	(Anonymous) 2004-03-11 09:46 pm UTC (link)
	This isn't even that wanky. Where is my wank, damn you!? kicks potter fandom in the nads (Reply to this)(Thread)

	sporkify 2004-03-11 09:48 pm UTC (link)
	That's why I called it a mini wank. Although, the comments even made my girlffriend laugh and she's totally not into fandom. Take from it what you can get. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-03-11 09:49 pm UTC

slytherincess
2004-03-11 09:55 pm UTC (link)

You're right. It's not particularly wanky. Perhaps Sporkify thought so, because I mentioned it under a filtered post on LJ (which would mean, I would guess, that Sporkify is someone on my LJ f-list). I filtered it because even though it's my LJ and I have the right to bitch if I want to, I kind of felt that it would be inappropriate for me to discuss something that arose from FA business in a totally public forum.

Funny how the first filtered post I've ever made on my personal LJ is f_w'ed within two hours of my posting it. Gotta give props for chuztpah.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) -

sporkify, 2004-03-11 09:59 pm UTC

Question -

karma_bitch, 2004-03-12 03:51 am UTC

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-03-11 10:10 pm UTC

(no subject) -

slytherincess, 2004-03-11 10:21 pm UTC

(no subject) -

delfeus, 2004-03-12 05:10 pm UTC

Re: -

slytherincess, 2004-03-12 05:19 pm UTC

(no subject) -

chaos_rose, 2004-03-11 10:29 pm UTC

	sagralisse 2004-03-11 11:05 pm UTC (link)
	Damn. It smells like anons in here. ::sprays air freshener:: (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) -

ari_o, 2004-03-11 11:24 pm UTC

(no subject) -

sagralisse, 2004-03-12 02:57 am UTC

Re: -

ari_o, 2004-03-12 03:22 am UTC

(no subject) -

gaisce, 2004-03-12 10:39 am UTC

Re: -

ari_o, 2004-03-12 04:39 pm UTC

	erinmiran 2004-03-11 10:06 pm UTC (link)
	man, WHO CARES. fiction alley wank is so old because it's always the same thing someone opposes the moderators! the moderators respond and attempt to use logic! the opposition doesn't get it! the same thing happens every time! 8-\| (Reply to this)(Thread)

	(Anonymous) 2004-03-11 10:09 pm UTC (link)
	Double fucking standard when it comes to FA. Seriously. And Sporkify wasn't even wanking on the FA mod. He was wanking on the fuckwit who publically posted the rant. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) -

erinmiran, 2004-03-11 10:10 pm UTC

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-03-11 10:20 pm UTC

(no subject) -

erinmiran, 2004-03-11 10:23 pm UTC

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-03-11 10:25 pm UTC

<-- *NOT* speaking for FA! :O -

erinmiran, 2004-03-11 10:26 pm UTC

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-03-11 10:28 pm UTC

(no subject) -

eljuno, 2004-03-11 10:30 pm UTC

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-03-11 10:40 pm UTC

(no subject) -

ari_o, 2004-03-11 11:18 pm UTC

(Reply from suspended user)

shoiryu
2004-03-11 10:42 pm UTC (link)
..........m'kay.
(Reply to this)

sagralisse
2004-03-11 11:10 pm UTC (link)
I think a wonderful solution for this would be to get the fuck off of FA. You're supposed to count the number of characters in every single reply? Just... gah.
(Reply to this)(Thread)

slytherincess
2004-03-11 11:32 pm UTC (link)
Character count is one thing we use in determining whether a post qualifies as a one-liner -- just one thing. When I'm modding at FA, I just know a one-liner when I see it; however, the poster questioned my judgement, so yes I had to actually open up MS Word and count the characters in order to demonstrate the point to her.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - sagralisse, 2004-03-12 01:00 am UTC

Re: - slytherincess, 2004-03-12 01:04 am UTC

(no subject) - sagralisse, 2004-03-12 02:56 am UTC

Re: - slytherincess, 2004-03-12 03:07 am UTC

Double standards among mods - redina, 2004-03-12 05:32 am UTC

Re: Double standards among mods - janegraddell, 2004-03-12 07:20 pm UTC

(no subject) - erinmiran, 2004-03-12 12:17 am UTC

(no subject) - sagralisse, 2004-03-12 01:01 am UTC

Re: - erinmiran, 2004-03-12 01:03 am UTC

illuminati
2004-03-11 11:14 pm UTC (link)
I think the wank is coming from minerva_fan and her friends who are all lining up saying how much a bitch slytherincess is and how much she sucks as a mod. slytherincess was not being bitchy or wanky IMHO. I thought it was hilarious when she said they can call her McBitch. Apparently they call the other mod McGwen as a sign of affection because it is a McGonagall thread?

