Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



seto_fangirl ([info]seto_fangirl) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2004-12-11 16:58:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:Candy-Coated

Fear the CAPS LOCK of rage.....
I knew, with the release of the first teaser trailer, things were going to get ugly over on the IMDB boards for Charlie & The Chocolate Factory. IMDB user llutsic4 doesn't disappoint. He decides to tell people, loudly and rudely, just how much this movie sucks compared to the original. Not just once, but two, three, and four times. All the same speech, delivered via the caps lock of rage, in four seperate threads. People are becoming annoyed and tell him where he can get off. Its young yet (only a couple hours old), but the entire board there looks to be a breeding ground of splooge-waiting-to-happen (which is not really saying much, as it IS IMDB).
Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

(Post a new comment)


[info]redjackcash
2004-12-12 12:22 am UTC (link)
Bahg. Calm down dude, it's just a movie.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]singe, 2004-12-12 01:24 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]redjackcash, 2004-12-12 01:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kinneas, 2004-12-12 02:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]singe, 2004-12-12 03:19 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]altoidsaddict, 2004-12-12 07:54 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ruby_falls, 2004-12-15 05:37 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]bobomagicksock, 2004-12-12 09:27 am UTC

[info]aruru
2004-12-12 12:28 am UTC (link)
Yanno, as much of a fangirl of the original movie as I am, I've still got high hopes for this version, since it's Burton and Depp. So I'm not gonna knock it until I've actually seen the thing to judge.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]tempslut, 2004-12-12 12:30 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]crickets, 2004-12-12 03:47 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]blackjackrocket, 2004-12-12 02:12 pm UTC

(Reply from suspended user)
(no subject) - [info]deoridhe, 2004-12-13 06:01 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-12-14 10:45 pm UTC
OZ - [info]deoridhe, 2004-12-14 11:14 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]nonny_mouse, 2004-12-12 08:19 pm UTC

(Reply from suspended user)
(no subject) - [info]trollprincess, 2004-12-12 10:12 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tiirz, 2004-12-12 11:02 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-12-13 09:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]rustybitch, 2004-12-14 12:31 am UTC

[info]imaloserbaby
2004-12-12 12:32 am UTC (link)
I usually like to, you know, watch the entire movie before making up my mind about it. Although the Willy Wonka song in the background did kind of freak me out.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]schuldig, 2004-12-12 02:03 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lindentree, 2004-12-12 02:36 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]nonny_mouse, 2004-12-12 08:21 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]littlest_lurker, 2004-12-12 03:04 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kittikattie, 2004-12-12 06:43 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]circumstance, 2004-12-12 07:07 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kittikattie, 2004-12-12 10:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]jaseroque, 2004-12-12 05:33 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]bobomagicksock, 2004-12-12 09:28 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]fandom_bitch, 2004-12-12 05:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]littlekitsch, 2004-12-12 05:42 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-12-12 08:00 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]captainecchi, 2004-12-13 08:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]fatesarchitect, 2004-12-12 02:03 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]iczer6, 2004-12-12 03:55 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lush_rimbaud, 2004-12-12 06:04 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]fatesarchitect, 2004-12-12 12:15 pm UTC

(Reply from suspended user)
(no subject) - [info]fatesarchitect, 2004-12-13 09:24 am UTC

[info]eidolon_bird
2004-12-12 01:22 am UTC (link)
How much are we willing to be that this guy hasn't the faintest clue that both movies are based off of a BOOK.  Charlie and the Chocolate Factory isn't so much of a remake as it is a second adaptation.  And for someone raising so much sound and fury over watching something before passing judgment, maybe he should wait to see the entire movie before throwing in his caps-locked Opinion of DOOM.


P.S. - Depp is extremely creepy and not-very-Deppish in the trailer.  I still want his red coat.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]antigone, 2004-12-12 01:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]seto_fangirl, 2004-12-12 02:04 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kinneas, 2004-12-12 02:19 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sparkle_bitch, 2004-12-12 05:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]eidolon_bird, 2004-12-12 10:22 am UTC

(Reply from suspended user)
(no subject) - [info]cynicelle, 2004-12-12 02:09 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]eidolon_bird, 2004-12-12 03:10 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-12-12 08:03 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]eidolon_bird, 2004-12-12 10:29 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]nonny_mouse, 2004-12-12 08:27 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]athy, 2004-12-12 09:41 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-12-13 06:14 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]isobelsomething, 2004-12-12 10:05 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]hypno_jango, 2004-12-13 12:57 am UTC

(Reply from suspended user)
(no subject) - [info]trollprincess, 2004-12-12 10:14 pm UTC

