(Post a new comment)

	(Anonymous) 2004-06-22 10:11 pm UTC (link)
	The wank doesn't seem to be in the SV fanfic hate thread, but over in another entry someone else started. A love thread to counter the hate. A love thread in which someone immediately starts saying love threads are worse because your feelings get hurt if you don't get love: http://www.livejournal.com/users/sandram/195557.html?thread=908005#t908005 (Reply to this)(Thread)

	cleolinda 2004-06-22 10:15 pm UTC (link)
	You know, this is exactly how that "everyone gets a gold star" self-esteem movement got started in (American) schools. I blame the decline of Western culture, up to and including the whininess of booted American Idol contestants, on it. (Reply to this)(Parent)

	deeablo 2004-06-22 10:27 pm UTC (link)
	::gets out of rocking chair:: In my day, Smallville was the wankiest fandom that ever wanked. It was run by self-important, self-proclaimed "elder stateswomen" who woobified Lex Luthor at every turn. Now most of these women have run off to write gay Justice League porn. It's just not as wanky as it used to be. Bah! Get off my porch, you damn kids! (Reply to this)(Thread)

	Gay Justice League Porn? yadda 2004-06-22 10:38 pm UTC (link)
	How the mighty have fallen. (Reply to this)(Parent)

	Luther deoridhe 2004-06-22 10:54 pm UTC (link)
	Lex Luther? Woobified? ... ... head explodes (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Luther -

melange, 2004-06-22 11:57 pm UTC

Re: Luther -

deoridhe, 2004-06-23 12:06 am UTC

	kyuuketsukirui 2004-06-23 12:09 am UTC (link)
	Do we really need an announcement post each time a new fandom goes up there? This seems more fandom_loungeish. (Reply to this)(Thread)

	kijikun 2004-06-23 04:12 am UTC (link)
	Good point (Reply to this)(Parent)

	amandatwop 2004-06-23 01:49 am UTC (link)
	Well, it's gotten pretty well in gear now. Smallville fans: Apathetic or OMG SO MEEEEEN! (Reply to this)

	(Anonymous) 2004-06-23 05:50 am UTC (link)
	http://www.livejournal.com/users/thamiris/189476.html Just a wee little wank brought to you by superanonymouse on LJ. Stemming off from the fanfic_hate thread, it devolves. Quickly. (Reply to this)(Thread)

	(Anonymous) 2004-06-23 06:02 am UTC (link)
	Kelex is loaded for BNF, in both threads. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) -

kijikun, 2004-06-23 08:10 am UTC

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-06-23 08:50 am UTC

	WANK! (Anonymous) 2004-06-23 08:08 am UTC (link)
	And now LJ user spren_cious has deleted her LJ. Someone needs to post this in its own thread, but I do not have an account. (Reply to this)(Parent)

	(Anonymous) 2004-06-23 08:22 am UTC (link)
	wipes splooge off glasses Now that's a really a wank within its own right and deserves more than just a comments thread full of anonymice. weeps for the underachieving wank (Reply to this)(Parent)

	(Anonymous) 2004-06-23 08:25 am UTC (link)
	wipes splooge off glasses Now that's a really a wank within its own right and deserves more than just a comments thread full of anonymice. weeps for the underachieving wank (Reply to this)(Parent)

	(Anonymous) 2004-06-23 06:03 am UTC (link)
	One post about fanfic_hate once is enough kthxbai. (Reply to this)

	kijikun 2004-06-23 08:11 am UTC (link)
	Anon trolls: Check (Reply to this)

(Anonymous)
2004-06-23 09:24 am UTC (link)

I think that perhaps this is (http://www.journalfen.net/community/fandom_wank/443121.html) starting to (http://www.journalfen.net/community/fandom_wank/438516.html) get a bit (http://www.journalfen.net/community/fandom_wank/437611.html) repititive (http://www.journalfen.net/community/fandom_wank/436637.html). Saying "I NO WE R ALL SICK OF THIS BUT LOLZ I JUST WANTED TO WANK THIS PERSON COZ SHE CALLED MY BFF A BAD WRITER OMG" is not a bloody disclaimer to post the same wank over and over. We know fanfic_hate exists. Now chill out and go defend your favourite BNFs in the thread itself.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

	(Anonymous) 2004-06-23 09:27 am UTC (link)
	Oh, the (http://www.journalfen.net/community/fandom_wank/444033.html?thread=34459521#t34459521) irony. (http://www.journalfen.net/community/fandom_wank/444033.html?thread=34489217#t34489217) (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-06-23 09:29 am UTC

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-06-23 09:52 am UTC

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-06-23 10:00 am UTC

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-06-23 10:29 am UTC

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-06-23 01:49 pm UTC

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-06-23 04:38 pm UTC

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-06-23 09:37 am UTC

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-06-23 03:46 pm UTC

Mouse 2 - (Anonymous), 2004-06-24 11:19 am UTC

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-06-24 02:14 pm UTC

Mouse 2 - (Anonymous), 2004-06-24 02:18 pm UTC

Re: Mouse 2 - (Anonymous), 2004-06-24 02:19 pm UTC

Mouse 2 - (Anonymous), 2004-06-24 02:20 pm UTC

	Re: hmmm adinaj69 2004-06-23 10:33 am UTC (link)
	Most. Anonymouse. Comments. Evar. (Reply to this)(Thread)

	Re: hmmm iczer6 2004-06-23 10:46 am UTC (link)
	I don't know, they have a point. It is a little repetitive to have it mentioned every time the journal picks a new fandom. Not to say I'm the 'dictator of wankiness' but maybe we should treat it like the IMDb, we know it's wanky but there's no reason to post unless something spectacular happens. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)