Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Aurora Derall ([info]aruru) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2003-05-29 17:50:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:annoyed

Hello, Buffy badfic wank!
Aurora Derall here again, and reporting for yet another fandom I'm not into! Anyway:

I always knew there was a good reason to hang around the Mary Sue Report community. However, while it was the place where I got this scoop, this story ain't really about them.

See, today was just like any ol' day - we had one of the average posts mocking an MS writer's hissyfit. Everyone was having their usual fun poking holes at the person's argument, when ginmar decides to join in by sharing an even BETTER fit thrown by a Buffyfic writer. To give you an idea of who we're dealing with, I quote the summary ginmar so thoughtfully provided:

"Oh, God, where do I start? She writes rapefic where the character likes it, and where the rape is presented as justified punishment. Then she refers to it as 'naughty.' She encourages some really scary people to write really misogynistic fic, and she's part of the Babyverse---where some white-trash trailer park creature has taken the part of Buffy, and any old character from any old fandom becomes the writers' sex toys. The Baby character is a blatant self-insert. The writer was utterly bewildered when confronted with the fact that two men sexually fondling and then penetrating a drugged woman was rape. Oh, and she's not a teenybopper, either."

Now, this isn't particularly wanky in and of itself. It's a concept that is rife with badfic, but it's not wank. To quote the OP's reaction at being shown this: "Sordid sex can be damned funny but if you're going to do something controversial do it well and be prepared to stand your ground with an intelligent argument behind it.

However (because there's always a "however" in these things), this is where the wank comes in: Because the "No Cookie For You: Bad Buffy Fic" group dared to point and laugh at this particular author, the author retaliates by taking down her fics and posting a notice (as a fic) of why she took them down. And the beauty of the wank spills into the reviews, too!

ginmar also tells us: "She's threatening now to put her fics back up, now that she's gotten attention and petting and so on." All I can say is: Joy?


Thank you again for pointing this out to others, ginmar!



Edit: Since ginmar ain't a member of F_W (yet), I just thought I'd share what she just added now to the MS thread with the rest of the comm:

"Well, it gets better and better. Here's the reply I was going to post over there, but I really must go and beg for a code soon.

I forgot to mention a couple of things: that this writer has written RP fic before, and that she's now harassing other writers with whiny reviews about how they've been mean to her. Like, you know, she didn't do anything. And of course, there's the fact that she used my pen name as the title of her rant at AFF. An acquaintance of mine just got this review posted at her site from Ditto:

Well, I quite enjoyed your stories until I found out you're one of those mean peeps that delight in being nasty about other peeps stories. What can I say, what gives you lot the right to tear down other peeps and make them feel so bad. Too bad everyone doesn't know the truth about you. I could have given you a nice review for this story but my feedback has become suspect. If I say I like it then other peeps from your own group will start saying you're a bad one. I'm saving you all the meanness no one spared me from, I hope you're happy. :(

Let's count, shall we?
Peeps
Mean people
This twit believes she's so important that she can damage reputations of well-respected writers
Despite her unjust shunning, she's nobly trying to spare one of her tormentors.
She's really enjoying the attention, but I can't tell how stupid she is or not.


"Ginmar what human rapists? Ooooh, you mean Gunn and Riley, that fic? Ginmar...listen to me carefully now.. Gunn and Riley aren't real pet, can you wrap your mind around that? None of these little fantasies are real. It all stemmed from Joss' imagination (what would he think!!!)" She whined that we were being mean to her, as if vampires 'would never commit the atrocity of rape'---like, you know, she was nobly exposing this horrible crime to the world.

Also, Ginmar you keep hinting that me and other peeps have issues 'cos they write NC17 some of which are non-con, but not everybody has issues. I certainly don't. I have never been attacked/raped and if I had been I don't think I'd want to write fics about it, not even with vampires and imaginary characters playing out the roles. I think maybe you're the one with issues, you're the one searching the archives around the Net looking for bad fics and rape fics. Find something better do do, finish your own fics. Leave peeps to theirs. Can I recommend to everybody perusing this to go and read Affinity by Ginmar. It's very good. :) Maybe if you get enough feedback Ginmar, it will inspire you to write more of your own fiction rather than dissing everybody else's the way you do. I especially worry about the younger peeps who may be put off writing by the vitriolic outbursts against them by you and your crewe. We all have to start somewhere and we're not all good with the spelling. Leave them alone for goodness sake. If Rune and Sabre aren't safe from your criticism then there's no hope for the rest of us.

