Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Kerianne ([info]kerikeri) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2004-04-29 23:06:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Awww, lookit the little underage wank!
Over on [info]bad_rpers_suck, [info]xxlostrequiemxx asks if anyone else thinks age restrictions on RPs are "completely dumb and unfair."

Of course, people disagree-- not only do they disagree, they inform [info]xxlostrequiemxx that she is ignorant, childish, and can't spell "lawsuit."

It's small so far, but I'm sure it'll get bigger when it grows up, just like those damn whiny underaged RPers.


(Post a new comment)


[info]kijikun
2004-04-30 06:41 am UTC (link)
Shoulda know that one would grow wank when I saw it on my f-list

(Reply to this)


[info]iris
2004-04-30 07:09 am UTC (link)
I saw that on my friends list before any of the comments showed up, and had this brief mental flash of "hey, this is goin' somewhere."

It gives me warm fuzzies to know that it looks like I may be right.

(Reply to this)


[info]kannaophelia
2004-04-30 07:18 am UTC (link)
It warms my heart when people post in rant groups looking for a certain response, and don't get it.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]eiviiaru
2004-04-30 02:54 pm UTC (link)
This is a regular fixture of bad_rpers_suck, and yet most posters don't comprehend that it's even vaguely a possibility. Thus: wank.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]c_chan
2004-04-30 07:45 am UTC (link)
For some situations, I think the age limit is a Good Thing. Like someone said, I wouldn't want to RP a sex scene with a 12 year old. It's icky and wrong and I'd feel extremely uncomfortable, no matter how experienced the RPer is with that.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]purest_chaos
2004-04-30 08:09 am UTC (link)
Agreed.

The one rp group I was/am part of had an age restriction (LoK vampire rp. Sex, blood and violence basically), but we ended up getting a player oh... about over half a year after it's creation and it turns out she was 12. I think she ended up rp-ing one or two sex scenes...
She ended up getting kicked from the yahoo group, and banned from the forum, and yet she hung around on the fanfic archive, and harassed the mods (bringing in the assistant mods child, suicide, and a bunch of other issues). She hasn't been heard from in over a year now, but we still remember her.

Age limits are good. Really.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]croik
2004-04-30 06:28 pm UTC (link)
Like someone said, I wouldn't want to RP a sex scene with a 12 year old. It's icky and wrong and I'd feel extremely uncomfortable, no matter how experienced the RPer is with that.

Wahhh!! Nasty!! *hides*

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]rogue
2004-04-30 07:53 am UTC (link)
I moderate a huge community over on LJ; while most members are in the 16-25 area, I know there's a handful of people as young as 12. For the first year or so of the community's existance, I was really lax about it and just sorta ignored the community unless there was a F_W worthy flamewar going on, or if someone complained. Then one day I opened up my inbox and found an e-mail from an enraged mother threatening legal action because her daughter had read a post some nutjob member had made about trading sexual favors for crash space at an anime convention*. She had bypassed talking to the offending poster, opted not to report the post/community to LJ, and found my e-mail adress and was preparing to go get my ISP for a sepina. Now, my first reaction was, "Bitch, are you for REAL?" but in this sue-happy day and age, you have to appease these people because their paranoid complaints can and will hold up in court, especially when a minor is concerned. Realistically, if she'd gone through with her threat, it'd all be on that orginal poster, but still. People are nuts. So now, in fear of crazy parents looking over my shoulder, I have to mod the community like a anal retentive dictator (60% of the members are under 18, so making the comm 18+ wasn't realistic), because it only takes one uptight parent to ruin it for everyone.

That happened in a cosplay community - I shudder to think of what would happen if some happy Christian housewife looked over her 13 year old daughter's shoulder to discover her role playing Snape boinking Lupin.

* = something similar happened in the comm recently, except it was some chick trading sex for a ride to a con, and not a room. As far as I know they were different people; both got their skank asses banned.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]iris
2004-04-30 07:56 am UTC (link)
When you mentioned the sexual favors, I was about to ask if that was...that other one that you mentioned in the footnote.

