Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



LavenderFrost ([info]lavenderfrost) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2004-02-18 11:11:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:*sporfle!*

Fandom_Scruples RETURNS!
...and they're maaaaaaaaaad.

Fandom_Scruples has posted a mini-rant about how we live in a society where "immorality" is normal and we just CAN'T understand that we need to protect kids from teh EEVAL pr0n! Liek, OMGthinkofthechildren!!!1!11!one!

Go here:
http://www.livejournal.com/users/fandom_scruples/

Comments still disabled, of course.
Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

(Post a new comment)


[info]sarajayechan
2004-02-18 08:19 pm UTC (link)
*sporfle*

Ah, those silly people...

(Reply to this)


(Anonymous)
2004-02-18 08:21 pm UTC (link)
I wonder what set him/her off this time? I truly doubt that kids actually set their standards of behaviour by things that they read on people's LJ's but I wouldn't mind betting that they have a really good laugh though.

M.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]heidi, 2004-02-21 05:38 pm UTC

[info]kijikun
2004-02-18 08:32 pm UTC (link)
*yawn* they're just pissed becuase no one cares about them anymore

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - allen, 2004-02-18 08:39 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2004-02-18 08:47 pm UTC
(no subject) - allen, 2004-02-18 08:58 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2004-02-18 09:04 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]panthea, 2004-02-18 10:06 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2004-02-18 10:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]panthea, 2004-02-20 02:53 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2004-02-20 04:55 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]panthea, 2004-02-20 05:04 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2004-02-20 05:31 pm UTC

[info]maryavatar
2004-02-18 08:34 pm UTC (link)
It's like some horrible accident you can't look away from. Someone really needs to learn that children are people, not little clay dolls waiting for someone else to stamp their features on.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]evening_rose, 2004-02-18 08:38 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]maryavatar, 2004-02-18 09:21 pm UTC

[info]photosinensis
2004-02-18 08:46 pm UTC (link)
Y'know, I'm getting bored of fandom screwballs. It was funny in the beginning, but now, it's just trying to recreate its already gone glory days. If those behind f_s were to open comments, I'm sure it'd be fun again.

(Reply to this)


[info]zorb
2004-02-18 08:48 pm UTC (link)
Sounds like they didn't get whatever responses they were looking for. >:)

(Reply to this)


[info]big_bad_wolf
2004-02-18 08:52 pm UTC (link)
"MUMMY MUMMY LOOK AT ME! LOOK AT ME! I WANT ATTENTION! MEEEEE!"

(Reply to this)


[info]phosfate
2004-02-18 08:57 pm UTC (link)
They're not even trying.

(Reply to this)


[info]scottiegirlc
2004-02-18 09:08 pm UTC (link)
They lose points big-time for disabling comments. Where's the openness to debate, or if logical, mature debate isn't possible, then at least childish diatribes insulting one's politics, lineage, sexual preference, internet finesse, and stolen user icons?

This would be a hundred times more interesting if f_s would say something like "We hate how all the low-income homosexual pedophiles using ripped-off Orlando Bloom icons write pornographic stories for distribution to nursery schools," and then opened it for comments.

(And all the low-income homosexual pedophiles who distribute slash to three-year-olds would rise with a united, mighty voice, stating with absolute clarity: They make their OWN fucking Orlando Bloom icons, dammit!)

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]smo, 2004-02-18 10:19 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]beccastareyes, 2004-02-18 11:12 pm UTC
Three Year Olds Reading Bloom Slash? - [info]lots42, 2004-02-19 06:50 pm UTC
Re: Three Year Olds Reading Bloom Slash? - [info]scottiegirlc, 2004-02-19 07:48 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]msmanna, 2004-02-20 12:08 am UTC

[info]kicklecubicle
2004-02-18 09:11 pm UTC (link)
Yes, we must protect the innocent children from demoralizing and desensitizing sexuality. There is nothing more life-scarring for a child, to see two ficticious characters expressing love for one another in a physical (and usually poorly written) way.

(Violence is still okay! *thumbs up*)

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]smo, 2004-02-18 10:19 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]heidi, 2004-02-21 05:39 pm UTC

[info]zarla
2004-02-18 09:45 pm UTC (link)
Curses, I never should have read that Bert/Ernie/Elmo thing. Cause now I want to go rape muppets, and it's all that unpassworded link's fault. THE SHAME OF IT ALL.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]sagralisse, 2004-02-18 10:04 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sagralisse, 2004-02-18 10:05 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2004-02-18 10:25 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]blackjackrocket, 2004-02-18 10:35 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mooncalf, 2004-02-18 11:09 pm UTC
Icon love! - [info]smo, 2004-02-18 11:14 pm UTC
Re: Icon love! - [info]mooncalf, 2004-02-18 11:16 pm UTC
Squeee!!! - [info]deoridhe, 2004-02-18 11:27 pm UTC
Re: Squeee!!! - [info]smo, 2004-02-19 05:52 pm UTC
*Adds To To-Do List* - [info]lavenderfrost, 2004-02-19 11:33 pm UTC
Re: *Adds To To-Do List* - [info]smo, 2004-02-20 04:55 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sarajayechan, 2004-02-20 01:00 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2004-02-20 04:57 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]khym_chanur, 2004-02-20 04:47 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2004-02-20 04:54 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]crickets, 2004-02-20 07:35 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sarajayechan, 2004-02-18 10:26 pm UTC

(Reply from suspended user)
(no subject) - [info]princessdot, 2004-02-20 12:06 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2004-02-18 09:58 pm UTC (link)
Apparently plagiarism is one of those forms of morality that's now considered normal, because this rant is copied almost verbatim from a Family Research Council article by Susan Chamberlain:

While researchers and parents alike acknowledge the dangers of excessive violence and promiscuity on television, few are motivated to change their families' appetites. Immorality is normalized. And adolescents, who are most likely to imitate television's value system, become youth at risk for copy-cat violence, desensitization, exaggerated fears, and false impressions of sexual intimacy, gender, and their place in society.