And by the way I DO NOT WRITE ROLEPLAY! I HATE ROLEPLAY. IT'S DISRESPECTFUL (not that I would tell anybody to stop writing it, as it's up to individual peeps, but I for one don't like it and don't write it).

Wonder when this will get wiped? It's been fun. Luv Ditto xxoo


Peeps. xxoooxxx. Luv. Crewe. And she specifically hosted an RPfic with herself---by name---in the story, in an NC-17 story, so her stance here---that she's against it---is bizarre to say the least. Holy shit, what is she? Twelve?"


I have to say, I don't think I ever saw the term "peeps" used THAT many times in ONE paragraph in my entire life, not even by the "teeniest" of teenyboppers.


Edit 2: ginmar also adds:

"Keep in mind, that this is the basic plotline.

This writer belongs to a universe where the central female character is young, powerful, and beloved. The writers take out this young girl and insert some trailor trash forty year old who's a blatant Mary Sue, and they describe her as a fan who got yanked into the show! Oh, and the hot male lead falls for her. Then they grab characters from all sorts of other fandoms, whoever they lust after. There's no longer any resemblance to the original 'verse. And on the side, this writer has written at least eight rapefics that glorify the rape of young, attractrive---and underage---girls. Not only that, but she encourages some very, very scary people who write even more frightening rapefics than she herself does.

I hate to say this, but it needs to be mentioned, too. She's harassing at least one other writer, although I'm the only one that merited a mention by name. She had no reviews for most of her stories; none at all. She's got a story at FF.net that's been there, unreviewed, for at least six months. The person she was harassing besides myself? Is a very good writer, with lots of reviews. I'm not a bad writer myself, but I don't take shit like this lying down, and there's lots of people who think I'm a bitch. Surprisingly enough, they're rapefic writers. Hm.

Oh, and she says that if you have a problem with her rapefics, you're a prude, you need to get laid, you're man and pathetic...and whatever else junior high school kids say, along with 'peeps.'"



(Post a new comment)


[info]iczer6
2003-05-30 01:52 am UTC (link)
Damn! You beat me to it.

Icz

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]aruru
2003-05-30 02:12 am UTC (link)
Just call me a master of the Fast Draw. >D

Don't worry, I'm sure you'll get lucky soon enough. ^^

(Reply to this)(Parent)

Peeps?
[info]darkrose
2003-05-30 02:45 am UTC (link)
I'm confused: she's writing stories about raping vampiric marshmallow baby chickens?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Peeps?
[info]aruru
2003-05-30 02:51 am UTC (link)
Every time you mock a Buffy rapefic, a peep dies.

Please, think of the peeps.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

That calls for a poorly made icon...
[info]purplepopple
2003-05-30 06:22 am UTC (link)

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: That calls for a poorly made icon...
[info]eris
2003-05-30 06:27 am UTC (link)
*snicker*
You beat me to it, but what the heck, more peep icons!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]ingrid
2003-05-30 02:51 am UTC (link)
What did those Peeps ever do to her???

The poor sugar-coated darlings. I've never had a problem with any of them, except the purple ones, which, unfortunately, turned out to be LSD-spiked, but that wasn't their fault.

It's not Easter without Peeps! It's not Christmas without Peeps! It's not Labor Day without Peeps -- which shows you just how long the little bastards last, since nobody really eats them, except by mistake or out of dire starvation.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]mpoetess
2003-05-30 03:17 am UTC (link)
Mmmm! No, I loves me some Peeps. They're soft and tasty, and so good for you.

Oh, you were talking about the marshmallow kind. Nevermind.

(Actually, I love the marshmallow kind. Especially if they're slightly stake. Mmm. Chewy.)

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]mpoetess
2003-05-30 03:18 am UTC (link)
Especially if they're slightly stake.

