Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Lady Lance ([info]ladylance) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2003-05-08 10:07:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:
Entry tags:fandom: harry potter, person: msscribe, sockpuppets

Our dear *gag* friend pottersginny is at it again, trying to defend her horrendous comments of yesterday.

Anti-Christs will continue to promote racially mixed-marriages as they attempt to destroy all the races that God created. The races that God called good. The wicked want to void God's Genesis command to reproduce "after his kind". They blaspheme God by saying that what he created was "not good enough" and that they have a better way, "one world with one hybrid race"

At least the comments are enlightening about what the scripture that she butchers really means.

Edit: It appears that should couldn't take the heat and set her journal to friends only. She says that calling that one poster a "zebra" was justified because the other woman said that they were filming "Gorrillas in the Mist" in her shower (ignoring the fact that she cast the first stone by calling her a slut in someone else's journal).

She hasn't learned. She never will. She made baby jesus cry.

I weep.



(Post a new comment)


[info]penelope
2003-05-08 08:47 pm UTC (link)
This is not even an amusing wank any more, just so obviously racist and revolting that I'm chewing my keyboard and clawing at my screen. Perhaps she should post some naked pics of herself to spice the wank up a bit.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]queerasjohn
2003-05-08 08:57 pm UTC (link)
No. Really. No. NONONONONONO. A WORLD OF NO. A SPUFFY-BANNER-SIZED WORLD OF NO.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]penelope, 2003-05-08 08:58 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]penelope, 2003-05-08 09:01 pm UTC
(no subject) - tintin, 2003-05-09 12:03 am UTC

[info]cygnusfap
2003-05-08 08:58 pm UTC (link)
EEWWWWWWWWWWW.

EWWWW times infinity.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

Re:
[info]ladylance
2003-05-08 08:59 pm UTC (link)
::goes blind at the thought::

Yikes. that's just...Wow. bad imagery >.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]penelope, 2003-05-08 09:02 pm UTC
Re: - [info]ladylance, 2003-05-08 09:06 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]penelope, 2003-05-08 09:11 pm UTC
Re: - [info]ladylance, 2003-05-08 09:47 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]faintly_macabre, 2003-05-09 06:52 am UTC
Re: - [info]ladylance, 2003-05-09 10:34 am UTC
(no subject) - dawnjosephine, 2003-05-08 09:55 pm UTC

[info]ipomoea
2003-05-08 08:53 pm UTC (link)
Ugh. There are Just. No. Words.

I just really, really hope pottersginny's brand of stupid isn't contagious.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]phosfate
2003-05-08 08:56 pm UTC (link)
Alas, she has the potential to pass it on to her pure white children.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ueuecoyotl, 2003-05-08 09:42 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]faintly_macabre, 2003-05-08 10:35 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ipomoea, 2003-05-09 12:59 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sorchar, 2003-05-09 06:20 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ymfaery, 2003-05-09 06:30 am UTC
Re: - [info]sorchar, 2003-05-09 06:36 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ueuecoyotl, 2003-05-09 06:47 am UTC
Re: - [info]sorchar, 2003-05-09 06:52 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ueuecoyotl, 2003-05-09 06:55 am UTC
Re: - [info]sorchar, 2003-05-09 07:01 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ueuecoyotl, 2003-05-09 07:03 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2003-05-09 04:37 pm UTC

[info]misswindy
2003-05-08 09:07 pm UTC (link)
Gaaaaaah. This is possibly one of the most cringeworthy wanktasms I've ever had the misfortune of witnessing.

And I come from the Smallville fandom, so that's saying *a lot*.

At least the people schooling her on the Bible verses were interesting. In a salve-on-a-raging-boil kind of way.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]sorchar
2003-05-09 06:33 am UTC (link)
Well, the thing is, people like Potty aren't interested in the Bible as a whole, unfortunately...only in whatever verses they can take out of context and twist to support their sick beliefs.

