Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



hinky ([info]hugsnkisses) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2004-05-21 20:58:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Even pandas need hugs sometimes.
Previous post moved here kthx.

[info]hugsnkisses writes a post about conduct on well known community journal [info]fandom_wank. People seem appreciative of this until rivier comes along.

She questions one of the guidelines set down and references a "nasty personal vendetta" as proof that the moderating on FW is subpar, despite the non-active modding role having been explained in the original post.

Various people attempt to reason with her, whilst others just point, laugh and ramble about pandas.

Wank ongoing, so just dive right in.

(psst: viking porn!!!)

And yes, this should go in [info]i_wank. And no, it's not going to.

(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


rivier
2004-05-22 12:28 am UTC (link)
7. We do not troll

Really? Because I got my fucking arse trolled off on your oh-so-scrupulous community some months back, and you and every other mod here stuffed your heads up your collective arse and pretended it wasn't happening. It had fuck-all to do with any kind of fandom, and everything to do with one of your own pursuing a nasty personal vendetta and employing a public forum to vilify me.

Should it really matter anymore? No.

Do I still want to stab the bloody hypocritical lot of you with white-hot pokers? What do you think?

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]hugsnkisses
2004-05-22 12:36 am UTC (link)
you and every other mod here stuffed your heads up your collective arse and pretended it wasn't happening

Or we didn't notice that it was going on. We prefer to sit on our fat arses and eat cheetos rather than do something strenuous like click all those pesky links people keep putting here. If it was over something dull like another one of the anime wanks then I'm certain that no one noticed.

We're not the fandom police, and we're not your mother (..mostly). If people are trolling we can't stop them beyond chewing them out over here. I'm sorry it happened but, that's life. All we can ask is that people don't. But you seem to be holding me and my friends personally accountable for the actions of over 1500 people. Seems a bit.. wanky to me.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


rivier
2004-05-22 12:46 am UTC (link)
It was a f_w entry, a main entry, not a subsidiary comment or something happening elsewhere. Not tiresome old anime either. My name plastered all over the entry.

Why on earth would I be pointing at your high standards and laughing hollowly otherwise?

I don't actually expect you to rule my world, just to make a half-adequate stab at moderating your own community if that's what it says on the outside of your tin. Or you could stop trying to pass yourself off as someone who gives a shit.

And don't worry, I wasn't mistaking you for my mother. I know better than to swear around her: she gets very narky if I do.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]hugsnkisses
2004-05-22 12:52 am UTC (link)
Wow, you could at least pretend you'd read what I wrote. Now my feelings are hurt.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - rivier, 2004-05-22 12:56 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]hugsnkisses, 2004-05-22 01:16 am UTC
(no subject) - rivier, 2004-05-22 01:31 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]anatsuno, 2004-05-22 01:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]anatsuno, 2004-05-22 01:44 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]funkyhelix, 2004-05-22 01:31 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ashenmote, 2004-05-22 01:41 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2004-05-22 07:49 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ashenmote, 2004-05-22 01:13 pm UTC

[info]littlest_lurker
2004-05-22 01:13 am UTC (link)
It was a f_w entry, a main entry, not a subsidiary comment or something happening elsewhere. Not tiresome old anime either. My name plastered all over the entry

Just out of curiosity, could you please provide a link to the entry?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - rivier, 2004-05-22 01:37 am UTC
Link - [info]deoridhe, 2004-05-22 01:48 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]snacky, 2004-05-22 02:01 am UTC
(no subject) - rivier, 2004-05-22 02:23 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]snacky, 2004-05-22 02:33 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]princessdot, 2004-05-22 02:53 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]munchkinott, 2004-05-22 03:56 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sorchar, 2004-05-22 07:29 am UTC

rama_snark
2004-05-22 01:15 am UTC (link)
Why on earth would I be pointing at your high standards and laughing hollowly otherwise?

Where are these "high standards" of which you speak? I don't want nothin' to do with no "high standards"!

