Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



La Guera ([info]laguera25) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2004-06-13 15:43:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Because Everyone Knows Sex Appeal Ends at Fifty
Someone on the RottenTomatoes.com boards starts The Battle of the Hotties, a poll tournament to determine the sexiest male celebrity. A good time was had by all as they happily drooled over their lust object du jour and cast their vote with a gleeful squee and a click of the mouse.

But alas, wank found its way into the wet-pantied revelry. You see, in Round Three, Johnny Depp, the lust monkey of every girl old enough to fork her fingers and lock the bedroom door, was pitted against that paragon of British sexiness, Alan Rickman. Oh, how the spooge did flow.

When it becomes apparent that Mr. Rickman just might win the row, the Johnny fangirls explode. Accusations of ballot stuffing ensue. Cries of "BUT LIEK, HES SOO OLD and NOT TEH SEXXORZ" rise from the Depp contingent, who cannot seem to fathom the idea that a man north of fifty can be attractive. Threats of sockpuppetry fly.

Anram12 proposes that only those with 50+ post be allowed to vote. After all, it's hardly fair that people who just registered be allowed to join in.

The mod, Katie, responds with a slightly more eloquent version of PLZ die, Kthxbi.

The wank continues until the mod closes the thread early, tallies the votes, and declares Alan the winner. Johnny fans call her a loser bitch with no life. Ah, the irony.

Depp vs. Rickman in a Steel Cage


(Post a new comment)


[info]snarkbunny
2004-06-13 11:11 pm UTC (link)
*snorts* Well, at least all these fangirls acknowledge that a guy over 25 can be attractive, unlike most of the fandoms I'm in.

(Not that I find either of those two particularly attractive, but I'm weird. :D)

(Reply to this)


(Anonymous)
2004-06-13 11:37 pm UTC (link)
I have been having impure thoughts about AR for years. Not that Dep isn't gorgous, but "Closet land" may be the sexiest movie ever filmed (which tells you what kind of a freak this girl is!)


-Fae_struck

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]rinoared
2004-06-13 11:57 pm UTC (link)
Whoa. "Closet Land" was about the only film that ever gave me nightmares. During daytime. For YEARS.

...but he was still HOT. Him and Madeleine Stowe too. Such hottness in such a creepy movie. *sighs*

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]solar_type_star, 2004-06-14 12:25 am UTC

[info]azarias
2004-06-13 11:58 pm UTC (link)
Depp vs. Rickman in a Steel Cage

Yes please. (There is a mud pit in this cage, yes?)

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]solar_type_star
2004-06-14 12:20 am UTC (link)
I'd pay good money to witness that... maybe offer myself as a "consolation price" to whoever loses? *grins*

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]norabombay
2004-06-14 06:38 am UTC (link)
I think it might be a vat of KY Jelley.

Goes on clear, you know?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]marginalsanity, 2004-06-14 09:25 pm UTC

[info]visp
2004-06-14 06:30 pm UTC (link)
Oh yes!

(Reply to this)(Parent)

In defense of sexy "old" men
[info]kasra
2004-06-14 12:02 am UTC (link)
Patrick Stewart.

That's all I have to say.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: In defense of sexy "old" men
[info]telesilla
2004-06-14 12:33 am UTC (link)
Liam Neeson

Although Patrick rocks my world as well.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: In defense of sexy "old" men - [info]singe, 2004-06-14 01:02 am UTC
Re: In defense of sexy "old" men - (Anonymous), 2004-06-14 01:06 am UTC
Re: In defense of sexy "old" men - [info]chaoscheebs, 2004-06-14 01:09 am UTC
Re: In defense of sexy "old" men - [info]llama_treats, 2004-06-14 01:16 am UTC

(Deleted post)
Re: In defense of sexy "old" men - (Anonymous), 2004-06-14 04:54 am UTC

(Deleted post)
Re: In defense of sexy "old" men - [info]skarrow, 2004-06-14 06:16 am UTC
Re: In defense of sexy "old" men - [info]jerel, 2004-06-14 04:08 pm UTC
Re: In defense of sexy "old" men - (Anonymous), 2004-06-15 04:41 am UTC

