Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Sister Psychosis ([info]bohicamouse) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2003-12-05 04:12:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:Hawkish

1-up, please.
Ahhh Super Mario fandom wank, so rare and precious! Or rather, very common, but rarely so AMUSING.

So MoonEye821 makes a short and strange newbie post which is IMO overreacted to by the Mushroom Kingdom forum in general. Spelling is nitpicked, threats to overthrow the group are taken far too seriously, someone's Christianity is brought up for no reason, etc. Birdo makes an unknowingly hilarious attempt at smacking him down:

Err.. i asked "WHERE" are the other eighthundred-twenty mooneyes, not whether are not they are faild revisions of yourself, and revisions can only be made off of the origional model or a previous number, so you would be a revision of mooneye820 and have no revisions of yourself. Unless, of course, you are an obsolete failure that has not been disposed of. Still, the first 820 could not have been revised off of the 821st who came after them. Your explaination has absolutely no logic or reason or relevancy to my question, and your spelling is abysmal.

Unfortunately MoonEye has to go and prove the wankers right by then posting many poorly-spelled, delusional threads:

A good point about attacking spelling which sadly I can't take at all seriously, because I can't read it. The wank from both sides flies all over the place. Also, what the hell kind of mod asks the other posters whether she should do her damn job or not?

MoonEye invites other specific posters to join his great revolution of the forums, once again in an unreadable manner. Contains the wonderful "IT'S MY FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHT TO MAKE THREADS HAHAHA NOW I MAKE TWO MORE YOU MADE ME DO IT SUCKER" However, the best part is once again Birdo's pseudointellectualism, especially since he revives the thread 4 days later to post it:

I foster the most terrible animosity towards you, mooneye, and The world would be exponetally better without you and your fellow star wars nerds. I should rather say dorks or geeks than nerds, as nerds are often smart and end up like William Gates, you, however will either end up in prision, dead, selling burgers, or hiding in the corner of your padded room muttering threats to such foods as baby corn.

Something about "William Gates" really cracks me up, there. It's like those fic writers who call Buffy "Elizabeth" because they know where the nickname derives from, despite the fact that nobody ever calls her Elizabeth in the show.

MoonEye apologizes for his behavior, kinda. "Sorry, but I have to take my rage out on someone, or it will eat me alive!" Despite this wankiness and the continued poor spelling the apology is accepted with a fair amount of grace and good-naturing teasing until Birdo shows up again with some rage of his own to splurt all over the thread, once again after everyone else has stopped replying.

You were not missed by me, and may the lord have pity on your soul... please die soon.

Your good friend,
Birdo



(Post a new comment)

There should be a law...
[info]deoridhe
2003-12-05 06:18 pm UTC (link)
There should be a law about invoking First Amendment rights in an online discussion that isn't about free speech, right to assemble, or the government not supporting any individual religion.

Is there a law?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Found it!
[info]sagralisse
2003-12-05 06:57 pm UTC (link)
That's Rebecca-Sama's Law.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Found it!
[info]deoridhe
2003-12-05 07:48 pm UTC (link)
You rule. 8)

Is there a searchable database anywhere? There really should be.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Found it!
[info]sagralisse
2003-12-05 08:18 pm UTC (link)
There's just a few pages of [info]jurisimprudence laws so far. A searchable database sounds good as long as it doesn't involve any work on my part.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Found it!
[info]deoridhe
2003-12-05 10:10 pm UTC (link)
*sniggers* I like the way you think.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

Re: There should be a law...
[info]smo
2003-12-05 07:31 pm UTC (link)
Or freedom of the press. [/pissant]

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: There should be a law...
[info]deoridhe
2003-12-05 07:49 pm UTC (link)
Totally.

BTW, I adore your icon. 8) Makes me giggle every time.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: There should be a law...
[info]smo
2003-12-05 08:03 pm UTC (link)
Aw, sanks!

*whispers* And yours makes me randy. Mmm, Yohji the manslut.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: There should be a law...
[info]deoridhe
2003-12-05 10:08 pm UTC (link)
I always find it ironic that that's cannon for him. 8)

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: There should be a law...
[info]smo
2003-12-05 10:44 pm UTC (link)
And if Miki Shin-ichirou's profile on the first WK DVD is to be believed, it's canon in real life as well. (He listed "women" and "alcohol" among his interests. Um. Congratulations?)

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: There should be a law...
[info]deoridhe
2003-12-05 10:46 pm UTC (link)
*sniggers* I've heard the Weiss boys are close to their anime counterparts. Funny, yet frightening.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: There should be a law...
[info]smo
2003-12-05 11:17 pm UTC (link)
Heh. Guess that means Ken's boring, Omi's flaming, and Aya has the scraggliest teeth known to man.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: There should be a law...
[info]deoridhe
2003-12-06 03:45 am UTC (link)
...

...

*laughs!!!*

Truth? Now I'm glad I've avoided the voiceactor interview! 8)

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: There should be a law...
[info]smo
2003-12-06 08:38 pm UTC (link)
Fair enough... but you absolutely must not miss the American dub outtakes. I literally fell off the couch laughing.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: There should be a law...
[info]deoridhe
2003-12-09 06:00 am UTC (link)
Oh, I loved them! Actually, our bunch dressed up as Weiss for a local convention and met Omi's voice actor. He was pretty funny (con report here).