I'm kinda curious about all this plus-size modelling she supposedly does...cause you know, I'm the first one to admit I'm fat. I shop at these places she supposedly models for. And I have YET to see anyone who looks anything like her in any of their catalogs or print ads. The average plus-size model might be big, but she don't look like her face caught on fire and somebody beat it out with a bag of nickels. Potty, on the other hand...ouch.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]jerry_ds_girl, 2003-05-10 06:38 pm UTC

[info]lexin
2003-05-08 09:26 pm UTC (link)
That has to be one of the most unpleasant things I've read in a very long time. And it's so unpleasant because I didn't get the feeling she's a troll doing this for the jollies, she actually seems serious.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]darkrose
2003-05-08 09:35 pm UTC (link)
Yes. I was really, really hoping that this was a parody, but I don't think it is.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

Re: - [info]ladylance, 2003-05-08 09:48 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lulinda, 2003-05-09 02:11 am UTC

[info]faintly_macabre
2003-05-08 09:27 pm UTC (link)
Reading past the entry in question makes me want to pour bleach over my head.

My god... There's... this has to be a joke, right? right?!

[...]

Or not, I guess.

Scary-ness abounds. I'm going to go crawl into my sock drawer and sleep for days.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]slippery_fish, 2003-05-08 09:38 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]faintly_macabre, 2003-05-08 09:52 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]slippery_fish, 2003-05-08 10:14 pm UTC
Re: - [info]ladylance, 2003-05-08 10:15 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]slippery_fish, 2003-05-08 10:18 pm UTC
Re: - [info]ladylance, 2003-05-08 11:01 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]faintly_macabre, 2003-05-08 10:36 pm UTC
Re: - [info]ladylance, 2003-05-08 11:01 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]faintly_macabre, 2003-05-08 10:38 pm UTC

[info]nita
2003-05-08 09:28 pm UTC (link)
I keep thinking to myself "I really wish she-who-must-not-be-named would discover this chick's journal." If only, then let the weinner roast begin.

Ok, I am so destined for hell.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]singe, 2003-05-08 09:40 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]nita, 2003-05-08 09:47 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mpoetess, 2003-05-08 09:49 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]nita, 2003-05-08 10:05 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]moonjaguar, 2003-05-09 01:13 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2003-05-09 05:34 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sorchar, 2003-05-09 07:46 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]nita, 2003-05-09 04:35 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2003-05-09 04:38 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cmikhailovic, 2003-05-09 09:50 pm UTC
Re: - [info]singe, 2003-05-08 10:12 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sorchar, 2003-05-09 06:26 am UTC
Re: - [info]singe, 2003-05-09 07:36 am UTC
Re: - [info]sorchar, 2003-05-09 07:41 am UTC
Re: - [info]sorchar, 2003-05-09 07:43 am UTC
Re: - [info]singe, 2003-05-09 07:53 am UTC
Re: - [info]sorchar, 2003-05-09 07:55 am UTC
(no subject) - croupier, 2003-05-09 12:39 pm UTC
Re: - [info]sorchar, 2003-05-09 06:39 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]parlance, 2003-05-10 02:09 am UTC
Re: - [info]sorchar, 2003-05-10 07:14 am UTC

[info]ueuecoyotl
2003-05-08 09:41 pm UTC (link)
I wonder what the hell she's doing in Harry Potter fandom in the first place if she considers herself so pure and righteous. Doesn't the Bible preach against the use of magic in the first place?

Ah well, at least I got time to say my piece. Too bad she seems like the type that will never listen.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]nita, 2003-05-09 04:37 pm UTC

[info]hotpinkdragones
2003-05-08 09:41 pm UTC (link)
Wow. That's about all I can say. I know some Christians whose beliefs are a bit conservative, but I can say that this chick takes the cake. I mean ... I knew that there were groups that twisted scripture to fit bizarre beliefs (look at that guy, Matt Hale (?) who runs that Christian neo-Nazi, neo-KKK church), but I didn't think I'd encounter them online.

