Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



sutaretagaisce ([info]gaisce) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2004-01-01 23:18:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:cranky
Entry tags:baleetion, bnf, fandom: harry potter

Now it dead from...coke?
If a bountiful source of amusement potential wank is suddenly deleted, does it still spooge?

http://www.livejournal.com/users/hpbnfdeathmatch/ Seems to have disappeared.

Conspiracy theories are welcome. BNF inner circle politics? Someone hired monkey robot assassins to kill the management? The world may never know...

If it's just disabled or something you can all mock me senselessly. I'll wear a target and everything.


(Post a new comment)


[info]tigerlily
2004-01-02 09:26 am UTC (link)
http://www.livejournal.com/userinfo.bml?user=hpbnfdeathmatch

Deleted *sniffles*

(Reply to this)

(Reply from suspended user)
Hmm.
(Anonymous)
2004-01-02 10:58 am UTC (link)
I think it died for lack of wank. There was, what, one good sploogefest in seven rounds? I think they were hoping for super-bukkake-n-bloodshed and what they got was The Little Mermaid.

Chaos_Rose on LJ.

P.S. What are bokken?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Hmm. - allen, 2004-01-02 05:21 pm UTC
Re: Hmm. - [info]amand_r, 2004-01-02 08:47 pm UTC
Re: Hmm. - [info]smo, 2004-01-02 10:18 pm UTC
Re: Hmm. - [info]amand_r, 2004-01-02 10:29 pm UTC
Re: Hmm. - [info]lizardlaugh, 2004-01-03 12:39 am UTC
Re: Hmm. - [info]smo, 2004-01-03 08:20 am UTC
Re: Hmm. - [info]lots42, 2004-01-02 11:33 pm UTC
Re: Hmm. - [info]anu, 2004-01-03 07:27 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ipomoea, 2004-01-04 08:10 am UTC

[info]lemone
2004-01-02 10:04 am UTC (link)
My money's on ninja pirates instead of robot monkey assassins.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]iczer6
2004-01-03 07:03 am UTC (link)
How about undead-ninja-pirates with lazerblades?

(Reply to this)(Parent)

yep
(Anonymous)
2004-01-02 10:12 am UTC (link)

hp is a blackhole. i've managed to keep my distance for a loooooong time, but slowly, inexorably, the wank drew me in; must have something to do with saturation points and the sheer vastness of JKR's audience.

anyway, this is just to say that i bitterly regret not having set up a journalfen account while the codes were plentiful (cough)(lastnightsremains at yahoo dot com)(cough), since this is a wank that truly aspired to be all-inclusive and transcendent. The One Wank for hp fandom. gotta respect the vision.

v.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

thank you...
[info]dirtymartini
2004-01-02 08:51 pm UTC (link)
...to the lovely person who donated this code. cheers, and very wanky new year to everyone!

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: thank you... - [info]smo, 2004-01-03 08:22 am UTC
Re: thank you... - [info]dirtymartini, 2004-01-03 08:26 pm UTC
Re: thank you... - [info]smo, 2004-01-03 11:44 pm UTC
cramptini - [info]dirtymartini, 2004-01-04 06:11 am UTC
Re: cramptini - [info]smo, 2004-01-05 09:56 pm UTC
Occam's Razor Wankerage
(Anonymous)
2004-01-02 10:13 am UTC (link)
Cassie (Miss Claire if you're nasty, aka first round landslide loser) is probably pals with whoever set it up.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Occam's Razor Wankerage
(Anonymous)
2004-01-02 09:29 pm UTC (link)
actually, this has aja written all over it. didn't someone bait her about being shut out or something?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Occam's Razor Wankerage - [info]bookshop, 2004-01-03 07:57 am UTC
Re: Occam's Razor Wankerage
(Anonymous)
2004-01-02 11:53 pm UTC (link)
I don't know... if it was someone who was upset over CC's loss, they probably wouldn't have created and closed another round before deleting it.

The girl who was mocked on there a while back (forget the name) did send one of her friends to try and TOS the Deathmatch for harrassment. It could've been that. However, I think it would have more likely been suspended if that was the case, so... dunno.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Occam's Razor Wankerage - [info]th1rdpartyimpax, 2004-01-03 12:27 am UTC
Re: Occam's Razor Wankerage - (Anonymous), 2004-01-03 12:45 am UTC
Re: Occam's Razor Wankerage - [info]sidekick, 2004-01-08 09:05 am UTC
Re: Occam's Razor Wankerage - [info]th1rdpartyimpax, 2004-01-09 08:19 am UTC

[info]arabel
2004-01-02 11:50 am UTC (link)
I was disappointed to see it go - honestly, if you're going to set something like that up, please be prepared to be in for the long haul. *pouts*

Bad form, say I!