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]llama_treats, 2004-05-22 01:25 am UTC

[info]ashenmote
2004-05-22 01:31 am UTC (link)
My standards got to high to be pointed at, but there is always room for some hollow laughter.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

Wah, wah...
[info]raisedbyhyenas
2004-05-22 02:18 am UTC (link)
I love how you assume we have any idea who you are. *pinches your cheek* So CUTE!

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Wah, wah... - rivier, 2004-05-22 02:25 am UTC
Re: Wah, wah... - [info]ashenmote, 2004-05-22 02:46 am UTC
Re: Wah, wah... - [info]bubosquared, 2004-05-22 03:10 am UTC
Re: Wah, wah... - [info]marginalsanity, 2004-05-22 03:20 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]bubosquared, 2004-05-22 03:33 am UTC
Re: Wah, wah... - [info]ashenmote, 2004-05-22 03:30 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]bubosquared, 2004-05-22 03:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ashenmote, 2004-05-22 03:46 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]bubosquared, 2004-05-22 03:49 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ashenmote, 2004-05-22 03:57 am UTC
Att. all: ORGY HERE! - [info]bubosquared, 2004-05-22 04:00 am UTC
Re: Att. all: ORGY HERE! - [info]ashenmote, 2004-05-22 04:06 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]bubosquared, 2004-05-22 04:09 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ashenmote, 2004-05-22 04:29 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]bubosquared, 2004-05-22 04:30 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ashenmote, 2004-05-22 04:38 am UTC
AT LAST! THE ORIGIN OF RIVIER--REVEALED!! - [info]nabiki_gmyw, 2004-05-22 04:30 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]bubosquared, 2004-05-22 04:35 am UTC
Re: AT LAST! THE ORIGIN OF RIVIER--REVEALED!! - [info]iammeiam, 2004-05-22 04:49 am UTC
Re: AT LAST! THE ORIGIN OF RIVIER--REVEALED!! - [info]deoridhe, 2004-05-22 05:01 am UTC
Re: AT LAST! THE ORIGIN OF RIVIER--REVEALED!! - [info]ashenmote, 2004-05-22 04:50 am UTC
Re: AT LAST! THE ORIGIN OF RIVIER--REVEALED!! - [info]mirabellawotr, 2004-05-22 04:54 am UTC
Re: AT LAST! THE ORIGIN OF RIVIER--REVEALED!! - [info]ashenmote, 2004-05-22 05:05 am UTC
Re: AT LAST! THE ORIGIN OF RIVIER--REVEALED!! - [info]snacky, 2004-05-22 05:15 am UTC
Re: AT LAST! THE ORIGIN OF RIVIER--REVEALED!! - [info]notjo, 2004-05-22 07:17 am UTC
Re: AT LAST! THE ORIGIN OF RIVIER--REVEALED!! - [info]senor_pinata, 2004-05-22 09:11 am UTC
Re: AT LAST! THE ORIGIN OF RIVIER--REVEALED!! - [info]eljuno, 2004-05-22 09:55 pm UTC
Re: AT LAST! THE ORIGIN OF RIVIER--REVEALED!! - [info]smit, 2004-05-23 06:15 am UTC
Re: AT LAST! THE ORIGIN OF RIVIER--REVEALED!! - [info]terminal_frost, 2004-05-23 08:46 am UTC
Re: Wah, wah... - [info]sorchar, 2004-05-22 07:30 am UTC
Re: Wah, wah... - [info]ladymalen, 2004-05-22 10:29 am UTC

[info]anatsuno
2004-05-22 12:39 am UTC (link)
we do not troll means: it's not in the spirit of the comm, and in most of its members view it's an uncool and non fun thing to do. we also, as pointed out, pretty much self regulate... which means the mods weren't stuffing their heads in their asses but ratehr doing what they normally do: nothing.

