Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Voip ([info]banal_o_rama) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2004-02-08 17:33:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Transsexuals wank two standard deviations better than normal wankers!
To no one's surprise, the Queen of Wank has got her introitus all squirty again. Before I begin, I beg forgiveness for wanking her again; you must understand that JDR-watching is my hobby. Some people RP--I do this.

To those who have lives better pastimes than mine, Jennifer Diane Reitz is a 40-something MTF transsexual who is quite possibly the most irritating person ever put upon God's green Earth. Dubbed "Whiny McBlame-chan" by some long-forgotten POE wag, she is notable for...holy crap, if I had to list it all I would probably die or something. Just look at the first URL, you'll get up to speed pretty quickly.

At any rate, said Creatrix runs excessively huggy and pretentious forums, and has just started an offense to Wacomkind a new webcomic based on an old story she did for Otakuworld ages ago. The religion in this particular comic is a thinly-veiled parody of Catholicism, which has led of late to lots of fun arguments which have made JDR pretty damn touchy even for JDR. (The link above, though not the subject of this particular wank, is a wonderland of "GODDAMN FUNDIEZ RATIONALISM IS TOTALLY COOLIEZ!!!!ichi!SOMEONEFUCKINGHUGGLEME!" rhetoric, and thus well worth the time taken to read it. Whatever kind of logic this is, the planets are flat.) Combine this with the fact that JDR may have to quit calling herself a hetaera and maybe actually get a real fucking job, and you have a stumpcock that fairly aches for sweet splurty release.

Bingo.

It starts off innocuous enough, but then JDR, in her infinite wisdom, decides to let everybody know that Lewis Carroll was indeed a pedophile. One of the forumites, apparently something of an expert on Mr. Carroll, takes issue with her characterizing him as such, and asks to see some evidence (beyond his ballyhooed naked girly photographing, which is not incontrovertible proof of pederasty) that he was such. And then...this. (Regrettably, putting this in italics destroys the formatting of the original, which is VERY special indeed. My apologies.)

Yes it is cool. Because I know my stuff. Because I know my stuff so well, I can say things like that and not have to be questioned about it. I shouldn't have to be called out over stuff like that. It makes me cranky.

Being called out pisses me off, Kenny. Especially when I am right. I did make one mistake, though, and I will admit to it at the end. So you win one. But the rest...well... ok, fine. You calling me out? Normally I just ignore such questioning of my validity, but tonight I am feeling really pissy. REALLY REALLY PISSY!

Which means I slam down references, and a little anger too, perhaps. We'll see. Did I already mention I'm feeling pissy about being questioned about knowing what I speak of and also being called 'not cool' as well?

Let's bring it on, then....


She then goes on to cite multiple references, several in foreign languages, that allege but do not prove that Carroll was a genuine pedophile. Tempers flare, several people come out of the woodwork to criticize the Creatrix for essentially calling herself infallible, and all in all there are 9 solid pages of me bouncing up and down in my chair like a kid with ADHD on Christmas morning.

Eventually, JDR apologizes, and then reveals that she didn't think Carroll was a pervert at all. Why would she defend her claim to the contrary so strongly? No one can say. The wank continues apace, but summarizing it robs it of its beauty. It is akin to attempting to describe the physics of a bumblebee's flight. The essence is lost in the retelling.

I swear it's my birthday again or something.


(Post a new comment)


[info]iczer6
2004-02-09 12:59 am UTC (link)
It's oddly compelling to watch someone flip out when asked to give evidence of their claim.

And check out the forum members rushing to her defense because 'how DARE he ask her a question when she's in a bad mood!', and talking about her great suffering because people look up to her or something like that...

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]skijg
2004-02-09 02:30 am UTC (link)
I think your icon gave me an orgasm seizure.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Anonymous)
2004-02-09 06:35 am UTC (link)
Holy crap, I want that icon. Who made it? *wants, wants, wants the precious*

-josie

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]iczer6, 2004-02-09 06:36 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-02-09 06:39 am UTC

[info]sagralisse
2004-02-09 01:01 am UTC (link)
Some people RP--I do this.