-hp

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: - [info]ladylance, 2003-05-08 09:50 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]moonjaguar, 2003-05-10 12:09 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cesare, 2003-05-10 02:58 pm UTC

[info]nita
2003-05-08 09:52 pm UTC (link)
Hey, she's deleting comments like crazy - just as I was reading them. Mostly she's removing the most rational and well-reasoned ones. Not the ones that were flaming her with what a nazi racist nutbar she is. Nope, she's deleting the ones that actually refute her, even when they do so tactfully.

So, what does that say about her?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]nevadafighter, 2003-05-08 09:56 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]diamonde, 2003-05-09 03:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]nita, 2003-05-09 04:46 pm UTC

[info]esorlehcar
2003-05-08 09:54 pm UTC (link)
Wow. She makes cobain_x_mortis look like Martin Luther King.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2003-10-16 08:34 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]stubbleglitter, 2003-10-16 07:22 pm UTC
Did someone say dysgenics?
[info]mauralabingi
2003-05-08 11:06 pm UTC (link)
Okay, I know that slamming a person based on their appearance is cheap, but... damn. The cross-eyes, the beer-opener teeth, the teased-big-yet-thinning hair, the viciously-plucked eyebrows and pastel Merle Norman makeup....

"Cletus, you know I gotta wear the shirt what the Dairy Queen done give me!"

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Did someone say dysgenics? - dawnjosephine, 2003-05-08 11:34 pm UTC
Re: Did someone say dysgenics? - [info]mauralabingi, 2003-05-08 11:39 pm UTC
Re: Did someone say dysgenics? - dawnjosephine, 2003-05-08 11:53 pm UTC
Re: Did someone say dysgenics? - [info]mauralabingi, 2003-05-08 11:55 pm UTC
Re: Did someone say dysgenics? - [info]ladylance, 2003-05-09 03:42 am UTC
Re: Did someone say dysgenics? - [info]sorchar, 2003-05-09 06:25 am UTC
Re: Did someone say dysgenics? - [info]hotpinkdragones, 2003-05-09 06:59 am UTC
Re: Did someone say dysgenics? - [info]sorchar, 2003-05-09 07:03 am UTC
Re: Did someone say dysgenics? - [info]chaya, 2003-05-09 12:27 am UTC
Re: Did someone say dysgenics? - [info]faintly_macabre, 2003-05-09 05:31 am UTC
Re: Did someone say dysgenics? - [info]ipomoea, 2003-05-09 12:57 am UTC
Re: Did someone say dysgenics? - [info]moonjaguar, 2003-05-09 06:32 am UTC
Re: Did someone say dysgenics? - [info]sorchar, 2003-05-09 06:40 am UTC
Re: Did someone say dysgenics? - [info]moonjaguar, 2003-05-09 08:35 am UTC
Re: Did someone say dysgenics? - [info]sorchar, 2003-05-09 08:38 am UTC
Re: Did someone say dysgenics? - [info]ladylance, 2003-05-09 10:40 am UTC
Re: Did someone say dysgenics? - [info]mpoetess, 2003-05-09 06:25 pm UTC
Re: Did someone say dysgenics? - [info]ladylance, 2003-05-09 09:11 pm UTC
Re: Did someone say dysgenics? - [info]mpoetess, 2003-05-09 09:25 pm UTC
Re: Did someone say dysgenics? - [info]ladylance, 2003-05-09 09:43 pm UTC
Re: Did someone say dysgenics? - [info]starkeymonster, 2003-05-09 11:45 pm UTC
Re: Did someone say dysgenics? - [info]ladylance, 2003-05-10 01:17 am UTC
Re: Did someone say dysgenics? - [info]sorchar, 2003-05-10 10:30 am UTC
Re: Did someone say dysgenics? - [info]sorchar, 2003-05-09 06:50 pm UTC
Re: Did someone say dysgenics? - [info]ipomoea, 2003-05-09 10:38 am UTC
Re: Did someone say dysgenics? - croupier, 2003-05-10 01:11 am UTC
Re: Did someone say dysgenics? - [info]parlance, 2003-05-10 02:11 am UTC
Re: Did someone say dysgenics? - [info]moonjaguar, 2003-05-10 04:01 am UTC
I know it's shitty to crack on people's appearances but...
[info]moonjaguar
2003-05-09 01:40 am UTC (link)
Dog knows I'm no beauty but that woman looks like the result of five generations of brother-sister inbreeding. I keep wondering if it's real or if she stole it from uglypeople.com.

