Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Amberina ([info]missambs) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2004-07-27 14:12:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Trolls and HP.... they mix like.... mixy things
There's a new troll/serial adder on LJ, this time targetting the Harry Potter fandom. Only thing is... they don't troll.

So far, no wank, but this kind of thing is bound to bring the wank, yo.


(Post a new comment)


[info]seether
2004-07-27 09:18 pm UTC (link)
If serial adders/trolls are going to add me to their flist, they should troll me. Otherwise it's no fun.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


(Anonymous)
2004-07-27 09:19 pm UTC (link)
*Agrees* Seriously! I've been on some strange serial adder's list for months now, and nary a peep of wank! I feel so... used... :p

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]ultimate_cin
2004-07-28 02:43 am UTC (link)
I adore your icon!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]starrysummer
2004-07-28 02:54 am UTC (link)
I'll troll you!

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]seether, 2004-07-28 04:39 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]starrysummer, 2004-07-28 07:22 am UTC

[info]plazmah
2004-07-27 09:27 pm UTC (link)
I had a serial adder add me once. He was pretty harmless, and annoyingly cheery. So I ignored it. Then he started quoting the Bible and I politely requested he unfriend me.

(Reply to this)


[info]photosinensis
2004-07-27 09:41 pm UTC (link)
Why do they do this to us? I mean, I want a TROLL, dammit! Not some non-troll, but a genuine troll. I want teh funneh!

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]phosfate
2004-07-27 09:47 pm UTC (link)
The hostile replies to 'Hello' are pretty funneh. "Hello." "FUCK YOU!"

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]photosinensis, 2004-07-27 09:49 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]plazmah, 2004-07-27 11:01 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-07-28 10:33 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-07-28 02:47 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]elanor_durall, 2004-07-28 06:34 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-07-28 07:57 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-07-28 09:26 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-07-28 12:34 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]elanor_durall, 2004-07-28 02:34 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]bubosquared, 2004-07-28 12:13 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2004-07-28 12:17 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]bubosquared, 2004-07-28 12:52 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]missi, 2004-07-28 01:03 am UTC

[info]xero_sky
2004-07-27 09:48 pm UTC (link)
Well, there's potential... I hope they'll hit all the major wank points:
-- They're kids' books!
-- Chan = pedophilia
-- Slash = teh evol
-- Icon theft
-- fanfic = stupid waste of time
-- HP fen are stupid overweight women

Hmmn... It's not really my fandom. Any other major wank points for a troll to hit?

(Reply to this)(Thread)


(Anonymous)
2004-07-27 09:52 pm UTC (link)
Plagiarism! And obviously, there's a mega case of plagiarism here, as this serial adder COPIED OTHER SERIAL ADDERS IDEAS OMFG.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]the_sockpuppet, 2004-07-27 10:06 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]a_sockpuppet, 2004-07-28 12:36 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]the_sockpuppet, 2004-07-31 05:22 pm UTC

[info]seether
2004-07-27 10:20 pm UTC (link)
Pretty much everything can be turned into icon drama nowadays, can't it?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]bitca, 2004-07-27 11:12 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]seether, 2004-07-27 11:27 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]redjackcash, 2004-07-28 06:14 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]bitca, 2004-07-28 05:04 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]xero_sky, 2004-07-27 11:48 pm UTC

[info]beccastareyes
2004-07-27 11:08 pm UTC (link)
Anime style fanart is either teh evol or how the characters really look, yaknow?

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]ahiru
2004-07-27 10:12 pm UTC (link)
Hmmm....if a troll adds in the woods but doesn't make a sound, does it have its title revoked?

(Reply to this)


[info]littlebitca
2004-07-27 10:20 pm UTC (link)
"So far, no wank..."

*headdesk*

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]missambs
2004-07-27 10:24 pm UTC (link)
Careful there, don't give yourself a headache.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]oulangi, 2004-07-28 02:09 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]littlebitca, 2004-07-28 02:10 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]crickets, 2004-07-28 06:38 am UTC

[info]seether
2004-07-27 10:25 pm UTC (link)
We're talking about the HP fandom and a serial adder. There's bound to be wanking. It's not like she said "Here's a random conversation. They might possibly argue in a second."

But so far, there's just insane overreactions.

Troll: Hello.
HP Fen: FUCK YOU, H0R!!!1

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]diemydawny, 2004-07-27 11:13 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]seether, 2004-07-27 11:30 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]elfy, 2004-07-28 08:23 am UTC

[info]wankprophet
2004-07-28 12:37 am UTC (link)
Okay, as soon as Robin and ZR set up the creation of new accounts again, I propose we set up another community called "clairvoyant_wank". It will be dedicated for all those people scrying the Great Crystalwank Ball of Wacky Wank and discerning, through the mists of time, the inevitable approach of wank.