You have got to be insane. That shit's making my head hurt.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]banal_o_rama
2004-02-09 02:03 am UTC (link)
I have a very high tolerance for crap. This shit is like Beaujolais to me.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]rhi_silverflame
2004-02-09 07:01 am UTC (link)
ICON!!! *loves* *wants*

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]sagralisse, 2004-02-09 03:46 pm UTC

[info]mael
2004-02-09 01:34 am UTC (link)
Lady, if you're calling Carroll a pederast because he took pictures of young, naked girls then you don't know your vocab and should take criticism like a man woman hardy person. Pederasty implies the presence of anal intercourse and, coincidentally, boys, neither of which has anything to do with Carroll and his admiring little girls in pretty dresses (or out of them).

That said, please shut up.

Your head might explode, or lift you off this earth entirely to float forever and ever as a bloated, pink balloon of trivia and pathetic, not-at-all-apparent bitching sarcasm. And I don't want to see that.

I don't know who you are, I don't know what you draw, I sure as hell don't dwell in your candy forums, but, hey, I really don't think all that ego is healthy.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]smo
2004-02-09 03:03 am UTC (link)
*fangirls your icon*

Yes, my little piranha fish!

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]mael, 2004-02-09 04:34 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2004-02-09 08:51 am UTC

[info]musette
2004-02-09 04:24 am UTC (link)
Dammit you stole my rant before I could say it!! *huffs off muttering about how at least they didnt say buggery in this wank*

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]mael, 2004-02-09 04:28 am UTC
Re: - [info]musette, 2004-02-09 04:39 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]amand_r, 2004-02-09 04:57 am UTC

[info]crickets
2004-02-09 06:12 am UTC (link)
John Cleese! ::licks your icon::

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]kannaophelia
2004-02-10 05:02 pm UTC (link)
Yeah, Carroll raped all those little girls he took pictures of, and Blyton locked herself in a room while her children screamed and wept "Mummy! Mummy! Please be a housewife! What did you do to Daddy?" outside her door, and as for Barrie:

For a REAL sicko of children's literature, we must turn to the scandalous Sir. James M. Barry, author of Peter Pan: his wife divorced him when he refused to release from sexual bondage and servatude the three young boys he nonconsensually played fairly severe B&D and S&M games with until they finally killed themselves in shame and disgust, the content of said games becoming the text of the story of Peter Pan itself.

I pray I never meet JDR socially, that's all.

Really, what is the bizarre attraction im interpreting the life of kids' book writers as scandulously as possible? And what the *fuck* is she using as sources?

I'd love to point out that if Barrie's pictures count as child porn, so do Anne Geddes'.

I don't know what you draw,

You don't know how lucky you are.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2004-02-10 10:41 pm UTC

[info]ecchaniz0r
2004-02-10 10:05 pm UTC (link)
WOOORRRDDD!

If you cannot get your terminology right, Whiney McBlame-chan-kun-WTFOMNGBBQ, people will think you an asstard. That's life. Suck it, bitch.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]visp
2004-02-09 01:52 am UTC (link)
I fail to see why some people are calling Kenny out for any of this. She made an unsubstantiated claim, and therefore deserves to be mocked for not having shown the evidence. Personally, I'd have been a lot nastier.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]ecchaniz0r
2004-02-10 11:26 pm UTC (link)
Kenny's being reamed because 90% of the forum-goers are Dr. Wank N FurterJDR's sycophants.

Blarg.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: - [info]visp, 2004-02-11 06:00 am UTC

[info]feenix
2004-02-09 02:06 am UTC (link)
Oh, Giniko-kun-chan-kun-(whatever the neuter diminutive in Japanese is, if there is one), you so funny.

