Page 1 of 2
<<	[1] [2]	>>

(Post a new comment)

	ashenmote 2004-05-01 10:35 pm UTC (link)
	Okay. But who will he sue for it, Charisma Carpenter or Playboy? And just to spare everyone else the trouble of saying it: Teh nipple-area is pastede on yay (Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) -

ashenmote, 2004-05-01 10:40 pm UTC

(no subject) -

visp, 2004-05-02 03:51 am UTC

	meshou 2004-05-01 10:44 pm UTC (link)
	For a photo shoot like that, it's common practice to use a little makeup on the nipples, so they show up after bright lights and flash. "22.6%"?? Damn, someone needs to put the calculator down and just enjoy the pr0n. They look an OK color and size to me, and I'm willing to bet I've seen at least 2 more real live breasts than him. (Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) -

sagralisse, 2004-05-01 10:49 pm UTC

(no subject) -

nolifeking, 2004-05-02 01:32 am UTC

(no subject) -

julia, 2004-05-02 01:38 am UTC

(no subject) -

azarias, 2004-05-02 03:41 am UTC

(no subject) -

wolfsamurai, 2004-05-02 03:06 am UTC

(no subject) - meshou, 2004-05-02 04:24 am UTC

(no subject) -

sagralisse, 2004-05-02 06:56 pm UTC

(no subject) -

tekenduis, 2004-05-02 07:04 pm UTC

(no subject) -

sagralisse, 2004-05-02 07:14 pm UTC

(no subject) -

virago, 2004-05-02 06:10 am UTC

(no subject) -

sewingmyfish, 2004-05-02 08:35 am UTC

(no subject) -

gaisce, 2004-05-02 02:37 am UTC

sagralisse
2004-05-01 10:48 pm UTC (link)

This one is worth the price of admission:

"Major ChrisB" wrote:

> theyre
> obscurly
> skined
> approximatle
> the nipple-area the nipplage-area
> redish

It pains me that you're breathing air that might be more gainfully employed
by bread mould.

Also, I boggle at the irony of this one:

I think the Playboy pictures are good if only to show that women can be
beautiful even if they don't look conform to the absurdly narrow
standards of beauty you seen in FHM and the like. Celebrate the miracle
of diversity, Chris.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-05-02 01:16 am UTC

(no subject) -

virago, 2004-05-02 01:30 am UTC

(no subject) -

red_eft, 2004-05-02 02:06 am UTC

(no subject) -

tempslut, 2004-05-02 09:23 am UTC

(no subject) -

bohicamouse, 2004-05-02 11:52 am UTC

(no subject) -

sagralisse, 2004-05-02 05:52 pm UTC

sagralisse
2004-05-01 11:04 pm UTC (link)

From the first link: she was not fired her charecter had no where to go that was said in like every interview w/ her joss, and david when she came up she was surprised and sad who wouldn't be i mean come on the buffyverse was her life for almost 8 years they were all said when they found out both shows ended they might have been happy that their charecters were moving on and in a good place to end but it does not mean they were not sad so when she says she was surprised by her not being needed that does not by any means mean that joss fired her. when your fired it is for doing something wrong not because your charecter has no more reason to be in the show. and as for her doing playboy she did it and she looked wonderful and it was her choice its finished if you are her fans just admire that she had the courage to do it and if you are not then dont click on the link for info on her.

I'm going to send Amber an gift assortment of capital letters and punctuation marks. [.......,,,,,------;;;;;?????!!! S H W W I T T S W A I I ]

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-05-02 12:54 am UTC

(no subject) -

lab, 2004-05-02 01:06 am UTC

(no subject) -

sagralisse, 2004-05-02 01:27 am UTC

(no subject) -

iris, 2004-05-02 05:32 am UTC

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-05-05 07:27 am UTC

(no subject) -

apoplexia, 2004-05-04 10:54 am UTC

(no subject) -

sagralisse, 2004-05-04 03:12 pm UTC

(no subject) -

serai, 2004-05-02 05:19 am UTC

	huh huh llama_treats 2004-05-01 11:07 pm UTC (link)
	they said nipplage huh huh (Reply to this)

	smit 2004-05-01 11:08 pm UTC (link)
	With most breasts, in my experience at least, the nipple-area the nipplage-area should cover between 7 and 12% of the total breast area. Dammit! I knew that besides being freakishly large there was something else wrong with my tits! My nipple percentage is just too high! commits seppuku (Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - ataniell93, 2004-05-02 01:08 am UTC

