(Post a new comment)

	tekenduis 2005-01-14 12:26 am UTC (link)
	Well, given LJ's track record with anything "wank", that ought to get deep-sixed in about fifteen seconds. (Reply to this)(Thread)

	ashenmote 2005-01-14 12:38 am UTC (link)
	Maybe not. 'suspended_wank' is still alive and kicking after ten weeks. But if they actually use that thing and annoy anyone, their prospects are grim. (Reply to this)(Parent)

	jrandomlurker 2005-01-14 02:54 am UTC (link)
	Yay for testing the new owners/TOS, or something. (Reply to this)(Parent)

	givemethepen 2005-01-14 12:32 am UTC (link)
	Lest we forget this community was created in part by crucifymylove, who was featured waaaayyyy back in a fm_alchemist wank I'm too lazy to look for, declaring herself as teh ultimate alchemist omgz. FMA's very own wanking machine, setting up a would-be fandom_wank community. squirm The irony, it slays me. (Reply to this)(Thread)

	sneer 2005-01-14 04:55 am UTC (link)
	Hum. There's this 'un... ...fuck. I remember the one about someone drawing crappy transmutation circles and declaring herself AN ALCKEMISISIST FOR REALZ ZOMG, but I can't find the damn thing. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) -

kalika_maxwell, 2005-01-14 06:16 am UTC

(no subject) -

chaos_seahorse, 2005-01-14 10:10 am UTC

(no subject) -

bishounenhuntrs, 2005-01-14 02:39 pm UTC

	(Anonymous) 2005-01-14 07:01 am UTC (link)
	Yes, because I live for the wank. I consumme it and then shoot it out of my asshole along with the rest of the bullshit. my brain iz pasteded on. (crucifymylove) (Reply to this)(Parent)

(no subject) -

aloysius, 2005-01-14 10:58 am UTC

(no subject) -

ladybirdsleeps, 2005-01-15 01:28 am UTC

	o_o 2005-01-14 12:32 am UTC (link)
	This was already posted at clairvoyant_wank. Where it has a nice home. Because you know, no wank has happened yet? (Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) -

kenboy, 2005-01-14 12:39 am UTC

(no subject) -

o_o, 2005-01-14 12:39 am UTC

(no subject) -

phosfate, 2005-01-14 12:44 am UTC

(no subject) -

yadda, 2005-01-14 03:12 am UTC

(no subject) -

lurker32, 2005-01-14 02:02 am UTC

(no subject) -

llama_treats, 2005-01-14 02:09 am UTC

(no subject) -

raven, 2005-01-14 02:36 am UTC

(no subject) -

kaiser_chan, 2005-01-14 07:57 am UTC

(no subject) -

xero_sky, 2005-01-14 08:15 am UTC

(no subject) -

bobomagicksock, 2005-01-14 01:57 am UTC

(no subject) -

ladybirdsleeps, 2005-01-15 01:31 am UTC

(no subject) -

o_o, 2005-01-15 01:46 am UTC

	sogrammatical 2005-01-14 02:28 am UTC (link)
	From the rules: 4. No wank about fandom_wankz is allowed on fandom_wankz The ~~first~~ fourth rule of fandom_wankz is you don't wank about fandom_wankz. (Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) -

lurker32, 2005-01-14 02:30 am UTC

(no subject) -

pradaloz, 2005-01-14 03:08 am UTC

(no subject) -

xero_sky, 2005-01-14 05:13 am UTC

(no subject) -

kaiser_chan, 2005-01-14 07:59 am UTC

(no subject) -

xero_sky, 2005-01-14 08:16 am UTC

(no subject) -

kaiser_chan, 2005-01-14 08:17 am UTC

(no subject) -

rawles, 2005-01-14 11:45 am UTC

	lindentree 2005-01-14 03:09 am UTC (link)
	This is so meta. My brain hurtz! (Reply to this)

	sneer 2005-01-14 03:36 am UTC (link)
	Are we taking bets on how long it'll survive before a) it gets TOS'd or b) it implodes in a spectacular black hole of jizz under the weight of its own internal wank? I give it a week. (Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) -

annabelle_lee, 2005-01-14 06:24 am UTC

(no subject) -

jaseroque, 2005-01-14 07:04 am UTC

(no subject) -

schoenschoen, 2005-01-14 09:07 am UTC

(no subject) -

the_clansmen, 2005-01-14 09:08 am UTC

(no subject) -

schoenschoen, 2005-01-14 09:27 am UTC

(no subject) -

rinoared, 2005-01-14 11:08 am UTC

(no subject) -

skjeve, 2005-01-15 01:36 pm UTC

(no subject) -

ecchaniz0r, 2005-01-14 09:14 am UTC

	(Anonymous) 2005-01-14 04:05 am UTC (link)
	Did they have to pick the most nauseating shade of yellow imaginable for their background? (Reply to this)

	darkvalkyrie 2005-01-14 04:25 am UTC (link)
	LJ Abuse TOS in 3... 2... 1... (Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) -

nonny_mouse, 2005-01-15 01:53 pm UTC

(Anonymous)
2005-01-14 04:45 am UTC (link)

Sweet crackers, it's the omnipresent "z instead of s at the end of the word because it makes me such a rebel OH-EM-GEE!" How I hate thee so. I say it dies just for that.

