Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Rackham Rose ([info]rackhamrose) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2004-10-12 19:50:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:Fan-Tabulous
Current music:HAAAHAHAHAHAHAHA XD
Entry tags:creator wank, person: anne rice

The People Have Spoken. Those Patience-Trying, Filth-Slinging Whores.
Sorry if this has already been posted somewhere; I couldn't resist.

Courtesy of, oddly enough, my mother:

New York Times article on the Anne Rice-on-Amazon-Debacle, October 11th, 2004: "The People Have Spoken, And Rice Takes Offense", by Sarah Lyall.

Running out of things to iconate? Here, have a telling highlight!

In a telephone interview, Ms. Rice elaborated on the point [her refusal to submit to criticism, constructive or otherwise, from an editor].
"People who find fault and problems with my books tend to say, 'She needs an editor,'" Ms. Rice said. "When a person writes with such care and goes over and over a manuscript and wants every word to be perfect, it's very frustrating."
She added: "When you take home a CD of Pavarotti or Marilyn Horne, you don't want to hear another voice blended in. I feel the same way about Hemingway. If I read it, I don't want to read a new edited version."


And of course everyone's favourite--sing along if you know the words!--

She posted a blistering, 1,200-word defense of her book on the site, laying in to those critics who, she said, were "interrogating this text from the wrong perspective."

I feel sorta warm and fuzzy. Now the whole world can point and laugh like True For-Real Fandom Wankas!




Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

(Post a new comment)


[info]iscoffy
2004-10-13 03:09 am UTC (link)
Because obviously Pavarotti has never had a vocal coach. And obviously Pavarotti and Anne Rice are on the same level.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]rackhamrose, 2004-10-13 03:13 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]iscoffy, 2004-10-13 03:15 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2004-10-13 03:16 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]iscoffy, 2004-10-13 03:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2004-10-13 03:36 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]bubosquared, 2004-10-13 02:27 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]iscoffy, 2004-10-13 09:16 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]bubosquared, 2004-10-13 09:18 pm UTC
... - [info]iscoffy, 2004-10-15 01:04 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-10-13 08:16 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2004-10-13 05:29 pm UTC
<i>psssst</i> wanna buy a cheep sub, leetle opera gurl? - (Anonymous), 2004-10-14 03:39 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-02-05 04:36 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mouseybrown, 2004-10-13 06:11 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]iscoffy, 2004-10-15 01:05 am UTC

[info]ishtar79
2004-10-13 03:14 am UTC (link)
This makes me so happy. Good Old Reliable Anne; guaranteed wanky entertainment.

*grabs popcorn*

Also, did she actually compare herself to Pavaroti and Hemingway?

Bitch, s'il te plait!

(Reply to this)


[info]smo
2004-10-13 03:14 am UTC (link)
The difference being, of course, that both Pavarotti and Marilyn Horne have taken, and still take, voice lessons. Why? So they can improve their craft. It has nothing to do with listening to reviews. It has to do with listening to people who are actually in a position to help one become even better.

That said, it's really time for Pavarotti to hang it up.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]littleshebear, 2004-10-13 04:07 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2004-10-13 05:14 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]starfish, 2004-10-13 06:29 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2004-10-13 05:35 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-10-13 05:44 pm UTC
... - [info]smo, 2004-10-13 06:29 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]littleshebear, 2004-10-13 05:50 pm UTC
... - [info]smo, 2004-10-13 06:27 pm UTC
... - [info]singe, 2004-10-13 08:30 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]starfish, 2004-10-13 07:59 pm UTC
... - [info]smo, 2004-10-13 09:25 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]xeno4eyes, 2004-10-15 08:41 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]vasaris, 2004-10-13 07:29 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]bubosquared, 2004-10-13 02:30 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2004-10-13 05:31 pm UTC
(no subject) - ataniell93, 2004-10-14 12:59 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]vasaris, 2004-10-14 10:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]vassilissa, 2004-10-14 05:05 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2004-10-14 06:26 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]vassilissa, 2004-10-15 02:59 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2004-10-15 07:18 am UTC
Critics: Telling you what you already know but don't want to hear!
[info]selene_avis
2004-10-13 03:15 am UTC (link)
I so need to check out her first book from the library. 'Cause, like, I would never actually pay money for it or anything.

