Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



crabnebula ([info]crabnebula) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2004-10-04 10:55:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Fandom Scruples Screws Up?
I was hesitant to post this wank because I don't know all of the history but since no one else seems to have noticed it, I think I might have just spotted Fandom_Scruples screwing up.



The password will change at noon my time. If you want to be able to view private entries after this be sure to check your email. I'm off to work now, but I'll check back around noon. I know it was a mistake to post that last week, but I didn't check LJ before I did and anyway no one seems to have paid it any attention. The draft of the next post will be sent over email in a few days.

I am untalented and cannot figure out how to save the entry or screencap it. Someone should do it for posterity's sake.

Now the really interesting question is what the locked post is talking about? I am clueless and I think my theory that it's a group of school teachers in Idaho might not catch on. And was there some special event going on last week that made it inappropriate to make it's last post? The Debates, perhaps? Anyway, it's bound to create a good old fashioned game of "Create the Conspiracy Theory" with the obligatory crazy participants accusing each other of high treason.

ETA: It's locked now but ashenmote is teh wonderful.

Also, Anonymice are coming! Anonymice are Coming!


(Post a new comment)


[info]roz_mcclure
2004-10-04 07:11 pm UTC (link)
Naked Came The Fandom_Scruples, says I.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]phosfate
2004-10-04 07:24 pm UTC (link)
Now that's an obscure reference!

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]roz_mcclure, 2004-10-04 07:33 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]llama_treats, 2004-10-04 09:01 pm UTC

[info]ashenmote
2004-10-04 07:19 pm UTC (link)
Someone should do it for posterity's sake.

Done and done.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]crabnebula
2004-10-04 07:42 pm UTC (link)
Can I link to it since the entry has now vanished? Another entry was added to it's calendar. Maybe it's pissed off?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ashenmote, 2004-10-04 07:49 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]amasaglajax, 2004-10-05 04:56 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2004-10-04 07:32 pm UTC (link)
If you check their calendar, there are tons of entries that are locked. *is intrigued*

(Reply to this)

one is the loneliest number
(Anonymous)
2004-10-04 07:51 pm UTC (link)
Pardon, but this is fandom_scruples (public!) friended list:

1. fandom_scruples

the public friend OF list is:

38: arachnethe2, auroraceleste, biztheinsane, brak666, butt_buddy, cheshyre, cumbitch, dave_the_great, dhlpa, entity_watcher, fandom_pillory, fandom_scruples, fandomscrewples, flameandsword, fuckahippogriff, greek_minx, hildechan, honoria, hpfan_grudges, hpnic06, icarusancalion, jess_darkwater, kagiri, lavenderfrost, lonicera, milady22, morlom, norne, oulangi, polaroidandroid, pottersister666, rabbijones, roz_mcclure, screwyouf_s, slightlydevious, stromfreak, thanks4dasmut, xtricks

If I understand the workings of lj correctly, it's the friend list, not the friend of list, (unless they're mutual) that gets to view protected entries. So basically, the only one who can see the private entries is, well, fandom_scruples.

Translation: No conspiracy. Fandom_scruples is just feeling lonely and ignored and wants to see if anyone is paying attention to their widdle ickle self.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: one is the loneliest number
(Anonymous)
2004-10-04 07:53 pm UTC (link)
Unless, of course, there are actually 423 teachers from Idaho logging in to the account as owner. That would be interesting.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: one is the loneliest number - ataniell93, 2004-10-04 09:57 pm UTC
Re: one is the loneliest number - [info]phosfate, 2004-10-04 10:23 pm UTC
Re: one is the loneliest number
[info]crabnebula
2004-10-04 07:57 pm UTC (link)
I'm no rocket scientist but I think the whole "changing password" reference mght be because a few people share the journal. I could be wrong, but it's interesting anyhow.

