(Post a new comment)

	seether 2004-07-27 09:18 pm UTC (link)
	If serial adders/trolls are going to add me to their flist, they should troll me. Otherwise it's no fun. (Reply to this)(Thread)

	(Anonymous) 2004-07-27 09:19 pm UTC (link)
	Agrees Seriously! I've been on some strange serial adder's list for months now, and nary a peep of wank! I feel so... used... :p (Reply to this)(Parent)

	ultimate_cin 2004-07-28 02:43 am UTC (link)
	I adore your icon! (Reply to this)(Parent)

	starrysummer 2004-07-28 02:54 am UTC (link)
	I'll troll you! (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) -

seether, 2004-07-28 04:39 am UTC

(no subject) -

starrysummer, 2004-07-28 07:22 am UTC

	plazmah 2004-07-27 09:27 pm UTC (link)
	I had a serial adder add me once. He was pretty harmless, and annoyingly cheery. So I ignored it. Then he started quoting the Bible and I politely requested he unfriend me. (Reply to this)

	photosinensis 2004-07-27 09:41 pm UTC (link)
	Why do they do this to us? I mean, I want a TROLL, dammit! Not some non-troll, but a genuine troll. I want teh funneh! (Reply to this)(Thread)

	phosfate 2004-07-27 09:47 pm UTC (link)
	The hostile replies to 'Hello' are pretty funneh. "Hello." "FUCK YOU!" (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) -

photosinensis, 2004-07-27 09:49 pm UTC

(no subject) -

plazmah, 2004-07-27 11:01 pm UTC

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-07-28 10:33 am UTC

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-07-28 02:47 am UTC

(no subject) -

elanor_durall, 2004-07-28 06:34 am UTC

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-07-28 07:57 am UTC

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-07-28 09:26 am UTC

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-07-28 12:34 pm UTC

(no subject) -

elanor_durall, 2004-07-28 02:34 pm UTC

(no subject) -

bubosquared, 2004-07-28 12:13 am UTC

(no subject) -

phosfate, 2004-07-28 12:17 am UTC

(no subject) -

bubosquared, 2004-07-28 12:52 pm UTC

(no subject) -

missi, 2004-07-28 01:03 am UTC

	xero_sky 2004-07-27 09:48 pm UTC (link)
	Well, there's potential... I hope they'll hit all the major wank points: -- They're kids' books! -- Chan = pedophilia -- Slash = teh evol -- Icon theft -- fanfic = stupid waste of time -- HP fen are stupid overweight women Hmmn... It's not really my fandom. Any other major wank points for a troll to hit? (Reply to this)(Thread)

	(Anonymous) 2004-07-27 09:52 pm UTC (link)
	Plagiarism! And obviously, there's a mega case of plagiarism here, as this serial adder COPIED OTHER SERIAL ADDERS IDEAS OMFG. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) -

the_sockpuppet, 2004-07-27 10:06 pm UTC

(no subject) -

a_sockpuppet, 2004-07-28 12:36 am UTC

(no subject) -

the_sockpuppet, 2004-07-31 05:22 pm UTC

	seether 2004-07-27 10:20 pm UTC (link)
	Pretty much everything can be turned into icon drama nowadays, can't it? (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) -

bitca, 2004-07-27 11:12 pm UTC

(no subject) -

seether, 2004-07-27 11:27 pm UTC

(no subject) -

redjackcash, 2004-07-28 06:14 am UTC

(no subject) -

bitca, 2004-07-28 05:04 pm UTC

(no subject) -

xero_sky, 2004-07-27 11:48 pm UTC

	beccastareyes 2004-07-27 11:08 pm UTC (link)
	Anime style fanart is either teh evol or how the characters really look, yaknow? (Reply to this)(Parent)

	ahiru 2004-07-27 10:12 pm UTC (link)
	Hmmm....if a troll adds in the woods but doesn't make a sound, does it have its title revoked? (Reply to this)

	littlebitca 2004-07-27 10:20 pm UTC (link)
	"So far, no wank..." headdesk (Reply to this)(Thread)

	missambs 2004-07-27 10:24 pm UTC (link)
	Careful there, don't give yourself a headache. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) -

oulangi, 2004-07-28 02:09 am UTC

(no subject) -

littlebitca, 2004-07-28 02:10 am UTC

(no subject) -

crickets, 2004-07-28 06:38 am UTC

	seether 2004-07-27 10:25 pm UTC (link)
	We're talking about the HP fandom and a serial adder. There's bound to be wanking. It's not like she said "Here's a random conversation. They might possibly argue in a second." But so far, there's just insane overreactions. Troll: Hello. HP Fen: FUCK YOU, H0R!!!1 (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) -

diemydawny, 2004-07-27 11:13 pm UTC

(no subject) -

seether, 2004-07-27 11:30 pm UTC

(no subject) -

elfy, 2004-07-28 08:23 am UTC

wankprophet
2004-07-28 12:37 am UTC (link)

Okay, as soon as Robin and ZR set up the creation of new accounts again, I propose we set up another community called "clairvoyant_wank". It will be dedicated for all those people scrying the Great Crystalwank Ball of Wacky Wank and discerning, through the mists of time, the inevitable approach of wank.