Personally, I want to slap Anne Rice. I may not write much more than fan fictions, but I go to a great extent to get criticism. And you want to know what? I am a better writer now than I was a couple of years ago. This is great since I am working on a book at the moment. (I'll probably finish it in, oh, 3011 at the rate I'm going. I plan to have a day job.) I mean, I recently renamed one of my character today because her name didn't fit with the rest of my story. I didn't like it, but the critic was correct.

Critics: Telling you what you already know but don't want to hear!

Oh, and I can't read the article in full. Do I have to register for an account first, or is there another way?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Critics: Telling you what you already know but don't want to hear! - [info]schoenschoen, 2004-10-13 03:49 am UTC
Re: Critics: Telling you what you already know but don't want to hear! - [info]selene_avis, 2004-10-13 06:02 am UTC
Re: Critics: Telling you what you already know but don't want to hear! - [info]schoenschoen, 2004-10-13 07:40 am UTC
Re: Critics: Telling you what you already know but don't want to hear! - [info]puipui, 2004-10-13 08:27 am UTC
Re: Critics: Telling you what you already know but don't want to hear! - [info]xanos, 2004-10-13 10:34 am UTC
... - [info]irishmastermind, 2004-10-13 03:26 pm UTC
... - [info]smo, 2004-10-13 05:33 pm UTC
... - [info]puipui, 2004-10-13 08:31 pm UTC
... - [info]smo, 2004-10-13 09:22 pm UTC
... - [info]schoenschoen, 2004-10-14 01:30 am UTC
... - [info]smo, 2004-10-14 05:53 pm UTC
... - [info]megmurry, 2004-10-14 09:13 pm UTC
... - cicer, 2004-10-14 02:06 am UTC
... - [info]smo, 2004-10-14 05:50 pm UTC
Re: Critics: Telling you what you already know but don't want to hear! - [info]selene_avis, 2004-10-13 03:48 pm UTC
Re: Critics: Telling you what you already know but don't want to hear! - [info]schoenschoen, 2004-10-14 01:26 am UTC
Re: Critics: Telling you what you already know but don't want to hear! - [info]adora_spintriae, 2004-10-14 02:17 am UTC
Re: Critics: Telling you what you already know but don't want to hear! - [info]schoenschoen, 2004-10-14 02:36 am UTC
Re: Critics: Telling you what you already know but don't want to hear! - cicer, 2004-10-14 02:02 am UTC
Re: Critics: Telling you what you already know but don't want to hear! - [info]schoenschoen, 2004-10-14 02:35 am UTC
Re: Critics: Telling you what you already know but don't want to hear! - [info]rhi_silverflame, 2004-10-13 04:36 am UTC
Re: Critics: Telling you what you already know but don't want to hear! - (Anonymous), 2004-10-13 06:07 am UTC
Re: Critics: Telling you what you already know but don't want to hear! - [info]msmanna, 2004-10-13 03:45 pm UTC

[info]lurker32
2004-10-13 03:19 am UTC (link)
How is she old enough to be my grandmother and still has no grasp of earth logic?

If I read it, I don't want to read a new edited version

No, Anne, you give it to the editor BEFORE it's published and people can read it. This is a simple concept.

When a person writes with such care and goes over and over a manuscript and wants every word to be perfect, it's very frustrating

...when someone tries to make that happen and you rip them a new one. Yeah, that is frustrating.

(Reply to this)

(Reply from suspended user)
(no subject) - [info]kyuuketsukirui, 2004-10-13 03:27 am UTC

(Reply from suspended user)
(no subject) - [info]kyuuketsukirui, 2004-10-13 03:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]edtel, 2004-10-13 05:10 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]nekoneko, 2004-10-13 09:32 pm UTC
/Nitpick - [info]sukeban, 2004-10-13 08:28 pm UTC
Re: /Nitpick - [info]coyote, 2004-10-14 12:08 am UTC

(Reply from suspended user)
Re: /Nitpick - [info]sir_hellsing, 2004-10-14 07:18 am UTC

[info]madamrex
2004-10-13 03:20 am UTC (link)
She makes me so sad that I actually liked "Interview With The Vampire."