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]rann
2004-01-02 11:33 pm UTC (link)
Bad form, Peter!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]anatsuno
2004-01-02 12:18 pm UTC (link)
Awwww!

So bad. They could've at least stuck around for the archiving, man. I say bad form, too. WANKY, like. but who's surprised? So predictable.

Oh well, I got my match (lost, of course!) before it vanished, I'm (still surprised and) happy. *g*

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Utterly OT
[info]iczer6
2004-01-03 07:04 am UTC (link)
But what the HELL is going on in your icon? Really I wanna know.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Utterly OT - [info]redina, 2004-01-03 08:39 am UTC
Re: Utterly OT - [info]romanesque, 2004-01-03 03:42 pm UTC
Re: Utterly OT - [info]folk, 2004-01-03 04:36 pm UTC
Re: Utterly OT - [info]redina, 2004-01-03 05:00 pm UTC
Re: Utterly OT - [info]folk, 2004-01-03 05:05 pm UTC
Re: Utterly OT - [info]redina, 2004-01-03 05:15 pm UTC
Re: Utterly OT - [info]folk, 2004-01-03 05:21 pm UTC
Re: Utterly OT - [info]redina, 2004-01-03 05:28 pm UTC
Re: Utterly OT - [info]uniquesnowflake, 2004-01-03 11:16 pm UTC
Re: Utterly OT - [info]virago, 2004-01-05 11:41 pm UTC
Re: Utterly OT - [info]amand_r, 2004-01-07 08:39 am UTC

[info]resmiranda
2004-01-02 03:40 pm UTC (link)
That's okay. Now we have BNF Watcher. *bangs head on desk*

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]sarajayechan, 2004-01-02 11:21 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]rann, 2004-01-02 11:33 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2004-01-03 02:59 am UTC
Re: - [info]rann, 2004-01-03 03:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]resmiranda, 2004-01-02 11:57 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-01-02 11:59 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-01-03 01:30 am UTC
(no subject) - ataniell93, 2004-01-03 04:03 am UTC
This is so fucking hilarious. - [info]mrsparkle, 2004-01-03 06:11 pm UTC
Re: This is so fucking hilarious. - [info]adolfa, 2004-01-03 08:28 pm UTC
Re: This is so fucking hilarious. - [info]slashcat, 2004-01-04 12:55 am UTC
Re: This is so fucking hilarious. - [info]adolfa, 2004-01-04 02:39 am UTC
Re: This is so fucking hilarious. - [info]slashcat, 2004-01-04 02:42 am UTC

coreopsis
2004-01-02 04:02 pm UTC (link)
Well, this is disappointing. Considering how utterly boring the SV one is. Oh well, at least there's still LOTR where some of the best stuff isn't even anonymous. booyah!

Oh and our own F_W bnfdeathmatch of course. heh.

(Reply to this)


(Anonymous)
2004-01-02 05:01 pm UTC (link)
OT, but seeing as I don't have a jf-account, I just have to use the comments-space to alert everybody to the very entertaining wank happening over in the World Idol LJ community, particularly this post:
Music+politics= World Wank (http://www.livejournal.com/community/worldidol/44658.html).

-Random Norwegian

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]miracalix, 2004-01-02 05:51 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-01-04 02:35 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2004-01-02 07:53 pm UTC (link)
Am I being too OliverStonish for thinking that the Deathmatch "casually" got deleted after CC lost by a landslide and Aja asked to be pulled out of the game?

After all, they're the alpha and omega of Harry Potter Wank. A deathmatch between them would had been amusing.

- andytomoe @ yahoo.com

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]sagralisse, 2004-01-02 11:16 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-01-03 12:21 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-01-03 01:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mariagoner, 2004-01-03 03:23 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-01-03 04:36 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-01-03 04:19 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]diamonde, 2004-01-03 11:13 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-01-03 04:20 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]diamonde, 2004-01-03 07:33 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]diamonde, 2004-01-04 12:04 am UTC
Alas, poor hpbnfdeathmatch, we hardly knew ye
[info]isiscolo
2004-01-02 07:58 pm UTC (link)
Yeah, I'm sort of sad to see it go. At first I thought, "oh, cool!" -- then I thought, "oh, no!" when I saw the vitriol being spewed. But then most of the vitriol seemed to leach out, settle down - people were actually giving reasons for their support or non-support, which were interesting enough to flip it back into "oh, cool" status. I also found it interesting to see how many people actually didn't recognize names of those I thought of as "BNFs" -- the division of the HP fen into so many subsets was really clear. And finally, it gave me reason to check out new people I didn't know, but who others obviously did, and maybe expand my reading/lj horizons.