And you're right. The formatting of that post was special. Special enough to get saved to my HD.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]banal_o_rama, 2004-02-09 02:23 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]feenix, 2004-02-09 02:38 am UTC
POE Link - (Anonymous), 2004-02-09 05:27 am UTC
Re: POE Link - [info]iczer6, 2004-02-09 07:04 am UTC
Re: POE Link - [info]eljuno, 2004-02-09 07:36 am UTC
Re: POE Link - [info]iczer6, 2004-02-09 07:42 am UTC
Re: POE Link - [info]eljuno, 2004-02-09 08:16 am UTC
*remembers the revenge comic, BOGGLES* - [info]garlicbug, 2004-02-09 09:23 am UTC
Re: *remembers the revenge comic, BOGGLES* - (Anonymous), 2004-02-10 08:40 am UTC
Re: POE Link - [info]psychofangirl, 2004-02-09 08:03 am UTC
Re: POE Link - [info]ecchaniz0r, 2004-02-10 09:29 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]eiviiaru, 2004-02-09 02:47 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]banal_o_rama, 2004-02-09 02:53 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]eiviiaru, 2004-02-11 01:00 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]feenix, 2004-02-09 02:58 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kyuuketsukirui, 2004-02-09 03:08 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]crickets, 2004-02-09 06:35 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]feenix, 2004-02-09 06:45 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]eiviiaru, 2004-02-09 04:15 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kaiser_chan, 2004-02-09 05:23 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kyuuketsukirui, 2004-02-09 05:55 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rogue, 2004-02-09 09:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kaiser_chan, 2004-02-10 12:48 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kijikun, 2004-02-09 06:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]koyomi_mizuhara, 2004-02-09 12:55 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kijikun, 2004-02-09 07:36 pm UTC
That's because of the "romantic interest" part - [info]liarliar, 2004-02-09 09:03 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]virago, 2004-02-09 04:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]eiviiaru, 2004-02-09 05:29 pm UTC

[info]chaoscheebs
2004-02-09 02:06 am UTC (link)
"In a normal situation both sides would be asked to take a step back, take a deep breath, and try again. That's how we'd treat two friends who got a little upset, right?

Not slam them against the wall and fuck them with razor blades."


Yeah, the anti-rapefic robots have that copyrighted!

OK, let me get this straight. JDR makes a comment that is challenged. She gets uber-bitchy about it, then others join the "fun", and when he says "Yeah, I coulda worded it more politely, but isn't this being blown out of proportion?", he gets jumped on even more? Man, did the logic train plow right past the forum. *Is dead from wank*

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]iczer6, 2004-02-09 02:45 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kaiser_chan, 2004-02-09 05:28 am UTC
Icon love! - [info]rinoared, 2004-02-09 09:43 am UTC
Re: Icon love! - [info]smo, 2004-02-09 09:33 pm UTC
Re: Icon love! - [info]ecchaniz0r, 2004-02-10 09:58 pm UTC
Re: Icon love! - [info]smo, 2004-02-10 10:46 pm UTC
Re: Icon love! - [info]ecchaniz0r, 2004-02-10 11:24 pm UTC
Re: Icon love! - [info]smo, 2004-02-10 11:27 pm UTC
Re: Icon love! - [info]kaiser_chan, 2004-02-10 12:50 am UTC

[info]ahiru
2004-02-09 02:22 am UTC (link)
Yes how dare someone ask for sources when a person is making an argument. You can see how very seriously I am angered at this, due to my rampant use of italics, for they are italics of rage and you must bow before them.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]baskinglizard, 2004-02-09 02:29 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]eiviiaru, 2004-02-09 02:44 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]yadda, 2004-02-09 03:03 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2004-02-09 03:04 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]eiviiaru, 2004-02-09 04:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]maryavatar, 2004-02-09 03:12 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ahiru, 2004-02-09 03:20 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]yadda, 2004-02-09 03:24 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]eiviiaru, 2004-02-09 04:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]enkogneatoh, 2004-02-09 04:45 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-02-09 05:58 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ahiru, 2004-02-09 03:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-02-10 01:55 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]chaoscheebs, 2004-02-09 03:36 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]eiviiaru, 2004-02-09 04:23 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ecchaniz0r, 2004-02-10 09:19 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]eiviiaru, 2004-02-10 09:38 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-02-10 08:43 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]chaoscheebs, 2004-02-10 09:17 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-02-10 11:26 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sagralisse, 2004-02-09 03:47 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]eiviiaru, 2004-02-09 04:23 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sagralisse, 2004-02-09 04:28 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]senor_pinata, 2004-02-09 05:16 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sagralisse, 2004-02-09 05:40 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-02-09 06:01 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]baskinglizard, 2004-02-09 08:32 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sagralisse, 2004-02-09 03:44 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2004-02-09 03:04 am UTC

[info]puipui
2004-02-09 05:47 am UTC (link)
And that stupid, dumb-ass is ME buddy!

It certainly is, Giniko-chan. It certainly is.

(Reply to this)


[info]crickets
2004-02-09 06:31 am UTC (link)
It's the Unicorn Jelly lady!

I got a very very easily-Googled Timothy Leary phrase completely and utterly wrong, but goddamn it, I KNOW MY SHIT!