People are scary. o_O

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]rogue, 2004-04-30 08:10 am UTC
iconlove - [info]speshulduck, 2004-04-30 08:43 am UTC
Re: iconlove - [info]rogue, 2004-04-30 08:50 am UTC
Re: iconlove - [info]speshulduck, 2004-04-30 08:57 am UTC

[info]mariagoner
2004-04-30 02:55 pm UTC (link)
Then one day I opened up my inbox and found an e-mail from an enraged mother threatening legal action because her daughter had read a post some nutjob member had made about trading sexual favors for crash space at an anime convention*.

......................Please please please please please tell me that the nutjob who was willing to supply room in return for sexual favors didn't know the kid was vastly underaged. Because otherwise... I hope you banned his skanky pedophilic ass... Ick...

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]kerikeri, 2004-04-30 05:56 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mariagoner, 2004-04-30 06:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]rogue, 2004-04-30 07:39 pm UTC

[info]cpip
2004-04-30 05:07 pm UTC (link)
some chick trading sex for a ride to a con, and not a room...

Well, you know the old line, "Gas, grass, or ass..."

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]shinigami_co
2004-04-30 06:17 pm UTC (link)
1) Your icon rules. Calisto was, indeed, the Superbitch.

2) Oh...my...God. The sad thing is, I can see this happening. When I first got on the net, of course I trolled around other forums (for a good dose of hilarious irony, it was actually Hercules and Xena forums). I got on an ML for fans of a certain character, and my parents actually made me write to the list to tell them that they couldn't use cuss words. Looking back on that now, I'm utterly shocked I actually did it. I must have looked like the biggest retard.

3) Nitpicky thing, but I deal with them every day...it's "subpoena". Don't take away the delicious almost-sexual-innuendo that keeps me going through the day. XD

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]callie_chan, 2004-04-30 06:33 pm UTC
Re: - [info]shinigami_co, 2004-04-30 06:40 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]callie_chan, 2004-04-30 06:52 pm UTC
Re: - [info]shinigami_co, 2004-04-30 06:54 pm UTC
Re: - [info]callie_chan, 2004-04-30 07:03 pm UTC
Re: - [info]shinigami_co, 2004-04-30 07:08 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]rogue, 2004-04-30 07:40 pm UTC

[info]notapirate
2004-04-30 07:55 am UTC (link)
Oh, I love how people continue to use grammar as a way to make themselves look smart. When you get into an argument and disagree with someone, don't attack their integrity but their opinion. Immaturity. People who correct spelling like that lose all respect.

Well, not that it matters :)

(Reply to this)(Thread)


(Anonymous)
2004-04-30 10:48 pm UTC (link)
Hey, I don't have a journalfen, so that's why the anonymous. I just wanted to say (good-naturedly, so don't take offense, please!) that's it's really funny that you're pointing this out, 'cause it's one of those picky things like grammar :P

Seriously, I don't mean anything rude or mean by it, I just thought it was pretty funny.

don't be mad at me!

Isidore

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: - [info]notapirate, 2004-04-30 11:45 pm UTC

[info]kijikun
2004-04-30 08:04 am UTC (link)
[info]blackjackrocket is wanking with the best of them.

Or maybe she's playing devil advocate.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]blackjackrocket
2004-04-30 08:35 am UTC (link)
No, I actually don't see any use for age limits. I mean, it's not like illicit acts are actually being performed, right?

If I can check Clive Barker books out of the public library at 15, I don't see any trouble with writing about the stuff therein, as long as I'm not gonna go out and *do* them...

