Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Els-chan ([info]els_chan) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2004-01-27 14:43:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:*sporfle!*

The business with fandom_scruples has apparently made its merry way to ljdrama.org, where wankiness on the post itself has begun in the comments, particularly with a person by the name of "Jopti", who apparently goes back and checks the comments regularly enough to reply to them. Hmmm...


(Post a new comment)


[info]psychofangirl
2004-01-28 12:07 am UTC (link)
Jopti was not the only one who was wanky. It seems to me that people make assumptions about slash writers, but do no such thing with those who write het or lesbian porn.

"which is scary...go out and get a boyfriend already!"

I'll be sure to tell the MARRIED slash writers/fans that.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]telesilla
2004-01-28 01:23 am UTC (link)
Not to mention those of us who are lesbians. :D

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]iczer6
2004-01-28 08:59 am UTC (link)
Well we know that all slash writers must suffer from some mental disorder.

After all no *normal* woman would be interested in gay sex, kinky sex, or sex at all. We're just supposed to 'lie back and think of England'.

If we're curious then it must mean we're insane, psycho or a complete perv.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]telesilla, 2004-01-28 09:05 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]harukami, 2004-01-28 10:54 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rhi_silverflame, 2004-01-28 11:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rann, 2004-01-28 11:33 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]starfish, 2004-01-28 02:55 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]bubosquared, 2004-01-28 09:01 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]coyotegirl, 2004-01-28 11:37 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ichigatsu, 2004-01-28 06:39 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2004-01-28 08:37 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]rhi_silverflame, 2004-01-28 11:07 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2004-01-28 11:12 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ichigatsu, 2004-01-29 01:59 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2004-01-29 04:30 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]rhi_silverflame, 2004-01-29 09:53 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2004-01-29 04:15 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sarajayechan, 2004-01-29 11:21 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ichigatsu, 2004-01-29 02:00 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rhi_silverflame, 2004-01-29 09:49 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ichigatsu, 2004-01-29 03:17 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sorchar, 2004-01-28 05:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lavenderfrost, 2004-01-28 07:39 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kijikun, 2004-01-28 08:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]picot, 2004-01-28 08:34 pm UTC
Re: - [info]lavenderfrost, 2004-01-28 08:36 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]musette, 2004-01-28 08:48 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]virago, 2004-01-28 10:25 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2004-01-28 11:13 pm UTC
Re: - [info]musette, 2004-01-29 06:06 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lavenderfrost, 2004-01-28 10:30 pm UTC
Re: - [info]musette, 2004-01-29 06:06 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]jfpbookworm, 2004-01-29 08:14 am UTC
Re: - [info]musette, 2004-01-29 08:38 am UTC
(no subject) - pooka, 2004-01-28 09:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2004-01-28 09:24 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]iris, 2004-01-28 10:25 pm UTC
Re: - [info]lavenderfrost, 2004-01-28 10:29 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mael, 2004-01-29 12:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]iris, 2004-01-29 02:19 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rhi_silverflame, 2004-01-29 04:15 am UTC

(Reply from suspended user)
(no subject) - [info]rhi_silverflame, 2004-01-31 01:28 am UTC

(Reply from suspended user)
(no subject) - [info]visp, 2004-01-29 05:56 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]minibalrogmum, 2004-01-30 03:03 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]visp, 2004-01-31 02:25 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mael, 2004-01-29 12:12 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-01-29 02:22 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mael, 2004-01-29 02:26 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]musette, 2004-01-28 08:52 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]musette, 2004-01-28 08:52 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]bastet, 2004-01-28 10:17 pm UTC
Re: - [info]musette, 2004-01-29 06:05 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-01-29 03:31 am UTC
Re: - [info]musette, 2004-01-29 06:08 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]wolfsamurai, 2004-01-28 11:15 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]onetrickpony, 2004-01-28 01:20 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sanguinary, 2004-01-28 06:58 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sanguinary, 2004-01-28 07:00 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]bishounenhuntrs, 2004-01-31 02:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sanguinary, 2004-01-31 09:32 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]bishounenhuntrs, 2004-02-01 02:34 pm UTC
Re: - [info]sanguinary, 2004-02-02 09:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]bishounenhuntrs, 2004-02-02 05:56 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sanguinary, 2004-02-03 08:49 am UTC

[info]rhi_silverflame
2004-01-28 09:22 am UTC (link)
What?

