(Post a new comment)

	psychofangirl 2004-03-19 06:39 am UTC (link)
	Oh...my...god... Please tell me that's some sort of troll... (Reply to this)(Thread)

	Re: rachelthedemon 2004-03-19 06:40 am UTC (link)
	Almost positive it is. If they're serious, then I'm scared. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	psychofangirl 2004-03-19 06:46 am UTC (link)
	So am I... Because people like that actually do exist and aren't trolls. Yikes... (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) -

hansbekhart, 2004-03-19 06:49 am UTC

(no subject) - rachelthedemon, 2004-03-19 04:48 pm UTC

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-03-20 04:05 am UTC

(no subject) - rachelthedemon, 2004-03-20 04:07 am UTC

	nessa_t 2004-03-19 06:41 am UTC (link)
	Is she for real? (Reply to this)

	aruru 2004-03-19 07:00 am UTC (link)
	That person is trying entirely too hard to troll, man. Total amateur. (Reply to this)

	liarliar 2004-03-19 07:09 am UTC (link)
	I can't believe Girlgamer fell for that. Argh, the stupid, it hurts me. And Usopp. And you don't hurt Usopp, dammit. (Reply to this)(Thread)

	smo 2004-03-19 05:05 pm UTC (link)
	Yeah, that's what gets me too. I mean, I could tell it was a troll right away, and I've been fooled before. Some of those people are in dire need of an irony transplant. (Reply to this)(Parent)

	rachelthedemon 2004-03-19 10:03 pm UTC (link)
	No, no you don't. Unless you're Nami. Because she runs that ship and only hurts Usopp when he's being a spazz. Icon Love, BTW. Great, now I'm getting Usopp/Nojiko ideas. Out, you cracked pairings! OUT! (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: -

liarliar, 2004-03-19 10:08 pm UTC

Re: - rachelthedemon, 2004-03-19 10:12 pm UTC

Re: -

liarliar, 2004-03-19 10:23 pm UTC

Re: - rachelthedemon, 2004-03-19 11:34 pm UTC

Re: -

liarliar, 2004-03-19 11:53 pm UTC

(Anonymous)
2004-03-20 07:55 am UTC (link)

Girlgamer didn't fall for it. She's far from stupid. She's just being polite.

Trolls feed on negitivity. They never know what to do when a person is polite though. :D Pretty funny actually.

And that 'troll' (If it is truly a troll because, the sad thing is, there are real people like that out there) wouldn't hurt Usopp unless Usopp got too close to Sanji...you know, then OMG UsOpP iZ hItTiN' oN SANJI HEMUSTDIE!!1111 (*gags at that writing*)

- Faerie KOS-MOS

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: -

liarliar, 2004-03-20 08:21 am UTC

	meshou 2004-03-19 07:53 am UTC (link)
	Bah. Not even a good parody of a troll. Too well spelt. My brain doesn't hurt reading it. Not enough netspeak. I don't know why I find this bad. Shouldn't there be some sort of skill to trolling? Either make me believe you're a functionally illiterate 13 year old lipgloss addict, or Anon 3.5. Compromise is for wussies. (Reply to this)(Thread)

	You called? anon_3point5 2004-03-19 08:52 am UTC (link)
	Did someone call? Oh dear, I'm missing all the good wanks of late. It is doing wonders for my waistline. Trolls are so fattening. Tea? Anon 3.5 (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: You called? - meshou, 2004-03-19 08:57 am UTC

Re: You called? -

singe, 2004-03-19 02:45 pm UTC

Re: You called? -

smo, 2004-03-19 05:05 pm UTC

Re: You called? -

deoridhe, 2004-03-19 05:19 pm UTC

Re: You called? -

ecchaniz0r, 2004-03-19 06:42 pm UTC

Re: You called? -

smo, 2004-03-19 06:49 pm UTC

Re: You called? -

ecchaniz0r, 2004-03-20 12:07 am UTC

Re: You called? -

smo, 2004-03-20 12:15 am UTC

Re: You called? -

chash, 2004-03-20 01:32 am UTC

Re: You called? -

rosalita, 2004-03-20 01:57 am UTC

	auguris 2004-03-19 07:53 am UTC (link)
	grayfox138 seems to be taking it personally, bothering to comment in her LJ and all. (Reply to this)(Thread)

	(Anonymous) 2004-03-19 08:28 am UTC (link)
	Brilliant. That solves everything. (Reply to this)(Parent)

	mooncalf 2004-03-19 10:47 am UTC (link)
	... don't get me wrong, I love One Piece an awful lot (see icon) but... did she just call One Piece holy? I feel like there needs to be a joke about 'canon' made here. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - rachelthedemon, 2004-03-19 04:49 pm UTC

