Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



w**k is a four-letter word ([info]esorlehcar) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2003-12-22 02:03:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:*sporfle!*
Entry tags:elitism, fandom: harry potter, high school girls

Brought to you by Ms. "I am a lit grad student, therefore my opinions are fact and your puny opinions must bow before them" of yesterday's HP/metaquotes wank:

ElitistAsshat

The community info:

We are the elite best of the best. We went to the Universities you wish you had gone to, we read the books you pretend to have read, we bedded the beautiful people who didn't know you existed. We are the ones you call pretentious elitists, and this is where we lay it all out on the table, every conceit and literosexual fetish, every obscure linguistic profanity and outrageous claim to intellectual fame. We know Latin plurals and understood The Wasteland. We deconstructed Harry Potter and then burned him in effigy in Central Park during our bi-annual bacchanal.

We are everything that threatens your mind in the suburban night. We are the Great and Marvelous Succubi--you hate us, but you still want us to touch you in all the naughtiest places. We are smarter than you, stronger than you, and prettier than you. We are the avant-garde, we are the eaters of souls.

Hate us and we will only grow stronger.


*sighs happily* And the posts are even better.

This wouldn't be anywhere near as funny if the community founder hadn't spent the day proving she actually believes much of this...



Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

(Post a new comment)


[info]siegfriedwanks
2003-12-22 10:19 am UTC (link)
A wank of beauty needs more tissues forever! Or something. *slobber*

We are the Great and Marvelous Succubi--you hate us, but you still want us to touch you in all the naughtiest places.

Think I'll pass. It probably takes a great amount of hideousness and having been bullied in school to become this bitter touched in all the wrong places.

obscure linguistic profanity

Lets hear 'em, lets! Can't wait!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

beyond elitism... - [info]siegfriedwanks, 2003-12-22 10:25 am UTC
Re: beyond elitism... - [info]rann, 2003-12-22 11:15 am UTC
Re: beyond elitism... - [info]schoenschoen, 2003-12-22 11:23 am UTC
Re: beyond elitism... - [info]rann, 2003-12-22 11:27 am UTC
Re: beyond elitism... - [info]rann, 2003-12-22 11:28 am UTC
Re: beyond elitism... - [info]schoenschoen, 2003-12-22 11:00 pm UTC
Re: beyond elitism... - [info]rann, 2003-12-22 11:04 pm UTC
Re: beyond elitism... - [info]panthea, 2003-12-23 08:35 am UTC
Re: beyond elitism... - [info]virago, 2003-12-23 04:43 pm UTC
Re: beyond elitism... - [info]schoenschoen, 2003-12-25 01:25 am UTC
Re: beyond elitism... - [info]panthea, 2003-12-28 05:55 am UTC
Re: beyond elitism... - [info]rann, 2004-01-16 10:45 am UTC
Re: beyond elitism... - [info]panthea, 2004-01-17 11:32 pm UTC
Re: beyond elitism... - [info]siegfriedwanks, 2003-12-24 06:05 pm UTC
Re: beyond elitism... - (Anonymous), 2003-12-25 08:08 pm UTC
Re: beyond elitism... - (Anonymous), 2003-12-25 08:11 pm UTC
Re: beyond elitism... - [info]esorlehcar, 2003-12-25 08:15 pm UTC
Re: beyond elitism... - [info]siegfriedwanks, 2003-12-26 06:04 am UTC
Re: beyond elitism... - [info]sorchar, 2003-12-22 01:41 pm UTC
Re: beyond elitism... - [info]resmiranda, 2003-12-22 03:24 pm UTC
Re: beyond elitism... - [info]siegfriedwanks, 2003-12-24 06:07 pm UTC
Re: beyond elitism... - [info]snacky, 2003-12-22 05:53 pm UTC
Re: beyond elitism... - [info]iamtheenemy, 2003-12-22 06:29 pm UTC
No duh, but could he arrange sticks of varying length? - [info]banal_o_rama, 2003-12-24 11:15 pm UTC
Re: beyond elitism... - [info]northatlantic, 2003-12-22 07:34 pm UTC
Re: beyond elitism... - [info]kijikun, 2003-12-23 05:14 am UTC
Re: beyond elitism... - [info]northatlantic, 2003-12-24 12:10 am UTC
Re: beyond elitism... - ataniell93, 2003-12-22 08:16 pm UTC
Re: beyond elitism... - [info]dontgiveahoot, 2003-12-23 10:26 pm UTC
Re: beyond elitism... - [info]darthfi, 2003-12-22 08:27 pm UTC
Re: beyond elitism... - [info]sorchar, 2003-12-22 10:15 pm UTC
Re: beyond elitism... - [info]siegfriedwanks, 2003-12-24 06:11 pm UTC
Re: beyond elitism... - (Anonymous), 2003-12-22 10:31 pm UTC
Re: beyond elitism... - [info]byagghametta, 2003-12-23 01:21 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2003-12-22 10:28 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sagralisse, 2003-12-22 06:55 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2003-12-23 04:43 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kijikun, 2003-12-23 05:57 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2003-12-23 08:12 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]amasaglajax, 2003-12-23 04:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]valarltd, 2003-12-23 01:52 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]siegfriedwanks, 2003-12-24 05:51 pm UTC