Some of us are lesbians?

*le gasp*

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Let's try finishing this this time, shall we? - [info]telesilla, 2004-01-28 10:11 am UTC
Re: Let's try finishing this this time, shall we? - [info]rhi_silverflame, 2004-01-29 12:15 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mariagoner, 2004-01-28 12:01 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kijikun, 2004-01-28 08:18 pm UTC

[info]ramlatch
2004-01-28 10:03 am UTC (link)
I am in love with your icon. Can I marry that? :D

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]bubosquared
2004-01-28 10:56 am UTC (link)
*gropes your icon* I mean, yeah!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]naeelah
2004-01-28 11:49 pm UTC (link)
Nah, married slash writers are just so horribly pathetic that they're beyond all redemption. If you're not under 18 and single (and straight), you have no hope.


(I had to control my fist of death a bit while reading that thread.)

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


pooka
2004-01-29 01:51 am UTC (link)
Why control it? Let the fist of death fly free!

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]naeelah, 2004-01-29 04:19 am UTC

camilla
2004-01-29 03:31 am UTC (link)
I mentioned that some of us are in our fifties and grandmothers; that should send them running.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]naeelah, 2004-01-29 04:22 am UTC
Re: - camilla, 2004-01-29 04:32 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]naeelah, 2004-01-29 06:16 am UTC
Re: - camilla, 2004-01-29 07:16 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-01-29 03:44 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]virago, 2004-01-29 05:22 pm UTC

[info]sarajayechan
2004-01-29 11:09 pm UTC (link)
"All slash writers are fat undersexed teenage girls who can't get a boyfriend."

...Right. Cause it's not like someone writing slash and being single are entirely coincidental and have nothing to do with each other.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

Stope being on my side, already
[info]deoridhe
2004-01-28 04:42 pm UTC (link)
I need a 'stop being on my side, you're making my side look idiotic' icon. *shoots Jopti with a stun gun*

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Stope being on my side, already
[info]maryavatar
2004-01-28 10:54 pm UTC (link)
Your wish is my command.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Stope being on my side, already - (Anonymous), 2004-01-29 05:06 pm UTC
Re: Stope being on my side, already - [info]maryavatar, 2004-01-29 08:57 pm UTC

[info]kijikun
2004-01-28 11:40 pm UTC (link)
Speaking of the whole issue, I call your attenion to this thread Someone it seems things Elance is the eval for her effots.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]nessa_t
2004-01-29 01:23 am UTC (link)
Seems that someone is over-reacting. I just can't get over the fact that some of them are putting on airs... i'm holier than thou kind of attutide. The bottom point lies with the fact that if parents don't want their kids reading smut, they must be supervised. End of story. I wouldn't let my 5 to 13 year old kids surf the net unattended.

the moment they hit 14... well... let's just say that some people *coughorlandobloomcough* lost their virginities at the age of 14 and i don't think it has anything to do with slash.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-01-29 01:27 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]visp, 2004-01-29 06:00 am UTC
Re: - [info]nessa_t, 2004-01-29 06:10 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]missambs, 2004-01-29 02:07 pm UTC
Re: - [info]nessa_t, 2004-01-29 02:12 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]missambs, 2004-01-29 02:25 pm UTC
An exerpt from Marmaladesky's journal.
[info]elanor_durall
2004-01-29 05:14 am UTC (link)
At least I ADMIT that Daddy pays my credit card bills.

Ahahahaha.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: An exerpt from Marmaladesky's journal. - (Anonymous), 2004-01-29 10:28 pm UTC
Re: An exerpt from Marmaladesky's journal. - [info]elanor_durall, 2004-01-30 02:53 am UTC
The echo
smirnoffmule
2004-01-29 12:50 am UTC (link)
What gremlin is it that makes them all repeat themselves three times? Do they measure how right they are in post volume?

