|
|
Azure Lunatic (![[info]](http://www.journalfen.net/img/userinfo.gif){kind=small} azurelunatic) wrote in ![[info]](http://www.journalfen.net/img/community.gif){kind=small} fandom_wank,@ 2004-01-26 19:48:00 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
fandom_scruples is now reachable for comment. Ha!
http://www.livejournal.com/users/el
The lovely E has gifted LJ user fandom_scruples with two months of paid account. fandom_scruples@livejournal.com
[edit @ around 9 pm my time: and fandom_scruples has been reported to LJ admin for extortion. ]
[son of the edit: Links to some of the reports to LJ admin are in comments here and elsewhere. Please post your own reports of extortion to LJ admin in comments here, with a subject line clearly identifying them as such. All for documentation purposes, natch.
Furthermore, LJ admin's current position is that f_s's actions haven't yet been against TOS, and that they aren't responsible for f_s's actions on other sites. Debate over this has been going on as we speak; no definitive conclusion has yet been reached.]
[bastard second offspring of the edit @ 9:55 pm my time: LJ admin are closing support requests from those who won't take "fandom_scruples hasn't actually violated the TOS" as an answer. Which says good things for LJ's support of free speech, which means that LJ won't likely target those with smut in their journals if f_s gets all uppity at them, but bad for justice being served on f_s. And for the record, E and her husband absolutely do not support mounting a massive spam campaign on fandom_scruples's inbox at all. No.]
[grandson of the edit @ 10:07 pm my time: Please, feel free to archive the entire text of the exchange between you and LJ support regarding f_s, neatly labeled for our enjoyment, lest it disappear because LJ considers it too, too wanky. And they are making them disappear. ]
[illegitimate grandson of the edit @ 11:42 pm my time: Looks like LJ support/abuse is getting slammed with this issue. As a part-time volunteer, I really can't condone making their lives too miserable. Unless you're actually *on* the blacklist, or have reason to believe that you are among the people that fandom_scruples is threatening to bring the Wrath of US Law down upon, try not to get involved over there. And do please be polite to Support/Abuse. No need to make us look like asshats, just concerned netizens worried that f_s plans to defy the LJ TOS and attempt to collect personally identifiable information about LJ users (stalking).]
[edit without a clever name @ 12:07 am Tuesday: COPA is not COPPA. COPA, which f_s is arguing based on, was overturned. COPPA is about the collection of personally identifiable information about kids, and is still in force. COPA is about the objectionable material. ]
[edit again, still without a witty name @ 1:34 am Tuesday: Now that LJ Abuse has been notified and given their response, and fandom_scruples@livejournal.com has been thoroughly e-mailed, and everyone's calmed down about the proceedings... Until fandom_scruples makes their next move (which I have no doubt that they'll do) it looks like it's all over but the inevitable review on http://www.ljdrama.org and the repercussions being played out in fannish circles all over the 'net. ]
[edit again again @ 1:52: In case f_w makes those entries that prompted this wank private, I've duplicated them in comments here. ]
http://www.livejournal.com/users/el
The lovely E has gifted LJ user fandom_scruples with two months of paid account. fandom_scruples@livejournal.com
[edit @ around 9 pm my time: and fandom_scruples has been reported to LJ admin for extortion. ]
[son of the edit: Links to some of the reports to LJ admin are in comments here and elsewhere. Please post your own reports of extortion to LJ admin in comments here, with a subject line clearly identifying them as such. All for documentation purposes, natch.
Furthermore, LJ admin's current position is that f_s's actions haven't yet been against TOS, and that they aren't responsible for f_s's actions on other sites. Debate over this has been going on as we speak; no definitive conclusion has yet been reached.]
[bastard second offspring of the edit @ 9:55 pm my time: LJ admin are closing support requests from those who won't take "fandom_scruples hasn't actually violated the TOS" as an answer. Which says good things for LJ's support of free speech, which means that LJ won't likely target those with smut in their journals if f_s gets all uppity at them, but bad for justice being served on f_s. And for the record, E and her husband absolutely do not support mounting a massive spam campaign on fandom_scruples's inbox at all. No.]
[grandson of the edit @ 10:07 pm my time: Please, feel free to archive the entire text of the exchange between you and LJ support regarding f_s, neatly labeled for our enjoyment, lest it disappear because LJ considers it too, too wanky. And they are making them disappear. ]
[illegitimate grandson of the edit @ 11:42 pm my time: Looks like LJ support/abuse is getting slammed with this issue. As a part-time volunteer, I really can't condone making their lives too miserable. Unless you're actually *on* the blacklist, or have reason to believe that you are among the people that fandom_scruples is threatening to bring the Wrath of US Law down upon, try not to get involved over there. And do please be polite to Support/Abuse. No need to make us look like asshats, just concerned netizens worried that f_s plans to defy the LJ TOS and attempt to collect personally identifiable information about LJ users (stalking).]
[edit without a clever name @ 12:07 am Tuesday: COPA is not COPPA. COPA, which f_s is arguing based on, was overturned. COPPA is about the collection of personally identifiable information about kids, and is still in force. COPA is about the objectionable material. ]
[edit again, still without a witty name @ 1:34 am Tuesday: Now that LJ Abuse has been notified and given their response, and fandom_scruples@livejournal.com has been thoroughly e-mailed, and everyone's calmed down about the proceedings... Until fandom_scruples makes their next move (which I have no doubt that they'll do) it looks like it's all over but the inevitable review on http://www.ljdrama.org and the repercussions being played out in fannish circles all over the 'net. ]
[edit again again @ 1:52: In case f_w makes those entries that prompted this wank private, I've duplicated them in comments here. ]
Post a comment in response:
