(Post a new comment)

	cmikhailovic 2003-10-28 12:00 am UTC (link)
	Said sarcastic review is here, btw. What I'm wondering is, how the fucking fuck can anyone not realize that's sarcasm? I mean, the author of the story in question writes horrible Mary Sues, and should therefore be given the benefit of the doubt where braincells (lack of) are concerned -- but the complainers have no such excuse. (Reply to this)(Thread)

	ishtar79 2003-10-28 12:06 am UTC (link)
	I know. I was just struck by the complete pointlessness of the whole thread. Why start it in the first place? Btw, love your icon. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) -

cmikhailovic, 2003-10-28 12:14 am UTC

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2003-10-28 03:00 am UTC

ahiru
2003-10-28 12:30 am UTC (link)

I dunno, I'm sure there are plenty of people who wouldn't be able to realize the sarcasm there. Hell, recently a classmate of mine showed her stupidity by complaining about an obviously sarcastic, meant-to-be-funny article in the school's local community forum-type paper (which is pretty much never serious except when people are debating or something), and then when she was informed that the whole thing was a joke, she replied that if something didn't have a disclaimer saying it was meant to be funny she took it seriously. And this is a college student I'm talking about.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) -

darthfi, 2003-10-28 12:38 am UTC

(no subject) -

ivyincubus, 2003-10-28 03:17 am UTC

(no subject) -

darthfi, 2003-10-28 10:30 am UTC

(no subject) -

sajasma, 2003-10-28 07:56 pm UTC

(no subject) -

maev_connacht, 2003-10-28 11:19 pm UTC

(no subject) -

nevadafighter, 2003-10-28 07:11 am UTC

(no subject) -

darthfi, 2003-10-28 10:30 am UTC

Re: -

nevadafighter, 2003-10-28 11:34 am UTC

(no subject) -

darthfi, 2003-10-28 12:35 pm UTC

Re: -

nevadafighter, 2003-10-28 11:11 pm UTC

(no subject) -

split, 2003-10-28 12:40 am UTC

(no subject) -

redina, 2003-10-28 06:26 am UTC

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2003-10-28 05:00 pm UTC

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2003-10-28 07:09 am UTC

Re: -

split, 2003-10-28 09:56 am UTC

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2003-10-28 05:04 pm UTC

	Scrumptious (Anonymous) 2003-10-28 05:52 am UTC (link)
	I just got here, and frankly, the review's much better than the fic; starting a thread over it is rather wanky. And the author (of the fic, not the review) has my name... Camilla (Reply to this)(Parent)

	(Anonymous) 2003-10-28 10:25 pm UTC (link)
	Not only do some people not recognize sarcasm they willfully misconstrue it. headdesk -ari_o (Reply to this)(Parent)

	ignatius 2003-10-28 12:13 am UTC (link)
	Regarding the sarcastic review- This sort of thing shouldn't happen here. I thought we were all better than that. sporfle (Reply to this)

That's FAP for you

(Anonymous)
2003-10-28 01:09 am UTC (link)

Hypersensitive Mother Teresa: Friends, Romans, countrymen, it is a sad, sad day for HP fandom. While in other corners of the fandom that at least more than five people care about, there are plagiarism threats running wild and BNF-blacklisting, right here on our own turf, someone has left a sarcastic review for another sweet, innocent ~~twelve-year-old~~ CITIZEN WITH RIGHTS TOO.

Stupid Teenagers: THAT PERSON IS MEEN!!!! FA IS FOR FLOWERS AND BUNNIES!!!!!!!1111!!!11

All in a day at FAP.

(Reply to this)

deejay435
2003-10-28 01:32 am UTC (link)

I just think it's funny that three pages of people are jumping to defend the girl whose response to the geniune, though negative, reviews was to say "Neeener! I'm NOT a MARY SUE and you can't prove it! And since I got negative reviews I'm never posting here again, you'll have to find the rest on ff.n! Neener!"

And, you know, that most of them were all jumping in with opinions on how evil, horrendous, awful the review was without even *seeing* said review.

