Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Bohemian Faerie (bohemianfaerie) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2004-07-30 22:42:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:disturbed
Entry tags:anime/manga, think of the fictional children, your kink is not okay

Pedophiles say the darndest things!
For those of you who weren't aware of its existence, there was a once wonderful site known as F*CKIN Otaku", a place on the internet that served as a sort of refuge and sanctuary from the herd-following mentality, cold elitism and overall sheer stupidity that has infected the anime fandom and which only continues to grow into a giant puss-oozing, festering sore. It was a place where healthy, reality-grounded individuals who just happened to enjoy anime, who didn't worship Japan and everything related to it, could unite to form a community that promoted intelligent discussion and debate concerning all things anime and animated, free of the self-righteous, judgmental overtones and smug, pretentious air that permeates many other similarly-themed communities and forums.

And then...

the pedophiles invaded.

During a recent thread addressing the issue of child erotica in which is posted a link to an article on websites that get away with posting material of this nature because they technically don't qualify as "child porn", this charming gentleman who goes by the name of CrackPr0n comes along, and somehow interprets this thread as nothing more than a personal attack against him and his sexual attraction and interest in girls that look to be about 14. To which others at the forum calmly respond by pointing out that the article in question which provoked this discussion in the first place, did not concern teenagers being exploited in a sexual manner, but in fact referred to pre-pubescent children being objectified and exploited in this way, and that that was primarily what the people commenting on the thread were concerned about and disgusted by. Clearly no one was accusing him or anyone else of being a pedophile simply for being interested in high school girls.

However, he then brought along his cleverly named sockpuppet army (which included "Censored Vagina" and "not a guest I swear"), and that's when the fun really began. Arguments that are brought up include the classic "pedophilia is not a disease but a sexual orientation" complete with just beautiful comparisons to homosexuality and other actually legitimate sexual orientations, and how children as young as 3 can in fact consent to sexual touching and intercourse with an adult. But wait, there's more!

Our old friend CrackPr0n then decides to start his own thread where he angrily accuses the people at the site of being hypocrites and elitists, just because they dare to look down upon lolicon and shotacon and happen to not share his personal kinks and fetishes.



Favourite moments:

"As for animated. So, thinking CCS is hawt is wrong? So is thinking a 24 yr. old animated character is hawt wrong? No? Okay, what if I told you that 24 yr. old is really only 6 years old, but due to magic she looks 26. That girl that looks like she's 8, no she's really 21. She is just under a curse to never age in appearance. Is it still wrong now?"

"And yes, I happen to find Nevada-tan waaaaaaaaaaaaaay cute"


That’s it, I now declare this positively the most frightening and disturbing wank in the history of ever. Now if you’ll so kindly excuse me, I believe I’m going to go give my brain the bleach treatment.



(Post a new comment)

Ugh
[info]danceswithelvis
2004-07-31 06:02 am UTC (link)
*bangs head on desk* Let me guess...these are probably the same people who find rape in fanfiction romantic?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Ugh
[info]telophase
2004-07-31 07:03 am UTC (link)
Probably. Or those who look at fanart and say "OMG hes so hawt i must rape him!!"

I shall also direct your attention to this recent comission I did for someone, and then to this comment thread (if you have a Deviantart account, it'll be properly threaded, if not, then not) which ... well. I think it's the guy's use of the jolly smiley faces in conjuction with the rape comment that causes me to raise my eyebrow.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Ugh - [info]beccastareyes, 2004-07-31 07:33 am UTC
Re: Ugh - [info]danceswithelvis, 2004-07-31 07:35 am UTC
Re: Ugh - [info]danceswithelvis, 2004-07-31 07:38 am UTC
Re: Ugh - [info]littlest_lurker, 2004-07-31 08:33 am UTC
Re: Ugh - [info]misswindy, 2004-07-31 06:00 pm UTC
Re: Ugh - [info]loki, 2004-07-31 07:35 pm UTC
Re: Ugh - [info]mariagoner, 2004-08-03 05:04 am UTC

[info]ladysorka
2004-07-31 06:12 am UTC (link)
*headdesk headdesk headdesk*

Oh for... can't they at least just buy pornographic lolicon doujinshi, which is slightly more legal and involves no actual children?

Gah. These people make my brain hurt.

(Reply to this)


[info]littlest_lurker
2004-07-31 06:22 am UTC (link)
*eyetwitch*

(Reply to this)


[info]sesana
2004-07-31 07:54 am UTC (link)
I do hope you brought enough bleach to share with the rest of the community. *shudders*

(Reply to this)(Thread)


(Anonymous)
2004-08-01 04:46 am UTC (link)
Who's that in your icon? *curious*

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]sesana, 2004-08-01 05:14 am UTC

[info]sepiamagpie
2004-07-31 08:03 am UTC (link)
Just...


ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww.

(Reply to this)


[info]iczer6
2004-07-31 08:47 am UTC (link)
Dude seems to be an obvious troll why hasn't he been banned yet?

(Reply to this)


[info]herring
2004-07-31 08:49 am UTC (link)
Nevada-tan is cute until she starts ripping out your innards with a box cutter, a la Uziga.


[insert proliferation of guro pictures from 5chan.net]


...... wait, that was kind of cruel. Oh, snap.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]iczer6, 2004-07-31 09:15 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]herring, 2004-07-31 09:25 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]littlest_lurker, 2004-07-31 11:28 pm UTC
please say this is sarcasm, yes?
(Anonymous)
2004-07-31 01:06 pm UTC (link)
a place on the internet that served as a sort of refuge and sanctuary from the herd-following mentality, cold elitism and overall sheer stupidity that has infected the anime fandom and which only continues to grow into a giant puss-oozing, festering sore. It was a place where healthy, reality-grounded individuals who just happened to enjoy anime, who didn't worship Japan and everything related to it, could unite to form a community that promoted intelligent discussion and debate concerning all things anime and animated, free of the self-righteous, judgmental overtones and smug, pretentious air that permeates many other similarly-themed communities and forums.

HAHAHAHHAAHAHHAHAHAHAAAAAH! That's hysterical! That's a great one! That's...

...not the wank?

Oh. My bad. Huh.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: please say this is sarcasm, yes? - [info]big_bad_wolf, 2004-07-31 01:21 pm UTC
Re: please say this is sarcasm, yes? - (Anonymous), 2004-07-31 11:16 pm UTC
Re: please say this is sarcasm, yes? - (Anonymous), 2004-07-31 11:24 pm UTC
Re: please say this is sarcasm, yes? - (Anonymous), 2004-08-01 12:44 am UTC
Re: please say this is sarcasm, yes? - [info]virago, 2004-08-02 06:30 pm UTC
Doesn't referring people to the dictionary break a jurisimprudence law? Cos I'm certain that quoting - [info]big_bad_wolf, 2004-08-01 04:23 pm UTC
Re: please say this is sarcasm, yes? - [info]chaoscheebs, 2004-08-01 04:04 am UTC
Re: please say this is sarcasm, yes? - bohemianfaerie, 2004-08-02 12:41 am UTC
Oh, for a "stop being on my side" icon.
[info]big_bad_wolf
2004-07-31 01:24 pm UTC (link)
FUCKS SAKE. There are some of us who are actually CONSUMED WITH GUILT over finding people under the legal age of consent attractive, you hideous retarded anime-freak. STOP GIVING PAEDOPHILES A BAD NAME.... STOP GIVING THEM A WANKIER NAME THAN THEY ALREADY HAVE ...


I'll just shut up now, shall I?