I also find it interesting that anonomice are appearing to defend the "F_S is one lonely person theory." I think I might have stumbled upon something here.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: one is the loneliest number - [info]phosfate, 2004-10-04 08:36 pm UTC
Re: one is the loneliest number
[info]xturtle
2004-10-04 11:36 pm UTC (link)
Um... except just about everyone here has a livejournal and knows that the only reason anyone would care about a password is for exactly the reason you explained: a friends list is public. If you don't want people to know who the "members" are, you give them all the password to one journal and communicate via private entry.

Please stop protesting too much. You're making the mocking too easy.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: one is the loneliest number - [info]narcissam, 2004-10-05 03:08 am UTC
Re: one is the loneliest number - (Anonymous), 2004-10-05 06:12 am UTC
Re: one is the loneliest number - [info]xturtle, 2004-10-05 06:23 am UTC
Re: one is the loneliest number - (Anonymous), 2004-10-05 05:39 pm UTC
Re: one is the loneliest number
[info]prettyveela
2004-10-05 09:12 am UTC (link)
Translation: No conspiracy. Fandom_scruples is just feeling lonely and ignored and wants to see if anyone is paying attention to their widdle ickle self.

Or they could have posted their entry to the wrong journal.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: one is the loneliest number - (Anonymous), 2004-10-05 05:45 pm UTC
Re: one is the loneliest number - [info]prettyveela, 2004-10-06 08:46 am UTC
Re: one is the loneliest number
(Anonymous)
2004-10-05 09:49 am UTC (link)
Totally off topic but didn't honoria (on the friends of list) die?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: one is the loneliest number - (Anonymous), 2004-10-05 06:01 pm UTC
Re: one is the loneliest number - (Anonymous), 2004-10-05 06:14 pm UTC
Re: one is the loneliest number - (Anonymous), 2004-10-06 01:55 am UTC
Re: one is the loneliest number - (Anonymous), 2004-10-06 08:37 am UTC
Re: one is the loneliest number - (Anonymous), 2004-10-08 08:40 am UTC
Re: one is the loneliest number - (Anonymous), 2004-10-09 10:05 am UTC
Re: one is the loneliest number
mbutterflye
2004-10-05 10:20 pm UTC (link)
Private posts are different from Friends Only posts. Private means only the person posting can see them. So, if they're privating posts and changing passwords, there's still a conspiracy. XD

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Anonymous)
2004-10-04 07:55 pm UTC (link)
I can't believe what idiots you all are for posting about this. It's msscribe and maybe a few of her friends screwing with all of your heads and I for one am sick of people pretending she's the innocent one. MAKE SENSE???!!! She hates Ron/Hermione shippers and she created that journal to draw negative attention to them and the authors who write that pairing just like she harrassed Harry/Ginny shippers a while back!!! Stop being so damn stupid!!!

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]ashenmote
2004-10-04 08:01 pm UTC (link)
Uh...thanks for clearing it up for us.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]crabnebula
2004-10-04 08:04 pm UTC (link)
Not being weird or anything but can you link us to any evidence you might have because I'll be happy to post it as I have no loyalties to BNF types.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]mpoetess
2004-10-04 08:11 pm UTC (link)
May I have a few of those extra exclamation points? My therapist took mine away, saying I'd sound saner on the internet if I just used one per sentence, and it's not fair! I want them baaaack!

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-10-04 08:14 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]eljuno, 2004-10-04 08:16 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-10-04 08:27 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]eljuno, 2004-10-04 08:28 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-10-04 08:32 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]eljuno, 2004-10-04 08:37 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]big_bad_wolf, 2004-10-04 08:39 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-10-04 08:57 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-10-04 09:07 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ecchaniz0r, 2004-10-05 07:14 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]eljuno, 2004-10-04 09:08 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]darkwitch666, 2004-10-05 10:56 pm UTC
In all seriousness: - [info]mpoetess, 2004-10-04 09:09 pm UTC
Re: In all seriousness: - [info]phosfate, 2004-10-04 10:31 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2004-10-05 12:12 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]els_chan, 2004-10-05 10:54 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]xanos, 2004-10-06 06:27 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-10-04 09:16 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ashenmote, 2004-10-04 09:38 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]heidi, 2004-10-04 10:09 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]pyratejenni, 2004-10-04 10:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]heidi, 2004-10-04 10:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]pyratejenni, 2004-10-04 10:34 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]eljuno, 2004-10-04 10:35 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ashenmote, 2004-10-04 10:42 pm UTC
(no subject) - msscribe, 2004-10-04 11:59 pm UTC

