Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Amasa Glajax ([info]amasaglajax) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2003-11-30 21:28:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:cranky
Entry tags:baleeted post replacement, baleetion, wtf mate

*Deleted entry*




[ucfangirl] 07:16pm - wank question and favorite quotes from the libertine "crisis" otherwise known
mood: Amazed

( ...as why wankers are posting three times a day about her. thanks to Jumble (see below entry) for the links, hilarious! )




AGH. STOP DELETING THINGS BEFORE I FECKING GET A CHANCE TO READ THEM. (Yes, that's right, f_w, are you paying attention to me? SERVE MY EVERY WHIM. O_O)

Ucfangirl, make up your mind, are you gonna report a wank or not? Jeebus.

Seriously though, I get the feeling lots of wank is flying fast and furious far above my head, and I'm sure I'm not alone when I wail piteously, "WTF is going ON?"


(Post a new comment)


[info]shoiryu
2003-12-01 04:38 am UTC (link)
I see your "WTF" and raise you one.

(Reply to this)


(Anonymous)
2003-12-01 04:40 am UTC (link)
I think she deleted the wank because it had been done before, or was embellishing on the earlier posts. *shrugs* All I know is that it's something about Libertine or whoever that person is.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]jumble
2003-12-01 04:43 am UTC (link)
Nah, she deleted the wank because she realized that f_w'ers were going to call her on the fact that she was wanking as much as anyone.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


(Anonymous)
2003-12-01 04:46 am UTC (link)
Is that icon from a potato chip bag?

*wonders*

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]jumble
2003-12-01 04:58 am UTC (link)
To be honest, I have no memory of where I got it, but if it was a potato chip bag, I didn't know about it. :)

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]dunc
2003-12-01 05:54 am UTC (link)
She bears a basic resemblance to the Better Made chip girl...

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]anglinsbees
2003-12-01 09:49 am UTC (link)
Looks more like one of the Girls from the "New Era" brand of Potato chips. They were billed as "More Digestible" in their day.
Must go look for vintage potato chip art now...
(E.J. Who lives Just a few miles down Gratiot Avenue from the Better Made Potato Chip Factory and who Misses New Era Brand Potato Chips.)

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]irk
2003-12-01 07:22 am UTC (link)
It hearkens to me as reminiscent of Wonder Bread art.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

Ucfangirl: A Retrospective
[info]yadda
2003-12-01 04:50 am UTC (link)
There was this girl, ucfangirl and she had a vendetta against this other girl named Libertine. she made this post of some month old libertine wank that had already been posted here. She then deleted her post in embarrassment.

No sooner had this happened then some actual wank exploded on libertine's lj. So that was posted here by [info]jumble. ucfangirl enjoyed this chance to wank some more about libertine. She enjoyed it so much she created a new post in which she recapped the wank again (that's the one you quoted). But wait! The libertine wank turned out to be a fake wank! This really didn't effect ucfangirl much so she continued wanking. Then, ucfangirl realized f_w was more into laughing at her than laughing with her so she deleted everything.

Yeah, that's about it.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Ucfangirl: A Retrospective
[info]shoiryu
2003-12-01 04:54 am UTC (link)
*APPLAUDS*

(Reply to this)(Parent)

Re: Ucfangirl: A Retrospective
[info]rebeccasama
2003-12-01 06:28 am UTC (link)
Good summary. Yet another example of 'personal grudge backfires on F_W' Too bad she deleted all her comments too. Kind of entertaining. And I was even nice to her! *sigh* Oh well.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

Re: Ucfangirl: A Retrospective
[info]sagralisse
2003-12-01 06:59 pm UTC (link)
Didn't anybody point her to [info]i_wank ::pouts::

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Ucfangirl: A Retrospective
[info]mariagoner
2003-12-02 07:51 pm UTC (link)
That site doesn't get as much traffic. And you know wankers. They need traffic.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

Re: Ucfangirl: A Retrospective
[info]anriko
2003-12-02 06:51 am UTC (link)
THANK YOU for clarifying that. Unfortunatley, my head now huts even worse from thrying to understand, and so I shall go and lie down.

Besides, Gilliam there sums it all up perfectly.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]diamonde
2003-12-01 04:54 am UTC (link)
Yes! Damn, I go away for a couple of hours and there's more (deleted) than wank!

Anyone want to provide a summary for those of us that went for a sandwich and missed it? With some, like, names and what the hell actually happened just there? Was wank faked? (Because seriously, that just makes you the biggest wanker, like a troll squared.) Were there multiple identities? Did a BNF die and come back with extra genitalia? If you're such a wimp that you troll then delete all your posts, do you have any genitalia - completely lack balls/ovaries, or are you composed entirely of genitalia - a quivering nutsack/total pussy?

WTF?