[info]singe
2004-12-12 01:27 am UTC (link)
Is it just me or does Depp look like Oscar Wilde on a tear to ya'll too?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]kijikun, 2004-12-12 01:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]singe, 2004-12-12 03:12 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]seto_fangirl, 2004-12-12 02:05 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kijikun, 2004-12-12 02:11 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]seto_fangirl, 2004-12-12 02:16 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kaiser_chan, 2004-12-12 03:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]littlekitsch, 2004-12-12 05:43 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]singe, 2004-12-12 03:10 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]seto_fangirl, 2004-12-12 04:51 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]wolfychan, 2004-12-12 06:06 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]crickets, 2004-12-12 07:03 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rustybitch, 2004-12-14 12:43 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]crickets, 2004-12-14 03:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rustybitch, 2004-12-14 03:24 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]seto_fangirl, 2004-12-14 07:22 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]singe, 2004-12-12 07:12 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tigerlily, 2004-12-12 08:20 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]singe, 2004-12-12 09:27 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-12-12 08:06 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]crickets, 2004-12-12 03:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]fandom_bitch, 2004-12-12 05:15 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]crickets, 2004-12-12 05:41 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]singe, 2004-12-12 07:17 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]seventy_three, 2004-12-12 06:13 am UTC
Calling Dana Carvey... - [info]singe, 2004-12-12 07:10 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]the_clansmen, 2004-12-12 08:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]singe, 2004-12-12 10:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]blackjackrocket, 2004-12-12 02:14 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]singe, 2004-12-12 09:35 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]athy, 2004-12-12 09:46 pm UTC

[info]ladysorka
2004-12-12 01:32 am UTC (link)
I really wish people would stop insisting this was a remake of a film.

It's no more a remake of a film (or at least I hope it's not) than Peter Jackson's Lord of the Rings was a remake of that horrid Bakshi animated version.

*whaps people over the head with the library*

Of course, as someone who loved the book but hated the Gene Wilder version... I'm all for it.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]mistressrenet, 2004-12-12 01:48 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kinneas, 2004-12-12 02:27 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]littlest_lurker, 2004-12-12 03:12 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kinneas, 2004-12-12 03:19 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]plazmah, 2004-12-12 03:25 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]littlest_lurker, 2004-12-12 03:58 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]plazmah, 2004-12-12 04:14 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]littlest_lurker, 2004-12-12 04:25 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]wallflower, 2004-12-12 06:49 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]littlest_lurker, 2004-12-12 09:43 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]wallflower, 2004-12-12 10:01 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]littlest_lurker, 2004-12-13 02:11 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]fandom_bitch, 2004-12-12 05:23 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]darkrose, 2004-12-12 02:32 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladysorka, 2004-12-12 03:08 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rogue, 2004-12-12 03:14 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]serai, 2004-12-12 08:08 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kijikun, 2004-12-13 06:01 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]singe, 2004-12-12 03:16 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]fandom_bitch, 2004-12-12 05:25 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]jaina, 2004-12-12 07:17 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]enkogneatoh, 2004-12-12 04:15 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]linzee, 2004-12-12 07:06 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]serai, 2004-12-12 08:07 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kittikattie, 2004-12-12 10:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]nonny_mouse, 2004-12-12 08:30 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]rustybitch, 2004-12-14 02:06 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2004-12-12 01:33 am UTC (link)
I. MUST. USE. THE. CAPITALS. OF. OEMGEE. RAGE. FOR. I. AM. ANGRY.

I. AM. VERY. ANGRY. CAN. YOU. TELL. THAT. I. AM. JUST. UTTERLY. FURIOUS. BECAUSE. I. AM. YOU. KNOW. FILLED. TO. THE. WANKING. BRIM. WITH. RAGE.

SO. ANGRY.

MUST. USE. CAPS. LOCK.

FOR. I. AM. ANGRY.

REALLY. QUITE. ANGRY.

INCREDIBLY. ANGRY.

WOE.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]temari, 2004-12-12 02:17 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-12-12 06:57 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]fatesarchitect, 2004-12-12 12:19 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-12-12 05:00 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]littlest_lurker, 2004-12-12 09:51 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladyrogue, 2004-12-13 08:10 am UTC

[info]wolfychan
2004-12-12 01:41 am UTC (link)
Jeebus. All that rage over a damn 30-second teaser. I'd hate to think of what kind of a shitstorm front we're going to see when the actual movie comes out.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]rustybitch, 2004-12-14 02:10 am UTC

[info]rogue
2004-12-12 01:53 am UTC (link)
The only thing that inspired rage in me from the trailer was those goddamn fake trees. SOMEONE TAKE THOSE HORRIBLE FAKE TREE THINGS AWAY FROM TIM BURTON RIGHT NOW.

... Yes.