(Deleted post)
(no subject) - [info]heidi, 2004-10-04 11:55 pm UTC
(no subject) - msscribe, 2004-10-05 12:00 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]heidi, 2004-10-05 03:41 am UTC
(no subject) - msscribe, 2004-10-05 02:39 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kaiser_chan, 2004-10-05 03:02 am UTC
(no subject) - msscribe, 2004-10-05 03:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dawnydiesel, 2004-10-05 03:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - msscribe, 2004-10-06 12:08 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mpoetess, 2004-10-04 08:16 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]eljuno, 2004-10-04 08:19 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mpoetess, 2004-10-04 08:25 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]eljuno, 2004-10-04 08:29 pm UTC
(no subject) - ataniell93, 2004-10-04 09:56 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]morgothik, 2004-10-04 11:41 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ecchaniz0r, 2004-10-05 07:16 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]eljuno, 2004-10-05 08:49 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]senor_pinata, 2004-10-04 08:54 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]entrenous88, 2004-10-06 01:47 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mouseybrown, 2004-10-04 08:14 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-10-04 09:21 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]misswindy, 2004-10-04 09:35 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]auguris, 2004-10-05 06:10 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]misswindy, 2004-10-05 06:19 am UTC
(no subject) - msscribe, 2004-10-04 09:37 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]xturtle, 2004-10-04 11:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - msscribe, 2004-10-05 12:16 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]xturtle, 2004-10-05 12:32 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cmikhailovic, 2004-10-08 01:09 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]eljuno, 2004-10-04 09:39 pm UTC
(no subject) - msscribe, 2004-10-04 09:41 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]eljuno, 2004-10-04 09:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kraken_sleeps, 2004-10-04 10:37 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mistressrenet, 2004-10-04 11:31 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]bubosquared, 2004-10-06 01:37 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]eljuno, 2004-10-06 08:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]bubosquared, 2004-10-06 10:16 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]eljuno, 2004-10-06 01:07 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]bubosquared, 2004-10-06 02:44 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]eljuno, 2004-10-06 03:01 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]bubosquared, 2004-10-06 03:08 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]eljuno, 2004-10-06 08:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]bubosquared, 2004-10-07 05:41 pm UTC
(no subject) - ataniell93, 2004-10-04 09:54 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]biichan, 2004-10-04 11:44 pm UTC
(no subject) - ataniell93, 2004-10-05 12:13 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]biichan, 2004-10-05 12:39 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]oulangi, 2004-10-04 10:35 pm UTC
(no subject) - blackoftwilight, 2004-10-07 02:08 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mistressrenet, 2004-10-04 11:29 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]bubosquared, 2004-10-06 01:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mouseybrown, 2004-10-04 10:38 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ashenmote, 2004-10-05 04:32 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]schoenschoen, 2004-10-05 07:00 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-10-05 11:03 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lucario, 2004-10-07 07:55 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lucario, 2004-10-07 07:56 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lurker32, 2004-10-04 08:16 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]livingadream, 2004-10-04 08:21 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2004-10-04 08:34 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]big_bad_wolf, 2004-10-04 08:34 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]crysiana, 2004-10-04 09:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]snacky, 2004-10-04 08:51 pm UTC