(Deleted post)
Re: In defense of sexy "old" men - (Anonymous), 2004-06-16 09:28 am UTC
Re: In defense of sexy "old" men - [info]plazmah, 2004-06-14 03:49 am UTC
Re: In defense of sexy "old" men - [info]chaoscheebs, 2004-06-14 08:08 am UTC
Re: In defense of sexy "old" men - [info]plazmah, 2004-06-14 04:10 pm UTC
Re: In defense of sexy "old" men - [info]singe, 2004-06-14 01:39 am UTC
Re: I like ENT... - [info]sewingmyfish, 2004-06-14 02:17 am UTC
Re: I like ENT... - [info]singe, 2004-06-14 04:45 am UTC
Re: I like ENT... - [info]squib, 2004-06-14 06:04 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sewingmyfish, 2004-06-14 08:48 am UTC
Re: In defense of sexy "old" men - (Anonymous), 2004-06-14 02:59 am UTC
Re: In defense of sexy "old" men - [info]tempslut, 2004-06-14 08:16 am UTC
Re: In defense of sexy "old" men - [info]lolibot, 2004-06-14 09:58 am UTC
Re: In defense of sexy "old" men - [info]lolibot, 2004-06-14 09:59 am UTC
Re: In defense of sexy "old" men - [info]tempslut, 2004-06-14 07:53 pm UTC
Re: In defense of sexy "old" men - [info]notjo, 2004-06-14 07:11 am UTC
Re: In defense of sexy "old" men - (Anonymous), 2004-06-14 07:16 am UTC
Re: In defense of sexy "old" men - [info]valarltd, 2004-06-14 04:45 pm UTC
Re: In defense of sexy "old" men - [info]visp, 2004-06-14 06:35 pm UTC
Re: In defense of sexy "old" men - [info]candy, 2004-06-15 09:18 am UTC
Re: In defense of sexy "old" men - (Anonymous), 2004-06-14 08:31 pm UTC
Re: In defense of sexy "old" men - [info]notjo, 2004-06-14 09:00 pm UTC
Re: In defense of sexy "old" men - [info]azarias, 2004-06-14 01:56 am UTC
Re: In defense of sexy "old" men - [info]telesilla, 2004-06-14 03:10 am UTC
Re: In defense of sexy "old" men - [info]mariagoner, 2004-06-15 05:41 pm UTC
Re: In defense of sexy "old" men - [info]phoenixwank, 2004-06-14 04:55 am UTC
Re: In defense of sexy "old" men - [info]singe, 2004-06-14 06:51 am UTC
Re: In defense of sexy "old" men - [info]teratologist, 2004-06-14 05:04 am UTC
Re: In defense of sexy "old" men - [info]singe, 2004-06-14 06:49 am UTC
Re: In defense of sexy "old" men - [info]valarltd, 2004-06-14 08:09 pm UTC
Re: In defense of sexy "old" men - [info]marginalsanity, 2004-06-14 09:28 pm UTC
Re: In defense of sexy "old" men - [info]elfy, 2004-06-14 08:18 am UTC
Re: In defense of sexy "old" men - [info]singe, 2004-06-14 02:13 pm UTC
Re: In defense of sexy "old" men - (Anonymous), 2004-06-14 03:52 pm UTC
Re: In defense of sexy "old" men - [info]jerel, 2004-06-14 04:07 pm UTC
Re: In defense of sexy "old" men - (Anonymous), 2004-06-14 05:04 pm UTC
Re: In defense of sexy "old" men - [info]singe, 2004-06-15 02:03 am UTC
Re: In defense of sexy "old" men - [info]valarltd, 2004-06-14 04:51 pm UTC
Re: In defense of sexy "old" men - (Anonymous), 2004-06-14 05:01 pm UTC
Re: In defense of sexy "old" men - [info]kindest_demon, 2004-06-14 04:42 pm UTC
Re: In defense of sexy "old" men - [info]marginalsanity, 2004-06-14 09:28 pm UTC
Re: In defense of sexy "old" men - [info]crickets, 2004-06-14 10:50 pm UTC
Re: In defense of sexy "old" men - [info]singe, 2004-06-15 01:52 am UTC
Re: In defense of sexy "old" men - [info]tami_brown, 2004-06-14 08:34 am UTC
Re: In defense of sexy "old" men - [info]phyll, 2004-06-15 12:53 am UTC
Re: In defense of sexy "old" men - [info]lolibot, 2004-06-14 09:58 am UTC
Re: In defense of sexy "old" men - [info]pokecheck, 2004-06-14 04:57 pm UTC
Re: In defense of sexy "old" men - [info]littlest_lurker, 2004-06-15 01:46 am UTC
Re: In defense of sexy "old" men - [info]valarltd, 2004-06-14 06:20 pm UTC
Re: In defense of sexy "old" men - [info]visp, 2004-06-14 06:44 pm UTC
Re: In defense of sexy "old" men - [info]belafarinrod, 2004-06-14 09:00 pm UTC
Re: In defense of sexy "old" men - [info]telesilla, 2004-06-14 10:41 pm UTC
Re: In defense of sexy "old" men - [info]visp, 2004-06-15 10:47 pm UTC
Re: In defense of sexy "old" men - [info]crickets, 2004-06-14 10:54 pm UTC
Re: In defense of sexy "old" men - [info]candy, 2004-06-15 09:20 am UTC
Re: In defense of sexy "old" men - (Anonymous), 2004-06-16 09:27 am UTC
Re: In defense of sexy "old" men - [info]dawnswalker, 2004-06-14 04:27 am UTC
Re: In defense of sexy "old" men - [info]chaimonkey, 2004-06-14 07:33 am UTC
Re: In defense of sexy "old" men - [info]crickets, 2004-06-14 09:14 am UTC
Re: In defense of sexy "old" men - [info]shoinomyoujou, 2004-06-15 01:08 am UTC
Re: In defense of sexy "old" men - [info]chaimonkey, 2004-06-15 02:31 am UTC
Re: In defense of sexy "old" men - [info]candy, 2004-06-15 09:20 am UTC
Re: In defense of sexy "old" men - [info]cherry, 2004-06-14 01:52 pm UTC
Re: In defense of sexy "old" men - (Anonymous), 2004-06-14 02:05 pm UTC
Re: In defense of sexy "old" men - (Anonymous), 2004-06-14 02:09 pm UTC
Re: In defense of sexy "old" men - [info]alina_kalime, 2004-06-14 10:29 pm UTC