(Reply to this)

	(Anonymous) 2003-10-28 02:10 am UTC (link)
	Yeah they so fukking stoopid over at FAP, right. Because they're laffing at sarkhasm and like that rooollllzzzz. Yeah it's like fukk them. Cuz they no nuffink and like sarkhasm is fukking funy. yeah. show them fukkers rit their. (Reply to this)(Thread)

	amakath 2003-10-28 02:17 am UTC (link)
	Okay! (Reply to this)(Parent)

	ignatius 2003-10-28 02:19 am UTC (link)
	No no, it's not sarkhasm, it's "sarchasm." (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) -

terminal_frost, 2003-10-28 04:52 am UTC

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2003-10-28 12:36 pm UTC

(no subject) -

sajasma, 2003-10-28 07:59 pm UTC

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-03-24 03:40 am UTC

	ladybirdsleeps 2003-10-28 02:25 am UTC (link)
	I tried to find the funny, but the funny eluded me. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) -

franzeska, 2003-10-28 05:14 am UTC

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2003-10-28 12:36 pm UTC

	phosfate 2003-10-28 04:51 pm UTC (link)
	Okay! (Reply to this)(Parent)

	amakath 2003-10-28 02:18 am UTC (link)
	Mocking? Dude, who wastes their time like that? Heh. Heh heh. What a charming little wank. nitro, your post was teh rawk. (Reply to this)(Thread)

	(Anonymous) 2003-10-28 02:39 am UTC (link)
	Well, to be fair, I do mock plenty of people--I just don't waste my time typing it/making it myself. I suppose that's because I use the back button regularly. There's plenty to be mocked without dragging clueless Mary-Sue writers into it. I really didn't think it got wanky until the so-called culprit came by and said 'Hey, it was me, everybody look!' (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: -

amakath, 2003-10-28 02:53 am UTC

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2003-10-28 02:58 am UTC

(no subject) -

pyratejenni, 2003-10-29 02:48 am UTC

(no subject) -

terminal_frost, 2003-10-28 04:54 am UTC

(no subject) -

psychofangirl, 2003-10-28 05:08 am UTC

Re: -

terminal_frost, 2003-10-28 05:10 am UTC

(no subject) -

dawnswalker, 2003-10-28 07:35 am UTC

(no subject) -

psychofangirl, 2003-10-28 07:37 am UTC

(no subject) -

sajasma, 2003-10-28 08:01 pm UTC

Re: -

amakath, 2003-10-28 07:56 am UTC

(no subject) -

mariagoner, 2003-10-28 09:15 am UTC

(no subject) -

grindelwald, 2003-10-28 09:47 am UTC

	pyratejenni 2003-10-28 02:26 am UTC (link)
	I told them they made it here. I'm cruel that way. "A fic is like a baby." .... Jeezus' effin' Keee-rist! (Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) -

darkrose, 2003-10-28 02:58 am UTC

(no subject) -

pyratejenni, 2003-10-28 03:03 am UTC

(no subject) -

ecchaniz0r, 2003-10-28 08:38 pm UTC

You called? -

amakath, 2003-10-28 03:11 am UTC

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2003-10-28 03:24 am UTC

Someone shoot the messenger - (Anonymous), 2003-10-28 05:56 am UTC

(no subject) -

nitro, 2003-10-28 07:35 am UTC

(no subject) -

shoiryu, 2003-10-28 08:45 am UTC

(no subject) -

phosfate, 2003-10-28 04:55 pm UTC

(no subject) -

dawnswalker, 2003-10-28 07:34 am UTC

(no subject) -

mooncalf, 2003-10-28 08:02 am UTC

(no subject) -

darthfi, 2003-10-28 11:33 am UTC

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2003-10-28 12:40 pm UTC

(no subject) -

darthfi, 2003-10-28 11:26 pm UTC

(no subject) -

limyaael, 2003-10-28 11:01 pm UTC

Oh so true. -

dontgiveahoot, 2003-10-29 06:54 am UTC

(no subject) -

smo, 2003-10-29 08:54 pm UTC

	iczer6 2003-10-28 02:51 am UTC (link)
	headdesk The eternal wank of how you can never, ever, ever tell anyone that you dislike their story. It's has an odd but compelling beauty to it. Icz (Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) -

pyratejenni, 2003-10-28 03:05 am UTC

(no subject) -

mariagoner, 2003-10-28 09:14 am UTC

(no subject) -

pyratejenni, 2003-10-29 02:51 am UTC

(no subject) -

phosfate, 2003-10-28 04:57 pm UTC

(no subject) -

sagralisse, 2003-10-29 06:51 am UTC

	fap fap fap fap fap fap uNF! (Anonymous) 2003-10-28 03:15 am UTC (link)
	It isn't possible for me to get a code out of this, is it? Since, y'know, we all want another antichrist on journalfen. And Fandom Wank is just begging for more sarcasm. - ~~teh eville~~ Greenie. (Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: fap fap fap fap fap fap uNF! -