FW doesn't ban people often AT ALL. the fact that one member (or two, or ten) happen to misbehave or behave v wankily off the grounds is no sufficient motive for the mods to go all dictator-like.


What do you think?

I think yes, and if yes the WTF yre you doing here? we don't all like each otehr here or agree with each other (AT ALL) but why get into a community if you dislike it's mode of functionning? sounds pointless to me.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]anatsuno
2004-05-22 12:42 am UTC (link)
*apologizes to the Grammar and Spelling God for stupid typos, pleads way-past-bedtime amendment*

(Reply to this)(Parent)


rivier
2004-05-22 12:55 am UTC (link)
I think moderating means taking occasional action, or why have moderators at all? For instance, one option would be to delete entries which breach the spirit or intent of the community. I think that's not the world's most difficult concept, and it's not banning either, which I wasn't advocating - what on earth would be the point of that? People simply take another account and come back if they're determined to spread shit.

I certainly don't think I'm "getting into [your] community". Why the fuck would I want to do that? I do watch out for what's being posted here, since that incident. If someone's going to run up some giant libellous post about me, and the rest of this community is going to either give their assent through inaction to what's being posted up about me, or comment encouraging the poster, then I'd at least like to know about it.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Okay!
[info]anatsuno
2004-05-22 01:08 am UTC (link)
I got it now, I think. It's all clear.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Okay! - rivier, 2004-05-22 01:17 am UTC
Re: Okay! - [info]smo, 2004-05-22 01:27 am UTC
>.< - [info]anatsuno, 2004-05-22 01:34 am UTC
Re: >.< - rivier, 2004-05-22 01:41 am UTC
>.< - [info]anatsuno, 2004-05-22 01:49 am UTC
Re: >.< - rivier, 2004-05-22 02:02 am UTC
Re: >.< - [info]melange, 2004-05-22 02:08 am UTC
Re: >.< - [info]snacky, 2004-05-22 02:12 am UTC
If you ask me... - [info]raisedbyhyenas, 2004-05-22 02:22 am UTC
Thank you, Sir! May I have another wank, Sir! - [info]bitpixy, 2004-05-23 07:14 am UTC
Re: >.< - [info]deoridhe, 2004-05-22 01:51 am UTC
YAY! - [info]anatsuno, 2004-05-22 11:59 am UTC
Re: Okay! - [info]deoridhe, 2004-05-22 01:50 am UTC
Re: Okay! - [info]anatsuno, 2004-05-22 12:00 pm UTC
Re: Okay! - [info]texta, 2004-05-22 12:07 pm UTC

[info]wankprophet
2004-05-22 01:14 am UTC (link)
For the benefit of us who have no fucking clue what you're talking about, could you give a hint -- or, preferably, a link -- pointing toward the post that made you so pissed-off? As it stands, I'm not even certain why you are being humored without confirmation that you're not just whining cause you got wanked rather than expressing a legitimate grievance.

The problem is, the original post made the point that the mods were something of a last resort, stepping in when the community itself is exploding into troll-induced into flames. The point about not trolling wasn't a descriptive, but a proscriptive...hinkey was saying that trolling is not going to be looked kindly upon. And I, for one, never do take kindly to it. And -- like many others -- will make no bones about pointing it out to the troll in question. There are even, as ana points out, people in this community we know are trollish wankers...but the fact that the mods don't shut them down at every turn (which, given the animus against deletions here, seems natural) doesn't imply approval of them or their wankiness. This is not a heavily-policed community, and that's one of the reasons people like it here -- we're expected to take responsibility for ourselves. The ones that don't...well, they can go fuck themselves.

In any event, this is moot for me until I see some reason to believe you were actually wronged rather than you got upset at being wanked and decided that Fandom_Wank was somehow responsible for the fact that you were being wankier than a Boy Scout Troop on a camping trip.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]mirabellawotr
2004-05-22 01:24 am UTC (link)
I think moderating means taking occasional action, or why have moderators at all?