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]kijikun, 2004-04-30 08:39 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]blackjackrocket, 2004-04-30 08:43 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kijikun, 2004-04-30 08:51 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]blackjackrocket, 2004-04-30 08:53 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kijikun, 2004-04-30 08:56 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rachelmap, 2004-04-30 03:19 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]blackjackrocket, 2004-04-30 10:48 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]rachelmap, 2004-05-01 04:41 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]blackjackrocket, 2004-05-01 07:35 pm UTC
Re: - [info]rachelmap, 2004-05-01 07:41 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]blackjackrocket, 2004-05-01 07:44 pm UTC
Re: - [info]rachelmap, 2004-05-02 01:03 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]blackjackrocket, 2004-05-02 02:57 am UTC
Re: - [info]rachelmap, 2004-05-02 06:44 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]blackjackrocket, 2004-05-02 07:36 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rachelmap, 2004-05-02 09:37 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]blackjackrocket, 2004-05-02 09:39 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rachelmap, 2004-05-02 11:07 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]blackjackrocket, 2004-05-02 12:54 pm UTC
... - [info]anon_3point5, 2004-05-03 05:47 am UTC
... - [info]blackjackrocket, 2004-05-03 07:46 am UTC
... - [info]anon_3point5, 2004-05-03 07:48 am UTC
... - [info]blackjackrocket, 2004-05-03 07:50 am UTC
... - [info]anon_3point5, 2004-05-03 08:12 am UTC
... - (Anonymous), 2004-05-04 09:33 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sorchar, 2005-07-02 10:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]blackjackrocket, 2005-07-03 12:28 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sorchar, 2005-07-03 12:49 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sorchar, 2005-07-02 10:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]snarl, 2004-05-01 10:05 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]limyaael, 2004-05-01 04:12 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]snarl, 2004-05-01 08:50 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]snarl, 2004-05-01 08:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-05-02 06:10 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-05-02 06:33 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]crickets, 2004-05-02 07:11 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]snarl, 2004-05-02 10:08 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-05-03 06:35 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sorchar, 2005-07-02 10:20 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kijikun, 2004-05-01 07:57 pm UTC
uses for age limits. - [info]rogue, 2004-04-30 08:56 am UTC
Re: uses for age limits. - [info]blackjackrocket, 2004-04-30 08:59 am UTC
Re: uses for age limits. - [info]rogue, 2004-04-30 09:06 am UTC
Re: uses for age limits. - [info]crickets, 2004-04-30 09:06 am UTC
Re: uses for age limits. - [info]darkwitch666, 2004-04-30 09:35 pm UTC
Re: uses for age limits. - [info]crickets, 2004-05-01 03:32 am UTC
Re: uses for age limits. - [info]darkwitch666, 2004-05-01 03:38 am UTC
Re: uses for age limits. - [info]crickets, 2004-05-01 03:47 am UTC
Re: uses for age limits. - [info]darkwitch666, 2004-05-01 03:49 am UTC
Re: uses for age limits. - [info]crickets, 2004-05-01 03:54 am UTC
Re: uses for age limits. - [info]darkwitch666, 2004-05-01 04:21 am UTC
Re: uses for age limits. - [info]crickets, 2004-05-01 04:54 am UTC
Re: uses for age limits. - [info]darkwitch666, 2004-05-01 06:49 am UTC
Re: uses for age limits. - [info]iczer6, 2004-04-30 09:13 am UTC