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]feenix
2003-12-01 04:57 am UTC (link)
[info]yadda recapped it perfectly.

Also: *sexorz your icon Justin Timberlake-style*

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]jumble
2003-12-01 05:00 am UTC (link)
ucfangirl "implied" that she was a BNF, but stated boldly in her journal, "YOU'LL NEVER FIGURE OUT WHO I AM".

I cared this >< much.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]diamonde
2003-12-01 05:07 am UTC (link)
Oh God, one of those. *facepalm* No, we'll never figure it out, because we don't care. Most of us aren't in your crusty little fandom and wouldn't know you from a hole in the ground. Except to stop and go "wow, that little hole is full of spooge!", wait until the dog is finished pissing in the little hole and then continue our happy walk.

Hee. At least I made it in time for the spitting on others and reassuring ourselves of our own superiority. That's nearly as good as eating our own.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]amasaglajax
2003-12-01 05:45 am UTC (link)
ucfangirl "implied" that she was a BNF, but stated boldly in her journal, "YOU'LL NEVER FIGURE OUT WHO I AM".

OMG THAT'S JUST LIEK ME. I AM DA SEKRIT BNF OF DOOM. NEVER WILT THOU KNOW MAH SEKRIT IDENTITY. *spooges upon cape*

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]oulangi
2003-12-01 06:59 am UTC (link)
I'm betting CC - if only because that's what this wank is missing

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]cmikhailovic
2003-12-01 07:02 am UTC (link)
No, not likely. But UC Fangirl had a really obnoxious whiny icon about CC, so there ya go.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]oulangi
2003-12-01 07:27 am UTC (link)
Misdirection?

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Anonymous)
2003-12-02 04:46 am UTC (link)
I actually thought that the icon was amusing.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]zana16
2003-12-01 10:49 pm UTC (link)
Nah--didn't use enough big words.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]diamonde
2003-12-01 05:00 am UTC (link)
And in the time it takes me to write that, my question is answered. (Thanks!) But I'm still peeved. I missed out on the drama and wank and the eating our young! Suck!

Fake wank is still just wrong, though. As is deleting everything and running away like a little bitch. If you get busted being an axe-grinding prat, take it like a teenie and stand by your wangsty little comments.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]wickedcherub
2003-12-01 05:19 am UTC (link)
I think Lib was just amused that someone took the time to wade through all her entries to bring up a wank 5 weeks old. So she posted a sarcastic bitchy post, just so the girl would have something to wank about.

Lib didn't expect all her friends to just jump in and roleplay the comments as well. It was rather funny though, who in the world seriously says, "We'll burn you! We'll drag your fandom name in the mud!!"

And so the girl who posted the wank didn't do her research and find out that the mailing list did *not* exist, that all the people who were partaking in the parody wank had put disclaimers in their journal, and posted the wank *anyway*.

And I don't know why I just needed to defend all of that. But now the wank is coming from the inside. No place is safe.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]diamonde
2003-12-01 05:26 am UTC (link)
Oh, I get that. I've had my own fake flamewars, and that one was pretty obviously fake when you actually look at it. It's just that fakes on f_w make me cranky because I get all excited and run in going 'yay, wank, wherewherewhere?!' and then it's gone. It's like holding a cookie out over your dog's head until it jumps in a frenzy then eating it.

Deletgirl is obviously chief wanker. I'm just disappointed. I wanted wank, dammit! Hair-pulling and old grudges being aired! It was a vicious tease with no money-shot.

Now I'm going to have to dig out some porn and w- sulk by myself.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]musicdiamond
2003-12-01 05:38 am UTC (link)
Faux wank can be a bummer IF you don't look at it the right way!

Come now--all you have to do is take the multitude of fake wank and turn it over in the right light. This uncgirl dug up old entries for axe-grinding hive vagina feces flinging monkey fun, got called on it, deleted it, posted a new PARODY wank/flamewar for aforementioned axe-grinding & etc fun, was about to get called on it, and finally deleted it. If you ignore the incoherent sentence structure, this is a gal, in essence, wanking all over f_w. Fandom_wank has somehow become part of the wank rather than a not so innocent bystander. It's the ultimate metawank.

Or I might just be going crazy. Either option's equally plausible at this point.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


(Anonymous)
2003-12-01 06:05 am UTC (link)
Um. Libertine here. I'm fairly sure this is a legitimate wank. The wank was all part of a Very Cunning Plan. Wanking at a fandom wank wanker who wanked me wankily, to get wanked for wankiness, thus creating metawank to illustrate the problem of wankers wanking wank wankily.

I think.

Though to be honest it all got out of hand around the bit with the teddybears, really.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]rebeccasama
2003-12-01 09:06 am UTC (link)
Wanking at a fandom wank wanker who wanked me wankily, to get wanked for wankiness, thus creating metawank to illustrate the problem of wankers wanking wank wankily.

