Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Sarky ([info]sarky) wrote in [info]fandom_wank,
@ 2005-01-14 16:39:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Jane Austen is spinning in her grave
And I bet you thought that the Jane Austen fandom would be endlessly polite...

Hyacinth Gardens is a community dedicated to racier fanfics based on Jane Austen's novels and the adaptations thereof and it seems to be rather prone to wank (unlike some other communities in the fandom). Perhaps this is because HG attracts some of the more fatuous and self-absorbed authors who like to think of themselves as famous and above criticism.

One of the peculiarities of the fandom is that it is considered bad form to publicly criticise an author. Any feedback given must be positive, thus stifling any form of constructive criticism and creating a vacuum where authors' egos can run rampant.



Someone starts a thread about what it is that attracts readers to certain stories. The answers are predictable - good plot, great characters etc. Someone makes the innocent remark that sex scenes that are badly written are a turn off.

So far, so normal.

Then Abigail R starts a new thread in which she bashes anyone who dares say that a sex scene might be badly written.

This is long and a bit of a rant, but if having sex scenes included in stories is important to you, you might want to read through it.

Just recently, in response to some comments that have been posted at HG, I've been feeling uncomfortable about having sex scenes I've written posted. I wasn't going to say anything about it, because I thought maybe I was being too sensitive or reading things that weren't there into what people were saying. Today I got an unsolicited email from another HG writer who was having similar sentiments, feeling doubt about whether she wanted to put a planned sex scene in her story given recent comments about sex scenes being too explicit and sometimes badly written. Since I'm much better about speaking up on someone else's behalf than on my own (and because I want to read her sex scene, because she writes good ones), I decided to say something, at the risk of offending some of the people involved.

Writing and posting sex scenes is taking a huge risk for most writers. It makes us feel exposed and embarrassed. Many of us would be in trouble if our employers/friends/family found out about them. Sometimes we're attacked on-line for writing them. Sure, writing about sex is also an empowering feminist statement about reclaiming our sexuality, but apart from that, it's scary as hell. For me, it's crucial to have an accepting and supportive environment if I'm going to post a sex scene.

Unfortunately, there have been some threads at HG recently that have made it feel less safe and supportive to me. It doesn't take a lot to change the atmosphere, just a few comments making implicit literary judgments on writers who include sex scenes, suggesting it is better or more effective not to include graphic detail. I don't have any problem if someone tells me they personally don't like sex scenes, though I'll tell them not to read my stories. I do have a problem when it's implied that my writing is somehow worse or less valuable for having them. I expect to run into such comments elsewhere, but I don't expect them at HG. And from a couple of posts by readers in these threads, I inferred that the comments were making some readers feel uncomfortable about admitting to liking sex scenes.

And then there was discussion of how awful bad sex scenes are, and let me tell you, it's not easy to tell if your own sex scene is bad or not, and if you feel like other people are out there sitting in judgment, it isn't conducive to making you want to post.

One of the odd things about writing is that for many of us, one critical comment can outweigh a hundred positive ones. Personally, I think that it's a vocal minority that is expressing the above sentiments, but I suggest that the less vocal people who like sex scenes or think they can be an integral part of a story might want to speak up and say so if they want writers to continue taking those risks. If two experienced HG writers are independently feeling this way, there are others out there feeling it too, and I can't imagine what new writers would feel.

A disclaimer: I do not claim to speak for all writers. Some, I'm sure, would disagree with what I have written, so let's not bother to have that fight, okay? Also, I am speaking as a writer and a reader, not as a moderator, and my views do not necessarily reflect the views of the HG staff.


And all hell breaks loose...

...Do you wish to chill these people's desire to share their opinions? The thread in question was asking why people read what they read. Not one poster said anything about wishing any author would not post sex scenes. Not one. There were some tongue in cheek statements about bad sex scenes, but there were more, many more, statements about how much most readers here enjoy them. Is the message to be gleaned here that if you don't agree with us, keep your mouth shut?...

...Regarding opinions that say stories are better off without them, um, all I say to that end is that I run an ADULT Janite website...

...I very much understand how sensitive authors can be - I've written a sex scene or two in my time, but never posted because I wasn't happy with them and couldn't face other peoples' opinions. But I think I would want to know what kinds of things about sex scenes, and other aspects of ff for that matter, appeal to readers or not, if only so that I improve my own...

