Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Rebecca ([info]rebeccasama) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2003-11-27 01:18:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:bnf, fandom: harry potter, person: cassie clare

Hey guys, we got another mention. *g*

http://www.livejournal.com/users/epicyclical/163582.html#cutid1



(Post a new comment)


[info]kyuuketsukirui
2003-11-27 08:45 am UTC (link)
*reads* Cause I *read* f_w to find out whether Cassie Claire has a boyfriend or not. *eyeroll* Whatevah. Dude, Cassie. Get over yourself.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]cesare
2003-11-27 09:20 am UTC (link)
But Grace, obviously we're all into fandom just so we can follow the dramas and gossip about the BNFs! What other use do LNFs serve??

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]iczer6, 2003-11-27 10:03 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mariagoner, 2003-11-28 12:56 am UTC

[info]sorchar
2003-11-27 08:59 am UTC (link)
Evidently she doesn't understand that any sort of speculation involving her, Aja, a boyfriend, a Golden Retriever, etc. was probably tongue-in-cheek, and people really don't give a shit about her private life.

I say "probably" because I don't recall said speculation. Of course, I lost interest in that wank when people tried to actually start fighting the battle within it, instead of just pointing and mocking. It just wasn't teh_funny anymore.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]rebeccasama
2003-11-27 11:45 am UTC (link)
Yes, I also recall no speculation about her boyfriend. I tend to think she's just making stuff up sometimes to make us look even meaner. *g* Not about to wade through that pile of HP wank to find out the truth though.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]sajasma, 2003-11-27 05:32 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]photosinensis, 2003-11-28 01:14 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ignatius, 2003-11-28 02:43 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]delfeus, 2003-11-30 05:38 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]katsaris, 2003-11-28 03:27 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]arabel, 2003-11-29 11:22 am UTC

[info]mariagoner
2003-11-28 12:57 am UTC (link)
Wanker = Someone Who thinks Everything Revolves around her Ass Hole.

There we go. That's the most concise definition of a wanker (and apparently CAssandra Claire) yet.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]necronomist
2003-11-27 09:33 am UTC (link)
Yeah, the 10 Unpopular Fandom Opinions tend to get wanky, and she's no exception.

(Greasy I will go with. Bohunk?)

(Reply to this)(Thread)

*takes a bow for inventing that one*
[info]redpanda
2003-11-28 08:10 am UTC (link)
Well, at least I took the "Unpopular Opinions" one and added a new spin because I was bored stupid at work. Do I get any kind of gold star for sowing discord? *bounces*

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: *takes a bow for inventing that one* - [info]necronomist, 2003-11-28 08:16 am UTC

[info]meril
2003-11-27 09:55 am UTC (link)
She must have missed all the Gaia Online wank posts. And the various LJ comm wank. And the icon theft wank.

But anyway, can we declare some sort of thingy where we don't post about Cassandra Claire? 'Cause, frankly, her LJ isn't anything out of the ordinary, and that last post about her here wasn't even about real wank (she was trying to defuse the potential wank in fact.) Unless she does something that is completely out of line or makes you go WTF or whatever, there's no there there. It's not wanky to have an LJ that's only really entertaining to your friends. That's what LJ is for.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]lavenderfrost
2003-11-27 11:24 am UTC (link)
Hmmm. Good point, although I must beg to differ a little bit.

I've never really minded the CC mentions. I mean, it's not like we do it on a regular basis, ya know? *shrugs* I mean, this is only the second mention in like, 2 months. And considering the number of wanks that get posted throughout the day on a near-daily basis, I'd say CC is one of the smaller things that f_w focuses on.

Now if we had a specific f_w custom that had "Daily CassieWank Updates" or something like that, *that* would be wanky. *nodnod*

Love the icon, BTW. *grins and pets it*

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]rebeccasama, 2003-11-27 11:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]meril, 2003-11-28 11:00 pm UTC

[info]mariagoner
2003-11-28 12:58 am UTC (link)
Hey... CC is like our own little Fandom Wank fairy. She has to be mentioned! It's the closest thing to tradition we have!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]pyratejenni
2003-11-28 05:38 am UTC (link)
Actually, I found that last comment of hers -- the one in this post -- a sort-of confirmation that she was talking about f_w the community in my "Let us hang our heads in shame. Or something," entry.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]bloodysakura
2003-11-27 10:24 am UTC (link)
I know I'm amused. What a thinly veiled stab at all those meanies at F_W. Like we have nothing better to do than discuss her personal life? And people ask me why I refuse to read any of the Potter books and/or get within ten miles of the fandom.

Ms Claire seems happy that all those sock puppet journal have her friended, though. *snicker*

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]redmenace
2003-11-27 11:22 am UTC (link)
Like we have nothing better to do than discuss her personal life?