(no subject) - ataniell93, 2004-10-04 09:53 pm UTC
??? - [info]poconell, 2004-10-04 10:49 pm UTC
Re: ??? - ataniell93, 2004-10-04 10:58 pm UTC
Re: ??? - [info]poconell, 2004-10-04 11:13 pm UTC
Re: ??? - ataniell93, 2004-10-05 12:15 am UTC
Re: ??? - [info]poconell, 2004-10-05 02:51 am UTC
Re: ??? - ataniell93, 2004-10-05 02:57 am UTC
Re: ??? - [info]poconell, 2004-10-05 03:11 am UTC
Re: ??? - [info]bishounenhuntrs, 2004-10-05 03:37 am UTC
Re: ??? - [info]poconell, 2004-10-05 04:03 am UTC
Re: ??? - ataniell93, 2004-10-05 11:09 pm UTC
Re: ??? - [info]poconell, 2004-10-05 11:27 pm UTC
Re: ??? - [info]bishounenhuntrs, 2004-10-05 11:38 pm UTC
Re: ??? - ataniell93, 2004-10-06 12:08 am UTC
Re: ??? - [info]bishounenhuntrs, 2004-10-05 11:41 pm UTC
Re: ??? - [info]poconell, 2004-10-06 12:04 am UTC
Re: ??? - (Anonymous), 2004-10-06 02:54 am UTC
Say Wha? o_O - [info]bishounenhuntrs, 2004-10-06 03:05 am UTC
Re: Say Wha? o_O - [info]poconell, 2004-10-06 03:49 am UTC
Re: Say Wha? o_O - [info]prettyveela, 2004-10-06 08:40 am UTC
Re: Say Wha? o_O - (Anonymous), 2004-10-06 01:19 pm UTC
PS - [info]bishounenhuntrs, 2004-10-06 03:12 am UTC
Re: ??? - ataniell93, 2004-10-06 12:10 am UTC
Re: ??? - ataniell93, 2004-10-06 12:14 am UTC
Re: ??? - [info]bishounenhuntrs, 2004-10-05 11:34 pm UTC
Re: ??? - ataniell93, 2004-10-06 12:10 am UTC
Re: ??? - [info]poconell, 2004-10-06 12:11 am UTC
Re: ??? - ataniell93, 2004-10-06 12:26 am UTC
Re: ??? - [info]poconell, 2004-10-06 12:58 am UTC
Re: ??? - teh_one, 2004-10-06 01:51 am UTC
Re: ??? - [info]poconell, 2004-10-06 02:21 am UTC
Re: ??? - [info]lucario, 2004-10-07 08:08 am UTC
Re: ??? - ataniell93, 2004-10-07 08:46 am UTC
Re: ??? - (Anonymous), 2004-10-08 09:25 pm UTC
Re: ??? - [info]prettyveela, 2004-10-06 08:45 am UTC
Re: ??? - teh_one, 2004-10-05 03:14 am UTC
Re: ??? - [info]poconell, 2004-10-05 03:33 am UTC
Okay, I think I get it now. - ataniell93, 2004-10-05 09:39 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-10-04 10:14 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]eljuno, 2004-10-04 10:29 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]deoridhe, 2004-10-04 10:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]big_bad_wolf, 2004-10-05 05:04 pm UTC
(no subject) - ataniell93, 2004-10-05 12:16 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]narcissam, 2004-10-05 03:07 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]amasaglajax, 2004-10-05 05:10 am UTC
(no subject) - msscribe, 2004-10-05 03:33 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-10-09 02:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]bookshop, 2004-10-04 11:32 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ari_o, 2004-10-05 12:18 am UTC
(no subject) - msscribe, 2004-10-05 12:20 am UTC
(no subject) - msscribe, 2004-10-05 12:26 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]biichan, 2004-10-05 12:38 am UTC
(no subject) - msscribe, 2004-10-05 12:20 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]missi, 2004-10-05 12:11 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]jaina, 2004-10-05 12:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lucario, 2004-10-07 08:14 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]jaina, 2004-10-07 10:19 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]bishounenhuntrs, 2004-10-05 12:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladylisse, 2004-10-05 03:32 am UTC
(no subject) - msscribe, 2004-10-05 03:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladylisse, 2004-10-05 03:46 am UTC
(no subject) - msscribe, 2004-10-05 03:49 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]bishounenhuntrs, 2004-10-05 03:45 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-10-05 04:48 am UTC
o_O - [info]ladylisse, 2004-10-05 04:50 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-10-06 03:12 am UTC

