Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



firebad ([info]firebad) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2004-12-02 08:54:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:Amped
Entry tags:person: the countess

We have a Royal Update.
Ahem. Fandom_Wank?

YOU ARE JUST LIKE THE PAPARAZZI!

AND THE "COUNTESS" JUSTINE BAKER HAS YOUR PHONE NUMBER!

EDIT: No, she really does! She's started posting them, too.

EDIT THE SECOND: We have a mirror. Not just Alexander, folks! Marilyn and Hemingway and Cleopatra, oh my! Thanks to lurker 32!


(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


(Anonymous)
2004-12-02 10:36 am UTC (link)
http://www.geocities.com/CountessBaker/

Are those REALLY the full names, addresses and phone numbers of some F_W people on her site? Isn't she breaking all kinds of TOS by doing that? Wow.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]danceswithelvis
2004-12-02 10:43 am UTC (link)
The page is down due to bandwidth. But if it is...then I'd say probably. Big ole TOS violation.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

In fact yes.
[info]danceswithelvis
2004-12-02 10:47 am UTC (link)
If it is...then yes it does:
From the YahooGeocities TOS agreement.


5. Member conduct.

a) upload, post or otherwise transmit any Content that is unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, tortious, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, invasive of another's privacy, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable;

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: In fact yes.
(Anonymous)
2004-12-02 10:51 am UTC (link)
I hope someone screencapped it before she takes it down. If she had a brain she'd know that F_W frowns on trolling people. She's on another level right now with doing that.

She posted someone's phone number! :\

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: In fact yes.
[info]prettypinkkitty
2004-12-02 12:57 pm UTC (link)
Momma's good to you, yes she is.

picture the top
picture the bottom

While I have beeped the second one for journalfen/photobucket TOS purposes, I have the uncensored one, but I'm not sure they're correct. For example, the last address/number doesn't work together - the area code is wrong.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: In fact yes.
[info]prettypinkkitty
2004-12-02 12:58 pm UTC (link)
Right. That came out smaller than I expected. Stupid photobucket size limits...no problem, I suppose. If anyone wants fullsize, lemme know.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: In fact yes.
[info]danceswithelvis
2004-12-02 01:24 pm UTC (link)
http://add.yahoo.com/fast/help/us/geo/cgi_abuse

I think those who's names, addresses, etc... that have been posted by her should follow that link if they haven't already.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: In fact yes. - [info]mistressrenet, 2004-12-02 08:46 pm UTC
Re: In fact yes. - [info]mrbimble, 2004-12-02 09:51 pm UTC
Re: In fact yes. - [info]danceswithelvis, 2004-12-03 12:30 am UTC
Re: In fact yes. - [info]altoidsaddict, 2004-12-03 02:15 am UTC
Re: In fact yes. - [info]backfromspace, 2004-12-03 05:08 am UTC
Re: In fact yes. - (Anonymous), 2004-12-04 01:28 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]backfromspace, 2004-12-04 01:35 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-12-07 03:38 am UTC
Re: In fact yes. - [info]ororo, 2004-12-05 05:19 am UTC
Re: In fact yes.
[info]skarrow
2004-12-02 03:46 pm UTC (link)
Whoo! She's posted my e-mail. Gee golly willikers, I just can't wait for the flood of hatemail!

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: In fact yes.
[info]prettypinkkitty
2004-12-02 04:32 pm UTC (link)
Seriously dude, TOS her. I have no evidence for myself, but you're directly involved. I mean, it's not as bad as if your home address was posted, but there's still a threat, and it's an academic e-mail...

