Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



ihatebees ([info]ihatebees) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2004-09-07 19:45:00

Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
HP wank- Don't Tell Me I'm Wrong!
Story time, kids!

This person posts a bitter 'ship rant that speaks out against intolerant shippers claiming their 'ships to be canon, when they are very obviously not. She goes on to tell us we're all allowed to like any pairing we please, as long as we never dare say it's canon when it's not expressly stated in the books themselves. Fair enough.

Ragdoll then claims that Canon Is All- except when Rowling makes a mistake in the books that disagreed with something she said in an interview. Oh well, math's not JK's strong point, but it's enough to bring the wrath of canon!whores upon her poor head.

The wankage really starts pumping (excuse me) when Blacksatinrose points out an eensy bit of hypocrisy on the original poster's part. Her obviously aggressive use of logic is then ignored, kicked in the throat, and shot at with a flame-thrower by some toady named tephra and the ANGRY GOD OF CAPS LOCK (Ragdoll again), who not only completely misses the point but also drags irrelevant information screaming and kicking into the argument of whether R/S is a valid ship, and how oppressed the non-R/S shippers are. Woe unto them.

The bitter hypocrisy is suffocating.

(I still want to know how BSR proved anything about R/S shippers, when she wasn't even talking about R/S to begin with. It looked to me like she was the most reasonable one out of all of them. Am I wrong?)

It's a small wank, sure, but I thought it deserved to be mentioned for the sheer WTF factor of some of the replies. Stay tuned for further developments.

ETA: That tephra person wallows in smugness for no apparent reason, and BSR bows out gracefully, thus ending the debate.

Or does it???

dun dun dunnnn.....


(Read comments)

Post a comment in response:

From:
( )Anonymous- this user has disabled anonymous posting.
Username:
Password:
Don't have an account? Create one now.
Subject:
No HTML allowed in subject
  
Message:
 
Notice! This user has turned on the option that logs your IP address when posting.
 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map