1983 called, they want her hair and makeup back. Oh, and World Church of the Creator called, they're looking for fine upstanding white people like her.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: I know it's shitty to crack on people's appearances but... - [info]sorchar, 2003-05-09 06:37 am UTC
Re: I know it's shitty to crack on people's appearances but... - [info]moonjaguar, 2003-05-09 08:37 am UTC
Re: I know it's shitty to crack on people's appearances but... - [info]sorchar, 2003-05-09 08:47 am UTC
Re: I know it's shitty to crack on people's appearances but... - [info]ladylance, 2003-05-09 10:40 am UTC
Re: I know it's shitty to crack on people's appearances but... - [info]mrbimble, 2003-05-09 06:03 pm UTC
Re: I know it's shitty to crack on people's appearances but... - [info]ladylance, 2003-05-09 09:11 pm UTC
Re: I know it's shitty to crack on people's appearances but... - [info]lm, 2003-05-09 09:39 pm UTC
Re: I know it's shitty to crack on people's appearances but... - [info]sorchar, 2003-05-09 10:19 pm UTC
Re: I know it's shitty to crack on people's appearances but... - [info]pyratejenni, 2003-05-10 03:02 am UTC
Re: I know it's shitty to crack on people's appearances but... - [info]sorchar, 2003-05-10 07:13 am UTC
Re: I know it's shitty to crack on people's appearances but... - [info]cmikhailovic, 2003-05-09 09:55 pm UTC
I imagine wizards have some leeway... - [info]moonjaguar, 2003-05-09 11:53 pm UTC
Re: I know it's shitty to crack on people's appearances but... - [info]parlance, 2003-05-10 02:13 am UTC
Re: I know it's shitty to crack on people's appearances but... - [info]moonjaguar, 2003-05-10 04:00 am UTC

[info]defenestrate
2003-05-09 03:55 am UTC (link)
If they ever start sarcrificing Christians again I hope they start with her. XP

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]iczer6, 2003-05-09 07:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lm, 2003-05-09 09:27 pm UTC

[info]sorchar
2003-05-09 06:02 am UTC (link)
Because after all, she's just such a shining example of the beauty and intelligence that can be obtained by keeping whites pure.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]moonjaguar, 2003-05-09 06:34 am UTC
Re: - [info]sorchar, 2003-05-09 06:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]fearthainn, 2003-05-09 06:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]singe, 2003-05-09 07:45 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]moonjaguar, 2003-05-09 08:25 am UTC
Re: - [info]singe, 2003-05-09 07:44 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]starkeymonster, 2003-05-10 12:31 am UTC
Re: - [info]sorchar, 2003-05-10 01:48 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ymfaery, 2003-05-10 01:56 am UTC
Re: - [info]sorchar, 2003-05-10 03:17 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ymfaery, 2003-05-10 05:31 am UTC
Re: - [info]sorchar, 2003-05-10 07:10 am UTC

[info]eilan
2003-05-09 10:04 am UTC (link)
I am all for giving her The Darwin Adward.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]nevadafighter, 2003-05-09 10:17 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]eilan, 2003-05-09 10:34 am UTC
Re: - [info]nevadafighter, 2003-05-09 10:38 am UTC
Re: - [info]ladylance, 2003-05-09 10:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]eilan, 2003-05-09 10:47 am UTC
Re: - [info]ladylance, 2003-05-09 10:53 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]eilan, 2003-05-09 10:53 am UTC
Re: - [info]ladylance, 2003-05-09 10:54 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lm, 2003-05-09 09:38 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sanguinary, 2003-05-10 05:05 am UTC
Re: - [info]ladylance, 2003-05-10 06:42 am UTC

[info]ingrid
2003-05-09 05:21 pm UTC (link)
Those Old Testament loons always crack me up.