Even my typos are Buffy-themed.

Stale.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]ereshkigal
2003-05-30 11:22 am UTC (link)
Peeps!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]iczer6
2003-05-30 03:59 am UTC (link)
>>I especially worry about the younger peeps who may be put off writing by the vitriolic outbursts against them by you and your crewe.<<

First, dear God we can only hope they're put off...

Second when did little sugar coated marshmellow candies gain sentience and the ability to type? With all these references to 'peeps' I have to assume that the candy has revolted and is gaining revenge with creepy rape fics.


Icz

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Oh, the crewelty of it all!
[info]ingrid
2003-05-30 04:08 am UTC (link)
... against them by you and your crewe.

And your crewe neck and your crewe cut and your creweeel ways ...

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]snacky
2003-05-30 05:07 pm UTC (link)
when did little sugar coated marshmellow candies gain sentience and the ability to type?

Well, Peeps do use the library. Not always sucessfully, as you'll see, but it seems like they're computer literate.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


wizzard
2003-05-30 05:21 am UTC (link)
Oh my god-babyverse. *runs away*

(Reply to this)


[info]ipomoea
2003-05-30 06:45 am UTC (link)
Eep! Babyverse! Their story descriptions alone are enough to send me running in the opposite direction screaming. I had no idea their writers were even scarier.

(Reply to this)


[info]hoorofcrowley
2003-05-30 07:16 am UTC (link)
Babyverse! Dear heavens, if there's a position that Baby hasn't tried with Spike, I'll pillage a village!

I'd so enjoy MSTing Babyverse fics. Baby needs to be taken down. And not in that apparently enjoyable group rape way. *shudders*

(Reply to this)


[info]sorchar
2003-05-30 07:21 am UTC (link)
Jaysus Keerist on a crutch...how did this Ditto person even manage to obtain a computer?

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]redconverse
2003-05-30 09:05 am UTC (link)
Don't worry. Remember, it's her sister's computer. Which, naturally, makes this all more amusing (or worrisome, depending on your take) due to the fact that she has a sister who will defend her rapefics.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re:
[info]sorchar
2003-05-30 10:00 am UTC (link)
I know I'm shakin' in fear of said sister.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

By the way...
[info]redconverse
2003-05-30 09:15 am UTC (link)
How does Ginmar feel about being called "just another freaking Tipper Gore," anyway?

Come on, crewe! Tipper's totally, like, down on us peeps. xxoo!!!

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]margin
2003-06-02 08:50 pm UTC (link)
That's what I don't get. I'm pretty notorious for writing explicit erotica. Also, you should see some of the pics of herself and her 'peeps' that Ditto and her crewel crewe have posted online. I'm sorry, but I've just been getting assaulted by all these frickin' peeps, and the sheer idiocy of it all is just getting to me.

Did I mention that this woman, high-school like, uses James Marsters' last name as part of her email address? I get the feeling she probably scrawls it across her locker, too.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]embitca
2003-05-30 09:35 am UTC (link)
I'm afraid to even ask, but what the hell is the Babyverse?

At any rate, it's some choice wank -- from both sides of the fence. It amuses me just as much to see people say "You shouldn't be writing this because it's just SICK" as it is to see badfic writers throw hissyfits and threaten to leave the internet. I think Ginmar is as pathetic as Ditto.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]ari_
2003-05-30 10:55 am UTC (link)
http://www.theprideandthescourge.com/
http://www.shadows-and-dust.co.uk/Babyverse/library.htm (this is the fic archive)

Essentially, Baby is a SelfInsert OFC, who's a Buffy fan and gets yanked into the show, and ends up telling Buffy why she sucks, and then falls in love with Spike, and he with her (or something similar. I've only read about the stories, but I'm too afraid to read them myself). After that, it gets worse.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]snacky
2003-05-30 05:19 pm UTC (link)
Oh dear. I clicked on those links, and the most disturbing thing about the Babyverse? That Baby is supposed to look like Gillian Anderson. Poor GA!