...Everyone has to start somewhere in writing. The prospect of posting your work on a fairly public forum is daunting and frightening. If you want constructive criticism of your work, then find someone you trust and work with them PRIVATELY. Abigail is right that a single negative comment can make more impact than a bunch of positive ones. There is strong research in psych and economics that show that the value of negative events looms larger than that of a positive event. Beyond the pedantic, I don't think that many people realize how damming an offhand negative remark can be - it's magnified because it appears often without qualification and because it's in hard cold words for everyone to see. It's bad enough when delivered privately, but in public, that sucks. When you provide constructive criticism, you have a responsibility to the author to provide it with tact and compassion, which is why it's hard to do in a public forum online and generally left to betas. If you're interested enough in a story to provide ongoing feedback, then contact the author...

And so it goes on, with protestations of love for Abigail's writing, declarations from someone else that they're never going to post again, complaints about censorship etc etc.

Jane Austen would be horrified.


(Post a new comment)


(Anonymous)
2005-01-14 07:06 pm UTC (link)
Thank you soooo much for posting it. I've been laughing my arse off at it all day.

karintheswede@LJ

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]queenbead
2005-01-14 11:43 pm UTC (link)
no kidding. I read this last night and just had to sigh and shake my head. I know too many of the people involved to take a side, but everyone's being pretty cranky about the whole thing. If anything, it's an excessively polite flame war. One of the quirks of the fandom I suppose.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Anonymous)
2005-01-14 07:11 pm UTC (link)
Jane Austen would be horrified

Aw, you and I both know that she'd secretly love the random fighting!

Yours,
The Anonymouse

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]sarky
2005-01-14 07:15 pm UTC (link)
Probably - she'd love mocking it.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]jediowl, 2005-01-15 03:28 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]pyratejenni, 2005-01-15 09:20 pm UTC

[info]telophase
2005-01-14 07:29 pm UTC (link)
*twitch*

You know, I don't really understand the type of mindset that wants to post publicly but can't handle anyone criticizing their work, no matter how polite and mild it is. I don't *love* it when people crit my art, but I welcome it, and it sure as hell doesn't stop me from trying again and maybe getting it right next time.

And this, a sort of criticisim in potentia, not even directed at anything specific, is even more absurd.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]iscoffy
2005-01-15 01:13 am UTC (link)
It is especially wonderful in this case where apparently no one was directly critcized anyway.

No one wants bad feedback, but wouldn't you rather know if your sex scenes are ridiculous so you can work at writing not bad sex scenes? Apparently not, as it might damage female empowerment. Or... something.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]telophase, 2005-01-15 01:34 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]iscoffy, 2005-01-15 08:51 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-01-15 03:17 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]iscoffy, 2005-01-15 08:50 am UTC

[info]atalantapendrag
2005-01-14 07:44 pm UTC (link)
There's porny Jane Austen fanfic?

*blink*

I used to read Victorian-era smut when I was a teenager (it was easy to get, ok?) and the mental juxtaposition of all that birching and gamahuche-ing (ugh, probably forgetting the right spelling, and I doubt the spellchecker has it!) with MANSFIELD PARK is a bit jarring.

*shrug*

As long as they like it.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]alpheratz
2005-01-14 08:20 pm UTC (link)
There's porny Jane Austen fanfic?

Oh yeah. I like the stuff that's posted on [info]rarelitslash on LJ. "Like" meaning "it squicks me out, but I can't stop reading it."

There's also a lot of published JA fanfic, like Mr Darcy Takes a Wife, which is some of the most hilarious and terrible porn *ever*.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]sarky, 2005-01-14 08:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]funwithrage, 2005-01-14 09:26 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]queenbead, 2005-01-14 11:38 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]octavia, 2005-01-15 01:39 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-01-15 03:54 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]nonny_mouse, 2005-01-15 01:56 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]jediowl, 2005-01-15 03:32 pm UTC

[info]rackhamrose
2005-01-15 07:04 pm UTC (link)
Birching and gamahuche-ing?

You have, dear stranger, piqued my curiosity beyond imagining.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]atalantapendrag, 2005-01-15 08:11 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]blue_linnet, 2005-01-15 09:22 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]visp, 2005-01-16 02:01 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]funwithrage, 2005-01-16 02:53 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]visp, 2005-01-16 07:18 am UTC

[info]ashenmote
2005-01-14 07:53 pm UTC (link)
For me, it's crucial to have an accepting and supportive environment if I'm going to post a sex scene.

We can do that. Just sit down over there for a moment and try to unwind.
*dims the lamps, lights a few candles, cools a bottle of champagne and plays a kitschy CD*
Better now, dahling? Feel comfortable?

Umm...would you like...I hope you don't mind the question...you know...perhaps...to post a little...sex scene now? If it's ok for you?