(Reply to this)


[info]luckdragonfujur
2004-12-12 01:58 am UTC (link)
I haven't seen the first movie, but I read the book about a couple years ago, when I went in a rampage of reading/buying children books.
Since it's not very popular in my country, you can say that I found it out of mere luck.

I remember the book being a little creepy :P
I'll search for it to re-read it before they release the movie here.

(Reply to this)


[info]temari
2004-12-12 02:35 am UTC (link)
Well someone needs to take their hand out of their pants and back away from the caps-lock.

That said, I really can't wait to see what Depp and Burton did with this movie (or would that be book?).

(Reply to this)

So, no one claiming to be Willie Wonka's child yet? *gasp!*
[info]kaiser_chan
2004-12-12 03:43 am UTC (link)
ROFLMAO. I LOVE trailer wank. Being a Star Wars and FFVII fangirl, I've gotten my fill of late, though, I think.
I never understood how people can base their opinions of a movie (except for the better) off of a brief clip of it. Besides that the original movie still scares the bleep out of me, and my father loves it, and hence turns it on every time it's on tv...

Will somebody please think of the Oompa Loompas?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: So, no one claiming to be Willie Wonka's child yet? *gasp!* - [info]littlest_lurker, 2004-12-12 03:52 am UTC
Re: So, no one claiming to be Willie Wonka's child yet? *gasp!* - [info]kadath, 2004-12-12 04:13 am UTC
Re: So, no one claiming to be Willie Wonka's child yet? *gasp!* - [info]jaseroque, 2004-12-12 05:41 pm UTC
Re: So, no one claiming to be Willie Wonka's child yet? *gasp!* - [info]shinigami_co, 2004-12-12 07:22 am UTC
Re: So, no one claiming to be Willie Wonka's child yet? *gasp!* - [info]kaiser_chan, 2004-12-12 07:24 am UTC
Re: So, no one claiming to be Willie Wonka's child yet? *gasp!* - [info]shinigami_co, 2004-12-12 07:38 am UTC
Re: So, no one claiming to be Willie Wonka's child yet? *gasp!* - [info]kaiser_chan, 2004-12-12 07:41 am UTC
Re: So, no one claiming to be Willie Wonka's child yet? *gasp!* - [info]shinigami_co, 2004-12-12 07:48 am UTC
Re: So, no one claiming to be Willie Wonka's child yet? *gasp!* - [info]mael, 2004-12-12 03:18 pm UTC

(Anonymous)
2004-12-12 06:02 am UTC (link)
What I can't figure out is why he kept watching the trailer if it sucked so much. Was he being held hostage by an insane attacker who was holding a gun to his head to make him watch it repeatedly? Did someone chain him to his computer chair and set it on contious loop? Was he momentarily trapped on a deserted island with the trailer as his only source of entertainment? Or is he just a loony?

Incidently, whenever I see someone TYPING LIKE THIS I always want to ask them to please stop shouting at me.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]rustybitch, 2004-12-14 02:54 am UTC

[info]linzee
2004-12-12 07:02 am UTC (link)
Huh. Who knew something involving chocolate could inspire that much rage?

Personally, I'm excited as hell for this movie - I adore the book, and while I like the Gene Wilder version well enough, IMHO it isn't the book. The atmosphere is all wrong. So, you know - Johnny Depp + Tim Burton + Charlie and the Chocolate factory = happy Linzee.

Though I have to admit, I'm slightly disturbed by how pretty Johnny Depp looks, even with the off-colored face makeup and outfits of doom. I'm going to be perving over Willy Wonka. I can see it now. :facepalm:

I am so shamed.

Linzee

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]singe, 2004-12-12 07:24 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]linzee, 2004-12-12 07:55 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]blackhat, 2004-12-12 07:53 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]linzee, 2004-12-12 07:54 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]seto_fangirl, 2004-12-12 08:11 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]linzee, 2004-12-12 08:49 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kittikattie, 2004-12-12 10:48 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]linzee, 2004-12-12 10:53 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]kittikattie, 2004-12-12 12:22 pm UTC
OompaLoompa! - [info]seto_fangirl, 2004-12-12 10:57 am UTC
Re: OompaLoompa! - [info]linzee, 2004-12-12 11:00 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladybirdsleeps, 2004-12-12 03:30 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]littlest_lurker, 2004-12-12 09:56 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]fatesarchitect, 2004-12-12 10:15 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]visp, 2004-12-13 03:52 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rustybitch, 2004-12-14 03:03 am UTC

(Reply from suspended user)
(no subject) - [info]rustybitch, 2004-12-14 03:06 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]msmanna, 2004-12-13 12:17 pm UTC

[info]the_clansmen
2004-12-12 08:38 am UTC (link)
I HAVE SEEN ALOT OF REMAKES IN MY TIME BUT THIS MUST BE THE WORST REMAKE I HAVE EVER SEEN.