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]crysiana, 2004-10-13 03:22 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mistressrenet, 2004-10-13 04:09 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cesare, 2004-10-13 03:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kyuuketsukirui, 2004-10-13 03:51 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cesare, 2004-10-13 05:22 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2004-10-13 08:54 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]htrismegistus, 2004-10-14 01:05 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]uriel, 2004-10-13 06:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]singe, 2004-10-13 08:39 pm UTC
(no subject) - cicer, 2004-10-14 02:00 am UTC

[info]crysiana
2004-10-13 03:21 am UTC (link)
This is...totally unsurprising. Anne? Get over yourself. I'm sorry if you're going through a hard time, but that's no excuse for the fact that you dismissed your editor as soon as you could.

...on the Pavarotti side of things, my university recently had the newest best voice in opera come by. Seriously, the man will be remembered as greater than the three tenors when the mainstream chooses to pick him up. His name is Peter Buchi, and everyone must check him out.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]rackhamrose, 2004-10-13 03:27 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]crysiana, 2004-10-13 03:35 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rackhamrose, 2004-10-13 03:39 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]crysiana, 2004-10-13 03:53 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ilpalazzo, 2004-10-15 03:57 pm UTC
... - [info]crysiana, 2004-10-15 07:45 pm UTC
... - [info]chaos_seahorse, 2004-10-17 12:12 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2004-10-13 03:44 am UTC (link)
People who find fault and problems with my books tend to say, 'She needs an editor,'" Ms. Rice said. "When a person writes with such care and goes over and over a manuscript and wants every word to be perfect, it's very frustrating."

Bitch, please. If you want "every word to be perfect," then you should get an editor. No matter how carefully you edit yourself, chances are you'll miss something at some point. Thing is, you're not per...

Wait, this is Anne Rice we're talking about. She is perfect! The voices in her head told her so.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]iscoffy, 2004-10-13 03:45 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sesana, 2004-10-13 06:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]iscoffy, 2004-10-13 09:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sesana, 2004-10-14 07:12 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]iscoffy, 2004-10-15 01:06 am UTC

[info]cesare
2004-10-13 03:45 am UTC (link)
The NYT also ran a hilarious article a few years back which snarked on Rice's need for an editor.

Among the bewitched are editors, those meant to know the ancient laws of reason and the dark secrets of grammatical construction. None questioned "What mysteries we are, human, vampire, mortal, that we can love and hate simultaneously, and that emotions of all sorts might not parade for what they are not." None would challenge "He was very startled when I laid down this part of the story, but wouldn't have me pause just yet but encouraged me to go on." None wondered what was amiss "as the sky grew ever more lighter." But those are the labors of mortals. What mortals would dare?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]rackhamrose, 2004-10-13 03:49 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]schoenschoen, 2004-10-13 03:54 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]im_nucking_futs, 2004-10-13 04:03 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]schoenschoen, 2004-10-13 04:04 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rackhamrose, 2004-10-13 04:09 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]schoenschoen, 2004-10-13 07:53 am UTC
Anne Rice x Laurell Hamilton pr0n - [info]rackhamrose, 2004-10-13 09:27 am UTC
... - [info]schoenschoen, 2004-10-13 09:41 am UTC
... - [info]rackhamrose, 2004-10-13 09:49 am UTC
... - [info]romanesque, 2004-10-13 10:22 am UTC
... - [info]gloria_mundi, 2004-10-13 11:36 am UTC
... - [info]mistressrenet, 2004-10-13 04:20 pm UTC
... - [info]shun_mcdaddy, 2004-10-13 04:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]crysiana, 2004-10-13 03:58 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]squeakytoy, 2004-10-13 06:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cie_anthy, 2004-10-13 08:34 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]squeakytoy, 2004-10-13 09:07 am UTC
... - [info]crysiana, 2004-10-13 09:19 am UTC
... - [info]squeakytoy, 2004-10-13 10:22 am UTC
... - [info]pyratejenni, 2004-10-13 06:58 pm UTC
... - [info]crysiana, 2004-10-13 08:47 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]selene_avis, 2004-10-13 06:24 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sewingmyfish, 2004-10-13 07:54 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2004-10-13 08:59 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mistressrenet, 2004-10-13 04:23 pm UTC
... - [info]rackhamrose, 2004-10-14 02:04 am UTC
... - [info]sewingmyfish, 2004-10-14 07:18 am UTC
... - [info]mistressrenet, 2004-10-14 04:04 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]bubba_ray, 2004-10-13 09:30 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sewingmyfish, 2004-10-13 09:32 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2004-10-13 03:52 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]shun_mcdaddy, 2004-10-13 04:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]random_fandom, 2004-10-14 04:04 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]winterfalls, 2004-10-13 06:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]notjo, 2004-10-15 12:20 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]winterfalls, 2004-10-15 12:36 pm UTC