[info]ashenmote
2004-10-04 08:42 pm UTC (link)
*stops backing away, gets out scratchpad and pen and settles down to listen to your tale*

Um, for the record, your license plate was GT-RIP 03-09-20, right?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ashenmote, 2004-10-04 08:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]eljuno, 2004-10-04 09:16 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]vasaris, 2004-10-05 09:28 am UTC

[info]narcissam
2004-10-04 09:26 pm UTC (link)
You know, it might just be me, but that post sounds rather artificial. Made to have it sound like Fandom Scruples actually has legions of terror.

"Look at me! I have friends!"

Not going to hazard a guess on the identity of the person, but I'd classify them as an attention-seeking troll rather than an insane zealous reformer.

NM

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - ataniell93, 2004-10-04 09:54 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]heidi, 2004-10-04 10:11 pm UTC
(no subject) - ataniell93, 2004-10-04 10:30 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]narcissam, 2004-10-05 03:01 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]prettyveela, 2004-10-05 09:08 am UTC
(no subject) - ataniell93, 2004-10-05 09:31 pm UTC
Gah? - [info]prettyveela, 2004-10-06 08:38 am UTC

teh_one
2004-10-04 11:17 pm UTC (link)
Is it those opertatives of evil or whatever they hell those good shippers called themselves who stalked those pumpkin piers? They were some gang of trolls, weren't they?

I swear, they're like the bloods and crips--they need colors and leaders and rap songs for antehms....I can't keep them straight.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2004-10-05 12:22 am UTC
(no subject) - teh_one, 2004-10-05 12:26 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]prettyveela, 2004-10-05 12:43 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]narcissam, 2004-10-05 03:04 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]prettyveela, 2004-10-05 09:04 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]poconell, 2004-10-09 07:30 pm UTC
(no subject) - teh_one, 2004-10-05 03:09 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]schoenschoen, 2004-10-05 07:08 am UTC

[info]prettyveela
2004-10-05 12:48 am UTC (link)
The draft of the next post will be sent over email in a few days.

What the hell? So a F_S post has to be approved by the House of Potter congress before it becomes a bill/post?

Yeah, it's a lone person alright :\

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-10-05 04:41 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]prettyveela, 2004-10-05 09:00 am UTC

teh_one
2004-10-05 03:22 am UTC (link)
So, if we had to take a vote, would this Mythical Person(s) Behind F_S be a shipper or no? And if so, which side of the shipping wank debate would they be on?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ladysorka, 2004-10-05 05:45 am UTC

[info]arielchan
2004-10-05 06:04 am UTC (link)
... despite recent instances, I am still proud to be a blacklister.

Just not as much.

Poor fandom_scruples, you used to be so cute!

~*Ariel*~

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]vasaris, 2004-10-05 09:32 am UTC
Rove/Potter
[info]fuzzytowers
2004-10-05 04:15 pm UTC (link)
Um, maybe I missed something because I'm not in the HP fandom anymore, but what's the big deal about F_S being a group of people?

This fandom just makes me really, really sad.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Rove/Potter - (Anonymous), 2004-10-05 05:39 pm UTC
Re: Rove/Potter - [info]fuzzytowers, 2004-10-05 08:53 pm UTC

(Anonymous)
2004-10-05 11:58 pm UTC (link)
*gasp* Anonymice are coming! Let's hope they clean up after themselves, the dirty things!

Sorry. Couldn't resist.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-10-06 12:12 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lucario, 2004-10-07 08:26 am UTC

[info]lucario
2004-10-07 08:28 am UTC (link)
Now that I've thoroughly read this entry and its comments...

I really find it amusing how either one or more people love to get wanky with pairings whether they be canon or fanon. :)

(Reply to this)


 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map