Although, when she makes one comment about us, its immediately noted and suddenly she's spotlit again. Shove her off the stage, there are other splurts to wade through.

I question if this particular post of hers was wanky enough that it needed a post on F_W. If you pointed out everyone that had a vendetta against F_W, you'd need a whole new community. Boring, something new please.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]rebeccasama, 2003-11-27 11:48 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2003-11-27 09:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]redmenace, 2003-11-27 10:11 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]pyratejenni, 2003-11-28 05:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]photosinensis, 2003-11-28 01:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]redpanda, 2003-11-28 08:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]elfy, 2003-11-28 10:56 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]darkrose, 2003-11-28 12:56 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]fuzzytowers, 2003-11-30 03:01 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]katsaris, 2003-11-28 03:39 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]delfeus, 2003-11-30 05:42 pm UTC

[info]elfy
2003-11-27 10:32 am UTC (link)
Another Cassie Claire honerable mention. Go us.

And, oh, but I've learnt all I know about the HP fandom from fandom_wank!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]mariagoner, 2003-11-28 01:00 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]elfy, 2003-11-28 10:53 am UTC

[info]lavenderfrost
2003-11-27 11:16 am UTC (link)
CC: OMG I hate F_W they're always so mean to meeeeeeeeeeee!!!!

Dude...We've talked about her maybe *twice* in the past month or two.

Yep. We're obsessed, and she is SO persecuted. *rolls eyes*

Fandom Wank - We're like the Spanish Inquisition...in a way.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]redmoose, 2003-11-27 06:14 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]rhi_silverflame, 2003-11-27 10:36 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]dae, 2003-11-27 11:12 pm UTC

[info]electric_sheep
2003-11-27 12:14 pm UTC (link)
Only #2? Dammit! TRY HARDER PEOPLE!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]charabok, 2003-11-27 02:12 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]musicdiamond, 2003-11-27 08:49 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lavenderfrost, 2003-11-28 12:49 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]musicdiamond, 2003-11-28 01:26 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]electric_sheep, 2003-11-28 01:30 am UTC
Huh?
[info]ereshkigal
2003-11-27 12:37 pm UTC (link)
Uhuh... I still say Sarah T could her ass to hell and back any day of the week. She never had to make up shit to bitch about us with. *smiles fondly at the memories* Good time, good times.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Huh? - [info]redhead, 2003-11-27 10:41 pm UTC
Re: Huh? - [info]dae, 2003-11-27 11:15 pm UTC
Re: Huh? - [info]smo, 2003-11-28 12:42 am UTC
Re: Huh? - [info]photosinensis, 2003-11-28 01:21 am UTC
Re: Huh? - [info]electricchick, 2003-11-28 05:07 am UTC
Re: Huh? - [info]elfy, 2003-11-28 10:51 am UTC
Re: Huh? - [info]panthea, 2003-11-30 06:49 am UTC

[info]miztia
2003-11-27 04:02 pm UTC (link)
Since I couldn't give a toss what anyone thinks about Fandom_Wank, I don't have much to say on this one.

I personally find it amusing, and frankly? It keeps fandom in perspective, reminds me of how utterly ridiculous people can be, and are, often letting it consume their lives over something so insignificant like a crappy television show. That alone deserves a piss-taking.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]chash, 2003-11-27 04:49 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sajasma, 2003-11-27 05:35 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]senor_pinata, 2003-11-27 06:39 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cesare, 2003-11-28 03:31 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]miztia, 2003-11-28 11:53 pm UTC

[info]ingrid
2003-11-27 04:47 pm UTC (link)
I see nothing wrong with getting my HP news from F_W.

At least it looks vaguely interesting from this perspective.

Besides, nothing I've read anywhere else (my flist, random HP journals) contradicts the basic premise presented here -- HP is a wank paradise crammed with bloated, melodramatic egomaniacs and semi-illiterate squealers who OMGLUVTHMSOOOMCH!!!!

Yep. That sounds about right.

;)

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]rann, 2003-11-27 05:47 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]darkrose, 2003-11-27 06:12 pm UTC
Comes Down from Mountain to Dispense Wisdom - [info]yadda, 2003-11-27 07:48 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]bubosquared, 2003-11-28 01:53 am UTC
I see nothing wrong with Jerry Springer - [info]fuzzytowers, 2003-11-30 03:14 pm UTC

[info]sajasma
2003-11-27 05:36 pm UTC (link)
And I was always under the impression that Cassie loved the attention.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]redmoose, 2003-11-27 06:12 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]rebeccasama, 2003-11-27 09:45 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]fuzzytowers, 2003-11-30 03:20 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lynstraine, 2003-12-01 04:43 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]fuzzytowers, 2003-12-01 02:39 pm UTC