tempestuous
2004-10-13 03:50 am UTC (link)
For the ones that don't want to create an account just to read the article, here it is (*loves firefox' bugmenot password feature*)

***
The People Have Spoken, and Rice Takes Offense
By SARAH LYALL

Published: October 11, 2004

Lestat, the vampire narrator of Anne Rice's most recent book, "Blood Canticle,'' begins the novel with a harangue against its readers. "What the hell happened when I gave you 'Memnoch the Devil?' " he asks crossly, referring to an earlier novel by Ms. Rice that some readers, to put it mildly, did not like. "You complained!"

Many people did not care much for "Blood Canticle" (Knopf) either, as Ms. Rice found to her mounting horror when she began scrolling through dozens of virulently negative reviews of the book on Amazon.com.

"I cannot stress to you how bad this book is, and I have been waiting for it for so long!'' wrote a reviewer from California.

Wrote another reviewer, "I have read almost every one of Anne Rice's novels, and I have to say this is the worst one.''

A third was more specific. " 'Blood Canticle's' biggest problem,'' that reviewer said, "is that it is seriously lacking in creative writing, sense of continuity and character development.''

Ms. Rice, the best-selling author of 25 books, including the lush and original "Interview With the Vampire,'' has a passionate following and an unusually intimate relationship with her audience. She reacted to the criticism with shock and horror, although when the positive and negative reviews were averaged, Amazon gave "Blood Canticle" three stars out of five.

Many authors are upset by the snide tone of some Amazon reviews; Ms. Rice decided to do something about it. She posted a blistering 1,200-word defense of her book on the site, laying in to those critics who, she said, were "interrogating this text from the wrong perspective."

"Your stupid, arrogant assumptions about me and what I am doing are slander,'' she wrote. "You have used the site as if it were a public urinal to publish falsehood and lies.''

Ms. Rice seemed particularly incensed by reviewers who implied that she had not worked hard on the book, the 10th in her "Vampire Chronicles'' series, or that she had written it merely to fulfill a "contractual obligation,'' as one reviewer said.

Nor was she thrilled by the suggestion - often made by people who adored earlier books in the series but said they felt that the quality had deteriorated - that "Blood Canticle" might have benefited from some tough love. "Anne, you really should have an editor, or at least someone that would read your book before you send it off to print,'' one reviewer wrote.

No way, Ms. Rice replied.

....

(Reply to this)(Thread)

