Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



hinky ([info]hugsnkisses) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2004-05-21 20:58:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Even pandas need hugs sometimes.
Previous post moved here kthx.

[info]hugsnkisses writes a post about conduct on well known community journal [info]fandom_wank. People seem appreciative of this until rivier comes along.

She questions one of the guidelines set down and references a "nasty personal vendetta" as proof that the moderating on FW is subpar, despite the non-active modding role having been explained in the original post.

Various people attempt to reason with her, whilst others just point, laugh and ramble about pandas.

Wank ongoing, so just dive right in.

(psst: viking porn!!!)

And yes, this should go in [info]i_wank. And no, it's not going to.


(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]wankprophet
2004-05-22 01:14 am UTC (link)
For the benefit of us who have no fucking clue what you're talking about, could you give a hint -- or, preferably, a link -- pointing toward the post that made you so pissed-off? As it stands, I'm not even certain why you are being humored without confirmation that you're not just whining cause you got wanked rather than expressing a legitimate grievance.

The problem is, the original post made the point that the mods were something of a last resort, stepping in when the community itself is exploding into troll-induced into flames. The point about not trolling wasn't a descriptive, but a proscriptive...hinkey was saying that trolling is not going to be looked kindly upon. And I, for one, never do take kindly to it. And -- like many others -- will make no bones about pointing it out to the troll in question. There are even, as ana points out, people in this community we know are trollish wankers...but the fact that the mods don't shut them down at every turn (which, given the animus against deletions here, seems natural) doesn't imply approval of them or their wankiness. This is not a heavily-policed community, and that's one of the reasons people like it here -- we're expected to take responsibility for ourselves. The ones that don't...well, they can go fuck themselves.

In any event, this is moot for me until I see some reason to believe you were actually wronged rather than you got upset at being wanked and decided that Fandom_Wank was somehow responsible for the fact that you were being wankier than a Boy Scout Troop on a camping trip.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map