Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



May I Please Speak to the Complaints Department ([info]ladybirdsleeps) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2004-08-15 22:04:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:disterbed

Halwyn has noticed that there's, well, a lot of gay on Elfwood. She wants to know: "If all the Elves and Fairies (well, umm fairies) on Elfwood are gay, where is the next generation of Elves and Fairies going to come from?"

That's right, it's our duty to preserve the elf and fairy races by not making them gay. (Or maybe we can draw them wearing feather boas and fishnets and dropping spores. Would Halwyn be okay with that?)

Also, if you're worried that Halwyn's anti-gay, she wants you to know that she has a girlfriend named Zoe.

P.S. No, I don't know what's up with the capitalization either.

Edit: Halwyn has made a small change to the first sentence of her post; "homosexual sex" became "sex (both homo and hetro)". Hmm. Since she seems prone to editing, here's the post:

Sex on Elfwood
I have noticed a increasing trend for sex (both homo and hetro) on Elfwood.

This is very disterbing.

If all the Elves and Fairies (well, umm fairies) on Elfwood are gay, where is the next generation of Elves and Fairies going to come from? I mean, it's bad enough that a fairy dies each time someone complains about the search engine!

Also, can we please try to keep the sex between closed doors? I really don't want to have to watch your characters "doing it". Elfwood is an all ages site, but some of our members seem to be forgetting that.

And before you go accusing me of being anti gay, have you met my girlfriend, Zoe?


Eliza


Edit 2: The anonymice are in the pantry and it seems they're not happy! Oh dear.


(Post a new comment)


[info]j_crew_guy
2004-08-16 06:42 am UTC (link)
Two jokes come to mind:

Clap your hands if you believe in gay fairies!

and

I'm not gay but my girlfriend is.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]wakkymse
2004-08-16 08:03 am UTC (link)
*claps*

-lee

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]lm
2004-08-16 10:45 am UTC (link)
Black Sabbath said it best: Fairies wear boots, and you gotta believe me.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]littlest_lurker
2004-08-16 06:54 am UTC (link)
Heh. I love how her edit now contradicts the rest of her post.

I almost thought that her post was tongue-in-cheek, until I read her reply to mesana. There I go again, assuming the best of people. *headdesk*

(Reply to this)


[info]iczer6
2004-08-16 07:35 am UTC (link)
I just want to point out that last I checked 'all ages' meant, well, all ages.

Meaning not everyone who looks at the site is an oh-so-impressionable five year old, and God forbid an adult might want to see something smutty.

As for where the 'next generation' will come from, I don't know, Mpreg?


Icz

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]frau_eva
2004-08-16 07:41 am UTC (link)
As for where the 'next generation' will come from, I don't know, Mpreg?

I hope so. Because it would invalidate her point and piss her off at the same time.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]beccastareyes
2004-08-16 08:20 am UTC (link)
I like genetic engineering and in vitro fertilization myself, but to each his own.

I mean, we could create a super-elf here. Think of the science! Think of the merchandizing!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Anonymous)
2004-08-16 08:25 am UTC (link)
Aren't there other places for that? What, you're saying that just because adults want to go looking for smut, it should be made available on all-ages sites?

You are an ass, my friend.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]isntitironic, 2004-08-16 08:51 am UTC
(no subject) - wolfie_thu, 2004-08-16 09:56 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lm, 2004-08-16 10:47 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]deoridhe, 2004-08-16 05:47 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-08-16 06:35 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-08-17 11:05 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-08-17 02:15 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]deoridhe, 2004-08-17 06:09 pm UTC

meshou
2004-08-16 08:29 am UTC (link)
Which explains the blowjob in Lilo and Stich! It's just not "for everyone" without blowjobs.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]lm, 2004-08-16 10:48 am UTC

[info]ladybirdsleeps
2004-08-16 11:14 am UTC (link)
The site owners don't want porn on their site. This is in the rules and everything.

Which is kind of why the bitching about pissing on the spirit of Elfwood is so funny. If the site owners really didn't like it, they could just change the rules.

(I want to tell Mesana that Elfwood doesn't have a reputation for being kid-friendly, it has a reputation for being full of crappy artists. BIG DIFFERENCE.)

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]vassilissa
2004-08-16 11:19 am UTC (link)
Elfpreg!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Anonymous)
2004-08-16 12:23 pm UTC (link)
Wow, thats a stupid argument.

All ages does mean all ages. That means that it has to be suitable for all ages.

Now lets think a bit.
Smut -> suitable for
adult
late teenagers

early teenagers?
kids? Nope, by law not suitable. Its arguably what sex does on children, but thats how society sees it.


So, yes, you kinda defeat your own point. All ages means its suitable for everyone, and the gay rape sex you love to drool over is clearly not suitable for pre-18.

I really wish fangirls would stop with the rape crap, and notice that a homosexual relationship usually does not include ukes and semes -.- But well, fangirls have no clue about homosexual sex anyway, they even mess up the anatomy mostly. Funny is, most fangirls hate any erotica involving females. Because its oh so degrading. Oh cry me a river.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]diamonde, 2004-08-16 12:30 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mariagoner, 2004-08-16 12:32 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]aloysius, 2004-08-16 12:58 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladybirdsleeps, 2004-08-16 02:33 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2004-08-16 06:36 pm UTC

[info]mariagoner
2004-08-16 12:31 pm UTC (link)
>>>As for where the 'next generation' will come from, I don't know, Mpreg?

But then... how would the lesbians procreate? Would the chicks-with-dicks fetish have to become widespread?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]diamonde, 2004-08-16 01:16 pm UTC

(Anonymous)
2004-08-16 05:32 pm UTC (link)
I just want to point out that last I checked 'all ages' meant, well, all ages.