People will post all their "not-wanks" there and the masses gathered at the feet of these seers will watch and see what happens. That way, those who would bring us the "wanks-waiting-to-happen" will have to sit in judgment before posting to F_W.

Some will be revealed as false prophets, of course. They will then be summarily splooged to death by the disillusioned true believers of F_W as a lesson to all who would attempt to deceive us. Thus they will be destroyed before their "not-wanks" profane the (un)holy temple of F_W (the cult of F_W is dedicated to bringing about the Wankerdammerung, and we do not look kindly on those who pervert our goal through lies and false visions.) The false idols -- sploogeless golden calves -- will be melted down, reshaped into golden dildos, and then distributed amongst the real wankers.

And if the splooge actually does materialized, we'll worship it with due reverence.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]oulangi
2004-07-28 01:24 am UTC (link)
I love this idea. And we'll need those clairvoyants to tell us what's happing in the wank after the source of the wank notices they're being wanked and goes into lockdown.
Perhaps we should start searching for them now through a series of highly scientific tests?

I'm thinking of a number between 1 and 20...

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]llama_treats, 2004-07-28 02:44 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]oulangi, 2004-07-28 02:55 am UTC
hey! wait a minute... - [info]ari_o, 2004-07-28 03:56 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]iczer6, 2004-07-28 04:41 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]oulangi, 2004-07-28 12:52 pm UTC
Possible scenarios for posting wank
[info]littlebitca
2004-07-28 01:26 am UTC (link)
One
Find potential for wank to occur
Post to fandom_wank to say that wank might happen
Nothing to mock so post slides into oblivion

Two
Find potential for wank to occur
Wait for first appearance of wank
Post to fandom_wank to say it's small but will probably get bigger
Someone points out to original wankers that it's on f_w
The wank disappears and/or the original source is deleted/locked
Nothing left to mock except the deletion/locking

Three
Find potential for wank to occur
Watch until wank is in full swing
Post to f_w
Sit back and enjoy the mocking and pointing


It's a personal preference, I know, but I definitely like the third scenario better. More mocking and pointing and laughing and less premature locking of entries or deleting.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

A true Seer! - [info]oulangi, 2004-07-28 02:14 am UTC

rama_snark
2004-07-28 01:48 am UTC (link)
Thus sayeth the High Goddess of Wank: "Let it be so."

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]shoiryu
2004-07-28 01:59 am UTC (link)
See, now THAT'S an idea. A productive, fun idea!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]snacky
2004-07-28 02:06 am UTC (link)
I checked in my copy of "Everything I Needed to Know About Fandom, I Learned From Fandom_Wank," and it says:

"The wank must be there, or the fickle wanking masses will not be pleased. In order to avoid being dished up like last night's leg of lamb, please post REAL wank, of the type that soothes and satiates the angry crowd.

Then they will let you live."

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]deoridhe
2004-07-28 02:12 am UTC (link)
Can we throw the false prophets to the lions? Please? To appease the masses?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]kijikun, 2004-07-28 02:19 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]oulangi, 2004-07-28 02:33 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]deoridhe, 2004-07-28 02:39 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]oulangi, 2004-07-28 02:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]littlebitca, 2004-07-28 02:45 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]oulangi, 2004-07-28 02:52 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]deoridhe, 2004-07-28 03:03 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]littlebitca, 2004-07-28 03:05 am UTC

[info]crickets
2004-07-28 07:23 am UTC (link)
Have I told you lately that I love you?

Wankerdammerung

*snerkle!bwaha*

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]llorelei
2004-07-28 02:19 am UTC (link)
Gaelic? :-?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ultimate_cin, 2004-07-28 02:46 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]littlebitca, 2004-07-28 02:57 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]loki, 2004-07-28 05:10 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]crickets, 2004-07-28 07:26 am UTC
(no subject) - kairos, 2004-07-28 03:23 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]llorelei, 2004-07-28 08:04 am UTC
(no subject) - kairos, 2004-07-28 01:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]doyle, 2004-07-28 03:25 pm UTC
(no subject) - kairos, 2004-07-28 03:59 pm UTC

(Anonymous)
2004-07-28 06:00 am UTC (link)
Due to the lack of friends-lockage on this journal so far (I've been watching it, and posting my thoughts freely), it is rather obvious it's just a ploy.
Well, duh, you might say.
I seriously have to go with my theory that this could be a BNF in disguise having a prank.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-07-28 06:11 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-07-28 06:18 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-07-28 06:24 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-07-28 06:39 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-07-28 06:47 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-07-28 07:31 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-07-28 07:44 am UTC
The first anonymouse - (Anonymous), 2004-07-28 07:55 am UTC
Re: The first anonymouse - [info]alpheratz, 2004-07-28 10:22 pm UTC

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map