Plus, dude, I WON MY ROUND HA HA HA HA HA!!11!one!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Alas, poor hpbnfdeathmatch, we hardly knew ye - [info]naltariel, 2004-01-02 09:35 pm UTC
Re: Teh Irony - [info]isiscolo, 2004-01-02 09:46 pm UTC
Re: Teh Irony - [info]martianhousecat, 2004-01-02 11:11 pm UTC
Re: Teh Irony - [info]mariagoner, 2004-01-03 03:26 am UTC
Re: Teh Irony - (Anonymous), 2004-01-03 04:37 am UTC
Re: Alas, poor hpbnfdeathmatch, we hardly knew ye - (Anonymous), 2004-01-04 12:06 am UTC

[info]phosfate
2004-01-02 08:07 pm UTC (link)
Wussies.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-01-02 08:47 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]amand_r, 2004-01-02 08:52 pm UTC

(Reply from suspended user)
(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2004-01-03 07:06 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2004-01-02 08:35 pm UTC (link)
I won't mention any names but before the journal was deleted, there were some people that were *extremely* devastated that Cedar and Blackfall won over Cassie and Heidi.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]shoiryu, 2004-01-02 08:58 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-01-03 01:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ymfaery, 2004-01-02 09:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-01-03 12:14 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]beccafran, 2004-01-03 02:51 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-01-03 04:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]pre_madonna, 2004-01-03 02:54 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mariagoner, 2004-01-03 03:27 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-01-03 03:35 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mariagoner, 2004-01-03 06:08 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-01-03 06:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]calluna, 2004-01-03 07:24 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-01-03 03:46 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]pre_madonna, 2004-01-03 05:34 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-01-03 06:58 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-01-03 04:32 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]isiscolo, 2004-01-03 04:34 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]th1rdpartyimpax, 2004-01-03 05:24 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]pre_madonna, 2004-01-03 05:35 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-01-03 05:45 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]th1rdpartyimpax, 2004-01-04 12:19 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]slashcat, 2004-01-03 06:07 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-01-03 09:06 am UTC
Re: - [info]slashcat, 2004-01-03 09:09 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-01-04 08:31 am UTC
Re: - [info]slashcat, 2004-01-04 10:06 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]siegfriedwanks, 2004-01-05 05:02 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2004-01-02 08:56 pm UTC (link)
Not sure if its true, but heard a rumor it was an admin delete, for spamming. Was busy wading through 700+ comments from one round!! at the time, wah.

michmatch on LJ

(Reply to this)


(Anonymous)
2004-01-03 03:20 am UTC (link)
Aww...let's mock speculate about who ran the HPBNFdeathmatch instead!

My top 3 suspects:

1. Malachan
2. Heidi8
3. Moeyknight ..more of a suspect for the watcher journal though...

And all currently on LJ! Stalk them while they're hot!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-01-03 03:49 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lulinda, 2004-01-03 03:58 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-01-03 05:15 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lulinda, 2004-01-03 05:29 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]slashcat, 2004-01-03 05:46 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lulinda, 2004-01-03 05:57 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]slashcat, 2004-01-03 06:11 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-01-04 12:17 am UTC
Re: - [info]slashcat, 2004-01-04 01:56 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-01-04 02:02 am UTC
Re: - [info]slashcat, 2004-01-04 05:09 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-01-04 05:18 am UTC
Re: - [info]slashcat, 2004-01-04 05:18 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-01-05 03:00 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]pre_madonna, 2004-01-03 06:25 am UTC
Re: - [info]slashcat, 2004-01-03 06:27 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]pre_madonna, 2004-01-03 06:30 am UTC
Re: - [info]slashcat, 2004-01-03 06:40 am UTC
(no subject) - wizzard, 2004-01-03 08:10 pm UTC
Re: - [info]slashcat, 2004-01-04 12:27 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]diamonde, 2004-01-03 10:40 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-01-03 04:23 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]slashcat, 2004-01-03 04:44 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]slashcat, 2004-01-03 05:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]heidi, 2004-01-03 05:19 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]malachan, 2004-01-03 05:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]resmiranda, 2004-01-03 06:50 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lasultrix, 2004-01-03 11:17 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-01-04 08:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]heidi, 2004-01-04 01:43 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-01-04 03:01 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-01-05 06:50 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-01-05 09:56 am UTC
AllAnon
[info]dirtymartini
2004-01-03 06:07 am UTC (link)
You mean you don't think fandom is an accepting environment that respects a person's right to privacy?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

oops - [info]dirtymartini, 2004-01-03 06:11 am UTC
Re: AllAnon - [info]mariagoner, 2004-01-03 10:44 am UTC
Re: AllAnon - [info]dirtymartini, 2004-01-03 08:31 pm UTC
Re: AllAnon - [info]mariagoner, 2004-01-03 09:41 pm UTC

(Anonymous)
2004-01-03 07:37 am UTC (link)
DAMNIT! I had won my match and been personally attacked!

NM

(Reply to this)(Thread)

WTF? - [info]siegfriedwanks, 2004-01-05 05:05 am UTC

  
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map