People will post all their "not-wanks" there and the masses gathered at the feet of these seers will watch and see what happens. That way, those who would bring us the "wanks-waiting-to-happen" will have to sit in judgment before posting to F_W.

Some will be revealed as false prophets, of course. They will then be summarily splooged to death by the disillusioned true believers of F_W as a lesson to all who would attempt to deceive us. Thus they will be destroyed before their "not-wanks" profane the (un)holy temple of F_W (the cult of F_W is dedicated to bringing about the Wankerdammerung, and we do not look kindly on those who pervert our goal through lies and false visions.) The false idols -- sploogeless golden calves -- will be melted down, reshaped into golden dildos, and then distributed amongst the real wankers.

And if the splooge actually does materialized, we'll worship it with due reverence.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

	oulangi 2004-07-28 01:24 am UTC (link)
	I love this idea. And we'll need those clairvoyants to tell us what's happing in the wank after the source of the wank notices they're being wanked and goes into lockdown. Perhaps we should start searching for them now through a series of highly scientific tests? I'm thinking of a number between 1 and 20... (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) -

llama_treats, 2004-07-28 02:44 am UTC

(no subject) -

oulangi, 2004-07-28 02:55 am UTC

hey! wait a minute... -

ari_o, 2004-07-28 03:56 am UTC

(no subject) -

iczer6, 2004-07-28 04:41 am UTC

(no subject) -

oulangi, 2004-07-28 12:52 pm UTC

Possible scenarios for posting wank

littlebitca
2004-07-28 01:26 am UTC (link)

One

Find potential for wank to occur
Post to fandom_wank to say that wank might happen
Nothing to mock so post slides into oblivion

Two

Find potential for wank to occur
Wait for first appearance of wank
Post to fandom_wank to say it's small but will probably get bigger
Someone points out to original wankers that it's on f_w
The wank disappears and/or the original source is deleted/locked
Nothing left to mock except the deletion/locking

Three

Find potential for wank to occur
Watch until wank is in full swing
Post to f_w
Sit back and enjoy the mocking and pointing

It's a personal preference, I know, but I definitely like the third scenario better. More mocking and pointing and laughing and less premature locking of entries or deleting.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

A true Seer! -

oulangi, 2004-07-28 02:14 am UTC

	rama_snark 2004-07-28 01:48 am UTC (link)
	Thus sayeth the High Goddess of Wank: "Let it be so." (Reply to this)(Parent)

	shoiryu 2004-07-28 01:59 am UTC (link)
	See, now THAT'S an idea. A productive, fun idea! (Reply to this)(Parent)

	snacky 2004-07-28 02:06 am UTC (link)
	I checked in my copy of "Everything I Needed to Know About Fandom, I Learned From Fandom_Wank," and it says: "The wank must be there, or the fickle wanking masses will not be pleased. In order to avoid being dished up like last night's leg of lamb, please post REAL wank, of the type that soothes and satiates the angry crowd. Then they will let you live." (Reply to this)(Parent)

	deoridhe 2004-07-28 02:12 am UTC (link)
	Can we throw the false prophets to the lions? Please? To appease the masses? (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) -

kijikun, 2004-07-28 02:19 am UTC

(no subject) -

oulangi, 2004-07-28 02:33 am UTC

(no subject) -

deoridhe, 2004-07-28 02:39 am UTC

(no subject) -

oulangi, 2004-07-28 02:40 am UTC

(no subject) -

littlebitca, 2004-07-28 02:45 am UTC

(no subject) -

oulangi, 2004-07-28 02:52 am UTC

(no subject) -

deoridhe, 2004-07-28 03:03 am UTC

(no subject) -

littlebitca, 2004-07-28 03:05 am UTC

	crickets 2004-07-28 07:23 am UTC (link)
	Have I told you lately that I love you? Wankerdammerung snerkle!bwaha (Reply to this)(Parent)

	llorelei 2004-07-28 02:19 am UTC (link)
	Gaelic? :-? (Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) -

ultimate_cin, 2004-07-28 02:46 am UTC

(no subject) -

littlebitca, 2004-07-28 02:57 am UTC

(no subject) -

loki, 2004-07-28 05:10 am UTC

(no subject) -

crickets, 2004-07-28 07:26 am UTC

(no subject) - kairos, 2004-07-28 03:23 am UTC

(no subject) -

llorelei, 2004-07-28 08:04 am UTC

(no subject) - kairos, 2004-07-28 01:53 pm UTC

(no subject) -

doyle, 2004-07-28 03:25 pm UTC

(no subject) - kairos, 2004-07-28 03:59 pm UTC

	(Anonymous) 2004-07-28 06:00 am UTC (link)
	Due to the lack of friends-lockage on this journal so far (I've been watching it, and posting my thoughts freely), it is rather obvious it's just a ploy. Well, duh, you might say. I seriously have to go with my theory that this could be a BNF in disguise having a prank. (Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-07-28 06:11 am UTC

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-07-28 06:18 am UTC

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-07-28 06:24 am UTC

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-07-28 06:39 am UTC

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-07-28 06:47 am UTC

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-07-28 07:31 am UTC

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-07-28 07:44 am UTC

The first anonymouse - (Anonymous), 2004-07-28 07:55 am UTC

Re: The first anonymouse -

alpheratz, 2004-07-28 10:22 pm UTC