[info]mouseybrown
2004-06-14 12:12 am UTC (link)
You see, I like Johnny Depp. He's a good actor, he's got a sense of humour, he's not adverse to beating the shit out of a paprazzi once in a while.

But ...

I would willingly pay good money to hear Alan Rickman read the telephone directory and sigh, happily, the whole time he was doing that.

I just can't say that about Duh Depster.

It's all in the speaking voice.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]lovelypoet, 2004-06-14 12:52 am UTC
Speaking of the voice... - [info]telophase, 2004-06-14 04:13 am UTC
Re: Speaking of the voice... - [info]jerel, 2004-06-14 04:11 pm UTC
Re: Speaking of the voice... - [info]mouseybrown, 2004-06-14 05:18 pm UTC
Re: Speaking of the voice... - [info]plazmah, 2004-06-14 09:05 pm UTC
Re: Speaking of the voice... - [info]prettypinkkitty, 2004-06-14 08:43 pm UTC
Re: Speaking of the voice... - [info]telophase, 2004-06-15 06:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]skarrow, 2004-06-14 06:11 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]chaimonkey, 2004-06-14 07:34 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]elfy, 2004-06-14 08:18 am UTC
*busts out the Couvasier*
[info]dorian
2004-06-14 12:50 am UTC (link)
Dear Johnny,

I'm sorry there are so many hysterical fangirls out there who claim to be in lurve with you. I know it's hard being so pretty. Oh, no, sugar lips, don't cry. It'll be okay. How 'bout you come over tonight and let Dorian make it all better? That's a good boy.


Dear Alan,

I know pitting you against Johnny Depp is silly. You're on two different scales of hottness! I could never decide between the two of you. How 'bout you come over tonight and we laugh about silly fangirls over a few bottles of wine? Oh, of course it'll be just you and me. We'll I'll make you forget all about silly internet polls.