They rarely quote from the New Testament since Jesus, smart Messiah that he was, made sure His word was plain and clear and pretty hard to twist around. Those other guys ... not so much.

Maybe she'll start quoting Revelations and we can watch her head spin around, like in "The Excorcist." There's something inside of her that needs flinging out, really bad.

(Reply to this)

Voiding Genesis
[info]ivyblossom
2003-05-09 06:47 pm UTC (link)


"Voiding Genesis." Good idea, or bad idea? You decide.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Voiding Genesis - [info]solemnis, 2003-05-09 08:10 pm UTC
Re: Voiding Genesis - [info]ivyblossom, 2003-05-09 08:28 pm UTC
and this... - [info]mauralabingi, 2003-05-09 11:01 pm UTC
Re: and this... - [info]sorchar, 2003-05-10 01:49 am UTC
Re: and this... - [info]ymfaery, 2003-05-10 01:59 am UTC
Re: and this... - [info]sorchar, 2003-05-10 03:16 am UTC
Re: and this... - [info]mauralabingi, 2003-05-10 02:15 am UTC
Re: and this... - [info]sorchar, 2003-05-10 03:17 am UTC
Re: and this... - [info]sorchar, 2003-05-10 03:23 am UTC
Re: Voiding Genesis - [info]hakainokami, 2003-05-12 10:24 am UTC
Re: Voiding Genesis - [info]ladylance, 2003-05-12 10:41 am UTC
Re: Voiding Genesis - [info]hakainokami, 2003-05-13 09:57 am UTC
Re: Voiding Genesis - [info]ladylance, 2003-05-13 10:13 am UTC
Re: Voiding Genesis - [info]hakainokami, 2003-05-13 11:22 pm UTC
Re: Voiding Genesis - [info]ladylance, 2003-05-14 02:59 am UTC
Re: Voiding Genesis - [info]hakainokami, 2003-05-15 07:11 am UTC
Re: Voiding Genesis - [info]moonjaguar, 2003-05-10 12:28 am UTC
Re: Voiding Genesis - [info]iczer6, 2003-05-10 04:01 am UTC
Re: Voiding Genesis - [info]moonjaguar, 2003-05-10 04:19 am UTC
Re: Voiding Genesis - [info]iczer6, 2003-05-10 04:22 am UTC
Re: Voiding Genesis - [info]farcicalsquid, 2003-05-11 12:39 am UTC
Re: Voiding Genesis - [info]ivyblossom, 2003-05-11 03:32 am UTC
Re: Voiding Genesis - [info]farcicalsquid, 2003-05-11 03:56 am UTC

[info]ymfaery
2003-05-10 02:03 am UTC (link)
Is it really bad of me to snicker at this recent thread at Gryffindor Tower?

Oh wait... in some circles I'm a mean nasty evil person because I *read* f_w. Nevermind. >D >D >D

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]iczer6, 2003-05-12 12:51 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ymfaery, 2003-05-12 09:38 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]iczer6, 2003-05-12 09:59 pm UTC
GT - [info]jerry_ds_girl, 2003-05-12 05:26 pm UTC

[info]farcicalsquid
2003-05-11 01:39 am UTC (link)
Woah.
Where does the wank begin? The revolting racism combined with complete denial of the charge? Is it the hypocrisy? Is it the Biblical interpretation wankishness? Is it the incredible chutzpah? What about the self-aggrandizement accompanied by personal slander of others' appearance and race? The cries of victimhood? The deletion of posts that take a reasoned or kind approach to the issue?
Incredible. This wank blows them all away.
Sarah who?

(Reply to this)


 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map