*facepalm*

I was itty bitty during the sixties, and even I would remember the "drop out" part and why it was significant. Yep, she knows her stuff. Uh-huh.

*sporfle!* at her hissy fit. My, she's a mature one.

::waves a little RAH! flag for Kenny::

She couldn't be bothered to look up the Leary quote, but the amount of stuff she dredged up on Carroll was mind-numbing. Kudos to ObakeTenshi for calling her out for, among other things, the "creatrix" label JDR christens herself with.

Devon Lake injects some level headed logic, and that's as far as I go. Head hurts.

Anyone else? A round of Tylenol for everyone, on me.

::wanders off chuckling at the italics of rage::

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-02-09 07:45 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kijikun, 2004-02-09 08:17 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]big_bad_wolf, 2004-02-09 11:30 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]iczer6, 2004-02-09 07:59 pm UTC
Re: - [info]big_bad_wolf, 2004-02-10 02:32 pm UTC
Creatrix - [info]deoridhe, 2004-02-09 04:52 pm UTC

[info]snoozy
2004-02-09 07:25 am UTC (link)
11 Pages! God, it's the wank that never ends...

(as a side note, I must admit that for some reason I kept reading "Timothy Leary" as "Dennis Leary," so... yeah. CONFUSION!)

(Reply to this)


[info]dawnswalker
2004-02-09 08:18 am UTC (link)
I'll bet that Lewis Carroll could kick JDR's ass, any day of the week.

And he's dead.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]sewingmyfish, 2004-02-09 09:17 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-02-09 12:41 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kannaophelia, 2004-02-10 05:36 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2004-02-09 04:50 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]snacky, 2004-02-09 07:07 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]eiviiaru, 2004-02-10 08:16 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2004-02-10 10:38 pm UTC

[info]hoorofcrowley
2004-02-09 09:06 am UTC (link)
My head began hurting about seven pages in but I have to wonder . . .

If you sat in a literature class and called Carroll a pedophile and the teacher asked you to elaborate, would you honestly say, "FUCK YOU, PROF! I KNOW MY SHIT!" . . . ? No, of course not. And if you said that calling a celebrated author a pedophile even if it's not been proven wasn't harmful just because he was dead, do ye think the professor would just say, "Well, golly gee, you're right. You get an A, precious!"?

But, ah, this is the Internet. So it's OKAY. Because you know your shit.

Glorious wank.

(Reply to this)


[info]rikoshi
2004-02-09 10:10 am UTC (link)
Alfador has an icon of his character wearing a diaper now, huh?

And I remember reading a newspaper article interview with him, too...

*shakes head solemnly*

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]dawnswalker, 2004-02-09 10:16 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rikoshi, 2004-02-09 10:26 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dawnswalker, 2004-02-09 10:27 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rikoshi, 2004-02-09 10:31 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dawnswalker, 2004-02-09 10:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]eljuno, 2004-02-09 10:23 am UTC
Re: - [info]banal_o_rama, 2004-02-09 05:49 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]rikoshi, 2004-02-09 07:32 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]feenix, 2004-02-09 07:57 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]eljuno, 2004-02-09 08:05 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2004-02-09 09:34 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]eiviiaru, 2004-02-10 08:14 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]feenix, 2004-02-10 11:58 pm UTC
... - [info]eiviiaru, 2004-02-11 12:54 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]banal_o_rama, 2004-02-11 02:23 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]eiviiaru, 2004-02-11 05:23 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]crickets, 2004-02-11 06:26 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dawnswalker, 2004-02-12 08:15 am UTC

[info]ecchaniz0r
2004-02-10 09:56 pm UTC (link)
Good Jesus.

JDR, please die soon, and let the sparrows have your share of oxygen, for you are a lame-assed wankeriffic lonertard and you are giving the sane trannies a bad name.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ecchaniz0r, 2004-02-10 09:59 pm UTC

[info]obaketenshi
2004-02-15 10:15 am UTC (link)
JournalFen was down when this wank was in progress. You have no idea how much I was crawling up the walls wanting to post about it. @_@;

And I'd like to point out that nearly everyone thats on that forum KISSES HER ASS. And pooooooooooooooooooooooooooooor *sarcasm* Svzurich, left because "we're too MEAN!". Suck it up. -___-

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: - [info]banal_o_rama, 2004-02-15 06:20 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]obaketenshi, 2004-02-16 03:31 am UTC

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map