(no subject) -

smo, 2004-03-19 05:06 pm UTC

Re: - rachelthedemon, 2004-03-19 05:08 pm UTC

(no subject) -

smo, 2004-03-19 05:11 pm UTC

Re: - rachelthedemon, 2004-03-19 05:23 pm UTC

(no subject) -

smo, 2004-03-19 05:24 pm UTC

(no subject) -

ecchaniz0r, 2004-03-19 06:43 pm UTC

(no subject) -

smo, 2004-03-19 06:48 pm UTC

Re: -

ecchaniz0r, 2004-03-20 12:07 am UTC

(no subject) -

smo, 2004-03-20 12:17 am UTC

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-03-19 06:08 pm UTC

(no subject) -

liarliar, 2004-03-19 08:11 pm UTC

(no subject) -

tiasian, 2004-03-19 11:10 pm UTC

Re: -

liarliar, 2004-03-19 11:25 pm UTC

(no subject) -

mooncalf, 2004-03-19 10:02 pm UTC

Re: - rachelthedemon, 2004-03-19 10:10 pm UTC

(no subject) -

mooncalf, 2004-03-19 10:30 pm UTC

Re: - rachelthedemon, 2004-03-19 11:31 pm UTC

(no subject) -

sarajayechan, 2004-03-20 02:59 am UTC

(no subject) -

sarajayechan, 2004-03-20 02:58 am UTC

(no subject) -

sarajayechan, 2004-03-20 02:56 am UTC

(no subject) -

beccastareyes, 2004-03-20 09:29 am UTC

(no subject) -

snarl, 2004-03-20 10:53 am UTC

	toxictattoo 2004-03-19 08:31 am UTC (link)
	It appears that this current crop of troll is resistant to all available means to control it. Are we breeding a bettter troll? (Reply to this)(Thread)

	musette 2004-03-19 09:00 am UTC (link)
	Well y'know, with hybridisation, it was only a matter of time. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) -

orphanannie, 2004-03-19 09:20 am UTC

Re: -

musette, 2004-03-19 11:11 am UTC

(no subject) -

zipperednose, 2004-03-19 08:43 pm UTC

Re: -

musette, 2004-03-20 12:30 am UTC

	eiviiaru 2004-03-19 05:22 pm UTC (link)
	Considering selection pressures, it's not exactly a surprise that only the strongest trolls are able to successfully spread their spooge, and thus only the most powerful arise as a new generation. (Reply to this)(Parent)

	sarajayechan 2004-03-20 03:03 am UTC (link)
	pictures Mephesto from South Park with a few trolls and test tubes Or Washu from Tenchi Muyo. Either one. XD (Reply to this)(Parent)

	Sex bomb, indeed. smo 2004-03-19 05:02 pm UTC (link)
	Mmm, Sanji. fangirls your icon (Reply to this)(Thread)

	Re: Sex bomb, indeed. rachelthedemon 2004-03-19 05:06 pm UTC (link)
	Yes, obey the Sex Bomb! You know you want him! (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Sex bomb, indeed. -

smo, 2004-03-19 05:09 pm UTC

Re: Sex bomb, indeed. -

ecchaniz0r, 2004-03-19 06:44 pm UTC

Re: Sex bomb, indeed. -

smo, 2004-03-19 06:47 pm UTC

Re: Sex bomb, indeed. -

deoridhe, 2004-03-19 09:07 pm UTC

Re: Sex bomb, indeed. -

smo, 2004-03-19 09:20 pm UTC

Re: Sex bomb, indeed. -

eljuno, 2004-03-20 07:48 am UTC

(no subject) -

smo, 2004-03-21 02:18 am UTC

Re: Sex bomb, indeed. -

ecchaniz0r, 2004-03-20 12:06 am UTC

Re: Sex bomb, indeed. - rachelthedemon, 2004-03-20 12:11 am UTC

Re: Sex bomb, indeed. -

smo, 2004-03-20 12:18 am UTC

bohicamouse
2004-03-19 09:24 pm UTC (link)

In OT and only amusing to me news, I read this wank right before going to bed last night and then had a dream about One Piece, a series which I have never seen and know nothing about. It was only after coming back here just now and seeing the wank again that I realized why . . .

(Isn't there someone named Luffy? That's all I know about the series, because I think the name is really funny.)

That said I'm actually surprised by the reaction to the troll from the comm. I mean, I don't see what good can possibly be accomplished by responding that way--even if it WEREN'T a troll you can bet she'd have been inspired to become one after that reception, heh.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

	rachelthedemon 2004-03-21 12:28 am UTC (link)
	I think it's because the comm is, for the most part, a bunch of sane and level heads. And they don't want to be viewed as accepting of this kind of rabid wank. (Reply to this)(Parent)

	sarajayechan 2004-03-19 10:39 pm UTC (link)
	Gotta be a troll. Or at least a really bad parody. XD (Reply to this)

	lots42 2004-03-20 08:41 am UTC (link)
	I thought this was going to be some more of that soulbonding nonsense (aka 'How dare you make fun of the voices in my head! They're OMG REAL!1onesixsevenone') (Reply to this)

	liarliar 2004-03-20 08:58 am UTC (link)
	Now I'm paranoid and can't help but wonder if this anon is related. Naw, I'm paranoid. (Reply to this)