(Post a new comment)

	squeakytoy 2003-12-01 12:12 pm UTC (link)
	Life is terribly unfair. I missed the lot! Curses! Foiled again! (Reply to this)(Thread)

	sorchar 2003-12-01 12:16 pm UTC (link)
	Don't worry, she's much more amusing this way. (Reply to this)(Parent)

	munchkinott 2003-12-01 04:01 pm UTC (link)
	proposes deeply perverted sex to your icon ... thud (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	Re: squeakytoy 2003-12-01 10:33 pm UTC (link)
	Ha! Go find your own icons for deeply perverted sex! This one is miiiiine! (Reply to this)(Parent)

	musette 2003-12-02 07:31 am UTC (link)
	Bwahaha, it's the incredible growing Sam boobs photo shoot! Seriously, I about died when I first saw that pic. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	Re: squeakytoy 2003-12-02 08:54 am UTC (link)
	Between the incredible growing boobs and Daniel "check out my biceps" Jackson, the whole shot is way too funny. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	Re: musette 2003-12-02 09:07 am UTC (link)
	But Michael Shanks is hot, so I shan't complain. I'll just sit here and drool over him and laugh at Amanda Tapping's impending back problems. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: -

squeakytoy, 2003-12-02 09:15 am UTC

	starkeymonster 2003-12-02 05:55 pm UTC (link)
	Your icon is a thing of grace and beauty. (Reply to this)(Parent)

morganya
2003-12-01 01:35 pm UTC (link)

Maybe I'm just being paranoid, but this whole thing reeks of setup, if unnecessary setup: Create Soooper Sekrit Identity, post old, fake wank in hopes F_W reveals itself to composed of nothing but shit-slinging backstabbing bitches, then reveal True Identity and watch F_W cower and slink away, tail between our collective legs. If ruse doesn't work, delete everything and resume plotting.

...It might just be paranoia. I haven't been sleeping well lately.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

	Re: sorchar 2003-12-01 01:41 pm UTC (link)
	Eh, I doubt it - more like personal axe-grinding. Though, even if it was an attempted setup, it was still pretty amusing. Stop doing the espresso depth charges. They fuck with yer head, man. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

allyoops
2003-12-01 03:33 pm UTC (link)

Eh, I doubt it - more like personal axe-grinding.

She got her code through me via codes. Something about the Must!Post!To!Fandom!Wank! part struck me as odd (most eager wannabe poster ever), and I wasn't too surprised to see her posting her wank within an hour of recieving her code.

The continued theme of Smite!Libertine reeked of vendetta. Who is this Libertine that she has such an adoring, devoted ~~crazy~~ fan?

And can I order my own from Amazon.com?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	ruaha56 2003-12-01 03:47 pm UTC (link)
	Who is this Libertine that she has such an adoring, devoted crazy fan? I don't know who she is, but wasn't she a part of the Aja-Stacey-Cassie wank that never dies? (Reply to this)(Parent)

Re: -

sorchar, 2003-12-01 06:29 pm UTC

(no subject) -

oulangi, 2003-12-01 11:17 pm UTC

	morganya 2003-12-01 04:32 pm UTC (link)
	I thought your teeth were supposed to grind like that. I also thought there wasn't supposed to be a 'be' before 'composed' in my previous comment. Bugger. (Reply to this)(Parent)

	phosfate 2003-12-01 04:19 pm UTC (link)
	Who what where now? (Reply to this)

	guinevere33 2003-12-01 05:33 pm UTC (link)
	Explanation and back-story may be found here. (Reply to this)(Thread)

	phosfate 2003-12-01 06:22 pm UTC (link)
	Thank you! (Reply to this)(Parent)

	soy_latte 2003-12-01 11:17 pm UTC (link)
	In true wanker fashion she probably will one day undelete and post here again. Or even under another username. (Reply to this)(Thread)

	musicdiamond 2003-12-02 02:41 am UTC (link)
	'Cuz it's just like they taught us in science: wankers are never ~~created or~~ destroyed; they simply change forms! (Reply to this)(Parent)

	unoriginality 2003-12-02 02:40 am UTC (link)
	In all of it, I'm still wondering where she got that name. Because my own little personal inner tinhat is wondering if she's that scary insano-stalker girl that Uncreativity had back in the FF8 fandom. ¬_¬ I doubt it, but part of me wonders if that's not what the 'UC' stood for in her name. ::happily puts on her tinhat and flails about:: (Reply to this)(Thread)

	panthea 2003-12-02 03:03 am UTC (link)
	I think it stood for "undercover". As in "I AM UNDERCOVER YOU WILL NEVER FIND OUT WHO I REEELLY AM AHAHAHAHA". Just my take. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	Re: unoriginality 2003-12-02 03:48 am UTC (link)
	::nodnod:: More than likely. ^_^ I just couldn't help but wonder. But, as I said, 'twas only my personal inner tinhat speaking. XD (Reply to this)(Parent)

(Anonymous)
2003-12-02 05:52 am UTC (link)

ufangurl blah immature blah no wanks for her because of one mistake blah blah libertine bitch blah blah

Can we please have a NEW wank? This wank has carried on far too long, and it's gotten pathetic, because there's no sign she's going to return, and Libertine has been wanked a million times and enjoys it. Also, will anybody be kind enough to give me a JF code so I can post to fandom_lounge?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

	sorchar 2003-12-02 08:01 am UTC (link)
	No. No, we can't. We must ride this wank into the ground, dig it up, and take it for another turn around the block. Then we must talk about the ride for years to come. It is the way of wank. But hey, nice try, o spouter of whine. Better than your last one. At least this time you're not resorting to the playground insults. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	(Anonymous) 2003-12-02 11:44 pm UTC (link)
	Um...I swear to God that's not me. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2003-12-02 11:45 pm UTC

Re: -

sorchar, 2003-12-03 12:54 am UTC

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2003-12-03 03:33 am UTC

Re: -

sorchar, 2003-12-03 04:40 am UTC

(no subject) -

sorchar, 2003-12-03 04:49 am UTC

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2003-12-04 12:08 am UTC

(no subject) -

sorchar, 2003-12-04 02:15 am UTC

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2003-12-04 03:59 am UTC

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2003-12-04 05:32 am UTC

Re: -

sorchar, 2003-12-04 09:43 am UTC

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2003-12-05 12:54 am UTC

Re: -

sorchar, 2003-12-05 01:56 am UTC

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2003-12-05 10:57 pm UTC

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2003-12-06 03:56 am UTC

(no subject) -

sorchar, 2003-12-06 09:47 am UTC

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2003-12-05 04:16 am UTC

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2003-12-05 10:56 pm UTC

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2003-12-06 02:22 am UTC

(no subject) -

sorchar, 2003-12-06 09:56 am UTC

(no subject) -

sagralisse, 2003-12-03 04:18 pm UTC

(no subject) -

phosfate, 2003-12-03 04:25 pm UTC

(no subject) -

sorchar, 2003-12-04 09:47 am UTC

	moonjaguar 2003-12-02 09:39 am UTC (link)
	Seely Veelas. I always miss the ~~times they turn into ugly birdlike hags~~ wank and the other good stuff. (Reply to this)