part two - tempestuous, 2004-10-13 03:51 am UTC
Re: part two - [info]rackhamrose, 2004-10-13 03:58 am UTC
Re: part two - [info]deoridhe, 2004-10-13 05:33 am UTC
Re: part two - [info]amand_r, 2004-10-13 07:25 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-10-13 07:26 am UTC
Re: part two - (Anonymous), 2004-10-14 11:54 pm UTC
Re: part two - [info]suzywongdress, 2004-10-13 04:01 am UTC
Re: part two - [info]mirabellawotr, 2004-10-13 05:27 am UTC
Re: part two - [info]oysteria, 2004-10-13 05:52 am UTC
Re: part two - [info]selene_avis, 2004-10-13 06:27 am UTC
Re: part two - [info]elfy, 2004-10-13 10:53 am UTC
... - [info]kraken_sleeps, 2004-10-13 10:58 am UTC
... - [info]elfy, 2004-10-13 02:11 pm UTC
... - [info]suzywongdress, 2004-10-13 05:15 pm UTC
... - [info]marlo, 2004-10-13 09:10 pm UTC
... - cicer, 2004-10-14 02:21 am UTC
... - [info]selene_avis, 2004-10-13 03:48 pm UTC
... - [info]elfy, 2004-10-13 04:37 pm UTC
Re: part two - roxannelinton, 2004-10-13 12:41 pm UTC
... - [info]coffee_mug, 2004-10-13 06:48 pm UTC
... - ataniell93, 2004-10-14 01:15 am UTC
... - (Anonymous), 2004-10-14 01:23 am UTC
... - [info]adora_spintriae, 2004-10-14 02:25 am UTC
... - (Anonymous), 2004-10-14 09:28 pm UTC
Re: part two - tempestuous, 2004-10-13 04:15 am UTC
I might be wrong... - [info]the_gentleman, 2004-10-13 04:56 am UTC
Re: part two - [info]arielchan, 2004-10-13 06:30 am UTC
Re: part two - [info]vasaris, 2004-10-13 07:37 am UTC
Re: part two - [info]puipui, 2004-10-13 09:01 am UTC
Re: part two - [info]squib, 2004-10-13 12:24 pm UTC
Re: part two - [info]bubosquared, 2004-10-13 02:36 pm UTC
Re: part two - cicer, 2004-10-14 02:22 am UTC
Re: part two - [info]madamrex, 2004-10-14 04:57 pm UTC
Re: part two - [info]wrenlet, 2004-10-13 06:32 am UTC
Re: part two - [info]belafarinrod, 2004-10-13 01:03 pm UTC
Re: part two - [info]bubosquared, 2004-10-13 02:38 pm UTC
Re: part two - (Anonymous), 2004-10-13 06:02 pm UTC
... - (Anonymous), 2004-10-13 06:03 pm UTC
... - [info]bubosquared, 2004-10-13 06:13 pm UTC
... - [info]iczer6, 2004-10-14 02:16 am UTC
... - [info]bubosquared, 2004-10-14 10:53 am UTC
Re: part two - [info]coffee_mug, 2004-10-13 06:55 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]frelling_tralk, 2004-10-14 03:32 am UTC

[info]schoenschoen
2004-10-13 04:00 am UTC (link)
Yay, you made a posty over here! :D

Also, I'm betting that this latest bit of whinging it off into the sunset has something to do with her giving out her home address for returning copies of Blood Canticle that the readers were unhappy with (that was a post on her a few weeks back, too!). I wonder if that *ever* seemed like a good idea to her - right, give disgruntled fans your home address, so they can send you back their dissatisfaction with your product.

Of course, knowing her, she probably never even dreamed they'd be the least bit dissatisfied in real life. ^^

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-10-13 04:34 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]schoenschoen, 2004-10-13 07:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]shun_mcdaddy, 2004-10-13 08:07 am UTC
Bwahah! - [info]schoenschoen, 2004-10-13 08:11 am UTC
Re: Bwahah! - [info]shun_mcdaddy, 2004-10-13 08:14 am UTC
Re: Bwahah!Part 2 - [info]shun_mcdaddy, 2004-10-13 08:16 am UTC
Re: Bwahah!Part 2 - [info]khym_chanur, 2004-10-13 09:33 am UTC
... - [info]selene_avis, 2004-10-14 12:12 am UTC
... - [info]khym_chanur, 2004-10-14 06:19 am UTC
... - [info]selene_avis, 2004-10-14 06:21 am UTC
... - [info]khym_chanur, 2004-10-14 06:25 am UTC
... - [info]selene_avis, 2004-10-14 03:43 pm UTC
... - [info]mistressrenet, 2004-10-14 06:52 pm UTC

[info]im_nucking_futs
2004-10-13 04:04 am UTC (link)
She's crazy but teh wank is amusing!