"Violence and Promiscuity Set the Stage for Television's Moral Collapse" by Susan Chamberlain, http://www.frc.org/get.cfm?i=IS02E4

This strengthens my belief that Fandom_Scruples is a troll, since while these types tend to be dittoheads it is highly unoriginal and lazy to simply copy a quote, substituting "immoral fics" for "television."

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]hotpinkdragones, 2004-02-19 07:24 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]princessdot, 2004-02-20 12:09 am UTC

[info]ingrid
2004-02-18 09:59 pm UTC (link)
I think they've just jumped the wank.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]crickets, 2004-02-18 10:05 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sarajayechan, 2004-02-18 10:24 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]rhi_silverflame, 2004-02-18 10:40 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sarajayechan, 2004-02-18 10:56 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ahiru, 2004-02-18 10:53 pm UTC
You rang? - [info]panthea, 2004-02-18 10:59 pm UTC
Re: You rang? - [info]crickets, 2004-02-18 11:15 pm UTC
Re: You rang? - [info]panthea, 2004-02-18 11:27 pm UTC
Re: You rang? - [info]crickets, 2004-02-18 11:39 pm UTC
Re: You rang? - [info]sarajayechan, 2004-02-20 03:35 am UTC

[info]esseilte
2004-02-18 10:32 pm UTC (link)
Sounds like the little darlings are annoyed because their previous "Quake with fear, you tiny fools", got laughed at.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(Deleted post)
Re: They are just not taking their meds - [info]crickets, 2004-02-20 07:40 pm UTC

[info]telesilla
2004-02-18 10:42 pm UTC (link)
meh

They were much more interesting when I thought they were mock wank. Now they're just tedious.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]katsue, 2004-02-20 02:46 am UTC

[info]fairy_tale_echo
2004-02-18 11:15 pm UTC (link)
youth at risk for copy-cat sexual acts

COPY-CAT sexual acts? What's the world coming to? You can't just copy sex from somewhere, OK, you have to make it up as you go along.

But, you know, one kid is gonna read Weasleycest and then immediate try to nail their siblings. Duh.

We live in a society where stupidity is normalized. But then, I can't expect any of them to understand this? I suppose not.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - pooka, 2004-02-19 06:45 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]calluna, 2004-02-19 07:05 pm UTC

ataniell93
2004-02-18 11:24 pm UTC (link)
oh the waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaangst! *snif*

This isn't even funneh any more.

(Reply to this)


[info]eatsomepi
2004-02-18 11:35 pm UTC (link)
wish they hadn't disabled comments. i'm up for a good round of poke the troll.

and by their standards, i should've grown up to be a horrible immoral person with no respect for right and wrong and, were their predictions to come true, would probably be working a corner on 5th street, but...heh. Art school scholarship, yay, where I can write porn that's subsidized by the government!

mm, government subsidized porn.

(Reply to this)


redwarrior
2004-02-19 12:02 am UTC (link)
youth at risk for copy-cat sexual acts, desensitization, exaggerated fears, and false impressions of sexual intimacy, gender, and their world.

Is it me or does that sound like someone who's walked in on their parents a few times too many??

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]smo, 2004-02-19 05:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]princessdot, 2004-02-20 12:21 am UTC

[info]arielchan
2004-02-19 12:39 am UTC (link)
This has actually gotten so stupid as to make me wish I were not on the blacklist.

And I used to be so proud, too. v_v

~*Ariel*~

(Reply to this)


[info]guinevere33
2004-02-19 05:54 pm UTC (link)
I'm waiting for f_s to propose hiding children from their own genitalia with tinfoil hats, lest they learn to do or think about "immoral" things.

Fandom_scruples: Because human sexuality is immoral, goddammit.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]maryavatar, 2004-02-19 06:19 pm UTC
Re: - [info]guinevere33, 2004-02-19 06:24 pm UTC

(Anonymous)
2004-02-19 06:39 pm UTC (link)
I find it highly amusing that when you click on their friends link, one of the top messages is an icons post, including one with the text "my fandom is completely obsessed with sex", and in a distinctly non-disgusted way.

hehe, this is too easy

It's got to be a troll, right?

And for the record, when i have kids, i'm gonna re-write the fairytales, so that there are just as many brave knights rescuing other brave knights, and princesses rescuing princesses, as there are knights rescuing princesses.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]lots42, 2004-02-19 06:54 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kijikun, 2004-02-19 08:37 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-02-19 07:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]blackjackrocket, 2004-02-19 10:20 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kindest_demon, 2004-02-21 08:33 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]baskinglizard, 2004-02-20 02:46 am UTC

pooka
2004-02-19 06:48 pm UTC (link)
I was never "protected" from porn and it's ev0l ilk as a child. So why the hell aren't I morally corrupt? According to F_S, I should be having a wild, splooge-filled orgy right now.

Where is my orgy, dammit??

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]eljuno, 2004-02-19 06:56 pm UTC

[info]ichigatsu
2004-02-19 07:11 pm UTC (link)
youth at risk for copy-cat sexual acts, desensitization, exaggerated fears, and false impressions of sexual intimacy, gender, and their world

That explains all these university kids making these horrible, horrible amateur porn videos. Thank you, fandom scruples, for saving us from low-quality porn!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]eljuno, 2004-02-19 08:07 pm UTC
Re: - [info]ichigatsu, 2004-02-19 08:12 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]eljuno, 2004-02-19 08:16 pm UTC
Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map