Is this like 'How much wank would a fandom wank if a fandom could wank wank?' Sorry. *g* Couldn't resist.

It's amazing how fast these things go downhill for the poster the second they bring up their personal grudge against who they're trying to wank. Oh well. Back to watching the people fight on one of my LOTR lists *sighs* As much as I enjoy this community, I don't suppose there's an ice cube's chance in hell that a fandom could actually get along, is there?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

LOTR
[info]hakainokami
2003-12-01 10:44 am UTC (link)
Much like the ice cube's chances; when hell freezes over.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]elfy
2003-12-01 02:33 pm UTC (link)
*reads*

*goes and lays down with a cold facewasher over her eyes*

It hurts.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]phosfate
2003-12-01 07:11 pm UTC (link)
You what with the what now?

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]minibalrogmum
2003-12-02 07:06 am UTC (link)
I think this is one Very Cunning Plan Baldrick would have been hitten over the head by Blackadder for inventing. It reeks of turnip.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


(Anonymous)
2003-12-02 07:28 am UTC (link)
Reeks of wank, more like.

-Lib.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]smo
2003-12-02 04:28 pm UTC (link)
It's Wank Au Vin - wank run over by a van.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]romana03
2003-12-03 01:09 am UTC (link)
"But how did you get such a lot of wank out of such a small fandom?"

/coat

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]wickedcherub
2003-12-01 05:43 am UTC (link)
Oh! Deletegirl is the ultimate wanker.

Her one unlocked post on her journal read as thus:

I am Undercover Fangirl for wankering purposes. Many of you might agree that saying this in public could get me in trouble. Wrong. Nobody will ever figure out who I am. I, as well, have a backup JF just in case I get mocked by ToS.


The friends-only entries are mocking entries of the fandom BNFs that I truly loathe. Comment if you want me to add you as a friend.

WARNING: I do know many BNFs handle names, so if you are doing this to undermine ME, you'll get what's coming.


That's so wanky in of itself, it doesn't even need commentary.
Though I like how she thinks the ToS will mock her. I'm not sure how that's possible, but you know, the deluded.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]diamonde
2003-12-01 05:50 am UTC (link)
Wow, she IS like Jesus in a way! She's the living embodiment of Wank's will on earth. Or that's how it looks from here.

Though I like how she thinks the ToS will mock her.

Um. Maybe Zorro has a ventriloquist dummy that she writes the ToS on and if people break the rules she brings it around to their house and makes it tell them they're stupid?

I hope not. I hate those things.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


(Anonymous)
2003-12-08 10:14 am UTC (link)
I just wanted to say I *love* your icon, Diamonde :D Tis so funny and horribly true...

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]psychofangirl
2003-12-01 07:20 am UTC (link)
So, basically, she's so BIG and BAD that she went and deleted most of her comments!

Wow! I'm impressed.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]rebeccasama
2003-12-01 09:12 am UTC (link)
The least you could do after you do something dumb is leave your comments up so it looks like you have half a backbone. "I'll post! No! I'll delete the post! Back again! Wait! Must delete my comments! But I'll post again!"

She deleted her journal, what...twice in one day? Is that a record? She seems awfully terrified we'll find out her sooper sekrit identity or something. Whatever.

In itself 'I'm not telling who I am' pisses me off not because I care who she is but because it's amazingly cowardly. There are people who like and don't like me in my fandom, but at least I don't create a sekrit identity for myself so the BNFs don't find out who I am. *horrors* (Of course I also keep my personal grudges of F_W, too....)

Stupid BNFs.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]tos
2003-12-01 09:18 am UTC (link)
Mock, mock, mock.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]prettyamyrose
2003-12-02 01:42 am UTC (link)
*spit take*

Ahaha! YES!

Must stop drinking and reading F_W...

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]cmikhailovic
2003-12-01 05:32 am UTC (link)
Dude, exactly. Here you go.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]sorchar
2003-12-01 11:12 am UTC (link)
Dear ucfangirl,

You remind me of something once said by my good friend, Happy Bunny: You suck and that's sad.

Also, nobody really cares who you are, whether you're a BNF or just another whining wannabe. The cloak and dagger shit just makes you look more like the latter.

Either grow some sac or go away, plz, kthxbi.

(Reply to this)


[info]bunny
2003-12-01 07:40 pm UTC (link)
I've seen her friends-only post about Cassandra Claire, but it was neither wanky nor witty enough to save it, so there you go. Out of curious interest though, does anyone know who "Arthur" is and how he is connected to CC?

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]phosfate
2003-12-01 09:29 pm UTC (link)
Arthur is the name of the giant sea turtle that both women loved and lost.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]shoiryu
2003-12-02 01:57 am UTC (link)
*SNORT* Trying to drink milk here, thanks.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map