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Babyverse
[info]jerry_ds_girl
2003-05-31 10:47 pm UTC (link)
Oh man, you are so right! What did poor Gillian ever do to them? I read the character description of Baby and kept thinking it had to be a joke or a parody. Unfortunately, I think they're serious.

And who in the name of Ghod would name their character BABY?!?!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]aruru
2003-05-30 04:40 pm UTC (link)
At any rate, it's some choice wank -- from both sides of the fence. It amuses me just as much to see people say "You shouldn't be writing this because it's just SICK" as it is to see badfic writers throw hissyfits and threaten to leave the internet. I think Ginmar is as pathetic as Ditto.

I did indeed think that she was getting increasily ranty and militant (and thus amusing) when I asked for further background information for the writeup. I don't know and haven't cared to look at her "track record" regarding badfic authors, though, so I think I'll be reserving "final judgement" myself for the time being.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]margin
2003-06-02 09:03 pm UTC (link)
Um, I'm curious. This is for Mary Sues, so what's the deal? Sorry, but some of this stuff smacks of 'oh, you're so repressed if you don't like this' crap that Ditto was pulling. You don't have any idea of the crap she was emailing me, and other writers, either. So, yeah, I got sort of pissed off. Ditto's not a teenager, and neither am I. She's been posting badfic for quite a long time that never got any notice at all. I reviewed it. She blew up over it. What really pissed her off was one writer expressing trepidation over her (Ditto's) feedback, but that was not me. Still, however, I've been the object of these relentless, badly-spelled diatribes about my sex life and my character. I haven't responded to her since last week, but she's still whining and bitching all over the net, to judge by these remarks she just made this morning.


"PK, I was all for ending it and never responding ever again, but thought I'd best leave a message for peeps going there for my fics. Some of those fics had over 1000 hits and were popular. Peeps love trashy smut.

I didn't realise other peeps would put their oar in as well. I've stopped replying to Ginmar's emails and as soon as the webmistress deletes that on the Adult site, that'll be the end of it. I'll leave it to her to do it though otherwise Ginmar'll think she's got the upper hand. Can't have that PK.

I've had tons of emails re my fics. If I'd known I was that popular I'd have left them up! Actually, I'm lying, this was all a good excuse to take them down as I was feeling a bit uneasy about them myself. Don't tell Ginmar that though. Anyway, I mostly only like Spike/Xander now and she doesn't bother with them for some reason, I don't know her criteria for dissing fics. She has no rhyme or reason. A lot of slash is non-con but she never mentions it. I read one today that would make your toes curl.

The Babyverse have forbidden me to mention all this, they're bored silly with it all. Can't blame them, so I vented on here. Sorry peeps. Our Deb says we should all get a life! "

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]aruru
2003-06-02 11:00 pm UTC (link)
Um, I'm curious. This is for Mary Sues, so what's the deal?

Um, no. This community is for wank, and while Mary Sues and wank are often very closely related, it's not the same thing.


Sorry, but some of this stuff smacks of 'oh, you're so repressed if you don't like this' crap that Ditto was pulling.

I can't speak for anyone else, but where did I say you were "repressed" for not liking these Babyverse fic things? I just said that it seemed to me that you might've gotten more militant about the issue with this author the further I asked, but that since I didn't know what you were like, I wasn't going to pass judgement on the issue.

I think you're directing this argument at the wrong person.


(And like I said, I can't truly speak for the others [well, only one person thus far has made this comment], but it didn't strike me like anyone was saying you were "repressed" for not liking Babyverse - what I saw was someone taking issue with what looked to her like you were dictating to the author how to write. There's a big difference. Anyway, I'm not the one who brought this debate up, so it's not my problem.)

As for Ditto's ongoing whining over the situation, if it's on an LJ or a board or some other public forum, you can always post a follow-up entry to this submission. Be warned, though - if you show yourself to be all holier-than-thou over the matter, there's a good chance some of the other members might laugh at you as well as Ditto. It's part of F_W's Bill of Rights/general philosophy, after all.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]margin
2003-06-03 01:11 am UTC (link)
Sorry, I keep forgetting that this whole history is not common knowledge here. And I did get you confused with the person who said I was as pathetic as Ditto.