And sheesh, their own mod didn't even know why F_W moved here. Did she think journalfen had a better neighborhood, or something? Higher resale value?

Livejournal: Journalfen with an obstructed view!

-So squeaketh I

(Reply to this)

	jewlmc 2005-01-14 04:49 am UTC (link)
	Maybe their tired of getting the "Sorry, we're working on something" page every friggen day? (Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) -

ashenmote, 2005-01-14 05:11 am UTC

(no subject) -

wankprophet, 2005-01-14 05:48 am UTC

(no subject) -

ashenmote, 2005-01-14 06:04 am UTC

(no subject) -

elfy, 2005-01-14 09:28 am UTC

(no subject) -

jewlmc, 2005-01-14 06:02 am UTC

(no subject) -

ashenmote, 2005-01-14 06:21 am UTC

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-01-14 05:13 am UTC

(no subject) -

jewlmc, 2005-01-14 06:07 am UTC

(no subject) -

auguris, 2005-01-14 06:38 am UTC

(no subject) -

telophase, 2005-01-14 07:04 am UTC

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-01-14 07:34 am UTC

(no subject) -

funkyhelix, 2005-01-14 08:10 am UTC

(no subject) -

iris, 2005-01-14 09:47 am UTC

*rolls eyes* - (Anonymous), 2005-01-14 10:19 am UTC

(no subject) -

darkwitch666, 2005-01-14 11:21 am UTC

(no subject) -

mindset, 2005-01-14 12:06 pm UTC

(no subject) -

telophase, 2005-01-14 04:06 pm UTC

(no subject) -

runrunmarch, 2005-01-15 07:44 am UTC

	mooncalf 2005-01-14 05:14 am UTC (link)
	Maybe they figure that with the new SixApart management they can get away with it all over again! (Reply to this)

	(Anonymous) 2005-01-14 05:48 am UTC (link)
	I mean, it's not like the original FW got TOS'd on lj or anything like that.. (Reply to this)

	circumstance 2005-01-14 06:32 am UTC (link)
	wank; 1) (verb) To brag excessively 2) (verb) To have a meaningless discussion over abstract theories; a pissing contest 3) To masturbate What a limiting definition of wank that is. The truly great wanks defy definition. (Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) -

kaiser_chan, 2005-01-14 08:12 am UTC

	(Anonymous) 2005-01-14 06:58 am UTC (link)
	HOE KAN U WANK MY KOMMUNITY!1111one I R SO PIZZED I WLL KEEL U ALL WIT MY .45 CAL. I LIV IN UR BUSHES D: OMG FUKK. FUKK DIS. cutz wrsts 2 linkin park BLEEDZORZ (crucifymylove) (Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) -

lurker32, 2005-01-14 08:02 am UTC

(no subject) -

darkwitch666, 2005-01-14 11:23 am UTC

(no subject) -

lurker32, 2005-01-14 09:14 pm UTC

	jrs1980 2005-01-14 07:39 am UTC (link)
	The "z" makes it invisible to LJ Abuse, I think. (Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) -

dreamtoday, 2005-01-14 11:00 am UTC

	whimsy_chan 2005-01-14 08:07 am UTC (link)
	Oh, crucifymylove. She's so full of it I wonder where she keeps it all. This should be fun to watch, at any rate. (Reply to this)

	gal_montag 2005-01-14 09:21 am UTC (link)
	How many times can LJ Abuse delete a community before they start taking it personally? (Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) -

jrs1980, 2005-01-14 11:51 am UTC

(no subject) -

gal_montag, 2005-01-14 01:12 pm UTC

(no subject) -

jrs1980, 2005-01-15 04:17 am UTC

(no subject) -

oddplaces, 2005-01-16 01:19 am UTC

	jezebeth 2005-01-14 04:32 pm UTC (link)
	Check the comments, man. Even Phoenix shows up for a brief guest appearance! It really is a bad spin-off. (Reply to this)

	zing_och 2005-01-14 07:52 pm UTC (link)
	Damn, the userinfo is gone. On the other hand, there's already sniping. Maybe the wank will really start soon... Warning for overuse of the letter z, too. (Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) -

nonny_mouse, 2005-01-15 01:50 pm UTC

	danceswithelvis 2005-01-15 06:10 am UTC (link)
	Wow. Fandom_WankZ (why does that remind me of Dragonball Z?) made LJ all explody. Okay, so it didn't. I just like the theory. (Reply to this)

	oddplaces 2005-01-16 01:18 am UTC (link)
	Eurgh, immediate loss of fifty points for Gratuitous Use of Z Instead of S. I'll stay here, I believe. :D (Reply to this)