPs to include the AG headquartters, but we haven't confirmed that yet. Still funny though.
Current Mood: Mildly Amused
2:59pm: Could I BE any more wronged?
Thanks to the mousie on [info]wank_report for this.

[info]boy_ish has been on F_W before as [info]thetrainsinkaos but I'll be damned if I can find her wanks.

Background: A long time ago, in a CSI slash community far away... )


Now: [info]dagdrommer, a Nick/Greg writer who lives in Norway, has a husband who collects Coke cans.

boy_ish offers to send a can, but asks about compensation for shipping to Norway. dagdrommer says of course she'll pay for shipping and things look dandy.

A little later, kennedy_unknown, who is already sending a CD to dagdrommer, offers to send a Coke can along with it. dagdrommer informs boy_ish of this and that's where things get weird:

[info]boy_ish: Well it's a pretty crappy thing to do for somebody to pop in and 'help' when somebody else was already in the process, and "neglect" to even tell them about it.

[info]kennedy_unknown: Oh, for crap's sake. I'm sorry I didn't get your press release, otherwise I wouldn't have dared pick up a can. If you like, I'll just drink it, throw it out and you can send Dag an invoice for your troubles.

THRILL as old wanks are rehashed! CHILL as it is not [info]boy_ish's fault! WONDER as they split hairs about layout colors! MARVEL at the-- Well, just MARVEL:

You saw the effort I made--the places I was willing to go to genuinely make it better so we could all frickin' get along, but since I'd DARED to acknowledge mango's GENUINE agenda against me in a FRIENDS LOCKED journal entry, my every effort was deemed invalid and unworthy.

and

Please. You rub your freakin' self the wrong way. You choose to get worked up over nothing, and the fact that you have people who feel 'the same' as you do makes it a million times easier, and more likely.

Also, I've NEVER flamed anybody, and nor have I claimed "constructive criticism" (though "the mods" sure as hell have when attacking others--you have to be "prepared" for it and "able to deal with it" in that community!).

And, duh, how in the god damn *world* could it not bother me?? Could I not continue bringing up how SERIOUSLY wronged I was?? I know you don't get that--because you refuse, and will forever refuse to believe you've done anything wrong. Blame only goes on one side, and it's all about blame with you guys.
Current Mood: *sporfle!*
Powered by JournalFen