As someone who's raised this issue myself, I kind of want to speak to this, but I don't feel like I have enough information. I'm not clear, to begin with, on whether you were actually trolled - i.e., people came onto your LJ to post bitchy and wanky comments - or whether you just got wanked on Fandom Wank and didn't like it. Most of us are in agreement that vendetta wanks suck, and most of us can also smell them from a mile away, and there are usually some snarky comments on the topic in response to the FW post. Also, posts that are not about fandom are usually directed somewhere else.

If people were actually following you around trolling you, yeah, that sucks and those people were asshats, and feel free to post names and copies of the comments if you have them so we can all point and laugh at those people too. I do want to point out, though, that there's a limit to what the FW mods can do about things that happen on people's private LJs on other journal services; about all they can do, and we can do, is make clear that that kind of behavior is deemed fuckwittish and mockworthy - and also realize that in a community of over 1600 people there are going to be a nontrivial number of assholes who Just Do Not Get It.

If, on the other hand, you're pissed because you were being wanky and got made fun of... well, about all I can say is that we're not forcing you to hang out here, and you might want to find another hobby that doesn't involve hanging around 1600 people you hate.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - rivier, 2004-05-22 01:35 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]llama_treats, 2004-05-22 01:42 am UTC
(no subject) - rivier, 2004-05-22 02:06 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]llama_treats, 2004-05-22 02:21 am UTC
(no subject) - rivier, 2004-05-22 02:33 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]llama_treats, 2004-05-22 02:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]princessdot, 2004-05-22 04:36 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sorchar, 2004-05-22 07:24 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]snacky, 2004-05-22 01:45 am UTC
Re: - [info]mirabellawotr, 2004-05-22 01:48 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]raisedbyhyenas, 2004-05-22 02:24 am UTC
Honestly trying to be helpful... - [info]croik, 2004-05-22 10:53 pm UTC
Re: Honestly trying to be helpful... - [info]ymfaery, 2004-05-23 10:55 am UTC
Re: Honestly trying to be helpful... - [info]croik, 2004-05-23 05:52 pm UTC
Re: Honestly trying to be helpful... - [info]ymfaery, 2004-05-24 05:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]maryavatar, 2004-05-22 01:41 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]snacky, 2004-05-22 01:47 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]maryavatar, 2004-05-22 01:52 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]snacky, 2004-05-22 01:58 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ashenmote, 2004-05-22 02:04 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]maryavatar, 2004-05-22 02:09 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]snacky, 2004-05-22 02:13 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]funkyhelix, 2004-05-22 02:17 am UTC
Ding ding! - [info]snacky, 2004-05-22 02:51 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ashenmote, 2004-05-22 03:12 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]maryavatar, 2004-05-22 02:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]snacky, 2004-05-22 02:25 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]raisedbyhyenas, 2004-05-22 02:28 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]maryavatar, 2004-05-22 02:35 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mirabellawotr, 2004-05-22 02:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]maryavatar, 2004-05-22 02:45 am UTC
Re: - [info]mirabellawotr, 2004-05-22 02:54 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]blue_linnet, 2004-05-22 04:39 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]maryavatar, 2004-05-22 02:36 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mirabellawotr, 2004-05-22 02:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ashenmote, 2004-05-22 02:28 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mirabellawotr, 2004-05-22 02:37 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ashenmote, 2004-05-22 02:52 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]wankprophet, 2004-05-22 02:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]maryavatar, 2004-05-22 02:25 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mirabellawotr, 2004-05-22 02:35 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]maryavatar, 2004-05-22 02:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mirabellawotr, 2004-05-22 02:41 am UTC
Someone mentioned porn? - [info]bubosquared, 2004-05-22 02:49 am UTC
Re: Someone mentioned porn? - [info]ashenmote, 2004-05-22 02:55 am UTC

