Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



polly peachum-wright ([info]wallflower) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2004-12-28 18:07:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
The [info]broadway comm on LJ is a well-modereated community, possibly TOO well moderated (by [info]auryanne, Mod the Greater, and [info]shibaiko, Mod the Lesser, who isn't involved in this wank) at times - in many cases the occassional splooge is usually mopped up (read: bahleeted) before anything really gets stirred up. As a result, some of the wank I found right before I left for work this morning isn't there anymore, and I didn't think to save it before I left the house. But click the cut for mod gone wild and bannings galore.



Today, someone posted a review of the POTO movie, and asked towards the end, "And hey, what's with all the bannings lately?" Various community members: "Wait, bannings? What? Why?"

It's possible that the bannings were triggered by this post, asking about a Big River Revival recording. Any wankiness has been removed, however. I think some of it was removed before I even got to it (which is why I can only make a guess that it was the trigger), but this morning, there was a (now gone) rude comment about how it's not a "soundtrack" but a cast recording (this type of wank is infrequent these days, but for kicks, here's Cast Recoding wank from August), and someone remarking, "Hmm, you might be looking for a banning too," followed by a brief summary of the situation (the link posted here is that conversation, but since it was bahleeted, it's useless, so if you click it and wonder why there's nothing wanky there, that's why).

Yesterday, at least five people were banned by [info]auryanne from [info]broadway: [info]alligatorandme, [info]gruyere, [info]the_loebster, [info]sprnplr, [info]borscht_rider, and [info]charlieguiteau (the last two weren't part of the original list, but more bannees have started coming out of the woodwork). At the time, no one knew why. Not even the bannees were given a reason. They're opinionated (as are many of the people in the comm), but for quite a while now, they really haven't said anything objectionable, excessively rude, or offensive. For the most part, though, they add entertaining conversation and information for posters. But, it came as a surprise to everyone, since they hadn't done anything in the past few days (perhaps even weeks?) to get themselves banned. [info]alligatorandme posted about the banning in her journal, where some of the other bannees have commented similarly (one has been online sparsely as of late) - the last link has ban-themed icons.

Back to the POTO post, where most of the wank occurs. Up until this afternoon, [info]talissarocsham entertained the masses by singing amusing ban-themed Christmas carols.

[info]ladyshrew informs the curious that people were randomly banned, at which point Mod the Greater, [info]auryanne, enters the picture, objecting to the some of the word choice: "Randomly? Read the community rules. They broke them, several times."

Questioned further by ladyshrew, auryanne doesn't address a specific offense that brought about the banning, only that "they'd been skating on thin ice for a long time", yet she hadn't warned them lately (individually or as a group), and she hasn't told the bannees why they were banned because "none had asked" and "that they know they were acting like jerks" (her presumption) and if they really wanted to know, they should have asked her, since contact info is in the comm's userinfo as well as her personal journal's (refer a few paragraphs up for the answer to: "THEY KNOW WHY THEY WERE BANNED").

ladyshrew accuses her of stifling opinions and, a few more posts down, asks for a reason why the list of the banned (from the Big River post above) was deleted and why exactly the members were banned. auryanne doesn't answer and is accused to censorship (which she hasn't answered yet).

Choice quote, from here: "This isn't a democracy (sorry :) and I don't like having to babysit." Uh...auryanne, are you admitting dictatorship, then, or trying to play mother hen when the kids are capable of playing in the sandbox by themselves?

[info]auryanne has since unbanned them (or at least some of them - only a few of the bannees have commented in the community today, so I can't say for sure if all are back, or even if they know they've been unbanned), but the wankiness continues, specifically about why exactly they were banned in the first place and what happened to the deleted comments, neither of which has been addressed by auryanne.

[info]alligatorandme has also created [info]bannedfrombway, a community for the banned, but it's not very active as of yet.


(Post a new comment)


[info]dandywolves
2004-12-29 03:41 am UTC (link)
[info]shibaiko here. hi kids. I'd just like to say that I honestly had nothing to do with this whole thing. I wasn't even aware that it was taking place. I made the post to which you refered after someone posted a comment that was taken the wrong way, and feelings were hurt, and there was a dramatic I'M LEAVING post, and I decided to try and prevent any future drama. apparently that didn't happen, though. for what it's worth, I respect [info]alligatorandme and most of the other banned posters highly, and I don't understand why they were banned, because I see nothing wrong with what they did.
just wanted to clear my name there.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]wallflower
2004-12-29 03:49 am UTC (link)
I figured you didn't have anything to do with this whole big thing - I removed the link (since I can't locate the "I'M LEAVING" post, I'm assuming it's gone, so I lost the context of your post. Thank you for clarifying) so as not to give the wrong impression that you're involved (if I did, I didn't mean to and I apologize).