What I am beginning to find wanky is how whenever a wank remotely involves FAP how the mods rush in to say how bored they are or how the wank is old. Please. I don't think the original poster was implying that slytherincess was being wanky at all.
(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - ari_o, 2004-03-11 11:23 pm UTC

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-03-12 05:01 am UTC

Re: - ari_o, 2004-03-12 05:18 am UTC

(no subject) - muffinbutt, 2004-03-12 06:48 am UTC

(no subject) - sagralisse, 2004-03-13 12:38 am UTC

muffinbutt
2004-03-11 11:16 pm UTC (link)
Wow, what a silly wanker.

FAP wank is crazy repetitive, but I think all HP wank is pretty fucking repetitive. It's kind of a circlejerk that way. We're always hearing about the same things.

muffinbutt
-for herself, not FictionAlley (this should be obvious here, but perhaps it isn't)
(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - ari_o, 2004-03-11 11:21 pm UTC

Re: - muffinbutt, 2004-03-12 12:00 am UTC

Re: - ari_o, 2004-03-12 12:01 am UTC

Re: - muffinbutt, 2004-03-12 12:04 am UTC

Re: - ari_o, 2004-03-12 12:05 am UTC

Re: - muffinbutt, 2004-03-12 12:06 am UTC

Re: - ari_o, 2004-03-12 12:08 am UTC

Re: - muffinbutt, 2004-03-12 12:09 am UTC

Re: - ari_o, 2004-03-12 12:12 am UTC

Re: - muffinbutt, 2004-03-12 12:15 am UTC

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-03-12 12:03 am UTC

Re: - muffinbutt, 2004-03-12 12:05 am UTC

(no subject) - ari_o, 2004-03-12 12:11 am UTC

Re: - muffinbutt, 2004-03-12 12:12 am UTC

(no subject) - ari_o, 2004-03-12 12:17 am UTC

Re: - muffinbutt, 2004-03-12 12:18 am UTC

Huh? - (Anonymous), 2004-03-12 08:04 am UTC

Re: Huh? - muffinbutt, 2004-03-12 08:17 am UTC

Re: Huh? - ari_o, 2004-03-12 04:38 pm UTC

ingrid
2004-03-11 11:17 pm UTC (link)
I dunno, I thought it was good wank. Maybe you have to be outside of the HP fandom to appreciate it?

Anyway, I liked "Gwen's" response:

Minerva. This is your "darling" McGwen, saying: Get over it.

Ooooh, Teh Slapdown!

And, sorry, but I have no sympathy for site owners howling "Bandwidth!" every other second. If you can't handle the load and all the annoyances that come with it, close up the shop.

Or, at least let the customers in a few at a time. JMHO.
(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - ari_o, 2004-03-11 11:20 pm UTC

(no subject) - els_chan, 2004-03-11 11:22 pm UTC

(no subject) - ari_o, 2004-03-11 11:23 pm UTC

(no subject) - eljuno, 2004-03-11 11:26 pm UTC

(no subject) - els_chan, 2004-03-11 11:28 pm UTC

Re: - ari_o, 2004-03-11 11:28 pm UTC

(no subject) - eljuno, 2004-03-12 12:09 am UTC

Re: - ari_o, 2004-03-12 12:13 am UTC

(no subject) - eljuno, 2004-03-12 12:14 am UTC

Re: - ari_o, 2004-03-12 12:16 am UTC

(no subject) - ingrid, 2004-03-11 11:28 pm UTC

Re: - ari_o, 2004-03-11 11:31 pm UTC

(no subject) - ingrid, 2004-03-11 11:37 pm UTC

Re: - ari_o, 2004-03-11 11:45 pm UTC

Financial benefit between WB and FAP? - redina, 2004-03-12 02:36 am UTC

Re: Financial benefit between WB and FAP? - (Anonymous), 2004-03-12 08:04 am UTC

Re: Financial benefit between WB and FAP? - aiwendil, 2004-03-12 11:20 pm UTC

(Anonymous)
2004-03-11 11:19 pm UTC (link)
The one-liners get me all the time. It's one of the hardest rules to remember for me.
(Reply to this)

napoleon
2004-03-11 11:55 pm UTC (link)
what is different between you and I -- between you and me. There goes my patience for the other side.