(no subject) -

gaisce, 2004-05-02 02:39 am UTC

(no subject) -

crickets, 2004-05-02 02:41 am UTC

	esk 2004-05-01 11:14 pm UTC (link)
	"nipples should be a redish colour...hers are almost brown which is just weird..." whaaa? um, here's someone who has obviously only seen white women naked. (Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) -

stubbleglitter, 2004-05-01 11:34 pm UTC

(no subject) -

azarias, 2004-05-02 12:54 am UTC

(no subject) -

sagralisse, 2004-05-02 06:58 pm UTC

(no subject) -

photosinensis, 2004-05-02 01:08 am UTC

(no subject) -

esk, 2004-05-02 01:16 am UTC

(no subject) -

dar, 2004-05-02 11:43 pm UTC

(no subject) -

julia, 2004-05-02 01:23 am UTC

(no subject) - owlrigh, 2004-05-06 01:17 am UTC

(no subject) -

julia, 2004-05-06 03:02 am UTC

(no subject) -

princessdot, 2004-05-02 02:24 am UTC

(no subject) -

valarltd, 2004-05-02 03:39 am UTC

(no subject) -

serai, 2004-05-02 05:22 am UTC

(no subject) -

moonjaguar, 2004-05-02 06:12 am UTC

(no subject) - meshou, 2004-05-02 07:09 am UTC

(no subject) -

schoenschoen, 2004-05-02 12:43 pm UTC

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-05-04 09:17 pm UTC

	allen 2004-05-01 11:16 pm UTC (link)
	I'm also amused by the people who are yelling that they're fakes. I've seen not a few fake Buffy nudes (coughherhedwaspastedonyaycough) but if these are fakes, they're pretty damn high quality. (Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) -

bunny, 2004-05-01 11:45 pm UTC

(no subject) - allen, 2004-05-02 04:11 am UTC

(no subject) -

princessdot, 2004-05-02 06:01 am UTC

(no subject) - allen, 2004-05-02 06:06 am UTC

	crickets 2004-05-01 11:21 pm UTC (link)
	> yes...horrible nipplage.... I'm sure Charisma speaks highly of yours. sporfle! > well the discussion died off in the buffy group and it was quite interesting > so figured I'd do well traveled to the angel group.... THIS THREAD IZ PASTEDE ON YAY! CrystalWank: it's everywhere. (Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) -

miracalix, 2004-05-02 03:57 am UTC

(no subject) -

crickets, 2004-05-02 05:12 am UTC

	logan 2004-05-01 11:25 pm UTC (link)
	::rolls eyes:: the logical (and accurate) explanation is that she's still breastfeeding her infant. (Reply to this)

	angkgriffen 2004-05-01 11:31 pm UTC (link)
	And here I thought the only wanking those pictures would give us was the actual hand + genitals = fun kind. (Reply to this)

	Comparative anatomy azarias 2004-05-02 12:53 am UTC (link)
	clicks links looks down They look about right to me. Though that ass-corset she's wearing in one of the shots could really stand to go. (Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Comparative anatomy - (Anonymous), 2004-05-02 01:28 am UTC

moodeln
2004-05-02 01:32 am UTC (link)

Would it be ridiculously TMI to note that, in my experience, guys tend to like slightly-larger-than-average nipples? It would? Oh, excellent, I'll post pictures then! *rummagerummage*

And of course, there's the obvious comment that only a geek!wanker of the HIGHEST degree would be sitting there calculating nipple/boob percentages instead of, say, wanking to the rather awesome boobies.

(Reply to this)

	(Anonymous) 2004-05-02 01:34 am UTC (link)
	pops out own tits to check Hmm. Pale, with large brown nipples about the same size as Carpenter's. I'm not fat, and I'm not pregnant. Obviously, I've been Photoshopped. (Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) -

coclytus, 2004-05-02 02:09 am UTC

*dork* -

hugsnkisses, 2004-05-02 04:22 pm UTC

(no subject) -

ladylisse, 2004-05-02 05:52 pm UTC

(no subject) -

dar, 2004-05-02 11:45 pm UTC

	(Anonymous) 2004-05-02 02:13 am UTC (link)
	I would kill for those boobies ~~in a Buffalo Bill sort of way~~. Although even looking at those heels make my ankles scream in sympathy. -Mambo (Reply to this)

grith_sloffin
2004-05-02 03:03 am UTC (link)

"nipplage-area"?