(Reply to this)


[info]llama_treats
2004-06-14 01:06 am UTC (link)
Oh, please. Alan Rickman would SO kick Johnny Depp's ass in a steel cage match. And then he'd kick all the fangirls' asses, and they'd scream for more.

Can I get a one-way ticket to the cage, please?

(Reply to this)


[info]crickets
2004-06-14 01:30 am UTC (link)
Depp's cute and charming, but oh, I do love me some Rickman.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

The solution is SO simple - (Anonymous), 2004-06-14 02:21 am UTC
Re: The solution is SO simple - [info]crickets, 2004-06-14 06:45 am UTC
Re: The solution is SO simple - [info]chaimonkey, 2004-06-14 07:35 am UTC
Re: The solution is SO simple - [info]crickets, 2004-06-14 10:22 pm UTC
*flashes* - [info]chaimonkey, 2004-06-15 02:33 am UTC
Re: *flashes* - [info]crickets, 2004-06-15 07:06 am UTC
Re: The solution is SO simple - [info]rachelmap, 2004-06-14 11:56 am UTC
Re: The solution is SO simple - [info]crickets, 2004-06-14 10:24 pm UTC
Re: The solution is SO simple - [info]chaimonkey, 2004-06-15 02:34 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2004-06-14 06:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]littleshebear, 2004-06-15 02:24 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]starfish, 2004-06-15 03:11 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]crickets, 2004-06-15 04:41 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2004-06-15 02:57 pm UTC

[info]majinkarp
2004-06-14 01:45 am UTC (link)
Wha? But Depp is no spring chicken himself. What is he, like 40?

And I won't speak to anyone who can't appreciate the attraction of older men.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]wankprophet, 2004-06-14 01:54 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]majinkarp, 2004-06-14 02:05 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]telesilla, 2004-06-14 04:59 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]wankprophet, 2004-06-14 06:33 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]chaimonkey, 2004-06-14 07:36 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kindest_demon, 2004-06-14 04:45 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]visp, 2004-06-14 06:49 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]valarltd, 2004-06-14 08:08 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]candy, 2004-06-15 09:25 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]wg, 2004-06-15 08:59 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cleolinda, 2004-06-14 02:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]janegraddell, 2004-06-14 05:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cleolinda, 2004-06-14 08:07 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]p_tripp, 2004-06-14 07:48 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cleolinda, 2004-06-14 09:38 pm UTC

(Anonymous)
2004-06-14 02:15 am UTC (link)
Depp vs. Rickman in a Steel Cage

I'd pay good money to see THAT. Mind you, I'd also pay a lot more to watch Jack Davenport "console" Johnny after Alan Rickman kicked his ass.

(Reply to this)

(Deleted post)
(no subject) - [info]kicklecubicle, 2004-06-14 03:16 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kicklecubicle, 2004-06-14 03:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]o_o, 2004-06-14 03:28 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]o_o, 2004-06-14 03:30 am UTC
Old and Sexy.
[info]danceswithelvis
2004-06-14 03:34 am UTC (link)
So, these teeny-boppers would probably have a heartattack if they ever found out about my unadulterated fangirlism of Peter O'Toole?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Old and Sexy. - [info]pfeffermuse, 2004-06-14 04:31 am UTC
Re: Old and Sexy. - [info]singe, 2004-06-14 04:54 am UTC
Re: Old and Sexy. - [info]azarias, 2004-06-14 05:09 am UTC
Re: Old and Sexy. - [info]pfeffermuse, 2004-06-14 05:47 am UTC
Re: Old and Sexy. - [info]telophase, 2004-06-14 06:37 am UTC
Re: Old and Sexy. - (Anonymous), 2004-06-14 06:52 am UTC
Re: Old and Sexy. - [info]diamonde, 2004-06-14 09:53 am UTC
Re: Old and Sexy. - [info]cleolinda, 2004-06-14 08:17 am UTC
Re: Old and Sexy. - [info]singe, 2004-06-14 06:45 am UTC
Re: Old and Sexy. - (Anonymous), 2004-06-14 01:48 pm UTC
Re: Old and Sexy. - [info]munchkinott, 2004-06-14 10:04 pm UTC
Re: Old and Sexy. - (Anonymous), 2004-06-14 04:59 am UTC
Re: Old and Sexy. - [info]danceswithelvis, 2004-06-14 06:39 am UTC
Re: Old and Sexy. - [info]yankthewank, 2004-06-14 10:41 am UTC