Petty? Yes. Wanky? Absolutely. This wank? That's what I was referencing.
(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - sillywalks, 2004-03-12 12:14 am UTC

(no subject) - slytherincess, 2004-03-12 12:37 am UTC

(no subject) - mirabellawotr, 2004-03-12 04:14 am UTC

livii
2004-03-12 12:21 am UTC (link)
Well, I thought it was mildly amusing, at least in the comments. The OP's friend, mcmousiesomething, was just adorably wanky. Her reply to the bleedingly obvious troll was classic:

As for trying to insult her by saying that she has shit for brains, well, first of all that is not possible, if she had shit for brains she would not be alive, and therefore not be able to post at all. Secondly, (that means next, in case you did not know) at least in her complaints she did not use words that are not even in the dictionary. (In case you did not know, I am referring to fuckwit)

Heh! C'mon, that's good stuff.

I'm also enjoying watching all the FA mods tell us it's not wanky. Even if the subject isn't very wanky, them telling us so is wanky. In a weird sort of circle jerk way.
(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-03-12 05:13 am UTC

(no subject) - livii, 2004-03-12 05:31 pm UTC

chaos_rose
2004-03-12 12:22 am UTC (link)
If the wankers wank the wank and then more wankers come to wank the wank that was wanked and then get wanked themselves and wank about it some more...

Dang, I'm up to my neck in spoo.

Can you F_W a wank that's already on F_W?
(Reply to this)(Thread)

Wank will eat itself - telesilla, 2004-03-12 03:19 am UTC

Re: Wank will eat itself - sorchar, 2004-03-12 10:35 am UTC

GIP & GOLP - apoplexia, 2004-03-12 02:30 pm UTC

(Reply from suspended user)

resmiranda
2004-03-12 12:44 am UTC (link)
Well. If it wasn't wanky before, it sure is now.
(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - persephone, 2004-03-12 01:43 am UTC

(no subject) - telesilla, 2004-03-12 03:21 am UTC

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-03-12 08:11 am UTC

(no subject) - puipui, 2004-03-15 05:26 am UTC

phosfate
2004-03-12 01:00 am UTC (link)
One-liners, eh?
(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - sporked, 2004-03-12 02:13 am UTC

(no subject) - kijikun, 2004-03-12 02:32 am UTC

(no subject) - eljuno, 2004-03-12 02:41 am UTC

(no subject) - shoiryu, 2004-03-12 02:48 am UTC

(no subject) - singe, 2004-03-12 04:14 am UTC

(no subject) - froda_baggins, 2004-03-12 04:27 am UTC

(no subject) - yadda, 2004-03-12 05:13 am UTC

Re: - froda_baggins, 2004-03-12 05:18 am UTC

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-03-12 08:04 am UTC

Re: - froda_baggins, 2004-03-12 08:14 am UTC

(no subject) - lemone, 2004-03-12 09:03 am UTC

Re: - froda_baggins, 2004-03-12 09:04 am UTC

(no subject) - lemone, 2004-03-12 09:06 am UTC

(no subject) - apoplexia, 2004-03-12 02:31 pm UTC

(no subject) - singe, 2004-03-12 02:35 pm UTC

(no subject) - lemone, 2004-03-12 06:17 pm UTC

Re: - froda_baggins, 2004-03-12 04:24 pm UTC

meril
2004-03-12 01:03 am UTC (link)
I'd like to take this opportunity to suggest that Gaia Online and Fiction Alley Park should merge. Then we could safely assume that every post there will either be incoherent or wanky.
(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-03-12 02:01 am UTC

Your One Stop Wank Shop - telesilla, 2004-03-12 03:24 am UTC

(no subject) - meril, 2004-03-12 03:37 am UTC

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-03-12 10:14 am UTC

vasaris
2004-03-12 08:33 am UTC (link)
Jesus, who let all the anonymorons out on a day-pass?
(Reply to this)(Thread)

Um... - (Anonymous), 2004-03-13 05:51 am UTC

Re: Um... - vasaris, 2004-03-13 09:01 am UTC

gaisce
2004-03-12 10:37 am UTC (link)
Ummm, oh yeah. I think it is a conspiracy. Slytheriness just doesn't like us. Think about it. Slytheriness=Slytherin. Minerva=Gryffindor.

*sighs* Oh HP Fandom, why do you insist on reasoning out your wars over the dumbest shit? They're goddamn fictional houses that stand for heroes, smart geeks, wizard equivalent to Star Trek red shirts, and the place to store bad guys and those who are trying hard but can't get it right.
(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - amatia, 2004-03-13 10:17 am UTC

potter_wank
2004-03-13 06:53 am UTC (link)
I don't know if I'm more embarrassed for my fandom or for the person who tried to qualify this as an actual wank.

I'm just embarrassed all around I guess. Is there a full moon? *checks*
(Reply to this)