mumblemumble15+1/2 isn't that damn bad, right? Right?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Oh, for a "stop being on my side" icon. - [info]shoiryu, 2004-07-31 03:34 pm UTC
Re: Oh, for a "stop being on my side" icon. - [info]arielchan, 2004-07-31 04:38 pm UTC
Re: Oh, for a "stop being on my side" icon. - [info]big_bad_wolf, 2004-07-31 04:56 pm UTC
Re: Oh, for a "stop being on my side" icon. - [info]misswindy, 2004-07-31 06:07 pm UTC
Re: Oh, for a "stop being on my side" icon. - (Anonymous), 2004-07-31 07:33 pm UTC
Re: Oh, for a "stop being on my side" icon. - [info]misswindy, 2004-08-01 01:11 am UTC
Re: Oh, for a "stop being on my side" icon. - (Anonymous), 2004-08-01 06:27 pm UTC
Re: Oh, for a "stop being on my side" icon. - [info]redjackcash, 2004-07-31 07:40 pm UTC
Re: Oh, for a "stop being on my side" icon. - [info]big_bad_wolf, 2004-08-01 04:40 pm UTC
Re: Oh, for a "stop being on my side" icon. - [info]teratologist, 2004-07-31 06:55 pm UTC
Re: Oh, for a "stop being on my side" icon. - [info]big_bad_wolf, 2004-08-01 04:35 pm UTC
Re: Oh, for a "stop being on my side" icon. - (Anonymous), 2004-08-24 10:53 am UTC
Re: Oh, for a "stop being on my side" icon. - [info]littlest_lurker, 2004-07-31 11:30 pm UTC
Re: Oh, for a "stop being on my side" icon. - [info]big_bad_wolf, 2004-08-01 03:35 pm UTC
Re: Oh, for a "stop being on my side" icon. - [info]littlest_lurker, 2004-08-01 06:38 pm UTC
Re: Oh, for a "stop being on my side" icon. - [info]big_bad_wolf, 2004-08-01 07:10 pm UTC
Re: Oh, for a "stop being on my side" icon. - [info]littlest_lurker, 2004-08-02 01:50 am UTC
Re: Oh, for a "stop being on my side" icon. - [info]big_bad_wolf, 2004-08-02 02:18 am UTC
Re: Oh, for a "stop being on my side" icon. - ataniell93, 2004-08-01 01:53 am UTC
Re: Oh, for a "stop being on my side" icon. - [info]littlest_lurker, 2004-08-01 07:03 am UTC
Re: Oh, for a "stop being on my side" icon. - [info]diamonde, 2004-08-01 08:44 am UTC
Re: Oh, for a "stop being on my side" icon. - (Anonymous), 2004-08-01 03:43 am UTC
Re: Oh, for a "stop being on my side" icon. - [info]starherd, 2004-08-01 08:59 am UTC
Icon!
[info]khym_chanur
2004-07-31 04:42 pm UTC (link)
Who's that in your "Jaerb!!" icon?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Icon! - bohemianfaerie, 2004-07-31 05:22 pm UTC
Re: Icon! - [info]ecchaniz0r, 2004-07-31 05:39 pm UTC

(Anonymous)
2004-07-31 04:49 pm UTC (link)
i... am about to burn my eyes out with hydrochloric acid.


Why??

(Reply to this)


[info]kay_taylor
2004-07-31 04:52 pm UTC (link)
I am flabbergasted by all your half-assed attempts to debate.
You fucking suck at the point-counterpoint.
I hate you.


This was the best comment in that entire thread. Where reasoned argument on the not-so-paedophile side flew out of the window into:

"BECUZ IT'S THE LAAAAAAAWWW!"
"BECUZ I SAAAAAAAAAY SO!"

Please, you are making non-paedophilia look stupid. Engage with capacity to consent, ability to make reasoned decisions, potential for abuse, the difficulty of distinguishing between fantasy and reality when still young enough to be watching Teletubbies without irony. Just stop dribbling, okay?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]redjackcash, 2004-07-31 07:43 pm UTC
Icon! - [info]iczer6, 2004-07-31 09:37 pm UTC

[info]calluna
2004-07-31 07:26 pm UTC (link)
So, thinking CCS is hawt is wrong?

At first I read that as "CSS". Stylesheet pr0n?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]25th_of_april, 2004-07-31 08:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]big_bad_wolf, 2004-08-01 03:36 pm UTC

[info]tiki
2004-07-31 09:09 pm UTC (link)
You know, I've been lurking on this com for... over a year, at least. And this is the first time I've felt moved to actually say anything because HOLY SHIT THOSE PEOPLE ARE FUCKING STUPID

CENSORED VAGINA: Pedophiles are kool!!!

EVIL CANADIAN: Hey, everyone, don't argue with CV, he's an obvious troll.

F*CKING IDIOTS: Hey, pedophiles aren't kool!! Let me explain in detail why I disagree with the koolness of pedophiles blah blah blah blah

EVIL CANADIAN: Well, I tried. PEDOPHILES ARE KOOL

F*CKING IDIOTS: BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH

Am I the only one who's seeing the Fucking Otaku as being the wanky ones here? I mean jeez, just read that opening paragraph above...

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]xero_sky, 2004-07-31 10:21 pm UTC

(Anonymous)
2004-08-01 12:05 am UTC (link)
This reminds me of the clowns at Fiction Alley who think Paedophilia is cool. All those paedophilic ships... Harry & Snape, Ginny & Snape, Remus & Ron, George & Gabrielle... ugh, it's enough to make me puke!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]kay_taylor, 2004-08-01 12:29 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-08-01 12:48 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kay_taylor, 2004-08-01 02:45 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-08-01 12:47 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]teratologist, 2004-08-01 01:15 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-08-01 05:23 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kay_taylor, 2004-08-01 02:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]big_bad_wolf, 2004-08-01 03:38 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-08-02 11:02 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]blue_linnet, 2004-08-03 06:36 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-08-05 01:13 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2004-08-01 12:50 am UTC (link)
and how children as young as 3 can in fact consent to sexual touching and intercourse with an adult.