(Anonymous)
2003-12-22 10:33 am UTC (link)
We know Latin plurals and understood The Wasteland.

I know Latin plurals, too. I also understood The Wasteland. Yet I'm nowhere near as much of an elitist asshat as they all are.

And I find it hard to take a group seriously when their group title contains the word "asshat". Anyone else find that, or is it just me?

-Alexa

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]iczer6, 2003-12-22 11:48 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]esorlehcar, 2003-12-23 12:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]iczer6, 2003-12-23 04:03 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2003-12-23 04:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]iczer6, 2003-12-23 05:57 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]banal_o_rama, 2003-12-24 11:07 pm UTC

[info]schoenschoen
2003-12-22 10:45 am UTC (link)
We went to the Universities you wish you had gone to, we read the books you pretend to have read, we bedded the beautiful people who didn't know you existed.

Uhh, right. Because gods know that all those beautiful people are *so* turned on by nuclear physics and literary philosophy. *Just so you know, I put the nuclear physics part in for my own vanity. Heh.* Hell, everytime I hear something about MacBeth, I just have to sit on my hands to keep from touching myself in bad, bad places.

Of course, I could just get some succubi to do it for me, but where would the fun be in that? ^^ They'd enjoy it more than I would. *exercises Literary Pimp Hand or something*

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]sorchar, 2003-12-22 10:16 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]electricchick, 2003-12-23 02:47 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]madelfdisease, 2003-12-23 04:32 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]virago, 2003-12-23 04:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2003-12-25 06:29 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-05-17 02:10 am UTC

[info]rann
2003-12-22 11:07 am UTC (link)
...
I... just don't know... what to say...
The sheer... sheer arrogance... I mean, fuck, this tops Anne Rice's self-gratification, and that's something.
I have never... ever seen someone make such statements in seriousness. Not outright. Not while meaning it. It didn't occur to me that someone could actually consider pretentious arrogance to be a POSITIVE trait and admit to it as such.
... I... I...
Just... wah. x.x;;;;;

(Reply to this)


(Anonymous)
2003-12-22 11:11 am UTC (link)
OMG!!11!1 They have understood The Wasteland! Surely, it is the most complex and important work of THIS OR ANY OTHER TIME! They are probably the only people ever to have LiveJournals/online diaries to comprehend its greatness!

And as if that weren't impressive enough, they "deconstructed Harry Potter and then burned him in effigy in Central Park during our bi-annual bacchanal." WOW! Focusing literary criticism on HP is bold, daring, and completely original. No one has tried that before. I used to think the HP books were entertaining, well-written, and fun escapist books, but thanks to ElitistAsshats, I know better! Now I see I only thought that because I hadn't seen him burned in effigy or understood The Wasteland!

Is anyone else amused the one of the mods (http://www.livejournal.com/userinfo.bml?user=yuki_onna) of this community just posted I Think Therefore I Bite: The Body/Soul Split in Buffy the Vampire Slayer (http://www.livejournal.com/users/yuki_onna/41960.html)? Isn't that too fannish for such an intellectual giant? Shouldn't she be discussing Camus in a coffee house while wearing all black?

So, how does one join these titans of intellect?

--fairy_tale_echo on LJ

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]rann, 2003-12-22 11:19 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mariagoner, 2003-12-22 11:27 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2003-12-22 12:12 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]dae, 2003-12-22 06:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kijikun, 2003-12-23 06:08 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kijikun, 2003-12-23 06:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]amand_r, 2003-12-22 07:06 pm UTC

[info]mariagoner
2003-12-22 11:26 am UTC (link)
This wouldn't be anywhere near as funny if the community founder hadn't spent the day proving she actually believes much of this...