(Reply to this)


[info]memorycharm
2004-10-13 04:34 am UTC (link)
*sigh* Hemingway very famously *had* an editor. His name was Max Perkins.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]seppuku, 2004-10-13 05:00 am UTC
Beat me to it... - [info]wankprophet, 2004-10-13 05:28 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2004-10-13 04:37 am UTC (link)
"When a person writes with such care and goes over and over a manuscript and wants every word to be perfect, it's very frustrating."

I don't think she finished that sentence. I think it should read, "When a person writes with such care and goes over and over a manuscript and wants every word to be perfect, it's very frustrating when it isn't."

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]coffee_mug, 2004-10-13 06:55 pm UTC

(Anonymous)
2004-10-13 04:40 am UTC (link)
And lo, it came to pass that Anne Rice was known forever after throughout the land and the intraweb as not-Hemmingway.

anon 21:34

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]crysiana, 2004-10-13 04:51 am UTC
(no subject) - cicer, 2004-10-14 02:25 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]crysiana, 2004-10-14 06:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]selene_avis, 2004-10-13 06:29 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]windex_junkie, 2004-10-13 02:22 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tyraarane_, 2004-10-13 07:13 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]alina_kalime, 2004-10-15 12:49 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tyraarane_, 2004-10-15 12:51 am UTC

[info]seppuku
2004-10-13 04:59 am UTC (link)
Ah, the New York Times. All the wank news that's fit to print.

(Reply to this)

A message to Anne Rice. Too bad I'm such a coward I can't email it to her.
[info]bisclavret
2004-10-13 05:15 am UTC (link)
Oh for God's sake, woman. Get over yourself! Hemingway had an editor! Singers work with producers, or, as others have said, voice coaches! The idea is to work with someone who isn't as closely attached with the work so that way you can step back and look at what you've written with a clear head. A clear head is obviously not something you're familiar with. Shockingly, not every word that springs from your keyboard, or your pen, is magical. Even if you work over it rigorously, you are fallible. You have limits, especially with your own creations. It doesn't mean every criticism made by an editor is right. It just means you need PERSPECTIVE.

God, save me from the stupid.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: A message to Anne Rice. Too bad I'm such a coward I can't email it to her. - [info]vasaris, 2004-10-13 07:41 am UTC
Re: A message to Anne Rice. Too bad I'm such a coward I can't email it to her. - [info]toxictattoo, 2004-10-13 05:34 pm UTC
Re: A message to Anne Rice. Too bad I'm such a coward I can't email it to her. - [info]bisclavret, 2004-10-14 04:33 pm UTC

[info]ultimate_cin
2004-10-13 06:06 am UTC (link)
Anne Rice. The wank that keeps on giving. :)

(Reply to this)


[info]arielchan
2004-10-13 06:27 am UTC (link)
Oh, Anne. I have nothing more to say to you. ;_;

(Reply to this)


(Anonymous)
2004-10-13 07:22 am UTC (link)
Oh leave Anne alone already.Jesus.You people make me sick XD.Anne is a nice person-I know someone that knows her so ffs lay OFF Anne.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]amand_r, 2004-10-13 07:27 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mrbimble, 2004-10-13 07:45 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]serai, 2004-10-13 08:34 am UTC
>_< - [info]ashenmote, 2004-10-13 08:35 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-10-13 08:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]favyan, 2004-10-14 03:44 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]favyan, 2004-10-14 03:45 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]serai, 2004-10-13 08:35 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ashenmote, 2004-10-13 08:36 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]squeakytoy, 2004-10-13 09:10 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rackhamrose, 2004-10-13 09:14 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2004-10-13 09:15 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sahz, 2004-10-13 01:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]jrs1980, 2004-10-13 10:27 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]suzywongdress, 2004-10-13 05:13 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-10-13 12:00 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mistressrenet, 2004-10-13 04:26 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mouseybrown, 2004-10-13 06:17 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]big_bad_wolf, 2004-10-13 09:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2004-10-14 12:08 am UTC
Equal Opportunity Wank - [info]pfeffermuse, 2004-10-14 01:15 am UTC
Re: Equal Opportunity Wank - [info]wordjunkie, 2004-10-16 06:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]slothrop, 2004-10-14 10:23 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]byrne, 2004-10-14 09:32 pm UTC
Hey Ann Rice! - (Anonymous), 2005-12-15 12:47 pm UTC