ignatius, 2003-10-28 03:51 am UTC

	psychofangirl 2003-10-28 04:34 am UTC (link)
	It made LJ Drama! WHOO! HOO! (Reply to this)

	deejay435 2003-10-28 05:38 am UTC (link)
	How evil am I that the OP's impassioned plea to let the thread die already just makes me want to get a screen-name over there and say something? Yeah. Evil. Good thing I'm also lazy. (Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) -

nitro, 2003-10-28 07:13 am UTC

(no subject) -

deejay435, 2003-10-28 03:32 pm UTC

sockpuppet? - (Anonymous), 2003-10-28 10:33 pm UTC

Re: sockpuppet? -

deejay435, 2003-10-29 12:11 am UTC

	(Anonymous) 2003-10-28 08:07 am UTC (link)
	rolling eyes Okay, I think the re-wank here and on ljdrama has now surpassed the original thread. There is no winner when it comes to HP fandom. Sigh. (Reply to this)

grindelwald
2003-10-28 09:50 am UTC (link)

They all hated me, it was true. A conspiricy that has been going on for years - it wasn't really the principal behind the review, that was just the excuse they used to attack. In reality, they're all against me - even the ones who don't know who I am. They're coming to get me even as I write this. That's why I had to post. So if I disappear, you know what's going on.

I'd write more, but I can't see my computer screen; it's covered in wank.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) -

weaverandom, 2003-10-28 12:01 pm UTC

Re: -

grindelwald, 2003-10-28 12:10 pm UTC

Re: -

weaverandom, 2003-10-28 12:25 pm UTC

(no subject) -

grindelwald, 2003-10-28 12:45 pm UTC

Re: -

weaverandom, 2003-10-28 12:52 pm UTC

(no subject) -

grindelwald, 2003-10-28 12:59 pm UTC

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2003-10-28 12:44 pm UTC

(no subject) -

grindelwald, 2003-10-28 12:54 pm UTC

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2003-10-28 01:15 pm UTC

(no subject) -

amasaglajax, 2003-10-28 05:32 pm UTC

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2003-10-29 07:28 pm UTC

(no subject) -

sajasma, 2003-10-28 08:06 pm UTC

(no subject) -

sagralisse, 2003-10-29 06:55 am UTC

Re: -

grindelwald, 2003-10-29 07:05 am UTC

(no subject) -

sagralisse, 2003-10-29 07:09 am UTC

(no subject) -

grindelwald, 2003-10-29 07:21 am UTC

Mmmmmm.... cream cake. -

sagralisse, 2003-10-29 07:24 am UTC

Hi! - (Anonymous), 2003-10-28 02:31 pm UTC

Re: Hi! - (Anonymous), 2003-10-28 03:12 pm UTC

(no subject) -

ishtar79, 2003-10-28 05:47 pm UTC

esseilte
2003-10-28 11:06 am UTC (link)

You know, I can't get to the original review page at the moment due to FAP maintenance. But one thing did make me laugh. Well, two things, actually, since I thought the mock-review was hilarious. The very next review on the page was basically a flame, in true ff.net style. Did anyone mention that? Nope, of course not.

But then, god forbid anyone use sarcasm in a review. Truly evil - evil, I tell you! We need snuggles and puppies and...oh, screw it.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) -

pyratejenni, 2003-10-29 03:11 am UTC

(no subject) -

dontgiveahoot, 2003-10-29 07:08 am UTC

Icon, AAAAAAAH! -

iczer6, 2003-10-29 08:05 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2003-10-28 11:49 am UTC (link)

What is really sad is that fact that the 'moral' starter of the FAP thread saw a review praising a fiction, and actually took the time to owl the person to see what it was all about, make many owls to them, then start a thread about it, respond throughout the thread, get her friends to suggest banning the reviewer, review the fiction herself, owl the author, and STILL think she's hot shit.

I mean, bloody hell! Who goes to that much effort over a mocking review?

-Muffs

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) -

darthfi, 2003-10-28 12:36 pm UTC

(no subject) -

sagralisse, 2003-10-29 06:59 am UTC

(no subject) -

phosfate, 2003-10-28 04:51 pm UTC

(no subject) -

pyratejenni, 2003-10-29 03:03 am UTC

	(Anonymous) 2003-10-28 02:15 pm UTC (link)
	flashback to "Rated K for Kids by Kids" I give this an R. For Riddikulus. (Reply to this)