(Deleted post)
Re: Old and Sexy. - [info]danceswithelvis, 2004-06-14 07:05 am UTC
Re: Old and Sexy. - [info]danceswithelvis, 2004-06-14 07:07 am UTC
Wank On, Wank Off.
wolfie_thu
2004-06-14 05:38 am UTC (link)
Pfft. Brad Derf Dourif is hotter than either of them. EITHER OF THEM, I SAY!!1!1!11111o Because there's no such thing as differences in taste and opinion.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Wank On, Wank Off. - [info]skarrow, 2004-06-14 06:14 am UTC
Re: Wank On, Wank Off. - [info]jwaneeta, 2004-06-14 07:50 am UTC
Re: Wank On, Wank Off. - [info]oxydosic, 2004-06-14 02:00 pm UTC
Re: Wank On, Wank Off. - nakannimi, 2004-06-14 05:12 pm UTC
Re: Wank On, Wank Off. - [info]smo, 2004-06-14 08:59 pm UTC

[info]p_tripp
2004-06-14 05:22 pm UTC (link)
This is too funny. The steel cage comment made me sporfle.
I consider the RT boards to be an untapped wank resource. It's positively rife there.
A bit off topic, but...
Just the other day, in the "MTV Movie awards thread" I had to put the smackdown because one of the posters there quoted:
"Yeah, Sean Astin was so annoying when he gave that speech."
Another doofus agreed and added:
"He was annoying. And so was that Billy Boyd guy, even though he really didn't do that much".

Where I responded and said,
"Of course he didn't do much. He wasn't even there".
Back on topic:
Alan Rickman is incredibly sexy and I would gladly referee that steel cage match for free, thanks.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]visp, 2004-06-14 06:52 pm UTC

[info]frodaish
2004-06-14 10:57 pm UTC (link)
How odd this comes after my post...

What is with people @.@

(Reply to this)


[info]rikoshi
2004-06-15 01:10 am UTC (link)
I'm sad that Alan Rickman didn't have the part of Leonardo Leonardo on Clerks: The Animated Series.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]speshulduck, 2004-06-15 01:55 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rikoshi, 2004-06-15 01:58 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2004-06-15 06:23 am UTC (link)
I've had severe lust for Sean Connery since I was 9. Sexiest. Man. Alive. (Even in that one horrible movie he did where he had a pony tail and spent the whole time running around in a loincloth. His character was ridiculous, but the loincloth made it so that I didn't give a damn about that, or the incomprehensibility of the film.)

Helga

(Reply to this)

Musicians!
[info]candy
2004-06-15 09:31 am UTC (link)
At least the ones who are still alive and hot.

Lou Reed.

John Cale.

Mick Jagger.

Keith Richards (hey, Johnny *based* Jack on him, and everyone goes *crazy* over Jack, ergo, Keith = hot. And again - the *voice*. I swear I'm going to wear out "Losing My Touch" on the Forty Licks CD...)

Not musicians, and not mentioned yet.

Bernard Hill.

Will Patton (appeared in Armageddon, Entrapped, Gone In 60 Seconds, Inventing The Abbotts, Remember The Titans and other movies. Just. Plain. Hot.)

(Reply to this)


[info]luna
2004-06-15 03:42 pm UTC (link)
Johnny Depp, the lust monkey of every girl old enough to fork her fingers and lock the bedroom door,

::spews coffee all over monitor::

Hee!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]mariagoner, 2004-06-15 05:47 pm UTC

[info]mariagoner
2004-06-15 05:41 pm UTC (link)
I... I... I just don't get it. Isn't Johnny Depp like 40-something himself? (Dude is actually pretty damn old, despite his eerily unaging visage.) So why are his fangirls getting upset over the fact that other fangirls like a man who only has a decade or so on Johnny? Why is the cut-off age for sexiness suddenly 50? Why are they being such fickle bitches on age anyway, considering their idol ain't a spring chicken either?

(Reply to this)


 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map