Or just becuase she's being an insanely classless troll, but hey.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: In fact yes. - [info]skarrow, 2004-12-02 04:36 pm UTC
Re: In fact yes. - [info]prettypinkkitty, 2004-12-02 05:29 pm UTC
Re: In fact yes. - [info]skarrow, 2004-12-02 05:36 pm UTC
Re: In fact yes. - (Anonymous), 2004-12-02 07:10 pm UTC
Re: In fact yes. - [info]mrbimble, 2004-12-02 07:17 pm UTC
Re: In fact yes. - [info]funwithrage, 2004-12-02 08:13 pm UTC
Re: In fact yes. - [info]panthea, 2004-12-02 09:55 pm UTC
Re: In fact yes. - [info]funwithrage, 2004-12-03 10:36 pm UTC
Re: In fact yes. - [info]gaisce, 2004-12-03 01:00 am UTC
Re: In fact yes. - [info]prettypinkkitty, 2004-12-03 02:02 am UTC
Re: In fact yes. - [info]virago, 2004-12-03 03:28 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]backfromspace, 2004-12-03 05:10 am UTC
Re: In fact yes. - [info]altoidsaddict, 2004-12-03 05:12 am UTC
Re: In fact yes. - [info]edtel, 2004-12-03 10:29 am UTC
Re: In fact yes. - [info]chaimonkey, 2004-12-03 05:35 am UTC
Re: In fact yes.
[info]msmanna
2004-12-02 04:08 pm UTC (link)
Oh, I especially like her urging people to call our kids. Classy.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: In fact yes. - [info]ahiru, 2004-12-02 04:15 pm UTC
Re: In fact yes. - [info]telophase, 2004-12-02 04:47 pm UTC
Re: In fact yes.
[info]nightfish
2004-12-02 06:52 pm UTC (link)
she also calls us "fan_wank"--if she can't get the name right, mebbe the phone #'s are wrong, too?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: In fact yes. - [info]prettypinkkitty, 2004-12-03 02:04 am UTC
Re: In fact yes.
[info]chaimonkey
2004-12-03 05:27 am UTC (link)
o wow - #3 - the first one - that's me.

I love how the best she could get was my e-mail addy. Nyeah-nyeah!

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: In fact yes. - [info]skarrow, 2004-12-03 06:43 am UTC
Re: In fact yes. - [info]chaimonkey, 2004-12-03 08:23 am UTC
Re: In fact yes. - [info]doyle, 2004-12-03 03:05 pm UTC
Re: In fact yes.
[info]shinigami_co
2004-12-03 07:29 pm UTC (link)
Awwwww! She mentioned my email! That makes me so happy. *wipes a tear*

But any ol' shmo can get my email address. You'll have to do better than that, Countess!

Oh, wait...you've been BAHLEETED! Sorry about that. Maybe next time you won't be an idiot about things. :D

Ahh, nevermind, I'm probably putting too much faith in you. ^_^

(Reply to this)(Parent)

Re: In fact yes.
(Anonymous)
2004-12-02 06:59 pm UTC (link)
a) upload, post or otherwise transmit any Content that is abusive, harassing, tortious, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous.... hateful....or otherwise objectionable

Given that so many fandom wankish people post content in the group wanks that is the above, seems you all are getting just desserts. Look to your own behavior before you keeping whining and wangsting about others. WAAAAAHH!!!!! I'm outed from wanking someone in an ugly manner! WAAAAH!!

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: In fact yes.
(Anonymous)
2004-12-02 07:20 pm UTC (link)
Go away moonfart. We've got a bigger turkey to fry, now.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

Re: In fact yes.
[info]jaseroque
2004-12-02 07:46 pm UTC (link)
*hums* Which would you rather? People posting about you on a Journelfen community and laughing a bit, or people phoning your home and threatening your family and children?

Oh, I know! Let's make a deal. Because, you see, due to this post, we are all going to point and laugh at you. But I promise we won't, if you give us your phone number, so we can phone you up and threaten you and your family! After all, it's perfectly the same, isn't it? So you shouldn't have a problem.

I've got a lovely overseas phoning plan. I'm ready when you are.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

Re: In fact yes.
[info]panthea
2004-12-02 09:57 pm UTC (link)
You don't read too good, do you?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: In fact yes.
[info]trollprincess
2004-12-03 06:26 am UTC (link)
The reading's fine. It's the comprehension that's a bit off-kilter here.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]backfromspace
2004-12-03 05:13 am UTC (link)
Last time I checked, fandom_wank wasn't a Geocities site.

I'm just sayin'.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

Re: In fact yes.
[info]darkvalkyrie
2004-12-03 04:12 pm UTC (link)
You're not a very bright one, are you?

I don't seem to recall F_W ever posting anyone's personal information, but hey, maybe you know something I don't, mousie.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]nightfish
2004-12-02 06:51 pm UTC (link)
and she thinks *F_W* is abusive? my head hurts.


(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]schuldig
2004-12-02 09:06 pm UTC (link)
I realise that Crystal is compared to everyone who passes through here, but this lady is WAY beyond that. Permission to label 'batshit insane'? And quite possibly dangerous.

I'm heading to Geocities Abuse.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]ari_
2004-12-03 01:04 am UTC (link)
page just went from 'out of bandwidth' to 'We're sorry, but this page is currently unavailable for viewing. If this site belongs to you, please read this help page for more information and assistance.'

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]pyratejenni
2004-12-03 02:47 am UTC (link)
The page is gone.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]kate74
2004-12-04 01:20 am UTC (link)
Looks like it's been TOSed. Not a moment too soon, by the sounds of it.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map