And you guys held a party without me!!!!

*pouts*

I go away for a couple of days and you're all over each other like a bunch of horny lemmings in a corner. Honestly.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]ruaha56
2003-12-05 08:12 pm UTC (link)
Okay troll. Definitely not as amusing as Not-Bob, though.

(Reply to this)


[info]sagralisse
2003-12-05 08:27 pm UTC (link)
I read these, and as the mom of a young'un (who owns every Mario game ever made) my first impression was OMG THEY ARE SO CUTE! That was closely followed by the desire to Auntie-pinch every one of 'em.

Faves so far:

Mooneye821: I wish not to overthrow Deezer, I only wish to someday have control of the forum, the site can be his. Hence "Rule the Forum." Also, I don't just creat topic, I also reply to them. :-) <-- thus proving he's not a troll, right? Right?

Birdo: Where are the other eighthundred-twenty mooneyes?

Mooneye821: Those are the revishions of myself I have made, and faild. This one is perfection, as is the great Emporer himself. We shall all bow to Emporer Palpatine; for he is the Emporer of the Galaxy, and I will soon be the same as him.

Birdo: Err.. i asked "WHERE" are the other eighthundred-twenty mooneyes, not whether are not they are faild revisions of yourself, and revisions can only be made off of the origional model or a previous number, so you would be a revision of mooneye820 and have no revisions of yourself. Unless, of course, you are an obsolete failure that has not been disposed of. Still, the first 820 could not have been revised off of the 821st who came after them. Your explaination has absolutely no logic or reason or relevancy to my question, and your spelling is abysmal. Because of your incredible lack of intelligence and basic logical skills, I do not believe that you have followed the age limit of 13 to post on these fourms. Not to be offensive but you should be far less stupid if you are allowed to use such a complicated device such as a computer... maby a set of stacking blocks would be more appropriate for someone of your calibur. <-- Dorkily adorable. ::pinch!::

Later...

Mooneye821: You may find my page in the Site Dicussion forum, and except or decline there. <-- OMG! The child spelled "site" correctly. *thud*

Stealth-Link: Hay Moooneye, yuo rimined mey of sumone on tihs mesidge bored hwo gos by teh naem of uvg! If ya knwo wat I meen. <-- Hey, I can misspell better than you, buttmunch!

Cutest signatures:
- I am Meowrik! The 5th Samurai Pizza Cat! beware the fearsome fury of my fiery Jalapeno Katana!
- I see dead people!......Wait No! That''s my reflection in the mirror.

(Reply to this)


[info]pradaloz
2003-12-06 12:42 am UTC (link)
God damn it, now I'm going to have the SMB theme song stuck in my head for the rest of the day.

(Reply to this)


[info]livii
2003-12-06 05:10 am UTC (link)
Wait...there's message boards for Super Mario Brothers? That's actually pretty cool, although the fact people would wank over it is really, really lame.

It's like those fic writers who call Buffy "Elizabeth" because they know where the nickname derives from, despite the fact that nobody ever calls her Elizabeth in the show.

Buffy is a nickname for Elizabeth? Well, you learn something new every day! :D Seriously, are we to assume though that Buffy's name was Elizabeth? [/offtopic]

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]bohicamouse
2003-12-06 06:15 am UTC (link)
Apparently it is--a lot of fic writers come across that fact and decide to exploit it to look smart or something. Unless it was in an ep I didn't see (there were a few of those) there's no proof Buffy's name was actually Elizabeth. I think even her gravestone just said "Buffy Anne Summers" and if anything was going to show her real given name that'd be it.

The Mushroom Kingdom boards get a lot of wank although most of it is just kids who don't seem to know any better. This one was a lot more calculated and amusing, heh.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]livii
2003-12-06 04:34 pm UTC (link)
The gravestone did say "Buffy", you're right, so I think this is a classic case of "My Buffy fic is infinitely superior to those written by the plebes who don't even know her name, ha ha ha." Said in a crusty fake-British accent, of course. ;)

Similar to the HP writers who insist on calling Harry "Harold" even though McGonagall didn't call him that when she read everyone else's full name (like Ronald) in the first book.

Wankers and poseurs. How fun!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]musette
2003-12-06 06:27 am UTC (link)
I foster the most terrible animosity towards you, mooneye, and The world would be exponetally better without you and your fellow star wars nerds.

So, exponetally? Meaning displaying pregnancies (expo meaning a large display and netally meaning to do with pregnancy)? Or is the ex part seperate like in extrovert?

::geeks::

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]musette
2003-12-06 06:29 am UTC (link)
::kicks self:: Dammit, I know it's natal and not netal.

::sulks::

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]hoorofcrowley
2003-12-06 07:07 am UTC (link)
*delirious*

SMB wank is exponetally better than my self-contained Sextips wank. It's just so out of left field . . . mwah!

(Reply to this)


 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map