No... no... you lie to me! You must be lying to me! Surely even the founder of this society of twats cannot take this seriously! Surely this must all be part of some incomprehensible jest!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]rann, 2003-12-22 11:30 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]pyratejenni, 2003-12-23 03:02 am UTC

[info]sorchar
2003-12-22 11:29 am UTC (link)
AHAHAHA

If they're really as All That and A Bag of Bertie Botts as they claim, shouldn't they have better things to do than be elitist in a frickin' LJ community?

Methinks it's because they cannot, in fact, get away with that shit in real life.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]rann, 2003-12-22 11:32 am UTC
Re: - [info]sorchar, 2003-12-22 11:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mariagoner, 2003-12-22 11:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sorchar, 2003-12-22 01:43 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mariagoner, 2003-12-24 08:46 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2003-12-24 06:18 am UTC

[info]squib
2003-12-22 12:05 pm UTC (link)
we bedded the beautiful people who didn't know you existed

This is the first time I've seen a fist referred to as a "beautiful person."

And what on earth is "literosexual?" Here I thought "metrosexual" was silly. I guess I'm just a plebe.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2003-12-22 12:31 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sorchar, 2003-12-22 10:17 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]crevette, 2003-12-26 03:41 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]valarltd, 2003-12-23 01:58 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]coyotegirl, 2003-12-24 03:10 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]beccastareyes, 2003-12-23 06:43 am UTC

[info]arabel
2003-12-22 12:13 pm UTC (link)
Witness as their elite status is proven beyond doubt, as they do something so elite and amazing that it has never been done before ever at all in the history of the internet:

"Hee hee, we had a flamewar over grammar!"

Aaaaand my favourite quote:

"Non-members smell like cabbage."

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]rann, 2003-12-22 12:19 pm UTC

[info]altricial
2003-12-22 12:25 pm UTC (link)
I still cannot decide whether this is a joke or not. I will now sit and ponder this for a bit more.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]esorlehcar, 2003-12-22 07:22 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]darthfi, 2003-12-22 08:35 pm UTC

[info]musette
2003-12-22 12:28 pm UTC (link)
::yawn:: Yes pumpkins, I understand The Wasteland (though I still prefer Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock) and yes, shockingly enough I did go to one of those esteemed institutions of higher knowledge you hold so dear. And you know what? I wanted to vomit on a daily basis because of the small element of the college population that was like you.

Seriously, what in fuck do these people COME FROM?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]rann, 2003-12-22 12:32 pm UTC
Re: - [info]musette, 2003-12-22 09:50 pm UTC

(Deleted post)
Re: - [info]musette, 2003-12-22 09:51 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sorchar, 2003-12-22 01:39 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2003-12-23 09:44 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mariagoner, 2003-12-23 01:48 pm UTC
Re: - [info]sorchar, 2003-12-23 03:09 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]banal_o_rama, 2003-12-24 11:19 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]pradaloz, 2003-12-22 03:53 pm UTC
Re: - [info]musette, 2003-12-22 09:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]darkrose, 2003-12-22 04:34 pm UTC
Re: - [info]musette, 2003-12-22 09:54 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2003-12-23 04:46 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rann, 2003-12-23 05:54 am UTC
Re: - [info]musette, 2003-12-23 12:21 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2003-12-23 10:05 pm UTC
Re: - [info]musette, 2003-12-24 12:08 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2003-12-24 07:44 am UTC
Re: - [info]musette, 2003-12-24 07:51 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]arien, 2003-12-22 07:31 pm UTC
Re: - [info]musette, 2003-12-22 10:02 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sorchar, 2003-12-22 10:11 pm UTC
Re: - [info]musette, 2003-12-22 10:26 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]arien, 2003-12-23 12:08 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]combledore, 2003-12-23 06:03 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]arien, 2003-12-23 12:06 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sewingmyfish, 2003-12-23 02:30 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]beccastareyes, 2003-12-23 06:51 am UTC
Re: - [info]musette, 2003-12-23 12:17 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2003-12-24 03:26 am UTC
Re: - [info]musette, 2003-12-24 04:37 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2003-12-25 09:20 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mindset, 2003-12-22 08:14 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sewingmyfish, 2003-12-22 08:44 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]esorlehcar, 2003-12-22 10:03 pm UTC
Re: - [info]musette, 2003-12-22 10:03 pm UTC
Re: - [info]sewingmyfish, 2003-12-22 10:15 pm UTC
Re: - [info]musette, 2003-12-22 10:29 pm UTC
Re: - [info]sewingmyfish, 2003-12-22 10:36 pm UTC
Re: - [info]musette, 2003-12-22 10:37 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2003-12-23 01:16 am UTC
Re: - [info]musette, 2003-12-23 12:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]morganya, 2003-12-23 02:35 am UTC