Re: uses for age limits. - [info]blackjackrocket, 2004-04-30 09:21 am UTC
Re: uses for age limits. - [info]cairea, 2004-04-30 09:32 pm UTC
Re: uses for age limits. - [info]trintrin, 2004-05-01 07:12 am UTC
Re: uses for age limits. - [info]rogue, 2004-05-02 03:12 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cmikhailovic, 2004-04-30 10:46 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]blackjackrocket, 2004-04-30 10:51 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cmikhailovic, 2004-04-30 11:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]blackjackrocket, 2004-04-30 11:44 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cmikhailovic, 2004-04-30 12:14 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]blackjackrocket, 2004-05-01 01:32 am UTC
Re: - [info]cmikhailovic, 2004-05-01 06:55 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]blackjackrocket, 2004-05-01 06:57 am UTC
Re: - [info]cmikhailovic, 2004-05-01 07:06 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kannaophelia, 2004-04-30 05:27 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]blackjackrocket, 2004-05-01 01:31 am UTC
Re: - [info]kannaophelia, 2004-05-01 08:39 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]iczer6, 2004-04-30 07:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]notapirate, 2004-05-01 12:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]wolfsamurai, 2004-04-30 11:47 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cmikhailovic, 2004-04-30 12:17 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]eiviiaru, 2004-04-30 02:57 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kijikun, 2004-04-30 08:43 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]eiviiaru, 2004-04-30 08:58 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]blackjackrocket, 2004-05-01 01:34 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]eiviiaru, 2004-05-01 01:47 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]naienko, 2004-04-30 05:52 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]misswindy, 2004-04-30 07:21 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]blackjackrocket, 2004-04-30 10:50 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kijikun, 2004-04-30 08:44 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]blackjackrocket, 2004-04-30 10:52 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]iczer6, 2004-04-30 11:26 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cmikhailovic, 2004-05-01 08:09 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rann, 2004-05-01 12:32 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cmikhailovic, 2004-05-01 05:54 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]misswindy, 2004-04-30 07:20 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]rogue, 2004-04-30 07:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]blackjackrocket, 2004-04-30 10:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kijikun, 2004-04-30 10:59 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]vasaris, 2004-04-30 11:11 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]blackjackrocket, 2004-05-01 12:59 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]vasaris, 2004-05-01 09:39 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]blackjackrocket, 2004-05-01 09:41 am UTC
Christ on a pogo stick. - [info]vasaris, 2004-05-01 09:58 am UTC
Re: Christ on a pogo stick. - [info]blackjackrocket, 2004-05-01 10:01 am UTC
Re: Christ on a pogo stick. - [info]cmikhailovic, 2004-05-01 11:23 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]misswindy, 2004-05-01 12:54 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]blackjackrocket, 2004-05-01 12:58 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]misswindy, 2004-05-01 01:24 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]blackjackrocket, 2004-05-01 01:28 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]misswindy, 2004-05-01 01:34 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]blackjackrocket, 2004-05-01 01:35 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]misswindy, 2004-05-01 01:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]blackjackrocket, 2004-05-01 01:39 am UTC
