Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Ichigo Kurosaki, Shinigami Company ([info]shinigami_co) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2004-05-03 12:00:00

Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
"Does this episode smell spoiled to you?" aka Fullmetal Alchemist spoiler wank
First time wank, so...etcetc. And, in the interest of saving my own behind (and to make this post all the more cute), there are spoilers for Fullmetal Alchemist in this, up to episode 30 and late issues of the manga.

There's been several Fullmetal Alchemist communities spring up on LiveJournal since the show's first airing last year, including fm_alchemist. It enjoyed a good, long time of little to no wank (besides a ridiculous incident where someone posing as the comm mod told all the yaoi fans to go "make their own community"). But, alas, all good things must come to an end.

crucifymylove has many, many theories about FMA. She also intensely believes each one to be true, and will get upset with anyone who 1) doesn't agree or 2) doesn't hang on her every breath and commit each to memory.

First she makes a post to the community with gibberish as a subject line, and an lj-cut simply titled "Epi30 spoilers". It starts off innocently enough, until she explodes into random consonents because someone dares to not remember what she said in a random thread whose location I have no clue about. An anon then politely asks (roundabout) for manga spoilers to be marked as such.

And it all gets crazy from there.

It's worth noting that the show and the manga have actually diverged on some seriously large points by now, and that ends up boosting both sides of the argument. Still, it just seems like common courtesy that, if you diverge from the actual topic warned against, you make another warning.

Dunno if this is especially wank-worthy as annoying, but there you go. XD


(Read comments)

Post a comment in response:

From:
( )Anonymous- this user has disabled anonymous posting.
Username:
Password:
Don't have an account? Create one now.
Subject:
No HTML allowed in subject
  
Message:
 
Notice! This user has turned on the option that logs your IP address when posting.
 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map