[info]telesilla
2003-12-22 12:36 pm UTC (link)
I'm so totally ashamed of wanting to stick my nose into a debate over there about Umberto Eco and whether Baudolino was as good as Foucault's Pendulum and Name of the Rose.

But then I realized I have a site that has free scans of hentai manga open in a different tab and that Liam Neeson is trying to talk Alex Law of Shallow Grave into dressing in drag for him over in TM and thought, fuck it.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Shiny penny! - [info]resmiranda, 2003-12-22 03:33 pm UTC
Re: Shiny penny! - [info]kyuuketsukirui, 2003-12-22 06:08 pm UTC

[info]ingrid
2003-12-22 12:48 pm UTC (link)
We know Latin plurals and understood The Wasteland.

You understood it? Ha! I still understand it!

Nyah, nyah, nyah!

:::: licks pork rind crumbs from fingers ::::

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ecchaniz0r, 2003-12-22 08:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2003-12-22 10:29 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]dontgiveahoot, 2003-12-23 10:41 pm UTC

[info]squeakytoy
2003-12-22 01:32 pm UTC (link)
*snorts*

Oooookay. Someone bring the Pin Of Ego Deflation, please?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Don't mind me... - [info]byagghametta, 2003-12-23 01:25 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2003-12-22 03:07 pm UTC (link)
And the description doesn't even go into what prompted the community being founded in the first place! That is where all this starts getting *really* funny. But then again, looking at the previous mention of her metaquotes/wank thing, it fits a pattern. She says something, people don't agree and then we get something like email exchanges, rants and community foundings. At least, it's consistent. *snorts*

- v

(Reply to this)


[info]virago
2003-12-22 03:31 pm UTC (link)
They're so annoying that I don't really care whether they're serious or not.

I'll just sit back and enjoy the irony. I first was exposed (like a virus) to the star of the previous wank when she crashed into a Nanowrimo comm I was in, informing us all that everyone who visits online communities are not Serious About Their Work, suck at writing, and do nothing but obsess about trivial posts and waste all their time.

(Of course, after the flaming settled she claimed she only said it "to inspire emotions" or somesuch babble. So basically, you're a troll. Okay!)

And now... a community.

Mmm, hypocrisy.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2003-12-22 03:58 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]virago, 2003-12-22 05:11 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sorchar, 2003-12-22 10:07 pm UTC
I remember that - (Anonymous), 2003-12-24 03:41 am UTC
Re: I remember that - (Anonymous), 2003-12-24 05:53 pm UTC
Re: I remember that - (Anonymous), 2003-12-25 01:45 am UTC
Re: I remember that - (Anonymous), 2003-12-25 01:45 am UTC

[info]diamonde
2003-12-22 03:33 pm UTC (link)
We are the elite best of the best. We went to the Universities you wish you had gone to, we read the books you pretend to have read, we bedded the beautiful people who didn't know you existed.

They are the people we made fun of in high school and deliberately never invited to parties in university. They read the books everyone else thinks are boring and masturbate to computer-generated porn. Right, gotcha.

We are the ones you call pretentious elitists, and this is where we lay it all out on the table, every conceit and literosexual fetish,

The rest of us eventually discovered the warmer, more responsive, less cutty option of fucking people. That or they're just digging through the stacks of Penguin Classic 'erotica' because they're not old enough to get into the grown-up bookshop yet. Because in that case I have to point out that just because Fanny Hill is old and reprinted by the Penguin that does not mean it's literature. Porn yes, literature no.

We are everything that threatens your mind in the suburban night.

Dunno about the rest of you, but what I fear in the suburban night isn't wankers. Wank away, little monkey, as long as you don't break into my house and try steal my stuff.

Hate us and we will only grow stronger.

Laugh at them and they run crying for mummy.


(If this isn't a parody, imagine my current laughter has a pained edge, okay?)