...

WHAT THE FUCK!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]hm_, 2004-08-01 01:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]littlest_lurker, 2004-08-01 07:09 am UTC
If I recall... - [info]danceswithelvis, 2004-08-01 08:22 am UTC
Re: If I recall... - [info]big_bad_wolf, 2004-08-01 03:41 pm UTC
Re: If I recall... - [info]danceswithelvis, 2004-08-02 03:25 am UTC
Re: If I recall... - [info]pokecheck, 2004-08-03 12:38 am UTC
Re: If I recall... - [info]big_bad_wolf, 2004-08-03 12:43 am UTC
Re: If I recall... - [info]big_bad_wolf, 2004-08-03 12:45 am UTC
Re: If I recall... - [info]big_bad_wolf, 2004-08-03 12:45 am UTC
Re: If I recall... - [info]big_bad_wolf, 2004-08-03 12:54 am UTC
Re: If I recall... - [info]big_bad_wolf, 2004-08-03 12:56 am UTC
Re: If I recall... - [info]big_bad_wolf, 2004-08-03 12:59 am UTC
Re: If I recall... - [info]pokecheck, 2004-08-03 03:03 am UTC
Re: If I recall... - [info]big_bad_wolf, 2004-08-03 03:40 pm UTC
Re: If I recall... - [info]darkvalkyrie, 2004-08-04 09:36 pm UTC
Re: If I recall... - [info]big_bad_wolf, 2004-08-05 12:03 am UTC
Re: If I recall... - [info]darkvalkyrie, 2004-08-05 04:41 am UTC
Re: If I recall... - [info]big_bad_wolf, 2004-08-05 01:01 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-08-02 05:34 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-08-06 04:35 am UTC
Okay, THIS scared me...
ataniell93
2004-08-01 02:05 am UTC (link)
In anycase, thinking that a young girl is hot is fine--however, if you're going to objectify this little girl by your own sexual standards, that's not really any better than acting upon your sexual desires, now, is it?

Um, what about the whole NOT ACTUALLY FUCKING HER part?

How can someone NOT understand that there's a world of difference between having a fantasy about someone in private and actually forcing them to be involved with you?

No matter how repulsive a fantasy is, if someone has it about me in the privacy of their own mind and I never find out about it, I haven't been harmed.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Okay, THIS scared me... - (Anonymous), 2004-08-01 05:22 am UTC
Re: Okay, THIS scared me... - [info]big_bad_wolf, 2004-08-01 03:42 pm UTC
Re: Okay, THIS scared me... - [info]pokecheck, 2004-08-03 12:45 am UTC
Man in a dress! Man in a dress! - [info]big_bad_wolf, 2004-08-03 12:58 am UTC
Re: Okay, THIS scared me... - [info]big_bad_wolf, 2004-08-03 03:38 pm UTC
Re: Okay, THIS scared me... - [info]virago, 2004-08-02 06:37 pm UTC
Re: Okay, THIS scared me... - [info]redjackcash, 2004-08-02 09:14 pm UTC

cicer
2004-08-01 03:05 am UTC (link)
Ugh. I feel like I need to take a shower after reading that. Whether that guy is a troll or not, he needs to be taken out back and shot, because that shit is nasty.

And yes, there is a world of difference between looking at a 16 year old and thinking, "Woo! She/he's a hottie!" and looking at a 3 year old and thinking the same. One is understandable, the other is creepy and gross, kthx.

*walks off to scrub out brain*

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-08-01 05:22 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rinoared, 2004-08-01 11:15 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-08-01 11:33 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]plazmah, 2004-08-02 01:05 am UTC

[info]vixen
2004-08-02 02:12 am UTC (link)
I feel dirty..can i beat the crap out of them now?

(Reply to this)


[info]gal_montag
2004-08-02 05:26 am UTC (link)
and how children as young as 3 can in fact consent to sexual touching and intercourse with an adult.


I don't even have to go there and I'm horrified, just by that. Ugh. *shudders* That is just some... Ugh.

(Reply to this)


(Anonymous)
2004-08-02 01:34 pm UTC (link)
The sad thing is that I used to chat with CrackPr0n on #megatokyo about two years back.

...when I was twelve. (http://bash.org/?56881)

(Reply to this)


[info]phosfate
2004-08-02 05:09 pm UTC (link)
All other (really revolting) things aside, isn't trying to force yourself on one of the most powerful magicians on the planet a really stupid idea?

(Reply to this)

(Deleted post)
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-08-04 07:14 pm UTC


 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map