Oh, so you've seen the movie, already, doof? Not to mention I believe that it was supposed to be anything other than a remake because so many people were disappointed in the first Charlie movie.

IM JUST SO UNHAPPY RIGHT NOW I COULD SCREAM.

Well, your caps lock is having about the same visual effect on my eyes. Ow.

HOW COULD TIM NBURTON MAKE A MOCKERY OF THIS MOVIE. USING STUPID A** LINES LIKE, "LETS BOOGIE" OR "CHEWING GUM IS REALLY GROSS, CHEWING GUM I HATE THE MOST".

I don't know about the former, but the latter seems quite in the spirit of the books as I recall them.

MY GOD I HATE THIS MOVIE.

OMG, you have seen the movie?!

BECAUSE WWCF WAS A GREAT/EXCELLENT CLASSIC, AND YOU CANT DESTROY A CLASSIC UNLESS THE REMAKE IS MORE WORSE THAN THE ORIGINAL!

Again, talking like you've actually seen it. Also, is it just me, or does it seem as though this person doesn't quite realize that it was based on a _book_ first. Dahl wrote a _book_, not a movie script.

MY ADVICE IS, WATCH THE DA*M ORIGINAL BEFORE YOU WATCH THE TRAILER! THEN PASS JUDGEMENT.

My advice is watch the damn movie.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]rustybitch, 2004-12-14 03:08 am UTC

[info]bloody_vixen
2004-12-12 09:32 am UTC (link)
I though chocolate was suppose to make people happy, not go into a Caps Abusing Rage.

Mmm, chocolate.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]linzee, 2004-12-12 10:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]littlest_lurker, 2004-12-12 09:59 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]linzee, 2004-12-13 02:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]fatesarchitect, 2004-12-13 09:28 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rustybitch, 2004-12-14 03:10 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2004-12-12 10:30 am UTC (link)
duuuude! there's a trailer been released? link a poor anonymouse up ;;)!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]kittikattie, 2004-12-12 10:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]blackjackrocket, 2004-12-12 02:20 pm UTC

[info]criticalcricket
2004-12-12 11:14 am UTC (link)
You haven't even seen it yet! I mean, I'm a bit skeptical of the movie and watching the trailer was a little bit of a WTF moment for me, but I'm willing to wait. Mr. Wanker on the other hand needs to simmer.

"THE REMAKE IS MORE WORSE THAN THE ORIGINAL"

*weeps*

(Reply to this)


[info]arielchan
2004-12-12 07:57 pm UTC (link)
o_O I find this trailer really addictive. I've watched it 4 or 5 times now, and I can't stop myself.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]trollprincess, 2004-12-12 10:21 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]seto_fangirl, 2004-12-12 10:32 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sewingmyfish, 2004-12-13 12:31 am UTC

[info]nonny_mouse
2004-12-12 08:33 pm UTC (link)
verily, you are full of woe. Woe. Woe.

(Reply to this)


[info]tiirz
2004-12-12 11:05 pm UTC (link)
The trailer is sick and wrong and I love it...

(Reply to this)


[info]deoridhe
2004-12-13 06:14 am UTC (link)
I have an overwhelming desire to read the book again...

(Reply to this)


(Anonymous)
2004-12-13 06:20 am UTC (link)
BECAUSE WWCF WAS A GREAT/EXCELLENT CLASSIC, AND YOU CANT DESTROY A CLASSIC UNLESS THE REMAKE IS MORE WORSE THAN THE ORIGINAL!

1. I didn't know that remaking a film could wipe out all existence of the original!

2. He thinks the first one was a "classic"? I wonder how he'd scream if, say, David Lynch did a remake of Chitty Chitty Bang Bang?

and

3. Dude, it's "worse". Just "worse". "More worse" makes you sound like a monkey.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]mastervex, 2004-12-13 06:41 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]pipssister, 2004-12-13 05:53 pm UTC
holy shit - [info]here4tehwank, 2004-12-13 07:17 pm UTC

[info]mastervex
2004-12-13 06:46 am UTC (link)
So we're getting something that involves Tim Burton and Johnny Depp, and people are whining instead of pissing their pants with joy? What a crazy world. o_O

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]swordmage, 2004-12-14 09:11 pm UTC

[info]here4tehwank
2004-12-13 07:16 pm UTC (link)
I heard about this remake a while back, and since I'm such a big fan of the original movie, I was less than thrilled about it.

But I still think it'll be interesting to see it and compare the two, and I still think that Depp is bloody brilliant in creative roles like this.

(Reply to this)
Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map