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]mmmkay
2005-01-14 09:16 pm UTC (link)
Better have tincture of laudanum on hand just in case it's all too much. Also scented vinegar in the event she faints anyway.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ashenmote, 2005-01-15 12:47 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mmmkay, 2005-01-15 01:23 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mistressrenet, 2005-01-15 04:09 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ashenmote, 2005-01-15 01:24 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mmmkay, 2005-01-15 01:31 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]coffee_mug, 2005-01-15 02:45 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mmmkay, 2005-01-16 09:15 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]fatesarchitect, 2005-01-15 09:32 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mmmkay, 2005-01-16 09:14 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]fatesarchitect, 2005-01-17 09:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]visp, 2005-01-16 02:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]bitca, 2005-01-14 09:27 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ashenmote, 2005-01-15 01:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]littlest_lurker, 2005-01-15 05:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]plazmah, 2005-01-16 01:33 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]bishounenhuntrs, 2005-01-16 12:05 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]plazmah, 2005-01-16 07:36 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]bishounenhuntrs, 2005-01-18 07:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]adinaj69, 2005-01-15 01:27 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ashenmote, 2005-01-15 04:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ravenclaw_devi, 2005-01-15 02:06 pm UTC

[info]lurker32
2005-01-14 07:53 pm UTC (link)
I never knew you could use so many words to say "OMG I rite from teh HART u r opressign meeeeeeeeeeh!!!!1"

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]mmmkay, 2005-01-15 01:35 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2005-01-14 07:55 pm UTC (link)
and let me tell you, it's not easy to tell if your own sex scene is bad or not

Not that I'm interested in knowing whether it's good or not. Either way, just tell me it's good, m'kay?

(Reply to this)


[info]phosfate
2005-01-14 08:14 pm UTC (link)
Sure, writing about sex is also an empowering feminist statement about reclaiming our sexuality,

Note to self: Reclaim sexuality. The ticket's on the fridge door.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]mmmkay, 2005-01-14 09:20 pm UTC
(no subject) - cicer, 2005-01-15 04:54 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mmmkay, 2005-01-16 09:43 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ravenclaw_devi, 2005-01-15 02:07 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]bitca, 2005-01-14 09:27 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2005-01-14 10:01 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]littlest_lurker, 2005-01-15 05:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lucky13, 2005-01-14 11:37 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladyrogue, 2005-01-16 08:07 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lucky13, 2005-01-16 08:22 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mistressrenet, 2005-01-15 04:10 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]telophase, 2005-01-15 07:03 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]visp, 2005-01-16 02:26 am UTC

[info]fuzzypink
2005-01-14 08:42 pm UTC (link)
So, let me get this straight: writing smut is an empowering feminist statement, but it's embarassing and might get you in trouble if people you actually know find out you do it.

Right.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]fuzzytowers, 2005-01-14 11:13 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ravenclaw_devi, 2005-01-15 02:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ravenclaw_devi, 2005-01-15 02:12 pm UTC

[info]ingrid
2005-01-14 09:52 pm UTC (link)
Oh, Christ. It's the the Blah-Blah-Blah vession of the teenie whines found all over FF.N. at the slightest bit of crit-read -- OMG, Ursomeeeen! I'm not gonna write anymore!"

Abigail is right that a single negative comment can make more impact than a bunch of positive ones.

Holy shit. If you're an artist, you better learn how grow a fucking hide. Or keep your fic in the underwear drawer with the rest of your flimsy frillies.

Displaying artwork of any kind isn't for the weak of heart. Viewers have a right to comment on exactly what they see/read/hear because without an honest reaction from the audience, what's the damned point? Your giant, humungous, balloon of an ego can take a little pinpricking, I promise.

(Reply to this)


kairos
2005-01-14 10:38 pm UTC (link)
And once more I am reminded why entering fandom via Jane Austen's books was more than a slightly scary experience. I saw my very first flamewar in that fandom - about whether or not having a Pride and Prejudice AU fic where Darcy and Lizzy were both devoutly religious Mormons was evangelising or not - which was followed very closely by the 'If you can't comment with anything nice, don't comment at all!' flamewar.

I don't remember Hyacinth Gardens being all that bad though, in comparison to the rest of the wanktasticness. I thought the DWG (that thing with Nutella?) and Pemberley.com (Sugarquill by any other name... 'If it's not what we think is canon, you cannot post it here!') were even worse for the wank.

Jane Austen would be horrified.