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Anonymous)
2005-01-11 01:42 am UTC (link)
It would have been cool if you could contact me to express your concerns instead of me seeing it here. Thanks.

And I admitted that I was incorrect in not giving "proper warning". And your banned list is incorrect.

All lj comms are dictatorships. I fail to see how this is "censorship".

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]adora_spintriae
2004-12-29 04:34 am UTC (link)
If a wank occurs online, and nobody fucking furls it, has it actually happened?

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]julia
2004-12-29 05:10 am UTC (link)
Very zen, lovie.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Anonymous)
2004-12-29 04:34 am UTC (link)
Alligatorandme here. Actually, that wasn't me who created that, but I'm not sure the creator wants to be known. I'm a mod there, though. ;-)

I do love it when people fly off the handle.

I've saved some of the deleted posts...

(Reply to this)(Thread)


(Anonymous)
2004-12-29 06:20 am UTC (link)
talissarocsham here. I'm the creator (Gosh, that makes me sound quite significant. Maybe I should capitalise it. "I'm the Creator!" Okay, enough of that) of bannedfrombway, despite having not yet been banned (No idea how, though).

I'm glad you liked my carols, though :-)

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


(Anonymous)
2004-12-29 08:11 am UTC (link)
What is this? Like, this site? I found it by going to alligatorandme's journal (sorry about that, by the way; wanted to see if you had posted more about the Broadway thing, LOL) and am just curious. That was a very good article, by the way!

To talissarocsham: Are you trying to get banned from Broadway? I certainly wouldn't mind (I would like to join the club, too!), but I don't think it's possible. auryanne isn't going to make the mistake again, seeing the controversy she's caused. I seriously doubt she's going to ban anyone again. :)

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

talissarocsham again ;-)
[info]jiltedviolet
2004-12-29 08:52 am UTC (link)
(I couldn't find the account I was sure I had earlier, so started a new one)

I was trying to get myself banned from Broadway in protest. If my friends were going to be banned for no reason, then I was going to do my darnedest to join them. And besides, since I'd just created bannedfrombway, I had to be banned, or I'd be ineligible for my own comm ;-)

And this is journalfen. If I remember correctly, it was created almost explicitly for fandom_wank, which is where people make fun of the wankiest things to happen, mostly on LJ.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Anonymous)
2005-01-11 01:39 am UTC (link)
Nah, I'll just do it "properly" next time. I still reserve the right to toss trouble-makers out :)

Auryanne on LJ

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]iscoffy
2004-12-29 04:49 am UTC (link)
I love the part where the mod is more and more annoyed that people aren't contacting her about their bannings. Er, you banned them. They can't comment in the community any more.

I suppose they could email her or go to her private journal, but...

(Reply to this)(Thread)


(Anonymous)
2004-12-29 04:53 am UTC (link)
I had to comment in her own LJ. She replied that she thought it'd have been inappropriate to contact people via commenting in their own LJs.

Interesting.

- Gator

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]iscoffy
2004-12-29 04:55 am UTC (link)
Wait, what?

I was sort of following the WTF-y thought train up until that point. Then we de-railed.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


(Anonymous)
2004-12-29 05:00 am UTC (link)
I'll get back to you on that. ;-)

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]rachelmap
2004-12-29 11:49 am UTC (link)
Now that's zen.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Anonymous)
2005-01-11 01:40 am UTC (link)
The comm info lists my contact information and invites comments/feedback.

Thanks for not responding to my message, btw.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]mastervex
2004-12-29 12:22 pm UTC (link)
Did you know auryanne works for Neopets? One of the artists.
It's a tiny, spoogey internetworld.

(Reply to this)


(Anonymous)
2004-12-30 08:01 am UTC (link)
Auryanne is also a lunatic. Serves her right. :p

(Reply to this)(Thread)


(Anonymous)
2005-01-11 01:40 am UTC (link)
Thanks for letting me know. I'm sure my non-existent therapist will be pleased to hear it ^_^

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]livviebway
2004-12-30 08:02 am UTC (link)
Ohh! My friends! Tons of my friends! All on FW! I'm so proud!

(Reply to this)


[info]drhenryjekyll
2004-12-30 05:52 pm UTC (link)
*perks up* Did someone mention Big River revival? Deaf West theatre cast? *squeeee*

Oh, there's wank too...

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]orphanannie
2004-12-31 03:07 am UTC (link)
Wank makes Tyrone Giordano cry!

(Just think of the scene where he lies to the slave hunters. Tee hee.)

;-)

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Anonymous)
2005-01-11 01:37 am UTC (link)
Well-moderated? I've never banned anyone before that day (and hence my failing to do it properly -- I was never given the manual, alas).

I did address it in the comments, but eh. Reading comprehension isn't high on some people's to-do lists.

Auryanne on LJ

(Reply to this)


 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map