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]sorchar, 2003-12-22 05:16 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ecchaniz0r, 2003-12-22 08:13 pm UTC

[info]sarajayechan
2003-12-22 05:02 pm UTC (link)
@_@

...With a name like that, I-I can't believe someone's meaning that to be SERIOUS!! It just screams "MOCK" to me...but they all seem perfectly serious. @_@

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]sorchar, 2003-12-22 10:07 pm UTC

[info]shoiryu
2003-12-22 05:26 pm UTC (link)
Fac ut vivas!

Which is probably wrong, but I'm sure the effort will be appreciated!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]siegfriedwanks, 2003-12-24 05:56 pm UTC

[info]psychofangirl
2003-12-22 06:40 pm UTC (link)
"Hate us and we will only grow stronger."

This is where indifference comes in. Not give a shit and they'll fade away. NEEENER!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]sorchar, 2003-12-22 10:06 pm UTC

[info]bunny
2003-12-22 07:42 pm UTC (link)
This must be my favorite entry.

My plans for world domination were taken seriously by the FBI when I was 16.

No Fucking Words, except for Muahaahahaha.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - ataniell93, 2003-12-22 08:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sorchar, 2003-12-22 10:05 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]bunny, 2003-12-23 04:09 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sorchar, 2003-12-22 09:57 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]theonedespot, 2003-12-22 11:57 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]bunny, 2003-12-23 12:32 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]theonedespot, 2003-12-23 12:43 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]bunny, 2003-12-23 12:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]squib, 2003-12-23 01:16 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sewingmyfish, 2003-12-23 02:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]necronomist, 2003-12-23 03:13 am UTC
(no subject) - wizzard, 2003-12-23 10:01 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]necronomist, 2003-12-24 02:38 am UTC

(Reply from suspended user)
(no subject) - [info]nell, 2003-12-24 04:31 am UTC

(Reply from suspended user)
(no subject) - [info]nell, 2003-12-23 06:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]coyotegirl, 2003-12-24 03:17 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]nell, 2003-12-24 04:30 am UTC
Re: - [info]coyotegirl, 2003-12-24 05:07 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]nell, 2003-12-24 05:32 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2003-12-28 09:52 am UTC
Errr.
(Anonymous)
2003-12-22 08:05 pm UTC (link)
I ... uh. Um. Errr ... WHAT? Pardon me while I go catch my eyebrows, which have flown up as if butterflies emerging from caterpillar cocoons -- *ahem* Pardon, my language center was affected by the stupidity.

Are they FOR REAL? The beautiful people didn't bed me, they laughed at me for spending my time reading all those so-pretentious books while they struggled over the day's English homework. Excuse me now, I have to get back to my so-mundane job.

PLEASE.

(Reply to this)


[info]majinkarp
2003-12-22 10:45 pm UTC (link)
I see someone else said this already, but it bears repeating. You would think that anyone who wanted to be taken seriously wouldn't name their community something like "asshat".

Oh god, she's not just a lit person but a linguist too. *hides in shame*

(Reply to this)(Thread)

not all linguists wank (just most of them) - [info]necronomist, 2003-12-23 03:05 am UTC
Re: not all linguists wank (just most of them) - [info]smo, 2003-12-23 08:21 am UTC
Re: not all linguists wank (just most of them) - [info]iczer6, 2003-12-23 07:18 pm UTC
Re: not all linguists wank (just most of them) - [info]smo, 2003-12-23 10:01 pm UTC
Re: not all linguists wank (just most of them) - [info]ecchaniz0r, 2003-12-26 08:03 pm UTC
Re: not all linguists wank (just most of them) - [info]smo, 2003-12-26 09:47 pm UTC
Re: not all linguists wank (just most of them) - [info]ecchaniz0r, 2003-12-27 04:56 am UTC
Re: not all linguists wank (just most of them) - [info]smo, 2003-12-27 08:40 pm UTC

[info]electricchick
2003-12-23 02:59 am UTC (link)
We are everything that threatens your mind in the suburban night.

Even the one about getting gunned down by a crazed soccer mom?

(Reply to this)


[info]bohicamouse
2003-12-23 03:10 am UTC (link)
We are the elite best of the best.

As opposed to the . . . other . . . elite.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]seldomnaughty, 2003-12-23 04:08 am UTC
*sounds buzzer* - [info]gairid, 2003-12-25 03:33 pm UTC



Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map