It's pretty simple, actually. I know what the difference is between rape fantasies, and rapefic. I corresponded with Ditto a long time ago, back when she wrote the RP fic, and told her why some people would find it rather disturbing that she'd use a real person in her story as her, well, sex toy. I didn't---and haven't---ever asked her to take anything down, but I told her precisely why not just myself but many others were disturbed by it. This was the same thing with the rapefic. This all happened a long time ago. Ditto seemed to respond in a mature fashion---remember, we never asked for removal, but we did express our opinions over stuff that was publicly posted---and Ditto responded in a mature fashion. But her usual method is to turn right around and whine, and put words in peoples' mouths behind their backs. After that, nobody really bothered with her. It's public, everyone's entitled to their opinions. We expressed them and moved on.

When BBF!NCFY was formed, one of the people there sort of expressed a feeling of squickedness over getting feedback. And Ditto completely and utterly lost it. She said that we were being mean, that we were spoiling the 'fun' of it, and so on. Keep in mind, this was stuff she'd publicly posted, and then had begged for feedback. Well, she got it.

I'm a very opinionated critic, and I don't apologize for it. But in real life, I work as a linguist/translator, where my job depends on my ability to pull apart language and make a case for the writer's intentions, based on bits of evidence. I don't get this wound up over every story I read, not even more than a few of them, not even most rapefic. Ditto said serious stuff to my face, then turned around and adopted this giggly, LOLing persona. It's this combination of things, plus a background that, admittedly, few people know about, that makes me take more than a slight interest in her.

Does that clarify things, I hope?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]aruru
2003-06-03 04:14 am UTC (link)
< snips some >

I'm a very opinionated critic, and I don't apologize for it.

That's perfectly understandable, and you don't have to - that's why it's called an opinion, after all.

Do keep in mind that not everyone's gonna see it in the same light, though, especially if there's a lack of information somewhere to get an idea of the whole picture. Just take a look around at a few of the other entries - a lot of the time there's disputes of some kind going on (like whether the submission was truly wanky or not, or if the subject matter is weird or not, whether the person submitting did it because he/she has a personal axe to grind with the target rather than for it being "true" wank, etc.). The debates can even get pretty heated and even bitchy, but the times where anyone winds up begrudging another poster aren't too numerous (At least, from my observation during the small amount of time I've spent here, they're very few in comparison to the amount of members in total.). It's just the nature of the comm, I guess.


< snips rest >

Does that clarify things, I hope?

Actually, yes, that clears up a whole lot for me, and I'm sure it probably does for a couple of others. This is precisely why I said I was reserving judgement on the matter, as I was pretty sure there were still some background details missing.

You might've wanted to come out with the full details the first time when replying to the other poster who brought the whole discussion onto the table, though. Oh well. :\

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]margin
2003-06-03 05:07 am UTC (link)
I'm sorry, but Ditto's done so much bitching to me, at least, that I sort of lost perspective over how much of this might be known. She's really, really beaten this to death, for quite some time, but I don't participate in a lot of fandoms, so I'm pretty much a virgin at this. And she's been whining about her side of things for quite a while. I know that it's very tempting to adopt the argument that she has---"You're all repressed"---and that's essentially what her proponents have said.

I haven't had any contact with her for a week, but according to even her supporters, they're tired of it. As am I.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

Thanks..
[info]margin
2003-06-02 08:53 pm UTC (link)
Thanks, but that wasn't what I said, was it? Her stories were very badly charactarized in order to make the rape possible and desireable, and she refused to own up to it. I don't mind rape fantasies, but Ditto writes this crap in such a way that it's as if the victim deserved it. Oh, that and the fact that she writes the biggest Mary Sue in the world, then writes this crap where only the young, skinny girls-who-get-to-fuck-the-hot-guy get raped.

I'm sorry to fuck with your one size fits all shit, but in fact, this stuff is a little different that 'veryone's pathetic.'

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Thanks..
[info]embitca
2003-06-02 09:11 pm UTC (link)
Thanks for the explanation. Still think you're an idiot.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Thanks..
[info]margin
2003-06-02 09:14 pm UTC (link)
Feeling's mutual.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map