Isn't it cute how so many people who begin their posts with the phrase "I'm not into fanfiction, but... " then turn out to be Teh Expert on fic and all the people who read it and write it. Do they not realise how people with eyes will read that? "I'm a moron and my opinion means nothing, but..." They might as well just stop there.

Fuckwits.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: The echo
[info]iczer6
2004-01-29 02:00 am UTC (link)
"I'm not into fanfiction, but... " then turn out to be Teh Expert on fic and all the people who read it and write it. Do they not realise how people with eyes will read that? "I'm a moron and my opinion means nothing, but..." They might as well just stop there.

What? Didn you know that people who have never written a story in their are the *only* people who can judge the merits of fanfiction?

Another memo missed eh?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: The echo - smirnoffmule, 2004-01-29 02:26 am UTC
Re: The echo
[info]ladybirdsleeps
2004-01-29 09:13 pm UTC (link)
That gremlin would be LJDrama's servers sucking.

Speaking as someone who posted three times on accident, the comments form often times out and checking to see if your comment was posted is hell.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

Re: The echo
[info]mrsparkle
2004-01-30 03:54 am UTC (link)
Dude. It's all about Bill O' Reilly and imitating his show, the O'Reilly Factor. He does that all the time! :D

Take three weeks ago, for example: "Now, you know, I don't believe in the death penalty or anything, but if this kid Malvo show no remorse for the sniper shootings...then, well--you gotta fry 'im, ya know? He needs to die."

(Reply to this)(Parent)

Re: The echo
[info]zbloodyxkissesa
2004-01-30 07:16 am UTC (link)
Sowwy, but I must say...

I love your icon! ^.^

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]diamonde
2004-01-29 01:38 am UTC (link)
This person's all worked up about the vadlity and quality of other people's hobbies and claim they need psychiatric help for their taste in porn, and the slashers are the ones who need to go out and get lives/get laid?

*climbs up on chair, turns around, peers at screen through legs* No, it doesn't make any more sense upside-down, either.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]lntora
2004-01-29 10:37 am UTC (link)
Obviously all the wank on this one has warped my brain, as I read that statement as, "climbs up on chair, turns around, pees at screen through legs."

Although given the comments, I'd feel oblige to pee on the screen too.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]iris, 2004-01-29 06:48 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lntora, 2004-01-29 06:55 pm UTC

[info]rogue
2004-01-29 09:51 am UTC (link)
What I want to read are the testimonials of these mysterious children who stumble on unprotected porn. Because I haven't heard anything about it. Really. You'd think if little Suzie was looking around on Fanfiction.net for some more Mary Sues by her friend Sally, and somehow clicked on some kinky Snape/Hermione rapefic --- oh, wait. FF.net outlawed NC-17 fics.

Okay, okay, so let's say little Suzie's just websurfing, looking for pictures to print out for her book report. We'll also say that little Suzie is NOT on AOL or MSN and does not have the obligatory parental blocks, and that little Suzie's parents are herione addicts who can somehow afford a computer and have a semi-literate child totally ignore everything their daighter does unless they can sue someone for it.

... Wait, how is little Suzie finding this shit, again?

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]ahiru
2004-01-29 03:08 pm UTC (link)
Personally, I'm thinking that little Suzie is actually looking for the porn, and then her parents come walking up behind her and she quickly squeaks, "I wasn't looking! I just stumbled on it, really!" and then her parents immediately decide that, rather than letting her continue to look or punishing her and putting on parental locks or something silly and sensible like that, they must regulate the Internet instead. Because obviously, little Suzie looking at porn is the fault of everybody else except her parents.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]naeelah, 2004-01-29 05:19 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]naeelah, 2004-01-29 09:12 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ahiru, 2004-01-29 10:40 pm UTC

[info]dwarfjen
2004-01-30 11:31 am UTC (link)
To be fair, at one point my sister and her friends liked this teenybopper site than was a .co.uk address (I really can't remember which one), and once at school typed in the .com version by mistake and got a porn site.

Then again, she was thirteen and if she was anything like her three older sisters she closed it down immediately going 'Pay for porn? Bullshit. I can get this stuff free off usenet.'

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]kijikun, 2004-01-31 12:07 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]trintrin, 2004-02-02 01:43 am UTC

  
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map