~splorffle~

One would think that someone who knew 'correct' sizing of such things would also know the right words to describe what he's talking about. Areolas. Honestly.

And surely she doesn't actually have bigger areolas? They're just darker and so stand out more against her otherwise silky-smooth alabaster frontage-area. They certainly don't look any -- or much -- bigger many of the paler sort I've seen, which tend to get paler towards the outer-edge until they blend in with normal skin tone. Er... not that I go looking all that closely at other women's breasts, you understand, and I certainly don't whip out a tape measure, calculator and clip-board in order to determine statistical averages. Often.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) -

beccastareyes, 2004-05-02 08:25 am UTC

	zana16 2004-05-02 03:06 am UTC (link)
	And here I had been looking at the pics and saying, "thank God, someone with normal nipples has finally been in Playboy." (Reply to this)

	wolfsamurai 2004-05-02 03:08 am UTC (link)
	This is truely one of the greatest weeks in my life. First, cleavage theme over in Gothic_babes on LJ and then nipple wank. cries tears of joy (Reply to this)

	sarajayechan 2004-05-02 03:18 am UTC (link)
	"theyre obscurly dark for such a fair skined breast and they're fairly huge covering approximatle 22.6%of the total breast area. With most breasts, in my experience at least, the nipple-area the nipplage-area should cover between 7 and 12% of the total breast area." ... That seems totally random. (Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-05-02 04:36 am UTC

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-05-02 04:39 am UTC

	frodaish 2004-05-02 03:29 am UTC (link)
	Man, I will never show anyone my nipples. They might measure them and discuss them. How embarrasing. (Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) -

tiffage, 2004-05-02 09:33 am UTC

Re: -

frodaish, 2004-05-03 01:00 am UTC

(no subject) -

mare, 2004-05-02 03:35 pm UTC

Re: -

frodaish, 2004-05-03 01:00 am UTC

(no subject) -

mare, 2004-05-03 03:41 am UTC

	liarliar 2004-05-02 03:34 am UTC (link)
	Reading that post, it sounds like something from the Straight Dope. Someone send him an invite. We appreciate anal-retentive nipple counters there. (Reply to this)(Thread)

Sorry, no account here... - (Anonymous), 2004-05-02 07:51 pm UTC

	visp 2004-05-02 03:56 am UTC (link)
	the nipplage-area should cover between 7 and 12% of the total breast area Christ! Does Geekdom know no bounds? (Reply to this)

	miracalix 2004-05-02 04:01 am UTC (link)
	I can't believe you posted this! Except I'm really amused that you did, because that particular post of ChrisB's had me laughing in utter disbelief. Just for reference, the natalie in that thread would be me (real name shock!). (Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) -

katemonkey, 2004-05-02 11:38 am UTC

(no subject) -

themongkey, 2004-05-02 01:26 pm UTC

(no subject) -

miracalix, 2004-05-02 02:53 pm UTC

(no subject) -

themongkey, 2004-05-02 03:00 pm UTC

Re: -

miracalix, 2004-05-02 03:03 pm UTC

	jfpbookworm 2004-05-02 04:28 am UTC (link)
	they're fairly huge covering approximatle 22.6% of the total breast area. And all this time I thought that measuring to three significant figures in Playboy meant the "three sizes"... (Reply to this)

	ladysorka 2004-05-02 04:34 am UTC (link)
	looks down at own breasts looks at nipples only slightly more pink than rest of breast looks at complete and utter lack of areola Wow. This guy's on crack. Or maybe I'm photo-shopped too! ...wait. That was an overshare wasn't it. Oh well. Look, I have breasts! flashes FW (Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) -

wakkymse, 2004-05-02 08:37 am UTC

(no subject) -

bohicamouse, 2004-05-02 11:59 am UTC

(no subject) -

wakkymse, 2004-05-03 02:53 am UTC

Page 1 of 2
<<	[1] [2]	>>