Meaning not everyone who looks at the site is an oh-so-impressionable five year old, and God forbid an adult might want to see something smutty.



Last I checked, "all ages" meant, well, all ages. Meaning, young teens and kids, as they are are one of the many "all ages." If you think about it. Which you obviously haven't.

What you 're saying is that, since adults want ot look at smut, it should be posted on sites where kids are allowed and encouraged to be? Because like we all know, there is no other places for adults to look at smut. (That was sarcasm. Figure I have to tell you these things.) Great, by your reasoning, bring the smut on over to neopets! Because there are some adults there too, and maybe they want to see smut! Have to be fair to everyone, right?

Alls I'm saying is, you do realize how incredibly stupid your post is, right?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]msmanna, 2004-08-17 03:33 am UTC

[info]phosfate
2004-08-16 06:39 pm UTC (link)
'All ages' means 'material suitable for all ages,' not 'something here for every age and taste if you look hard enough.'

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]frau_eva
2004-08-16 07:45 am UTC (link)
*chuckles* Where will the next generation come from?... That's the best thing I've heard lal day XD.

That has to be the saddest thing I've ever read.

(Reply to this)


[info]xero_sky
2004-08-16 08:35 am UTC (link)
I mean, it's bad enough that a fairy dies each time someone complains about the search engine!

Man, those site mods over there must be harsh!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]kookaburra, 2004-08-16 08:44 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]shoiryu, 2004-08-16 08:27 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]xero_sky, 2004-08-16 09:52 pm UTC

(Anonymous)
2004-08-16 12:18 pm UTC (link)
Nice, but how is this a wank?
I thought this lj was there for communities which flame each other to hell/are prone to elitism, and not just single posters who dare to post a thing someone else dislikes. THATS wanky

Just let her. Her post is voiced badly, but she has a point nevertheless.
Also, please stop implying that people are homophobe just because they dislike slash oO; You know, some of us -don't- like when teenage girls completely get "gay" sex wrong.

The whole thing is a rant. A rant isn't a serious discussion, nor is it a carefully voiced opinion.

This thread is more wanky than what it links too =P

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]aloysius, 2004-08-16 12:54 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-08-17 10:57 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladybirdsleeps, 2004-08-16 02:31 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cleolinda, 2004-08-16 05:35 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2004-08-16 06:41 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-08-16 09:50 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-08-17 11:28 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladybirdsleeps, 2004-08-17 12:16 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lm, 2004-08-17 05:54 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-08-17 11:14 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]alyse, 2004-08-17 12:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]singe, 2004-08-18 11:41 pm UTC

[info]dreagonfli
2004-08-16 04:29 pm UTC (link)
Disterbing, eh? Is that like masterbating?

(Reply to this)


(Anonymous)
2004-08-16 09:07 pm UTC (link)
Because it's not like faeries have been inherently erotic since humans first began writing and drawing them, nor were fairy pictures ever "allowable erotica" in the Victorian era.

ohh no, fairies are either cutsy disney like creations or tights wearing punkish goth things at hot topic. I'm so glad the wonderful person reminded me of this. I'll stop drawing sexually charged fairies immediatly and totally ignore everything in Mid Summer's Night Dream, The Goblin Market and all of Fairy folklore everywhere ^__^

-ani_bester on LJ

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(Deleted post)
(no subject) - [info]heyoka, 2004-08-20 10:01 am UTC

[info]kijikun
2004-08-17 01:13 am UTC (link)
Is it just me or there a lot of anoymice around lately?

Hey micey! Accounts are open to all, you don't need codes now.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]dawnswalker, 2004-08-17 01:41 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kijikun, 2004-08-17 01:54 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-08-17 06:31 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladybirdsleeps, 2004-08-17 06:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lindentree, 2004-08-17 10:00 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-08-17 11:03 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kraken_sleeps, 2004-08-17 11:59 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]oysteria, 2004-08-17 05:57 pm UTC
OMG U R RITE!!!1 - [info]lindentree, 2004-08-17 10:01 pm UTC
Re: OMG U R RITE!!!1 - (Anonymous), 2004-08-18 01:40 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-08-18 01:44 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dawnswalker, 2004-08-17 11:04 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-08-17 11:30 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-08-17 02:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kijikun, 2004-08-17 10:25 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladybirdsleeps, 2004-08-17 01:42 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-08-17 11:01 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rinoared, 2004-08-17 11:49 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladybirdsleeps, 2004-08-17 12:04 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kijikun, 2004-08-17 10:27 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2004-08-17 08:21 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-08-17 03:40 am UTC

[info]virago
2004-08-17 02:31 am UTC (link)
Also, can we please try to keep the sex between closed doors?

Ouch.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]pokecheck, 2004-08-17 04:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]xero_sky, 2004-08-17 08:24 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]silverwind, 2004-08-17 11:13 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2004-08-17 02:43 pm UTC (link)
But we ARE happily mocking your stupidity :)
So don't say we aren't happy, miss coward :)

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2004-08-17 08:09 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lindentree, 2004-08-17 10:06 pm UTC

(Anonymous)
2004-08-17 02:56 pm UTC (link)
Wow, you still are too much of a coward to confront Haldir directly, why don't you post on that oh so wanky thread yourself and show her why she is wrong? But oh no, then people would notice what a silly fangirl you are :)

How is your inbox, by the way? :)

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]big_bad_wolf, 2004-08-17 03:47 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]deoridhe, 2004-08-17 06:13 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kijikun, 2004-08-17 10:24 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladybirdsleeps, 2004-08-18 05:33 am UTC

[info]mistressrenet
2004-08-17 06:33 pm UTC (link)
Isn't elf lore usually that elf babies are rare? Maybe we finally have our explanation.

(Reply to this)


 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map