[info]cairea
2004-10-13 08:35 am UTC (link)
I work in a used book store, and our horror section is overrun with Anne Rice. And unlike the authors who take over other sections (Nora Roberts, Tami Hoag, David Eddings, Tom Clancy etc.) Anne's stuff does not move. >> It sits there on the shelves and forms a dark aura of 'Unwanted Book' that we're all afraid to venture anywhere near.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ymfaery, 2004-10-13 01:13 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kyuuketsukirui, 2004-10-13 02:25 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kijikun, 2004-10-13 08:44 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ymfaery, 2004-10-14 12:18 am UTC
... - [info]kijikun, 2004-10-14 12:42 am UTC
... - [info]ymfaery, 2004-10-14 12:59 am UTC
... - [info]kijikun, 2004-10-14 01:06 am UTC
... - [info]ymfaery, 2004-10-14 01:12 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]toxictattoo, 2004-10-13 05:19 pm UTC
Works of horror indeed - [info]winterfalls, 2004-10-13 06:44 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cairea, 2004-10-14 01:29 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ymfaery, 2004-10-14 01:37 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dejla, 2004-10-14 01:56 am UTC
... - [info]ymfaery, 2004-10-14 02:03 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rhi_silverflame, 2004-10-14 03:48 am UTC
... - [info]xeno4eyes, 2004-10-19 04:31 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]violetta, 2004-10-13 04:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]belafarinrod, 2004-10-14 01:24 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cairea, 2004-10-14 01:31 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]belafarinrod, 2004-10-14 01:34 am UTC
... - [info]cairea, 2004-10-14 01:37 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]teratologist, 2004-10-13 06:29 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cairea, 2004-10-14 01:34 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]notjo, 2004-10-15 12:32 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]pyratejenni, 2004-10-13 07:04 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cairea, 2004-10-14 01:36 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]xeno4eyes, 2004-10-19 04:41 am UTC

[info]doranobaka
2004-10-13 10:19 am UTC (link)
I feel the same way about Hemingway. If I read it, I don't want to read a new edited version.

Actually, I'd rather like it if someone gave Hemingway an editor post-humously. :P */non-hemingway fan*

It's pretentious twits like her that make me ashamed to want to be a writer and make me more resolved to become an editor.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]belafarinrod, 2004-10-13 01:06 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]doranobaka, 2004-10-16 07:03 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]melusine, 2004-10-13 03:05 pm UTC

[info]adora_spintriae
2004-10-13 02:37 pm UTC (link)
When you take home a CD of Pavarotti or Marilyn Horne, you don't want to hear another voice blended in.

And yet some of us buy Bjork, because she works with other people on her stuff, and we like it that way because that's where her best stuff comes from. And some of us will never again buy another Missy Elliot CD not produced by Timberland, because we know she sucks without it. And some of us prefered the old Metallica drummer, even if he did have a mental breakdown from the abuse, because he at least kept time and made sure the other fucks weren't playing too much like idiots.

Don't comment on my music taste and I won't rape you with a spatula comment on yours.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]bubosquared, 2004-10-13 02:42 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]marlo, 2004-10-13 09:12 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]bubosquared, 2004-10-13 09:19 pm UTC
metallifuckin'ca - [info]marlo, 2004-10-13 09:46 pm UTC
... - [info]bubosquared, 2004-10-14 10:57 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]adora_spintriae, 2004-10-14 12:59 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]bubosquared, 2004-10-14 10:54 am UTC
**Dies laughing**
[info]ebbrowning
2004-10-13 04:35 pm UTC (link)
I'll have another tumber of Rice whine.

Her writing is crap, but she is still entertaining.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: **Dies laughing** - [info]wordjunkie, 2004-10-16 06:00 am UTC



Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map