Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Bunny ([info]bunny) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2004-01-22 14:20:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:sadistic
Entry tags:fandom: harry potter, imdb

HP wank
What can possibly be worse than Harry Potter and IMDb wank?



MsSmeagol posts: The twins are MAJOR DISAPPOINTMENTS in the movies!!!

Didn't had Terry Pratchett a rule on using excessive punctutation?

Auntie V aka Slagg (Obviously an original Christina blonde) replies with: Two fledling actors, not the best choice for the HP follies, but one is funny

How did the slag found out who is the funny one?

eekmonique blames Chris Columbus, for doing a half-arsed job of casting

Nicole01 disagrees: Read the details on the trusty IMDB and you'll see that someone named Karen Lindsay-Stewart did the casting for both SS and COS. Jina Jay is doing the casting for PoA.

I have been highly impressed with Chris Columbus's films in the past, and in my humble opinion, he's a miracle worker where children are concerned. My reason for not being overly enthusiastic about the Harry Potter movies is that the books are, simply put, far far superior to any possible movie. My imagination is very vivid, and I "see" the characters and events as I read.


preciouzpepsi345 sums it up with: I dont think that the actorts are wrong

retrorocket wanks like a real Brit: Put it down to the direction. CC doesn't understand British humour and stupidly assumed the USA audience wouldn't either. So he took it all out. Exit Peeves.

petamavis takes the cake though: Did anyone else hear that the weasley twins had a big fight and now only one of them is going to be in the next film. So they are going to kill off Fred Weasley!


Check out the PoA board, if you are masochist.



(Post a new comment)

OMG poor fred!!!!!!!!!11!!!!!!!pi!!!!!!!!!
[info]phosfate
2004-01-22 11:03 pm UTC (link)
Or maybe they cut Peeves because the movies are 3,000 hours long as it is?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: OMG poor fred!!!!!!!!!11!!!!!!!pi!!!!!!!!!
[info]mariagoner
2004-01-24 01:18 am UTC (link)
Once again, you attempt to place common sense within a realm that shall not take it.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: OMG poor fred!!!!!!!!!11!!!!!!!pi!!!!!!!!!
[info]jezrana
2004-01-24 08:13 am UTC (link)
I think they were going to have a CGI Peeves, but scrapped it because it looked horrible. Can't remember where I read that, though.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]neenski
2004-01-22 11:05 pm UTC (link)
So they are going to kill off Fred Weasley!

Sure. And then they're going to CGI the other one. Yes. Maybe they'll hire the guys who did Gollum...

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]erilee
2004-01-22 11:29 pm UTC (link)
Brilliant, one Weasley twin is enough. *snicker*

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]neenski
2004-01-22 11:35 pm UTC (link)
Sure! Man, with the amount of lame jokes between them, they should have replaced Fred with a life-size sex doll with red hair. Would have been no difference, really. (Except at night when George gets all hot and bothered lonely...)

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re:
[info]erilee
2004-01-22 11:38 pm UTC (link)
Then George would be so sad! *cries in sympathy*

But in the end it would be better, because they'd only have to pay one actor.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]neenski
2004-01-22 11:43 pm UTC (link)
Yeah, poor George, as there'll be no twincest. *smirks*

they'd only have to pay one actor

Yeah. And with the amount of Weasleys crawling around, they could have gotten an actor to play George, Fred, Ron (kneeling) and Percy (with glasses). No bother at all.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re:
[info]erilee
2004-01-22 11:45 pm UTC (link)
Really, you could just throw in a wig for Ginny.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


(Anonymous)
2004-01-22 11:48 pm UTC (link)
and the same wig would work for bill.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re:
[info]erilee
2004-01-22 11:50 pm UTC (link)
Yes!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]neenski
2004-01-22 11:52 pm UTC (link)
And a padded muscle skintight coat for Charlie. The dragon burns can be painted on.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]neenski
2004-01-22 11:49 pm UTC (link)
Exactly. And Mr and Mrs Weasley could be played by the same person - you'd just need some pillows for the extra girth, some balloons for the obvious, some clothes and voilĂ !

They should hire us to fire the unimportant parts. After we'd be done, they could do with just five actors and lots of dolls. And some wacky cardboard backgrounds (hand-painted by kids in kindergarten for free)...

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re:
[info]erilee
2004-01-22 11:51 pm UTC (link)
Oh, I don't know, we could paint the backgrounds ourselves, and they could pay us in personal time with the actors of our choice.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]neenski
2004-01-22 11:54 pm UTC (link)
Best idea EVAH.

What about a orgy/threesome/foursome/fivesome/some thing with all of them? *leers*

Even better idea: Let's just drop the whole movie and tell the people to go read the books *again*. After all, imagination is important!

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re:
[info]erilee
2004-01-22 11:56 pm UTC (link)
But the books don't come with the same delicious underaged boys!

Good idea. It's important to develop one's imagination! You can't write pr0n without it!

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]neenski
2004-01-23 12:08 am UTC (link)
You can't write pr0n without it!

Exactly. Why don't we tell 'em to make a movie only slightly based on the books and more on slashfics? *smirks* We could replace all the girls in the movie with actual sock puppets and the rest of the male characters could be played by gay pr0n stars. Meh. *eyes glaze over*

NC-17 material, at least. *nods*

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re:
[info]erilee
2004-01-23 12:10 am UTC (link)
*sniffles* Please let me keep Ginny and Hermione, who are secret lovers, unbeknownst to all the boys and to J.K. Rowling, too?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]neenski
2004-01-23 12:15 am UTC (link)
For you I would do everything. *pets [info]erilee* Don't worry, you'll get gorgeous lesbian flicks with them boffing like bunniesmaking love in the common room while we watch...

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re:
[info]erilee
2004-01-23 12:29 am UTC (link)
You're so lovely!

Mmmmmhermioneandginny I should write mmmhermioneandginny fic when I get home tonight.

I added you to my flist at LJ. :)

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]neenski
2004-01-23 12:35 am UTC (link)
Aw, shucks! *impersonates Clark Kent*

Herm/Ginny? Theirloveissosexy! *wipes quickly the drool from her lips*

Added you back :-)

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re:
[info]erilee
2004-01-23 12:36 am UTC (link)
My are we off topic. ;)

I have a lot of fic on the go. Including some with Clark Kent in it!

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]neenski
2004-01-23 12:46 am UTC (link)
We should truly be ashamed of ourselves. Because, where is the wank!?! ;-)

And, wah. Smallville aficionados unite! *grins*

Hey, if you want to have a little fun with these jigsaw puzzles and slide puzzles I'm totally addicted to: click clickity click

Even with TEH Clex!

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re:
[info]erilee
2004-01-23 12:49 am UTC (link)
I am going to save the puzzle for later. I will play with the puzzles, and then finish my Clex fic.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]neenski
2004-01-23 12:56 am UTC (link)
Meh. We're a match made in heaven! *grins*

Good luck with the fic! *crosses fingers, toes and eyes*

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re:
[info]erilee
2004-01-23 01:00 am UTC (link)
*giggles* You're going to get a headache, crossing your eyes like that.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]neenski
2004-01-23 01:02 am UTC (link)
Not in the slightest. *winces*

(Reply to this)(Parent)


 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map