We see your point, assclown - it's sitting nice and shiny atop your head. - [info]misswindy, 2004-05-01 01:47 am UTC
Re: We see your point, assclown - it's sitting nice and shiny atop your head. - [info]blackjackrocket, 2004-05-01 01:49 am UTC
Re: We see your point, assclown - it's sitting nice and shiny atop your head. - (Anonymous), 2004-05-01 03:02 am UTC
Re: We see your point, assclown - it's sitting nice and shiny atop your head. - [info]kijikun, 2004-05-01 03:04 am UTC
Re: We see your point, assclown - it's sitting nice and shiny atop your head. - [info]misswindy, 2004-05-01 05:07 am UTC
Re: We see your point, assclown - it's sitting nice and shiny atop your head. - [info]cmikhailovic, 2004-05-01 05:50 am UTC
Re: We see your point, assclown - it's sitting nice and shiny atop your head. - nakannimi, 2004-05-01 06:27 am UTC
Back off of BlackJackRocket! - (Anonymous), 2004-05-01 03:05 am UTC
Re: Back off of BlackJackRocket! - [info]blackjackrocket, 2004-05-01 03:06 am UTC
Re: Back off of BlackJackRocket! - (Anonymous), 2004-05-01 03:09 am UTC
Re: Back off of BlackJackRocket! - [info]blackjackrocket, 2004-05-01 03:10 am UTC
Re: Back off of BlackJackRocket! - [info]kerikeri, 2004-05-01 03:25 am UTC
Re: Back off of BlackJackRocket! - [info]misswindy, 2004-05-01 05:09 am UTC
Re: Back off of BlackJackRocket! - [info]loki, 2004-05-01 06:55 am UTC
Re: Back off of BlackJackRocket! - [info]anon_3point5, 2004-05-01 06:56 am UTC
Re: Back off of BlackJackRocket! - [info]loki, 2004-05-01 07:00 am UTC
15!? - (Anonymous), 2004-05-01 05:29 am UTC
Re: 15!? - [info]blackjackrocket, 2004-05-01 05:30 am UTC
Re: 15!? - [info]anon_3point5, 2004-05-01 05:31 am UTC
Re: 15!? - [info]blackjackrocket, 2004-05-01 05:36 am UTC
Re: Your 15!? - (Anonymous), 2004-05-01 06:00 am UTC
Re: Your 15!? - [info]blackjackrocket, 2004-05-01 06:01 am UTC
Re: Your 15!? - [info]anon_3point5, 2004-05-01 06:26 am UTC
Re: Your 15!? - [info]blackjackrocket, 2004-05-01 06:27 am UTC
Re: Your 15!? - [info]anon_3point5, 2004-05-01 06:31 am UTC
Re: Your 15!? - [info]blackjackrocket, 2004-05-01 06:32 am UTC
Laws aren't good reasons? - [info]anon_3point5, 2004-05-01 06:35 am UTC
Re: Laws aren't good reasons? - (Anonymous), 2004-05-01 06:39 am UTC
Re: Laws aren't good reasons? - [info]blackjackrocket, 2004-05-01 06:40 am UTC
Re: Laws aren't good reasons? - [info]anon_3point5, 2004-05-01 06:44 am UTC
Re: Laws aren't good reasons? - [info]blackjackrocket, 2004-05-01 06:47 am UTC
Re: Laws aren't good reasons? - [info]anon_3point5, 2004-05-01 06:51 am UTC
Re: Laws aren't good reasons? - [info]blackjackrocket, 2004-05-01 06:52 am UTC
Re: Laws aren't good reasons? - [info]anon_3point5, 2004-05-01 06:55 am UTC
... - [info]blackjackrocket, 2004-05-01 06:55 am UTC
... - [info]anon_3point5, 2004-05-01 06:59 am UTC
... - [info]julia, 2004-05-01 08:11 pm UTC
... - [info]anon_3point5, 2004-05-01 08:35 pm UTC
... - (Anonymous), 2004-05-04 09:37 am UTC
... - [info]oulangi, 2004-05-01 07:23 am UTC
Re: Laws aren't good reasons? - [info]pokecheck, 2004-05-01 09:48 am UTC
Re: Laws aren't good reasons? - [info]blackjackrocket, 2004-05-01 09:54 am UTC
Re: Laws aren't good reasons? - [info]pokecheck, 2004-05-01 10:25 am UTC
Re: Laws aren't good reasons? - [info]pokecheck, 2004-05-01 10:35 am UTC
Re: Your 15!? - (Anonymous), 2004-05-01 06:40 am UTC
Re: Your 15!? - [info]anon_3point5, 2004-05-01 06:42 am UTC
Re: Your 15!? - (Anonymous), 2004-05-01 06:47 am UTC
Re: Your 15!? - [info]anon_3point5, 2004-05-01 06:53 am UTC
Re: Your 15!? - [info]limyaael, 2004-05-01 07:11 am UTC
Re: Your 15!? - [info]crickets, 2004-05-01 07:41 am UTC
Re: Your 15!? - [info]kannaophelia, 2004-05-01 07:55 pm UTC