I'd say wherever she is, she's less horrified, and more incredibly amused. It's rather like having a whole load of Mrs Elton-esque fangirls.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]queenbead, 2005-01-14 11:50 pm UTC
(no subject) - kairos, 2005-01-15 06:05 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]queenbead, 2005-01-15 08:47 am UTC
Ah, if only - (Anonymous), 2005-01-16 01:09 am UTC
Re: Ah, if only - [info]queenbead, 2005-01-16 04:41 am UTC
Re: Ah, if only - (Anonymous), 2005-01-16 02:46 pm UTC
Re: Ah, if only - (Anonymous), 2005-01-16 09:28 pm UTC
Re: Ah, if only - (Anonymous), 2005-01-17 08:03 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]teratologist, 2005-01-15 01:30 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]moonjaguar, 2005-01-15 01:37 am UTC
(no subject) - bigi, 2005-01-15 03:28 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]pipssister, 2005-01-15 04:47 pm UTC
(no subject) - kairos, 2005-01-15 06:00 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]telophase, 2005-01-15 07:12 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dimethyl, 2005-01-15 07:24 am UTC
(no subject) - kairos, 2005-01-15 04:30 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]squib, 2005-01-15 09:51 am UTC
(no subject) - kairos, 2005-01-15 03:45 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]octavia, 2005-01-15 01:35 am UTC
(no subject) - kairos, 2005-01-15 06:23 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]octavia, 2005-01-15 12:34 pm UTC
(no subject) - kairos, 2005-01-15 08:50 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-01-15 08:30 pm UTC
(no subject) - kairos, 2005-01-15 08:45 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]platedlizard, 2005-01-16 12:46 am UTC
(no subject) - kairos, 2005-01-16 11:29 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]platedlizard, 2005-01-16 11:40 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-01-15 01:56 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]queenbead, 2005-01-15 08:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]big_bad_wolf, 2005-01-15 11:51 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]jediowl, 2005-01-16 06:33 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-01-21 07:43 pm UTC

[info]enkogneatoh
2005-01-15 12:23 am UTC (link)
Oh good grief. If you're that uncomfortable about posting sex scenes, here's an easy solution: either don't post them, or get the hell over it!

(Reply to this)


[info]belafarinrod
2005-01-15 01:38 am UTC (link)
Isn't that why you have betas? Someone you trust who can point out that while "reddened tower of manhood" is certainly more creative than just writing "cock" it will also lead to your readers laughing like loons at you.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]gairid, 2005-01-15 01:58 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sarracenia, 2005-01-15 03:51 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]belafarinrod, 2005-01-15 10:31 am UTC

[info]blue_linnet
2005-01-15 01:59 am UTC (link)
Jane Austen...smut. Interesting. I don't think I could read that without getting really giddy, though, as for some reason, while I can read the smuttiest of smut without a flinch, old-timey movies where everything is all repressed and below-the-surface makes me squeal. I do not understand this phenomenon.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]singe, 2005-01-15 03:37 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2005-01-15 03:56 am UTC (link)
Thank you for posting this! That's one of the things that drives me nuts about the JA fandom. I mostly read the Derbyshire Writer's Guild, and some of the people are good writers, but some desperately need beta readers. But you can't criticize anyone, so I can't tell people that or correct their grammar or anything.

*headdesk* I love Jane Austen, but sometimes her fans drive me insane.

(Reply to this)


[info]marumae
2005-01-15 07:21 am UTC (link)
As far as I can see the comment was badly written sex scenes, not sex scenes at all. So please, shove your bleeding heart back up your ass along with your own silly martyr complex in your chest.

(Reply to this)


[info]selene_avis
2005-01-15 09:10 am UTC (link)
Sure, writing about sex is also an empowering feminist statement about reclaiming our sexuality, but apart from that, it's scary as hell. For me, it's crucial to have an accepting and supportive environment if I'm going to post a sex scene.

Smut = Feminism? But only if no one is allowed to say anything bad about it?

I actually don't write smut. In all honesty, I'm a PG-13 kind of gal, and I've never found myself in the situation where a plot required a sex scene. But if I were to ever write one, I'd make sure it was good. And that would involve getting some good, critical responses from my beta-readers and very likely my readers as well.

(Kind of ironic, but one of my beta-readers just got back to me tonight with my newest chapter. Va-san isn't as harsh as Flowers often is, but besides correcting some of my errors, she made some important points that force me to re-evaluate the interaction between two characters, as it is slightly off. No, it's not fun to face your own flaws. But I can't improve as a writer if I don't.)

(Reply to this)


[info]maryavatar
2005-01-15 03:36 pm UTC (link)
I'm getting error messages when I click on those links. Damn.

(Reply to this)


[info]ladyrogue
2005-01-16 08:11 am UTC (link)
o.O My god, this makes HP fandom look like some backwater cousin compared to all this polite wankery. There isn't even anyone calling anyone else a lesbian bitch.

Writing and posting sex scenes is taking a huge risk for most writers. It makes us feel exposed and embarrassed.

Wow. If they ever run into some of the stuff posted for HP, (Squid/Hogwarts = OTP!) God help them. They'd probably get the vapors and pass out.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]bishounenhuntrs, 2005-01-18 08:00 pm UTC

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map