(Deleted post)
(no subject) - [info]bubosquared, 2004-05-22 03:00 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]maryavatar, 2004-05-22 03:05 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]bubosquared, 2004-05-22 03:08 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]vasaris, 2004-05-23 01:16 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]bubosquared, 2004-05-23 01:24 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]vasaris, 2004-05-23 02:13 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]bubosquared, 2004-05-23 02:26 am UTC
Historical filk! - [info]pyratejenni, 2004-05-23 11:41 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]bubosquared, 2004-05-23 11:43 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]pyratejenni, 2004-05-24 03:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]bubosquared, 2004-05-24 03:08 am UTC
Re: Someone mentioned porn? - [info]deoridhe, 2004-05-22 04:38 am UTC
Re: Someone mentioned porn? - [info]krazycat, 2004-05-22 05:21 am UTC
Re: Someone mentioned porn? - [info]rachelmap, 2004-05-22 06:22 am UTC
Re: Someone mentioned porn? - [info]maryavatar, 2004-05-22 11:55 am UTC
Re: Someone mentioned porn? - rivier, 2004-05-22 02:51 pm UTC
Good Jesus, woman! - [info]wankprophet, 2004-05-22 10:14 pm UTC
Re: Good Jesus, woman! - [info]ashenmote, 2004-05-23 12:02 am UTC
Re: Someone mentioned porn? - [info]rachelmap, 2004-05-23 08:02 am UTC
Re: Someone mentioned porn? - [info]laleli, 2004-05-22 11:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]maryavatar, 2004-05-22 02:53 am UTC
Re: - [info]mirabellawotr, 2004-05-22 02:57 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]maryavatar, 2004-05-22 03:01 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]bubosquared, 2004-05-22 03:04 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]maryavatar, 2004-05-22 03:09 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]jrs1980, 2004-05-22 09:59 am UTC
(no subject) - rivier, 2004-05-22 02:36 am UTC
Hitler - [info]deoridhe, 2004-05-22 04:39 am UTC
Bactine - [info]deoridhe, 2004-05-22 05:07 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mirabellawotr, 2004-05-22 01:53 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]anatsuno, 2004-05-22 01:55 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]snacky, 2004-05-22 02:00 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]anatsuno, 2004-05-22 11:58 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]maryavatar, 2004-05-22 02:01 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]snacky, 2004-05-22 02:09 am UTC
(no subject) - rivier, 2004-05-22 02:16 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]glomobius, 2004-05-22 02:24 am UTC
*yawn* - (Anonymous), 2004-05-22 02:30 am UTC
Why, hello there suspicious-anonimouse! - [info]nabiki_gmyw, 2004-05-22 02:48 am UTC
Re: Why, hello there suspicious-anonimouse! - [info]yankthewank, 2004-05-22 03:33 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]redpanda, 2004-05-22 05:51 am UTC
Hmm.... - [info]nabiki_gmyw, 2004-05-22 02:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]msilverstar, 2004-05-22 03:03 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]shinigami_co, 2004-05-22 03:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]bubosquared, 2004-05-22 04:28 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ecchaniz0r, 2004-05-23 11:53 pm UTC
Re: - [info]shinigami_co, 2004-05-24 06:30 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sagralisse, 2004-05-22 04:48 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]deoridhe, 2004-05-22 05:15 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sagralisse, 2004-05-22 05:25 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]snacky, 2004-05-22 05:27 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sagralisse, 2004-05-22 05:28 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]snacky, 2004-05-22 05:41 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sagralisse, 2004-05-22 05:43 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2004-05-22 08:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sagralisse, 2004-05-22 10:03 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]nevadafighter, 2004-05-22 09:23 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]diamonde, 2004-05-22 04:14 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]croik, 2004-05-22 11:16 pm UTC

[info]shoiryu
2004-05-22 03:02 am UTC (link)
everything to do with one of your own pursuing a nasty personal vendetta and employing a public forum to vilify me.

Hivemind strikes again!