[info]tinybubbles
2003-11-27 05:39 pm UTC (link)

What?! This isn't CNN?!?!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]yadda, 2003-11-27 07:50 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sanguinary, 2003-11-27 10:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]dae, 2003-11-27 11:19 pm UTC
Re: - [info]sanguinary, 2003-11-28 02:43 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2003-11-27 09:54 pm UTC (link)
Although I did enjoy the speculation last go-round at FW that I was peevish at Aja because she had stolen my boyfriend which conversely seemed to exist in a thread stating that I was peevish in general because I did not have a boyfriend and just hung around with gay men all the time. I suspect however my boyfriend found this hilariously funny as most likely did the people I do hang around with all the time, none of whom alas are gay men as my gay friends have all fucked off to China or England, the bastards.

OMG! F_W insinuated that I don't have a boyfriend and that all my friends are gay. What if someone believes them?!!!!!! I shall make a casual, yet, subtle reference to my boyfriend. Maybe it's too subtle. Maybe I should make it clear that I don't have gay friends either.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]photosinensis, 2003-11-28 01:23 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]nell, 2003-11-28 10:42 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2003-11-28 10:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]nell, 2003-11-28 10:57 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]livingadream, 2004-10-14 05:52 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2003-11-28 02:31 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]delfeus, 2003-11-30 05:46 pm UTC

[info]feenix
2003-11-28 04:28 am UTC (link)
2) As Julie said, fandom_wank when it gets vitriolic and personal. Although that's sort of like saying, fandom_wank on most days.

THANK YOU FOR MISSING THE POINT.*

What mostly annoys me is people getting their "fandom news" from fandom_wank. That's like getting your real life news from Jerry Springer.

Yes, Cassie. Everything I learned about HP fandom I learnd through Fandom Wank. Oh, wait...

It's a rumor mill, not CNN. Although I did enjoy the speculation last go-round at FW that I was peevish at Aja because she had stolen my boyfriend which conversely seemed to exist in a thread stating that I was peevish in general because I did not have a boyfriend and just hung around with gay men all the time. I suspect however my boyfriend found this hilariously funny as most likely did the people I do hang around with all the time, none of whom alas are gay men as my gay friends have all fucked off to China or England, the bastards. Hmm, I had a point there. Oh, yes. Dick around with fandom_wank all you like but I reserve the right to think that people who get their "facts" from it are lamers.

Um...okay then. I must have been out sick when we were calling her a faghag or insinuating that Aja was OMG STEELING HR BF, then, since I don't remember that happening either.

Also: Since when did we become the final authoritah on fandom news? And since when did we hand her the Golden Dildo for being the wankiest BNF ever? Wasn't Stacey supposed to be sharing the award with Aja and Ivy? YOU FUCKERS YOU STUFFED THE BALLOT BOX DIDN'Y YOU?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]pyratejenni, 2003-11-28 05:46 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]photosinensis, 2003-11-28 06:53 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mariagoner, 2003-11-28 07:09 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rebeccasama, 2003-11-28 07:02 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2003-11-28 10:49 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2003-11-28 05:45 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2003-11-28 08:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]iczer6, 2003-11-28 09:44 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2003-11-28 11:10 pm UTC
*coughs*
(Anonymous)
2003-11-28 11:35 am UTC (link)
http://www.livejournal.com/users/1anonymous1/91012.html

Check the icon too.

Me.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: *coughs* - (Anonymous), 2003-11-28 07:00 pm UTC
Thanks to Cassie Claire, my dishes turn out SPOTLESS! - (Anonymous), 2003-11-28 10:32 pm UTC
Re: Thanks to Cassie Claire, my dishes turn out SPOTLESS! - [info]nell, 2003-11-28 11:01 pm UTC
Re: *coughs* - [info]feenix, 2003-11-29 12:00 am UTC
Re: *coughs* - [info]ignatius, 2003-11-29 12:23 am UTC
Re: *coughs* - (Anonymous), 2003-11-29 05:38 am UTC
Re: *coughs* - [info]nell, 2003-11-30 04:43 am UTC
Re: *coughs* - [info]delfeus, 2003-11-30 05:51 pm UTC

[info]ahiru
2003-11-29 03:15 am UTC (link)
It's a rumor mill, not CNN.

A rumor mill? Wait, so that means we really are like those bitchy girls from high school! Woo hoo! (So, anyway, I heard from this anon, who heard from this other anon, who heard from a third anon who I thought was a troll but was really just a person pretending to be a troll in order to mess with the head of this real troll, who heard from a fourth anon in the girls' locker room that Cassie Claire's boyfriend was really gay and then he wasn't gay, and then he broke up with her because her pen was bigger than his and then, like, they had a fight in the hallway! OMG!)

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2003-11-29 07:04 am UTC

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map