ataniell93
2004-05-01 02:00 am UTC (link)
OK. I don't get it.

Are you guys:

1) defending the right of RPG owner/moderators to ban whoever they want from their games (which I support, because God knows I've had to use it) whether you like their standards or not?

or:

2) have you now started arguing that RPG owner/moderators have an obligation to ban persons under 18? Because if so, that's kinda like Fandom Scruples saying that site owners have an obligation to password-protect their sites.

Because the arguments I'm seeing against Blackjackrocket and the other poster are getting awfully...moralistic?

And in reality, it comes down to this. I don't have to let anyone into my game if I don't want them there.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]kerikeri, 2004-05-01 02:50 am UTC
Clarification - [info]deoridhe, 2004-05-01 04:17 am UTC
Re: Clarification - ataniell93, 2004-05-01 04:33 am UTC
Re: Clarification - [info]deoridhe, 2004-05-01 06:49 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ymfaery, 2004-05-01 04:52 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]misswindy, 2004-05-01 05:16 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cmikhailovic, 2004-05-01 06:08 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]iczer6, 2004-05-01 08:17 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]vasaris, 2004-05-01 10:09 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]pokecheck, 2004-05-01 10:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kijikun, 2004-05-01 08:04 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]iczer6, 2004-05-01 08:44 pm UTC

[info]lizzypaul
2004-04-30 09:16 am UTC (link)
Age limits have always seemed sort of silly to me. As someone who has been reading/writing slash since I was 14 (yes, I'm a naughty, naughty girl), I know there's always ways to get around age limitations ( ::cough::lie::cough:: ). So weird when I turned 18 and realized I could start being my *real* age.

So, yeah, understand about the covering your ass part. Age limitations should be in place so that mods don't get sued. I just wouldn't expect people to follow them.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


(Anonymous)
2004-04-30 09:21 am UTC (link)
Yes but there are alot of us that would rather not be writing adult material with a minor.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]lizzypaul, 2004-04-30 09:47 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-04-30 10:13 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cpip, 2004-04-30 03:44 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]eiviiaru, 2004-04-30 03:00 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kannaophelia, 2004-04-30 05:37 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-04-30 06:15 pm UTC
Re: - [info]kannaophelia, 2004-04-30 06:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cheshireempress, 2004-04-30 10:22 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kijikun, 2004-04-30 11:02 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cheshireempress, 2004-05-01 02:39 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-05-01 06:39 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]iczer6, 2004-05-01 12:15 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cmikhailovic, 2004-05-01 08:36 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kannaophelia, 2004-05-01 08:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2004-05-03 01:15 pm UTC
Re: - [info]kannaophelia, 2004-05-03 04:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]crickets, 2004-05-01 03:45 am UTC

[info]mariagoner
2004-04-30 03:02 pm UTC (link)
So you are actually perfectly all right with children and teenagers interacting in a sexual manner with adults online as long as the adult don't know the kids are... kids?

Dude, that's kind of fucked up. Yes, I know children and teens will lie about their ages all the time to read and write and role-play smut. But that doesn't make those lies all right. Especially when they can get the adults who write the smut and role-play the smut with them in hot water, for no fault of their own.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]misswindy, 2004-04-30 07:15 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mariagoner, 2004-04-30 07:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mirabellawotr, 2004-04-30 11:00 pm UTC
(no subject) - ataniell93, 2004-05-01 01:53 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kijikun, 2004-05-01 03:03 am UTC
(no subject) - ataniell93, 2004-05-01 04:42 am UTC

allen
2004-04-30 10:23 am UTC (link)
OMG SO MUCH ICON LOVE !!!!!!!!!!!!!

:: flails helplessly ::

Paul and Nick were SO doing it.

(Reply to this)


[info]beccastareyes
2004-04-30 03:32 pm UTC (link)
Mmmm... I love the smell of wank in-thread...

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]cpip
2004-04-30 05:08 pm UTC (link)
Smells like... chestnut sap!

(Reply to this)(Parent)

(no subject) - [info]eiviiaru, 2004-04-30 09:01 pm UTC

angkgriffen
2004-04-30 11:07 pm UTC (link)
Do people actually do that? Sue people when their kids read/participate in porn writing? I always thought people did what my parents did when I was underage and I got caught with porn, which was kick me off the internet for two years and monitor me and my books during that time.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]cleolinda, 2004-05-01 12:05 am UTC

[info]byagghametta
2004-05-01 05:26 am UTC (link)
Hey, I think I was in that one... *checks*

No, it seems it's just a repeat of the same thread. Damn.

I knew I dropped out of that comm for a reason. *makes a gaggy face*

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]pokecheck, 2004-05-01 10:41 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]byagghametta, 2004-05-01 08:40 pm UTC

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map