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Secret handshake
[info]deoridhe
2004-05-22 04:51 am UTC (link)
How do we identify "one of our own," anyway? Is there a secret handshake? Mating call? Do we get a button and no one told me?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Secret handshake
[info]tami_brown
2004-05-22 04:57 am UTC (link)
Nah, we brand everyone, like the herd of cows we are....

**runs through the group with a red-hot brand, marking everyone with a "FW"**

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Secret handshake - [info]princessdot, 2004-05-22 06:05 am UTC
Re: Secret handshake - [info]ecchaniz0r, 2004-05-23 11:56 pm UTC
Re: Secret handshake - [info]gjeanz, 2004-05-22 05:15 am UTC
Re: Secret handshake - [info]notjo, 2004-05-22 08:00 am UTC
Re: Secret handshake - [info]puipui, 2004-05-22 08:49 am UTC
Re: Secret handshake - [info]notjo, 2004-05-22 09:07 am UTC
Re: Secret handshake - [info]puipui, 2004-05-23 12:49 am UTC
Re: Secret handshake - [info]notjo, 2004-05-23 06:55 am UTC
Re: Secret handshake - [info]puipui, 2004-05-24 10:59 am UTC
Re: Secret handshake - [info]htrismegistus, 2004-05-22 02:43 pm UTC

[info]frodaish
2004-05-22 04:41 am UTC (link)
Why fore is the wanker wanking on fandom wank?

*runs in circles*

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]deoridhe
2004-05-22 04:52 am UTC (link)
She wanks... for JUSTICE!!!

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: - [info]frodaish, 2004-05-22 04:59 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]nabiki_gmyw, 2004-05-22 05:08 am UTC
Re: - [info]frodaish, 2004-05-22 05:09 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]deoridhe, 2004-05-22 05:16 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]krazycat, 2004-05-22 05:23 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]deoridhe, 2004-05-22 05:27 am UTC
Re: - [info]krazycat, 2004-05-22 05:55 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]krazycat, 2004-05-22 05:56 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]darkwitch666, 2004-05-22 11:12 pm UTC
Re: - [info]krazycat, 2004-05-23 12:33 am UTC

[info]gjeanz
2004-05-22 05:14 am UTC (link)
It's so very ironic that you're talking about trolling, when that's precisely what you're doing right now!
You're purposefully being unclear and just talking shit to get people riled up. Sounds like a troll to me, ma!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Anonymous)
2004-05-22 05:37 am UTC (link)
Yawn. Just an angry person who was once on F_W and decides to take their anger out on the users. Yeah, that's the way to go. Or not.

Get over it.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]panthea
2004-05-22 06:15 am UTC (link)
I think "trolling" in this context refers to going into people's journals and poking them just because they've been wanked, not anything that happens on the comm. That's what f_w as a whole (as much as it does anything as a whole) is against-- leaving the playground to bug people on their own turf.

Any dubious wank posted here, like the one you described, is pretty much open to Court of Public Opinion. Sometimes the OP gets ripped, sometimes it passes by the radar. All depends on the day of the week, the alignment of the planets, whatever.

And you know I wub you, Riv. ::EVAL WANKA::

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]sorchar
2004-05-22 07:28 am UTC (link)
Damn, you hold onto a grudge like some people hold onto their genitals. And I'm not saying that to be complimentary. Get over it.

And it's not trolling if you're wanked here, dipshit. It's trolling if someone comes to your journal and harasses you. We don't encourage that, but we sure as hell can't control the actions of every single person on teh_Interweb. If you want to try to do so, feel free. Should be good for a laugh.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

If nothing else...
[info]tekenduis
2004-05-22 08:25 am UTC (link)
Should take you up on that and become the self-proclaimed Internet Police and shine up her brand new E-sheriff badge to stop all of the Bad People, we should be seeing a -whole- lot more of her on F_W.

And OTF, and Offline, and....

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]ashenmote
2004-05-22 01:43 pm UTC (link)
rivier/grudge OPT!!!!11!Oneone!!!

(Reply to this)(Parent)

(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map